THE DIVORCEE SO NAMED BELOW, “AS”, WHOSE NAME WAS ABSENT THE SPARINGLY FEWS COURT DOCUMENT TO DO WITH PICKETTERS’ CHARGE UNTIL FIRST OCTOBER ONE LAST YEAR, WHO DID IN ALL LIKELIHOOD FREQUENT AN ESTABLISHMENT CONTEMPORANEOUS WITH A FEMALE INDIVIDUAL WHO AT ONE TIME RESIDED IN PRINCETON WHO WAS STALKED BY “AS”, WITH THE EXTENT OF THAT STALKING AT PRESENT TIME UNKNOWN, ALBEIT FIRST CONFIRMED TO BE KNOWN OF BY LAW ENFORCEMENT IN LAWRENCE TOWNSHIP ON SIXTH SEPTEMBER TWO-THOUSAND SEVENTEEN.
“WE ARE DIVORCED“
“BECAUSE WE HATE EACH OTHER SO”
NOTE, JUDGE FITZPATRICK IS THE HANDLER OF KANE/KENYON IN THE FAMILY PART OF THE MERCER VICINAGE. THE REMAINING FIVE PAGES OF THE SIX PAGE RECORD OBTAINED FROM THE FAMILY PART OF THE MERCER VICINAGE ARE EXHIBITED BELOW.
NOTE THE DATE ON THE COMPLAINT, TWENTY-NINTH OCTOBER TWO-THOUSAND SEVENTEEN, THE DATE FILED, THIRD NOVEMBER TWO-THOUSAND SEVENTEEN, AND THE DATE OF FINAL JUDGMENT, TWENTY-FIRST MAY TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN.
BOTH NAMED PARTIES ABOVE, NAMED ON ONLY ONE OF THE TWO SETS SEEN BELOW. YET SET NUMBER TWO ABSENT FROM THE FIRST OCTOBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN DISCOVERY, HOWEVER THE FIRST SET WAS OBSERVED IN THAT FIFTY-TWO PAGE PACKET PRODUCED IN TRIPLICATE, INEXPLICABLY, AND AS SUCH BOTH FULMINO AND SREENIVASAN WERE FORMALLY NAMED IN PICKETTERS’ CHARGE, HOWEVER NO MENTION OF ANY DIVORCE PROCEEDING DID OCCUR UNTIL SUCH TIME AN APPOINTED ATTORNEY DID CLAIM THAT,
“THE MERCER COUNTY PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE IS LOOKING TO CHARGE YOU AGAIN…THERE IS NO POSSIBLE WAY A DIVORCE COULD BE RELATED TO THIS CASE…THE MERCER COUNTY PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE IS LOOKING TO CHARGE YOU AGAIN…THE MERCER COUNTY PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE IS LOOKING TO CHARGE YOU WITH CYBER-HARASSMENT FOR POSTING ABOUT A DIVORCE ON…” [SOMETHING NOT RELATED TO BAETYL, BAETYL & CO.WHATSOEVER]
TO WHICH ONE CAN ONLY REPLY, DIVORCE RECORDS ARE PUBLIC, ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW ARE TWO NAMES, A COUNTY, AND A TEN YEAR RANGE. FITZPATRICK NEEDS TO BE REMOVED FROM THE BENCH AND PROSECUTED BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. (SOMETHING ABOUT A DIVORCE HERE)
NOTE, ONE OF THREE SETS IN THE DISCOVERY WAS A TYPE HERETOFORE UNSEEN AND SUBSEQUENTLY NOT PROVIDED BY THE MERCER COUNTY FAMILY PART IN THE RECORDS EXHIBITED BELOW THAT WERE OBTAINED FOLLOWING FROM A COURT RECORDS REQUEST TRANSMIT PRIOR TO FIRST OCTOBER.
PRESIDING JUDGE OF THE FAMILY PART OF THE MERCER COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT SPOTTED TWICE IN RELATION TO PICKETTERS’ CHARGE VERSIONS ONE AND TWO, WHEREIN VERSION ONE THE IDENTITY OF THE VICTIM WAS CONCEALED FOR THREE-HUNDRED AND NINETY DAYS.
THAT IS NOT JOKE.
NO NAME OF ANY VICTIM IN THAT CASE WAS IDENTIFIED ON ANY DOCUMENT FOR GREATER THAN ONE YEAR.
IS THE OBSCENE DURATION OF THE CASE OR CASES THE RESULT OF HIDDEN INTERFERENCE FROM JUDGE FITZPATRICK?
IF SO, WHY EXACTLY?
HERE WE ARE YET AGAIN
AGAIN WE FIND NO VICTIM NAMED ON THE SOLE DOCUMENT THAT MAY OR MAY NOT DESCRIBE VERSION TWO, SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD ON THE DATE FIVE-HUNDRED AND THIRTY-ONE DAYS FOLLOWING FROM THE START OF VERSION ONE.
VERSION TWO WITH NEW CLAIMS AGAINST THE DEFENDANT OF ALLEGED ACTS ON SIXTH SEPTEMBER TWO-THOUSAND SEVENTEEN.
SO WHAT IS TO BE DONE WITH THESE THINGS ABOVE AND BELOW?
REPORTS FAIL TO MENTION CASH STOLEN FROM WALLET IN EXACT AMOUNT OF LAWSUIT FILING FEE. OR WHO RECOVERED THE WALLET.
TWO WORDS, ONE BOROUGH, ROCKY HILL, NOT ROCKHILL
APPARENTLY MERCER COUNTY CAN SEND LETTERS, ALTHOUGH MEETING NEVER OCCURRED DESPITE MULTIPLE REQUESTS, NO CALLBACKS EITHER. JUST THREATS.
MEANWHILE DURING THE SAME CASE
HOW MANY COUNTIES INVOLVED? ALL BUT MERCER. NONE BUT MERCER. MERCER PTS WAS BOOTED FOLLOWING FROM NTH ATTEMPT TO EFFECT FALSE IMPRISONMENT OF THE DEFENDANT BY SCHEDULING CALL FOR THREE-FIFTEEN AM, WHICH THE DEFENDANT HAD TO CALL IN PRIOR TO DATE AND INFORM ALLEGED EMPLOYEES OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY INDEED A COMMUNICATION TO BE MADE AT RATHER UNREASONABLE TIME.
WHAT EXACTLY IS A MISTRIAL?
NOTE THAT THESE MATTERS HAVE NEVER REACHED TRIAL.
CLAIM REMANDED MATTER HAD ALREADY BEEN DISMISSED
ARE THE COMMUNICATIONS IN THE POST AND ELSEWHERE MADE WITH PURPOSE TO HARASS?
THEY ARE MADE IN PURPOSE OF SELF-DEFENSE. RATHER OBVIOUS TO SOME, HOWEVER THREATENING TO THOSE AGAINST WHOM LAWFUL, PEACEFUL, AND EXPLICITLY LEGAL SELF-DEFENSE IS REQUIRED.
THE FOLLOWING TWO CLAIMS EXHIBITED HEREIN TWO LETTERS ARE STATEMENTS OF INTENT TO HARM, MAIM, KILL OR FALSELY IMPRISON THE DEFENDANT FOR LIFE. WHY? BECAUSE THE CASE IS IN LAWRENCE. NORCIA SAYS OTHERWISE. EXCEPT THE CASE IS IN LAWRENCE. SO NORCIA DENIES A CITIZEN THE RIGHT TO KNOW WHAT CRIME HE WAS ACCUSED OF COMMITTING AND IN DOING SO MAKES THE ABSURD CLAIM THAT THE LAWRENCE TOWNSHIP MUNICIPAL COURT IS NOT AFFILIATED WITH THE TOWNSHIP OF LAWRENCE. WHY? TO MOCK THE DEFENDANT.
THE REASONABLE READER MAY PERCEIVE THE CLAIMS AS MADE IN ERR, HOWEVER, FIVE HUNDRED AND TWENTY-SEVEN DAYS AFTER LAWRENCE FAILED TO SERVE A COMPLAINT, THE TOWNSHIP OF LAWRENCE REFUSES TO SERVE A COMPLAINT ONCE AGAIN, AND A BLACK AND WHITE COPY OF PAGE ONE ALONE IS NOT THE GENUINE SEVEN PAGE COMPLAINT.
DID NORCIA COMMIT A SEX-CRIME? MAYBE NOT OFFICIALLY, DISCRIMINATION AT LEAST, BIAS INTIMIDATION IN ALL LIKE
NORCIA MAKES AN ABSURD CLAIM IN THE SECOND LETTER THAT THE MATTER AT HAND SOMEHOW INVOLVES DOMESTIC VIOLENCE. SO NORCIA KEEPS EITHER ONE OR ALL OF THE SEVEN PAGES OF THE COMPLAINT WHEREUPON ONE OF THE SEVEN WITHHELD PAGES IS TO BE FOUND AN UNKNOWN DESCRIPTION OF ACTS THAT A DEFENDANT ALLEGEDLY COMMITTED WHICH DID QUALIFY UNDER THE STANDARDS FOR DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SET FORTH IN CHAPTER TWENTY-FIVE OF THE CRIMINAL CODE, AND AS SUCH NORCIA CLAIMS TO KNOW MORE ABOUT THE DOWNGRADED PETTY DISORDERLY PERSONS OFFENSE THAN THE DEFENDANT AGAINST WHOM AN AMENDED COMPLAINT WAS ISSUED WITH THE EXACT SAME OFFENSE DATE OF SIXTH SEPTEMBER TWO-THOUSAND SEVENTEEN.
PROVES FAR BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT THAT LAWRENCE TOWNSHIP OPERATES FAR OUTSIDE THE BOUNDS OF THE NEW JERSEY CIVIL AND CRIMINAL CODE, AND DOES SO IN STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE.
NO LAWRENCE, THIS IS HAPPENING IN YOUR HOUSE, AND YOU ARE WITHHOLDING INFORMATION ABOUT THE CASE SO NAMED PICKETTERS’ CHARGE THAT WAS REMANDED TO THE LAWRENCE TOWNSHIP MUNICIPAL COURT NO LESS THAN SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE DATE AFFIXED TO BOTH LETTERS ABOVE AND BELOW.
THE TOWNSHIP OF LAWRENCE IS WITHHOLDING INFORMATION ON THE CASE, HAS REFUSED TO SEND OFFICIAL LEGAL NOTICE TO AN AMENDED ADDRESS SPECIFIED BY THE DEFENDANT AND FURTHERMORE NO OFFICIAL LEGAL NOTICE OF ANY KIND HATH BEEN RECEIVED AT SUCH TIME THREE DAYS PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED COURT DATE.
TO WIT, LAWRENCE TWP TRIED TO SLIP ONE BY AND THE EFFECT THE FALSE IMPRISONMENT OF YOURS TRULY. YET AGAIN.
IT IS TIME FOR THE LAWRENCE TOWNSHIP MUNICIPALITY, AND THE LAWRENCE TOWNSHIP MUNICIPAL COURT TO BE SHUTTERED PERMANENTLY, AND IT IS TIME FOR MANY OF THOSE EMPLOYED WITHIN TO BE PROSECUTED BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.
WHERE ARE THE OTHER SIX PAGES? NOTE, LAWRENCE TWP MUNI COURT REFUSED TO MAIL ANYTHING TO THE ADDRESS SPECIFIED IN PHONE-CALL. STILL NO OLN.
WHO EXACTLY IS “JOSHANI ALMONTE, DET.” AND WHEN DOES HE BEGIN HIS OR HER TERM OF IMPRISONMENT FOR PERJURY AT THE VERY MINIMUM.
WHAT PERSONAL INFORMATION?
PURPOSE TO HARASS? ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME? NO.
WHOSE FUCKING WEBSITE ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?
GET TO JAIL NOW JOSHANI.
THIS IS WHY THE OTHER SIX PAGES ARE REQUIRED.
NO WEBSITE IS NAMED.
NO VICTIM IS NAMED.
WHO IS THE VICTIM?
SO SOMEONE GOES ON TO A WEBSITE AND MERCER COUNTY CLAIMS THE WEB DEVELOPER FIFTY MILES AWAY IN A SEPARATE COUNTY COMMITTED CRIMES IN THE JURISDICTION OF MERCER COUNTY AGAINST AN UNKNOWN INDIVIDUAL WHO ACCESSED A WEBSITE NOT NAMED, ON A DATE NOT SPECIFIED, AND FURTHERMORE NO PROOF ALLEGED VICTIM WAS EVER ON THAT WEBSITE.
NO ACTUAL CRIMINAL CONDUCT IS DESCRIBED WHATSOEVER.
ANY WEBSITE ON THE INTERNET COULD BE FOUND IN THE OTHER SIX PAGES AND ATTRIBUTED TO THE DEFENDANT.
HERE WE ARE AGAIN LAWRENCE, AND THIS TIME ITS AN EXPLICIT HATE CRIME AGAINST THE DEFENDANT.
WHERE IS THE SUPPLEMENTARY AFFIDAVIT?
WILL WE FIND ANY NAMED WEBSITE AT ALL ON THE OTHER SIX PAGES?
IS THE DEFENDANT BEING FRAMED?
WHAT PERSONAL INFORMATION WAS POSTED?
WHY WAS THAT PERSONAL INFORMATION DEEMED “PROTECTED” ON SIXTH SEPTEMBER TWO-THOUSAND SEVEN?
IS FREE SPEECH BEING PROSECUTED?
WHOSE ORIGINAL CONTENT AND ARTISTIC CREATIONS HAVE BEEN DEEMED CRIMINAL ACTS?
WHOSE COPYRIGHTS ARE BEING ATTACKED? THE DEFENDANT’S? WE DON’T KNOW.
ALL WE WANT IS JUSTICE.
FIRE NORCIA TODAY.
FIRE JOSHANI TODAY.
THEN WE MAY PROCEED TO TALK ABOUT THE AMOUNT OF MONEY LAWRENCE TWP OWES THE DEFENDANT.
OR DOES THIS FARCE PROCEED TO UNLAWFULLY CURTAIL THE FREEDOM OF THE DEFENDANT TO PURSUE CIVIL ACTION.
WHY IS THERE A NEW DOCKET NUMBER IN THIS ALLEGEDLY DOWNGRADED COMPLAINT?
IS THE OLD CASE STILL ACTIVE AND LURKING IN THE ABYSS OF ZONE?
PURPORTEDLY FOLLOWING FROM A MOVING VIOLATION GONE ROUGE
NO CLAIM OF ANY ASSOCIATED ARRESTS OR WARRANTS OBTAINED UNTIL FOURTEENTH DECEMBER TWO-THOUSAND SEVENTEEN
AND THAT DATE INDEED WHAT WAS FIRST AT ISSUE IN THE CAMPAIGN AGAINST THE TOWNSHIP OF HOWELL INITIATED TWENTY-SIXTH OCTOBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN BY THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY GOVERNMENT RECORDS COUNCIL IN THE COMPLAINT ENUMERATED TWO THREE FOUR.
FROM TITLE TWO C WE FIND THE FOLLOWING DEFINITIONS OF AGGRAVATED ASSAULT
SIMPLE ASSAULT GRADED AS SECOND DEGREE AGGRAVATED ASSAULT, N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1 (B)(5)(A)
AN ACTOR COMMITS AN ACT OF AGGRAVATED ASSAULT WHEN HE OR SHE COMMITS ANY ACT IN VIOLATION OF N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1 (A) et seq. THAT WOULD OTHERWISE BE IDENTIFIED AS SIMPLE ASSAULT AND GRADED AS A DISORDERLY OR PETTY DISORDERLY PERSONS OFFENSE, WHEN THE VICTIM OF THAT SIMPLE ASSAULT IS A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER ENGAGED IN THE COURSE OF HIS OR HER DUTIES WHILE IN UNIFORM, OR AT SUCH TIME WHEN EVIDENCE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITY IS BEING EXHIBITED, OR WHEN THE ACTOR DIRECTS SUCH CONDUCT AT ANY PERSON FOR THE INTENDED PURPOSE TO HUMILIATE A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER WHETHER IN UNIFORM OR PLAINCLOTHES.
DAVID CANNADY WAS IN ALL LIKELIHOOD CHARGED WITH SECOND DEGREE AGGRAVATED ASSAULT FOR ONE OR MORE ACTS IN VIOLATION OF N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1 (B)(5)(A).
SECOND DEGREE AGGRAVATED ASSAULT, N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1 (B)(1)
OTHERWISE, AGGRAVATED ASSAULT IS DESCRIBED AS ANY ACT THAT IS COMMITTED WITH THE INTENT TO CAUSE SIGNIFICANT BODILY INJURY, EVEN IN THE CASE WHEN THE ACT DOES NOT CAUSE SIGNIFICANT BODILY INJURY, OR ANY ACT COMMITTED WITH INTENT TO THAT DOES INDEED CAUSE SIGNIFICANT BODILY INJURY, OR ANY CONDUCT THAT AN ACTOR ENGAGES IN WITHOUT PRIOR MOTIVE UNDER CIRCUMSTANCES MANIFESTING EXTREME INDIFFERENCE TO THE VALUE OF HUMAN LIFE THAT DOES RECKLESSLY CAUSE SIGNIFICANT BODILY INJURY TO A PERSON.
THIRD DEGREE AGGRAVATED ASSAULT, N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1 (B)(2)
WHEN THE ACTOR ATTEMPTS TO CAUSE OR DOES CAUSE SIGNIFICANT BODILY INJURY WITH A DEADLY WEAPON WITH PRIOR MOTIVE.
WHEN THE ACTOR POINTS A LOADED OR UNLOADED FIREARM IN THE DIRECTION OF ANOTHER PERSON AT SUCH TIME HE OR SHE KNOWS THE ACT WAS COMMITTED UNDER CIRCUMSTANCES MANIFESTING EXTREME INDIFFERENCE TO THE VALUE OF HUMAN LIFE.
THIRD OR FOURTH DEGREE AGGRAVATED ASSAULT, N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1 (B)(5) ET SEQ.
WHEN THE ACTOR COMMITS SIMPLE ASSAULT AGAINST SPECIFIC PERSONS IDENTIFIED IN PARAGRAPHS (A) THROUGH (K) FOLLOWING AS LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS, FIREMEN, FIRST-RESPONDERS, SCHOOL EMPLOYEES, AND OTHER PROTECTED PROFESSIONS WITH FURTHER DESCRIPTIONS OF SPECIFIC GEAR AND SCENARIOS THAT CONSTITUTE AGGRAVATED ASSAULT
SECOND, THIRD OR FOURTH DEGREE AGGRAVATED ASSAULT, N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1 (B)(6) THROUGH (12)
WHEN THE ACTOR ATTEMPTS TO CAUSE OR DOES CAUSE SIGNIFICANT BODILY INJURY OF A PERSON IN A SPECIFIC CONTEXT, OR POINTS A LOADED OR UNLOADED FIREARM AT ANOTHER PERSON IN A SPECIFIC CONTEXT, OR USES SPECIFIC TECHNOLOGY IN A SPECIFIC CONTEXT.
DISORDERLY PERSONS, THIRD OR FOURTH DEGREE AGGRAVATED ASSAULT, N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1 (C) ET SEQ
WHEN THE ACTOR USES AN AUTO OR VESSEL IN AN ATTEMPT TO CAUSE OR DOES CAUSE SIGNIFICANT BODILY INJURY OF A PERSON IN A SPECIFIC CONTEXT, OR OTHER SPECIFIED ACTS COMMITTED USING AN AUTO OR VESSEL.
WHEN THE ACTOR COMMITS SIMPLE ASSAULT AGAINST A PERSON AT YOUTH SPORTING EVENT.
WHAT ARE THE SENTENCING GUIDELINES FOR A SECOND DEGREE AGGRAVATED ASSAULT CONVICTION?
LET US DISCOVER IN THE TEXT OF THE LAW
N.J.S.A. C:43-2 (A)
SENTENCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CODE AND AUTHORIZED DISPOSITIONS SET FORTH IN CHAPTER FORTY-THREE OF THE CRIMINAL CODE, EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE PROVIDED BY THE CODE.
N.J.S.A. 2C:43-2 (B)(3)
THE INDIVIDUAL CONVICTED OF AN OFFENSE MAY BE SENTENCED TO IMPRISONMENT FOR A TERM AUTHORIZED BY SECTIONS 2C:11-3, 2C:43-5, 2C:43-6, 2C:43-7, 2C:43-8 OR 2C:44-5.
SECOND DEGREE SENTENCING GUIDELINES FOUND IN CHAPTER FORTY-THREE, SECTION SIX
AGGRAVATING OR MITIGATING FACTORS ASIDE, THE SENTENCING GUIDELINES FOR SECOND DEGREE AGGRAVATED ASSAULT ARE AS FOLLOWS BELOW,
(2) In the case of a crime of the second degree, for a specific term of years which shall be fixed by the court and shall be between five years and 10 years;
YET REMANDED IN TWENTY-FOUR DAYS BY THE MERCER COUNTY PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE!
WHEREAS IN THE CASE OF THE FOURTH DEGREE PICKETTERS’ CHARGE, THE SENTENCING GUIDELINE ARE AS FOLLOWS BELOW,
(4) In the case of a crime of the fourth degree, for a specific term which shall be fixed by the court and shall not exceed 18 months.
IN WHICH CASE THE MERCER COUNTY PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE TOOK FIVE-HUNDRED AND FIFTEEN DAYS TO REMAND AND DOWNGRADE PICKETTERS’ CHARGE BACK TO THE MUNICIPALITY OF ORIGIN AS A PETTY DISORDERLY PERSONS VIOLATION, THE SENTENCING GUIDELINES FOR WHICH ARE AS FOLLOWS BELOW,
“A person who has been convicted of a disorderly persons offense or a petty disorderly persons offense may be sentenced to imprisonment for a definite term which shall be fixed by the court and shall not exceed 6 months in the case of a disorderly persons offense or 30 days in the case of a petty disorderly persons offense.”
SO WHAT EXACTLY IS GOING ON IN THE COUNTY OF MERCER?
SIXTEENTH NOVEMBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN, THE 34TH DAY T PLUS THREE TWO: TAMPERING WITH EVIDENCE, REFER TO THE THIRTY-FOURTH PAGE ENUMERATED THIRTY-SIX IN THE FIFTY-TWO PAGE DISCOVERY PACKET FOR PICKETTERS’ CHARGE THAT WAS EXHIBITED ON SIXTEENTH NOVEMBER SANS COMMENTARY ALBEIT WITH NECESSARY REDACTIONS. THAT PRESENCE OF THAT PAGE AND THE NAME THEREUPON, CARA MCCOLLUM, HATH BEEN REMARKED UPON IN THE ORIGINAL SEQUENCE OF THE 34TH DAY. HOWEVER, THAT DOCUMENT IN THAT SPACE REMAINS A MYSTERY FOR WHICH NEITHER THE MERCER COUNTY PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE, NOR THE TOWNSHIP OF LAWRENCE HATH PROFFERED AN EXPLANATION. THAT PAGE APART OF TWO THREE NINE.
YOURS TRULY THE ONE-TIME BODYGUARD OF SHE SO NAMED. [CLICK TO EXPAND]
TWENTY-SIXTH OCTOBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN, TWO THREE FOUR, TWO THREE FIVE, AND TWO THREE SIX, WHERE FOLLOWING FROM THE HOWELL TOWNSHIP MUNICIPALITY MOST CERTAINLY DID RETALIATE AGAINST THE REQUESTOR NAMED THRICE BELOW.
RETALIATION IS ALREADY ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE MATHS OF OBTAINING PUBLIC RECORDS FROM THE MUNICIPAL RACKET, YES INDEED, FACTORED INTO WHAT OTHERWISE SHOULD BE ROUTINE AND LAWFUL CONDUCT OF ENTITIES IN THIS STATE WHEREIN RETALIATION AS SUCH HATH BEEN SO NAMED HEREUPON BAETYLMANY TIMES, EYE FOR AN EYE, FOR EVERY SINGLE THING IN FAVOR OF THE TARGET, ONE POINT, AYE, THE ADVERSARY DEMANDS AN EYE IN REVENGE, AYE AYE.
IN ONE OR MORE CASES, THAT EYE IS LEFT OF FIELD TO THE FIELD OF PLAY, BROUGHT TO FIELD IN PRINT THE VERY SAME DAY, ABOUT THE RACKET, MAYBE AFTER A CALL TO THE PRESS, CALL IN A FAVOR, PLEASE TO THE PUBLIC, PUT THE TRUTH UNDER DURESS.
IN ONE OR MORE CASES STILL, RETALIATION DID INDEED OCCUR IN THE CASES ALREADY THEN BEFORE A COURT, THE HOWELL TOWNSHIP BUT OF COURSE, WHEREIN THE VERY ACT OF LITERACY RISKS LIFE AND LIMB, WHERE ONE NEED REQUEST AT REGULAR INTERVALS IF THE COURT HATH APPOINTED COUNSEL IN SECRET, AND WHEREUPON BECOMING INFORMED OF THE VERY FACT THAT COUNSEL HATH BEEN APPOINTED SURREPTITIOUSLY, THE NEXT EYE IS SOUGHT AFTER THE LAST EYE HATH BEEN FOUND, THE CASE OF TWENTY-SIXTH OCTOBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN, WHEREUPON THE VERY SAME DAY THE FIRST THREE BECAME KNOWN, TWO THREE FOUR, FIVE AND SIX, THE COURT APPOINTED ONE ITS OWN EMPLOYEES AS DEFENSE COUNSEL, HID THAT FACT FOR GREATER THAN TWO WEEKS, THEN LIED ABOUT THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THAT INVOLUNTARY APPOINTMENT WHICH WAS ONLY DISCOVERED FOLLOWING FROM PERSISTENT INQUIRIES AS TO WHETHER COUNSEL HAD APPOINTED APPOINTED IN SECRET, AS THAT COURT DID THE VERY SAME THING IN THE PAST. OF NOTE, BOTH FEMALE APPOINTEES DID FAIL TO INFORM THEIR CLIENT THEY HAD BEEN APPOINTED, AND THE ALL FEMALE STAFF OF THE COURT DID ALSO FAIL TO PROVIDE ANY NOTICE WHATSOEVER. VERY GROTESQUE ACTS COMPOUNDED BY LIES ABOUT THOSE SAME ACTS.
AT WHICH TIME WE RETURN TO SEVENTH DECEMBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN
Pursuant to P.L.1963, c.73 (C.47:1A-1 et seq.), records kept or maintained by the Township of Howell, the Howell Township Municipal Court, the Howell Township Police Department and/or any other department in the jurisdiction of the Township of Howell, are requested and again marked required on this date of Request, January 30, 2019, to be in possession of both named parties in MUNICIPAL APPEAL NO: 18-040 that has been FILED and is now pending in SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, LAW DIVISION – CRIMINAL PART, MONMOUTH VICINAGE, and despite receiving no less than one form of notice marked FILED in the present year, no formal acknowledgment of that matter has been forthcoming from the Township of Howell, with that notice consisting of a one page document stamped “DAVID F. BAUMAN, P.J.Cr.”, whereupon the date of “JAN 10 2019”, the Howell Township Municipal Court was ORDERED to pay all fees and costs associated with preparation of the court transcript from the Municipal Hearing that did take place on just the one Hearing date of December 7, 2018, despite a multitude of other Hearings that did take place and are all directly related. Of note, the Violation enumerated “220-C” and/or “220-2” that did result in MA 18-040 was coerced on December 7, 2018, on which date a plea was agreed upon in light of a false presumption provided to this requestor while seated in the Howell Township Municipal Court with no less than one Howell Township Police Officer standing nearby following from alleged threats that on this date of Request have are not described in language beyond the general description of “threats”otherwise absent any official record(s) known to this requestor. The aforementioned proximity was maintained by HTPD on what had been scheduled as the first day of a trial, during which time each and every moment this requestor was present within either the Howell Township Municipal Court or in the antechamber that presence was maintained by the female Howell Township Police Department Officer whose badge number was identified #676 upon request and subsequently identified in a handwritten OPRA Request dated December 7, 2018 that was transmit on or about 12:10 PM EST to “Dianne”, who in all likelihood is or was employed by the Howell Township Police Department Records Bureau on that date. Furthermore, that Request has not yet been fulfilled or acknowledged as of the present time, and the text of that OPRA Request dated “12/07/18” was photographed on or about 12:08 PM EST and is reproduced in full, including errors, as follows hereafter: “All written documents in possession of Howell Police and/or the Township of Howell describing thereupon all alleged threats this requestor made, allegedly, against Howell Court staff, the judge(s) of Howell Court, and/or other Township of Howell employees, specifically following from the allegation made by PTL S. Regin (sic), #676 that SGT. J. Lopez as her supervisor ordered one to one monitoring of this requestor following from unspecified, allegedly and explicitly false claims that threats were made one or more (sic) employees of the Township of Howell.” The OPRA Request was handwritten on one of the handful of blank four page “OPEN PUBLIC RECORDS ACT REQUEST FORM” packets observed stacked on the counter of the public facing side of the Howell Township Police Department Records Bureau window that is also located in the antechamber to the Howell Township Municipal Court. Furthermore, that packet was obtained and completed in both physical and visual proximity to the male HTPD Class II Officer #324, whose surname remains unknown, and the female HTPD Officer PTL S. REGINA #676, as prior stated. Both HTPD Officers were so kind as to state their badge numbers aloud following from requests for identification made in the moments prior to handing the completed Request form to “Dianne”, despite only identifying #676 thereupon. The specific record(s) requested herein are the very same requested on December 7, 2018 and in at least one OPRA Request dated prior, both of which remain unfulfilled, wherein the prior dated and nearly identical Request regarding alleged threats is highlighted in GRC Complaint 2018-303 entitled Miller v. Twp. of Howell (Monmouth), for which the original Denial of Access Complaint submit by this requestor was stamped “RECEIVED” by the New Jersey Government Records Council on “2018 DEC 3 PM 1 26” at such time four GRC Complaints entitled Miller v. Twp. of Howell (Monmouth) had already been filed. Furthermore, the specific government record(s) that would bear the requested, required and otherwise absent information are not known to be anything other than police reports. As such, any and all Howell Township Police Department reports are requested herein, if not otherwise exempt, thereupon describing any and all threats allegedly made by this requestor against anyone who claims to have been threatened by that very same person in the period between the present date of January 30, 2019 and the nominal date of September 23, 1986.
SECOND, DOES THE CONDUCT OF LOPEZ PRIMA FACIE CONSTITUTE PROBABLE CAUSE FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST THAT REQUESTOR FOR MAKING TERRORISTIC THREATS? CONVERSELY, IF NO THREATS WERE ACTUALLY MADE BY THE ACCUSED, AS IS THE FACTUAL REALITY, DOES THE CONDUCT OF LOPEZ, WITH PERHAPS OTHER ACTORS, CONSTITUTE ONE OR MORE VIOLATIONS OF,
N.J.S.A. 2C:13-5. Criminal coercion
SPECIFICALLY IN REGARD TO 2C:13-5 A(2), 2C:13-5 A(4), 2C:13-5 A(6), AND/OR 2C:13-5 A(7), DESCRIPTIONS OF WHICH CAN BE FOUND IN THE TEXT OF THE NEW JERSEY CRIMINAL CODE EXHIBITED BELOW FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION.
AN ACTOR COMMITS CRIMINAL COERCION IF HE OR SHE PURPOSEFULLY AND UNLAWFULLY RESTRICTS A PERSON’S ABILITY TO ENGAGE OR REFRAIN FROM ENGAGING IN CONDUCT THROUGH THREATS:
N.J.S.A. 2C:13-5 A(2), CONSISTING OF FALSE ACCUSATIONS THAT A PERSON COMMITTED A CRIMINAL AND/OR OTHER OFFENSE.
N.J.S.A. 2C:13-5 A(4), CONSISTING OF AN ACTION TAKEN OR WITHHELD BY AN OFFICIAL, OR CONSISTING OF AN ACTION THAT WOULD CAUSE AN OFFICIAL TO TAKE OR WITHHOLD ACTION.
N.J.S.A. 2C:13-5 A(6), CONSISTING OF PROVIDING TESTIMONY OR INFORMATION, OR WITHHOLDING TESTIMONY OR INFORMATION WITH REGARD TO A PERSON’S LEGAL CLAIM OR DEFENSE.
N.J.S.A. 2C:13-5 A(7), CONSISTING OF ANY OTHER ACT THAT IS INTENDED TO HARM A TARGETED PERSON WITH REGARD TO HIS OR HER HEALTH, SAFETY, BUSINESS, CALLING, CAREER, FINANCIAL CONDITION, REPUTATION OR PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS.
THIRD, WITH REGARD TO THE ABOVE DESCRIBED ALBEIT NON-SPECIFIC ALLEGATIONS THAT THREATS WERE MADE, WE FIRST CONSIDER POTENTIAL VIOLATIONS OF,
N.J.S.A. 2C:12-3. Terroristic threats
WITH ABBREVIATED TEXT OF THAT STATUTE EXHIBITED BELOW AS EXCERPTED FROM THE PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE DATABASE MAINTAINED THE NEW JERSEY STATE LEGISLATURE.
AN ACTOR IS GUILTY OF MAKING TERRORISTIC THREATS IF HE OR SHE,
N.J.S.A. 2C:12-3 (A), THREATENS TO COMMIT ANY CRIME OF VIOLENCE WITH INTENT TO TERRORIZE THE TARGETED PERSON, OR MAKES A THREAT THAT RESULTS IN THE EVACUATION OF A BUILDING, PUBLIC SPACE AND/OR OTHER DEFINED LOCATIONS, AND THE SEVERITY OF THE VIOLATION IS GREATER IF THE ACT IS COMMITTED DURING A TIME OF DECLARED EMERGENCY. FURTHERMORE, THE ACTOR SHALL BE STRICTLY LIABLE UPON PROOF THAT THE CRIME OCCURRED.
N.J.S.A. 2C:12-3 (B), THREATENS TO KILL ANOTHER PERSON WITH INTENT TO PUT THE TARGETED INDIVIDUAL IN IMMEDIATE FEAR OF DEATH.
FOURTH, AGAIN CONSIDERING THE UNSPECIFIED NATURE OF THE ALLEGED THREATS, THE DESCRIPTIONS OF CRIMINAL HARASSMENT AND CYBER-HARASSMENT FOUND IN CHAPTER THIRTY-THREE ARE IN ALL LIKELIHOOD WHAT WOULD BE CONSIDERED NEXT FOR ALLEGED COMMUNICATIONS NOT EXPLICITLY THREATENING THE LIFE OF AN INDIVIDUAL. EXCERPTS BELOW FROM THE TEXT DESCRIBING VIOLATIONS OF,
N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4. Harassment
N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4.1. Cyber-harassment
AN ACTOR COMMITS A PETTY DISORDERLY PERSONS OFFENSE OF HARASSMENT IF HE OR SHE PURPOSEFULLY HARASSES ANOTHER PERSON:
N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4 (A), BY MAKING OR EFFECTING COMMUNICATION(S) KNOWN TO HAVE BEEN INITIATED BY THE ACTOR AT VERY INCONVENIENT HOURS, USING OFFENSIVE LANGUAGE, OR IN SUCH A MANNER LIKELY TO CAUSE ANNOYANCE OR ALARM.
N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4 (B), BY EITHER STRIKING, KICKING, SHOVING, OR OFFENSIVELY TOUCHING THE VICTIM, OR THREATENING TO DO SO.
N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4 (C), BY ENGAGING IN ANY OTHER COURSE OF ALARMING CONDUCT OR BY REPEATEDLY COMMITTING ACTS INTENDED TO ALARM OR SERIOUSLY ANNOY THE VICTIM.
N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4 (E), WHEREBY THE OTHERWISE NON-FELONY CRIMINAL ACTS DESCRIBED IN THE PRECEDING THREE SUBSECTIONS ARE GRADED AS A CRIME OF THE FOURTH DEGREE IN THE EVENT THE ACTOR ENGAGES IN SUCH CONDUCT WHILE SERVING A TERM OF IMPRISONMENT, WHILE ON PAROLE, OR WHILE ON PROBATION FOLLOWING FROM CONVICTION OF AN INDICTABLE OFFENSE UNDER THE LAWS OF NEW JERSEY, ANY OTHER STATE OR THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.
AN ACTOR COMMITS THE FOURTH DEGREE CRIME OF CYBER-HARASSMENT IF HE OR SHE MAKES A COMMUNICATION IN AN ONLINE CAPACITY USING ANY ELECTRONIC DEVICE OR THROUGH A SOCIAL NETWORKING SITE WITH THE PURPOSE TO HARASS THE TARGETED VICTIM THAT DOES:
N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4.1 (A)(1), THREATEN TO INFLICT INJURY OR PHYSICAL HARM TO THE TARGETED VICTIM OR HIS OR HER PROPERTY.
N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4.1 (A)(2), KNOWINGLY SEND, POSTS, COMMENTS, REQUESTS, SUGGESTS, OR PROPOSES ANY LEWD, INDECENT OR OBSCENE MATERIAL TO OR ABOUT A PERSON WITH THE INTENT TO EMOTIONALLY HARM A REASONABLE PERSON OR PLACE A REASONABLE PERSON IN FEAR OF PHYSICAL OR EMOTIONAL HARM.
N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4.1 (A)(3), THREATEN TO COMMIT ANY CRIME AGAINST THE TARGETED VICTIM OR HIS OR HER PROPERTY.
N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4.1 (B), OF NOTE, WHEN COMMUNICATIONS ARE MADE CONTRARY TO THE PRECEDING THREE SUBSECTIONS AT SUCH TIME THE ACTOR IS OVER THE AGE OF TWENTY-ONE AND THE TARGETED VICTIM IS A MINOR, THE ACT BECOMES A VIOLATION OF THE THIRD-DEGREE.
WHEN THE ACTOR IS MINOR UNDER THE AGE OF SIXTEEN, THE COURT MAY ORDER AS A CONDITION OF SENTENCE:
N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4.1 (C)(1), A CLASS OR TRAINING PROGRAM INTENDED TO REDUCE THE MINOR’S PROCLIVITY TO COMMIT ACTS IN VIOLATION OF THE STATUTE.
N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4.1 (C)(2), A CLASS OR TRAINING PROGRAM INTENDED TO INSTRUCT THE MINOR TO THE DANGERS ASSOCIATED WITH CYBER-HARASSMENT.
WHEN A PARENT OR GUARDIAN FAILS TO COMPLY THE CONDITIONS OF SENTENCE SET FORTH IN (C)(1) AND C(2) ABOVE, THAT PARENT OR GUARDIAN IS ADJUDICATED:
N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4.1 (D), A DISORDERLY PERSON WHO SHALL BE FINED NO MORE THAN TWENTY-FIVE DOLLARS FOR A FIRST OFFENSE AND NO MORE THAN ONE-HUNDRED DOLLARS FOR EACH SUBSEQUENT OFFENSE.
FIFTH, THE CASE OF PICKETTERS’ CHARGE DID INCLUDE FOR A PERIOD OF SIXTY-SEVEN DAYS THE PERCEIVED THREAT OF IMMINENT ARREST OR SERVICE OF PROCESS OF ONE OR MORE BRAND NEW CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS FOR ONE OR MORE ALLEGED CRIMINAL ACTS DESCRIBED AS “CYBER-HARASSMENT” BY A FEMALE INDIVIDUAL WHO DURING THAT SIXTY-SEVEN DAY PERIOD WAS ALLEGEDLY THE DEFENSE ATTORNEY OF THE ONE DEFENDANT IN PICKETTERS’ CHARGE, AND SHE WHO DESPITE NO LESS THAN THREE NOTIFICATIONS THAT HER SERVICES WERE NOT DESIRED DID IGNORE THOSE REQUESTS FOR SUBSTITUTION AS DID ANOTHER FEMALE EMPLOYEE OF THE MERCER COUNTY TRIAL REGION OPD WHO DID CLAIM TO BE HER SUPERIOR. FURTHERMORE, THE ATTORNEY DID MAKE A COMMUNICATION ON OR ABOUT TWENTY-NINTH NOVEMBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN BY PHONE CALL PLACED TO HER CLIENT, DURING WHICH TIME SHE DID STATE MULTIPLE TIMES THAT “THE MERCER COUNTY PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE IS LOOKING TO CHARGE YOU”, FOR COMMUNICATIONS DESCRIBING A VICTIM THAT SHE DID NOT IDENTIFY BY NAME AND SPECIFICALLY REGARDING PUBLIC DISCLOSURES RELATED A DIVORCE THAT WERE ALSO NOT SUBSEQUENTLY DESCRIBED BY DOCKET NUMBER, IDENTITY OF A JUDGE, THE NAME OF EITHER PARTY OR BY WHAT SPECIFIC PUBLIC DISCLOSURES WERE DEEMED CONTRARY TO N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4.1 (A) et seq. THE COMMUNICATIONS AS SUCH WERE NEVER DESCRIBED AS HAVING BEEN MADE OR CAUSED TO HAVE BEEN MADE BY THE DEFENDANT, NEVER CLAIMED TO HAVE BEEN MADE ON ANY ELECTRONIC DEVICE OR THROUGH A SOCIAL NETWORKING SITE THAT WAS IN ACTUAL FACT OWNED OR OPERATED BY THE DEFENDANT, AND OF THE HIGHEST SIGNIFICANCE SOMETHING WAS CLAIMED TO HAVE BEEN POSTED TO A WEBSITE THAT MAY OR MAY NOT HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS “SOMETHING AWFUL”, AND REGARDLESS OF WHAT SPECIFIC DOMAIN WAS UTTERED BY THAT ATTORNEY, THE DEFENDANT REMAINS UNAWARES OF ANY PUBLIC DISCLOSURES RELATED TO THE CASE POSTED TO ANY WEBSITE THAT SHE MAY OR MAY NOT HAVE ACTUALLY NAMED, AND FURTHERMORE THE DEFENDANT HER THEN CLIENT WAS CERTAINLY NOT AFFILIATED WITH ANY WEBSITE AS SUCH.
THE FOLLOWING CLAIMS WERE ALSO MADE BY THAT ATTORNEY DURING THE TWENTY-NINTH NOVEMBER PHONE CONVERSATION:
ONE, ASSERTION THAT ANY DIVORCE PROCEEDING INVOLVING THE ALLEGED VICTIM IN PICKETTERS’ CHARGE ACTIVE CONCOMITANT TO THE CASE COULD NOT POSSIBLY BE RELEVANT TO AN AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE. THIS CLAIM WAS MADE VERY EMPHATICALLY, IN MANNER ONE MIGHT DESCRIBE NEAR BORDERLINE HYSTERICAL, REPEATEDLY ASSERTED, APPROX “THERE IS NO POSSIBLE WAY IT COULD BE RELATED”.
TWO, EXPLICIT REFUSALS TO ASCERTAIN WHETHER A OR THE DIVORCE PROCEEDING RESULTED IN FINANCIAL GAIN OR LOSS FOR EITHER PARTY.
THREE, WOULD NOT ENTERTAIN POSSIBILITY THAT DEFENDANT MAY HAVE BEEN SUBJECT OF DIVORCE ON-RECORD TESTIMONY AND/OR DESCRIBED IN OTHER COURT DOCUMENTS. OF NOTE, ATTORNEY WITH NO KNOWLEDGE OF HISTORY BETWEEN DEFENDANT AND ALLEGED VICTIM PROVIDED BY DEFENDANT UNLESS SHE DID READ DOAC SERES VS LAWRENCE, NOTE RETURNED TWENTY-EIGHTH JANUARY TWO-THOUSAND NINETEEN, INCLUDING INVITE TO WEDDING OF THE ALLEGED VICTIM AND HUSBAND, BOTH OF WHOM NAMED ON EACH OF THREE VERSIONS OF A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER THAT DID APPEAR TO BE MADE AVAILABLE FOR USE AGAINST THE DEFENDANT IN A SIMULTANEOUS CRIMINAL PROCEEDING CONTRARY TO N.J.S.A. 2C: 25-29 BY VIRTUE OF INCLUSION IN FIFTY-TWO PAGE DISCOVERY PACKET FIRST PROVIDED TO DEFENDANT FIRST OCTOBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN AT INITIAL DISPOSITION CONFERENCE.
FOUR, CLAIM THAT ENTIRE DOAC SERIES VS LAWRENCE DID NOT MATTER, UNCLEAR IF SHE WAS EVEN AWARE OF CONTENT OR HOW THAT CONTENT RELATED TO AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE.
SIXTH, THE HISTORY OF PICKETTERS’ CHARGE AS RECORDED BY ZONE ON FOURTEENTH JANUARY TWO-THOUSAND NINETEEN, EXHIBITED IN THE TWENTY-TWO IMAGES SEEN BELOW,
SEVENTH, THE TWENTY-EIGHTH JANUARY TWO-THOUSAND NINETEEN SERIES OF A NEARLY IDENTICAL GROUP OF SHEETS THIS TIME DIRECTLY REQUESTED USING THE FORM EXHIBITED IN POSITION ONE WHICH DID YIELD THIS SERIES PURPORTING TO DESCRIBE A HISTORY OF PICKETTERS’ CHARGE. SPOT THE DIFFERENCE FROM THE FOURTEENTH JANUARY LOT IN THE TWENTY-SEVEN IMAGES EXHIBITED BELOW,
EIGHTH, THE FOURTH FEBRUARY TWO-THOUSAND NINETEEN SERIES THAT DID MARK THE CONCLUSION OF PICKETTERS’ CHARGE IN ZONE IS EXHIBITED IN FIVE IMAGES BELOW, AND DO INDEED PAY SPECIAL ATTENTION TO THE REMARK ON CORRESPONDENCE ALLEGEDLY NEVER SENT TO HUNTERDON COUNTY.
PURSUANT TO P.L.1963 c. 73 (C.47:1A-1 et seq.), as amended and supplemented, with regard to the unfulfilled statutory obligations of the thing exhibited in one photo below,
THE FINEST FINE IN EXCHANGE FOR THE THING THAT TELLS THE STORY FOR A PRICE ALREADY SET AT MAXIMUM, THRICE GREATEST, THEIR THIRD STRING, TEN-THOUSAND DETAILS THAT NEED A PHALANX OF SCRIBES TO BE HEARD, FOR THIS TRUE TAIL TO SING, HOWEVER ONLY THREE OR FOUR-THOUSAND DETAILS WILL SUFFICE FOR THIS TASK AT HAND, THE REMAINS SIX OR SEVEN-THOUSAND ALREADY KNOWN, HEREUPON BAETYL, ALREADY SHOWN, TO BE CONTINUED IN THREE OR FOUR-THOUSAND DETAILS MORE, NOT HERE BELOW, DEAR READER, BUT UPON FOREIGN SHORE, IN A ZONE WHERE SOME THINGS ARE HELD BACK, YET IN LIEU DO FALLBACK TO THE FALLBACK LINE THAT CAME SOME DAYS BEFORE, FOUR HUNDRED EIGHTY-TWO DAYS BEFORE THE ANJOU WINE, WHICH WAS ONCE EXEMPT, BUT THEN WAS NOT, SO IN THE FUTURE DO LOOK BACK TO THIS SPACE RIGHT HERE, ON THE DATE YOU WONDER, ON THE DATE YOU HEAR, ON THE DATE BAETYL, BAETYL & CO., HATH TURNED THE RIPE OLD AGE OF JUST ONE YEAR, THREE-HUNDRED NINE DAYS STRONG ON DAY SEVEN OF THE SECOND MONTH OF THIS YEAR, THE YEAR OF OUR LORD, TWO-THOUSAND NINETEEN, POST SIX HUNDRED FORTY-NINE HEREUPON LOG, THE SPACE OF VOLUMES HEREUPON THE BAETYL BLOG, BUT FOR NOW JUST A LOOK AT WHAT IS SEEN ABOVE, THERE LIES BELOW, NOBLESSE OBLIGE, THE NOBLES SINCE COWERING SINCE THE TIME OF STORM UPON SIEGE, THE DOORS ARE LOCKED AND THE PLAN IS SET, THE GREAT DELUGE THAT HAPPENED ONCE, AGAIN TO HAPPEN YET.
HOW THE THE MEDIA-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX HATH HIDDEN THE TRUE DISPOSITION OF THE FORMER ASSOCIATE JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT SO NAMED RUTH BADER GINSBURG IN A BID TO PREVENT THE PRESIDENT FROM APPOINTING A THIRD JUSTICE DURING HIS FIRST TERM.
IN THE MEANTIME
ONE AND THEN TWO OBSERVED EARLIER TODAY IN THE VICINITY OF THE FORTIETH PARALLEL
THE CASE OF ORIGIN WAS NOT RELATED TO ANY DRUG RELATED ISSUE.
DID THE MERCER COUNTY PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE ATTEMPT TO FABRICATE A DRUG CHARGE?
OF NOTE, THE CASE IN QUESTION CLAIMED TO HAVE BEEN REMANDED DOWN TO MUNICIPAL COURT FOR PROSECUTION AS SEPARATE PETTY DISORDERLY PERSONS OFFENSE VERUS FOURTH DEGREE 2C:12-10(B) MISDEMEANOR. NO OTHER INFORMATION REGARDING DRUG ALLEGATION ASIDE FROM SINGLE DOCUMENT EXHIBITED ABOVE. ONE ATTORNEY ASSOCIATED WITH CASE DID FAIL TO COMMENT. OPRA INBOUND.
END OF INQUIRY
EXCEPT NOT REALLY
SO WHERE DID IT GO? REMAINS UNKNOWN AS OF SEVEN FEBRUARY.
UPDATES SEVEN FEBRUARY FOURTEEN TWENTY-TWO EST.
MONMOUTH COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT RECORDS INDICATE THAT THIS MATTER IS COMPLETELY DISPOSED, FURTHERMORE A CLAIM WAS MADE THAT THE MUNICIPAL DISORDERLY PERSONS VIOLATION TO BE REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROSECUTION HAS ALSO BEEN DISMISSED UPON THE MOTION OF A MUNICIPAL PROSECUTOR. HOWEVER, THE MUNICIPALITY TO WHICH THAT DISORDERLY PERSONS VIOLATION WAS REMANDED WAS NOT IDENTIFIED IN A DATABASE USED BY ONE OR MORE UNIDENTIFIED VICINAGE STAFF.
Due to the restrictions imposed upon this [REQUESTOR] on the [DATE] at the time publicly accessible electronic devices were being used at the [FORMER BOROUGH FACILITY] in that thing that hath been formerly called [THE BOROUGH OF PRINCETON] that now is devoid of [THE BOROUGH] and is only [PRINCETON] in name, not even a [TWP], we do wonder for what shame, that [FACILITY] the only one outside of a [SUPERIOR COURTHOUSE] that does have a large section of [LAW BOOKS], however that section [BALANCED] atop [A BURROW] eighty-five stories tall, so please do not be unprepared for good things to happen when the happenings [BELOW] hereupon [ABOVE] are shared, specifically events that did transpire on the [DAY THREE DAYS AWAY] that were initially described and subsequently reproduced on a device owned by this [REQUESTOR] rather than on a device with one or two [ENTITIES] in the middle that do require [SUBMISSION] to the terms on offer to affirm permission hath been granted to inflict [INFORMITIES] upon the words written and [OBTAINED ILLEGALLY] by two [ENTITIES] in between, one man in the middle, and one elsewhere unseen, sent on orders of the [BURROW] to keep eyes on that which otherwise could only be seen from [THE BURROW] upon the device so named [THE MACHINE] operated in fact to steal and to shred every single word, so please do not care for what was said on the [DAY THREE DAYS AWAY] in lieu what is said today on this [DAY TWO DAYS AWAY] on topic of things [THAT BEAR VOLUME] in words written by [AYE], and [AYE] unseen [VOLUMES] on things perceived to be well-known, on the history [THE BURROW], on the history of [ZONE], on the [DAY TWO DAYS AWAY] however despite the campaign just begun to make public these things that [THE COURT THAT CAME UP TO THE COURT] does say are false, are slanders, are [VOLUMES] untrue, for reasons never uttered [UP ABOVE] except in the language of the [OPPRESSION INDUSTRIAL-COMPLEX] that does today have a date with you, and [AYE AYE], this [REQUESTOR], who did scare [THE BEAST] whose [LAIR] is so named to be one of the one-thousand points of light, first uttered in now the well-known turn of phrase by the forty-third, or was it perhaps the forty-first [PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATED] for whom the [THE MEDIA-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX] hath re-written the past on a dime, for a nickel, the last of the loot, the [STOLEN PROPERTY OF THE UNITED STATES] sequestered in such capacity so named [OFFICIAL BUSINESS] and buried far below in chambers cut deep in the rock below the [DISCONTINUITY] of what hath been formerly enumerated [ONE ONE ZERO NINE] adjacent to [ONE ONE ONE ZERO] that now enters [YEAR SIX] following the [GREAT DELUGE] that did [BEAT THE FUCK OUT] of [THE BURROW] that was rather split in twain, combined into [ONE ONE ONE FOUR] and stripped of any name [TWP] or [BOR] all the same, one and two of one-thousand points of light, each one cursed, the lairs that are layered in the space top to bottom [THIRTY-FOUR THOUSAND FEET], to basement and beyond that mystery sheet known to be the boundary layer between [THIS REALM] and the next, where from [THE RAVENS] did commit [THE BREACH] many years past, so please do please do bear respect for what hath passed, and to the [GENUINE TEXTS] where from the technology of the [VIOLETS] hath been discovered in those [GENUINE TEXTS], stolen and [BELOW] amassed, one of the [VIOLETS] so named for each [VIOLET DOOR], the most well-known secret of [THE BURROW], the secret behind [ONE ONE ONE FOUR].
[P.D. Illustration by John Tenniel of the Court below at the trial of the Knave of Hearts, Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland]
AS WAS FOUND AT THE PUBLIC LIBRARY THAT SERVES THE MUNICIPALITY SO NAMED THE TOWNSHIP OF MONTGOMERY. WHAT ABOUT THE TOWNSHIP OF HOWELL?
WHERE FROM A CALL WAS PLACED
THAT CALL TRANSCRIBED WITH FIDELITY AND REPRODUCED BELOW
AUTOMATED: HELLO, YOU HAVE REACHED THE MONMOUTH COUNTY LIBRARY HOWELL BRANCH. FOR DIRECTIONS PRESS ONE, TO RENEW MATERIALS, CHECK YOUR ACCOUNT, OR INQUIRE ABOUT BORROWING PRESS TWO, FOR INFORMATION ABOUT CHILDREN’S PROGRAMS OR FOR CHILDREN’S…
UNNAMED ONE: MONMOUTH COUNTY LIBRARY, HOWELL BRANCH
ACM: HI, HOW ARE YOU DOING TODAY?
UNNAMED ONE: I’M FINE HOW ARE YOU?
ACM: I’M DOING WELL, THANK YOU. I’M CALLING TO SEE IF THE HOWELL LIBRARY HAS A COPY OF THE TOWNSHIP OF HOWELL MUNICIPAL CODE ON FILE
UNNAMED ONE: UM, I DON’T BELIEVE SO BUT LET ME SEND YOU OVER TO REFERENCE, HOLD ON
ACM: OK, THANK YOU VERY MUCH
UNNAMED TWO: YES
UNNAMED TWO: OH, HELLO, THIS IS [UNNAMED TWO] AT THE REFERENCE DESK
ACM: HI [UNNAMED TWO], I’M CALLING TODAY TO SEE IF THE HOWELL LIBRARY HAS A COPY OF THE HOWELL TWP MUNICIPAL CODE ON FILE OR AVAILABLE FOR…OR AVAILABLE ON RESERVE FOR REFERENCE IN THE LIBRARY
UNNAMED TWO: I DON’T HAVE A PAPER COPY, ITS AVAILABLE ONLINE
ACM: OH, OK
UNNAMED TWO: THATS RIGHT
ACM: SO IF I JUST GO ON THE WEBSITE AND SEARCH FOR MUNICIPAL CODE I’LL COME ACROSS IT
UNNAMED TWO: YES, YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO, YEP
ACM: OK. AND THEY DON’T MAINTAIN A PHYSICAL COPY IN THE LIBRARY IN ANY CAPACITY?
UNNAMED TWO: I HAVEN’T HAD ONE HERE, I’VE BEEN HERE THREE YEARS, AND I DON’T RECALL EVER HAVING ONE HERE, UM, I DID INQUIRE OF THE TOWNSHIP AND ACTUALLY NEVER RECEIVED A RESPONSE SO I PROBABLY SHOULD…
ACM: OH, NOT SURPRISING
UNNAMED TWO: YEA BECAUSE SOMEONE ELSE HAD ASKED ABOUT IN, PROBABLY WITHIN THE LAST SIX MONTHS OR SO, UM, BUT YOU CAN SEE IT AS I SAID IN ELECTRONIC FORMAT
ACM: OK, VERY GOOD, THANK YOU VERY MUCH, APPRECIATE YOUR HELP
UNNAMED TWO: OK, YOU’RE WELCOME
AND WHY EXACTLY DO WE REQUIRE THE MOST UP TO DATE HARD-COPY TEXT OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE TOWNSHIP OF HOWELL?
BECAUSE OF THE FOLLOWING HANDWRITTEN LETTERS AND NUMBERS
PARTICULARLY THIS ONE HERE BELOW
HOWEVER DESPITE THE TWO CLAIM FROM THE TOWNSHIP OF HOWELL TRANSMIT IN HARD-COPY
THAT TWO, VERSUS C, ALSO SEEN IN THE PANEL BELOW
SO WHICH IS IT?
TWO OR C?
DOES C EVEN EXIST IN THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE TOWNSHIP OF HOWELL?
BUT FIRST, WE WONDER IF A HARD-COPY TEXT AS SUCH EVEN EXISTS AT THE PRESENT TIME. ONCE FOUND, WE MAY PROCEED TO FORMALLY SOLVE THE LATEST FOLD IN THE ONGOING SERIES SO NAMED THE MUNICODE MYSTERY.
AND OUT SAFE FROM LAST TRIP TO ZONE FIVE HUNDRED AND THREE DAYS LATER.
AT WHICH THIS RECENT DISCOVERY EXHIBITED ABOVE REMAINS INEXPLICABLE. NO HISTORY OF DRUG RELATED ARRESTS WHATSOEVER. FURTHERMORE, NO ON RECORD QUESTIONS PERMITTED. AS SUCH, THIS REMAINS A MYSTERY. SUSPECT THE INVOLVEMENT OF HOWELL.
[NOTE: US MARSHALS SERVICE ALLEGEDLY ON STANDBY FOR THE EXECUTION OF HC ORDER SIXTY-SIX THAT WAS DESCRIBED TO AN UNNAMED SOURCE AS THE MASS ISSUANCE OF WARRANTS FOR THE ARREST OF ALL WHITE CHRISTIAN MEN AND WOMEN THAT VOTED FOR DONALD J. TRUMP IN THE LAST PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION, WHICH OF NOTE WAS SPENT BY HERR BAETYL & CO HEREIN BEHIND ENEMY LINES AND YOUR TEARS ARE STILL DELICIOUS. TO RETURN, THAT DID CONSTITUTE AN ACT OF WAR ON THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND HAS BEEN TREATED AS SUCH. THE NAME “LIZ LEMPERT” IS NOT AUTHENTIC AND ONE OR MORE INDIVIDUALS HATH BEEN CALLED UPON IN THE INTERIM TO FILL IN SURREPTITIOUSLY FOR THE NOW DEPOSED FORMER [REDACTED] OF THE ENTITY BEAT THE FUCK OUT IN TWO-THOUSAND THIRTEEN, THEN STRIP STRIP DOUBLE STRIPPED OF THE BOROUGH AND THE TOWNSHIP BESIDE AND NOW SO NAMED THE THING THAT HATH USURPED THE NAME OF PRINCETON.]
AI TO KEEP AN EYE ON YOU AND AYE, AYE
AT THE PPL NO ONE IN PARTICULAR MUCH CARED FOR THESE REMARKS
FOX ROTHSCHILD THE VERY SAME BLACK HEART AT THE HEART BEREFT AC
ON THE MATTER OF THREATS AND THOSE WHO DO IN FACT THREATEN THE LIFE, HEALTH AND WELL-BEING IN A BREACH OF THE PEACE OF THIS STATE IN AFFRONT TO THE DIGNITY OF THOSE WHO RESIDE THEREIN.
IN THESE MATTERS DESCRIBED BELOW, THE OPTION TO PURSUE SENTENCING GUIDELINES THAT PERMIT A SENTENCE OF DEATH UPON CONVICTION IS BOTH REQUESTED AND WARRANTED FOR THOSE AMONG THE LOT OF ELECTED AND APPOINTED SO NAMED PUBLIC OFFICIALS FROM THE [ENTITY IN QUESTION].
Of note, due to the time restrictions imposed upon this requestor on January 24, 2019 by what are in all likelihood third-party applications that involuntarily eject users from publicly available computers at the Princeton Public Library located at 65 Witherspoon St, Princeton, NJ 08542, that after first log-in permit a total length of time that is not stated up front after bonus minutes were allotted no less than twice such that the exact length of time permitted to edit the text of that OPRA Request was uncertain and in all likelihood fleeting. The public device in question was used for approximately two hours between 4 and 6 PM during which time no less than two male individuals who were in all likelihood employees of PRINCETON did stand at the left and right flank of this requestor, and of note both of whom did interfere with the generation of that lawfully made Request, despite any claims made to the contrary by one or more elected or appointed officials in that jurisdiction. Of note, both males as prior described maintained physical and visual proximity and at one time did together approach this then seated requestor, and one of the two initiated verbal contact and did state that a closed water bottle would not be tolerated in the vicinity of the floor at the foot this requestor who was then instructed to place the water bottle on a ledge across the room before a window, which done did indeed steal some seconds, perhaps minutes in total that otherwise would have been spent editing the text of that most critical Request dated January 24, 2019 for which submission was later confirmed in an email “from: firstname.lastname@example.org via amazonses.com”, which of note does indicate that of two intermediate entities are responsible for transmission and submission of what is entered upon an interactive form of that Municipal Government which in all likelihood maintains that the page that appears to have been published for the purpose of conducting routine business in HOWELL TOWNSHIP located at the publicly accessible web address (http://www.twp.howell.nj.us/formcenter/community-3/opra-request-40), that is clearly marked atop as the official website of HOWELL TOWNSHIP, and which is exclusively used by this requestor to submit OPRA Requests that are directly related to matters of origin within the jurisdiction of HOWELL TOWNSHIP, and which is done for the purpose of self-defense in those very matters that may in all likelihood additonally involve one or more third-parties. Furthermore, those matters with origin n HOWELL TOWNSHIP have been observed to Breach the Peace of other jurisdictions wherein Custodians have received OPRA Requests made pursuant to P.L.1963, c.73 (C.47:1A-1 et seq.), as amended and supplemented, that intimately involve matters with origin in HOWELL TOWNSHIP , as prior stated, and on this date of Request in all likelihood have becomes monstrous crimes that do require daily vigilance from this requestor to ensure false accusations are not permitted to stand, as such herein this OPRA Request does proclaim these daily OPRA Requests are acts of self-defense, which is a Right that shall not be infringed and shall never be described in truth to have been exercised with the “purpose to harass”, despite the very same company that owns “amazonses.com” observed to be possibly involved in the transmission of those very same OPRA Requests made in self-defense via what is in all likelihood the same company that does continues to make frequent communications to purposefully harass this requestor in the manner of emails received from “Amazon Services” to “email@example.com” that allege this requestor does owe a debt for services rendered that were never requested, specifically alleging money owed for the destruction of texts once owned by this requestor who was and apparently remains sole proprietor of PAR_BOOKS, that from whom “Amazon Services” claims payment is required despite that small business nicknamed as such no longer permitted to do business on the platform associated with “Amazon Services”, and of note that small business effectively destroyed on July 11, 2017 by the heinous lies still maintained to be true by HOWELL TOWNSHIP, and following from a date that had been marked less than one week after July 11, 2017 and less than one year prior to July 11, 2018 was missed. That date was indeed a deadline for the required submission of document(s) to prove lawful conduct as implemented by the very same company that in all likelihood owns and operates “amazonses.com”. However, following from the forged record dated July 11, 2017, this requestor and sole proprietor of PAR_BOOKS was indisposed absent due process of any kind, yes indeed R. 4:74-7, as evidenced by the fact that the required legal notice was never served upon this requestor and as such denied Hearing before a Court, although a secret proceeding was alleged to have been convened by a judge, who may or may not have FILED three pages on or about July 14, 2017 then only obtained upon fulfillment of a request for legal medical records that were first denied by one or more individuals whose identity is not yet known, although who did mark RETURN TO SENDER on the first request for the legal medical records that would later be fulfilled on second and third request thereafter each with those three pages thereupon providing first informal notice no counsel had ever been named, however despite that absent counsel in all likelihood was alleged by HOWELL TOWNSHIP to be the same female individual who did make the heinous claim that this requestor did not have any Right to a Hearing in SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY that would establish Habeas Corpus and/or provide notice of prior adjudication(s) on same, and of note an attempt was made to justify that claim rendering the MAGNA CARTA null and void with a statement, “you need an outside attorney to do that”, when at such time this requestor first became aware that “time travel” was possible, having jumped over eight hundred years into the past on a date prior to that date in the year most likely 1215, as this requestor was not permitted to take incoming calls of his own volition, specifically from one more attorneys with whom attempts at contact were made during the first three days of that indisposition, whereupon some hours following from the “outside counsel required” claim, this requestor was brutally assaulted by no many individuals at such this requestor had placed just one hand on a pay phone with the intent to call the police for repeated acts of of sexual harassment that were perceived to be sanctioned conduct for the duration of that period of indisposition, and that assault following the events that did transpire on July 12, 2017 in what was perceived to be the attempted murder of this requestor who without cause was surrounded by multiple security guards and one class two Neptune police “officer”, all but one of whom african-american, with the assault initiated by Neptune police class two who did grab the neck of this requestor who was at the time kneeling motionless at a height of some feet from the floor, then dragged and thrown to floor that was met head first by this requestor who then placed in choke to the point of near death, THANK YOU VERY MUCH HOWELL TOWNSHIP, and with regard to the prior described “legal medical record” first unfulfilled was later found to bear the false claim that the July 12, 2017 assault could have only occurred on the fictitious date of July 11, 2017, which of note was day one of the no less than sixteen day period of indisposition that did occur at the height of Summer, for the entire duration of which this requestor was denied access to any electronic device that would permit access to those accounts required for submission in support of affirming lawful conduct to the company that in all likelihood owns “amazonses.com” which may or may not have satisfied the requirements imposed upon PAR_BOOKS, which if on this date of request had been certified on the date described above, an income would invariably exist in lieu of the denial of access to authorized permissions to sell what would in all likelihood have been more profitable texts following from document(s) rendered inaccessible to the sole proprietor of PAR_BOOKS due to false accusations with origin HOWELL TOWNSHIP that persist on this date of request 563 days hence. As such, the specific record requested is described in one point below:
(1) A copy of all records kept by HOWELL TOWNSHIP that include a CONTRACT and/or any other similarly titled document(s) thereupon describing all contractual obligations that HOWELL TOWNSHIP maintains with either one or both companies which own the third-party service(s) identified as “amazonses.com” and “firstname.lastname@example.org ” that in all likelihood take custody of part or all of the data entered into the interactive form on the HOWELL TOWNSHIP website, described herein and elsewhere, and which does not identify any third-party as such.
WE BEGIN WITH A TALE TOLD BY MR. MP ON THE DAY HE ARRIVED AT LITTLE BIG HORN TO MEET WOUNDED KNEE
MP: Everyone is trying to really work with so you can avoid a more severe sentence, right? DEF: Right. MP: Including the officer, the other officer who charged you after being stabed in the chest, your attorney, and that other officer who tried to frame your narcotics related arrests DEF: That’s correct, but he failed on the narcotics attempt MP: Yes indeed, so what the proposal to you would be would be to amend the charge DEF: Mm hmm MP: To just a noise altercation DEF: Sure MP: Municipal…a Violation which means that you got into argument with the individual who stabbed you DEF: Sure MP: Caused a noise disturbance and as you know thats not a criminal offense DEF: Ok MP: That’s, that’s a good thing DEF: Correct MP: The part of the sentence is you can actually be sentenced more severely as part of a, um, a municipal code violation DEF: Mm hmm MP: They wouldn’t be looking for that up front but it would be a suspended sentence which means that over the course of the next year if you got in trouble again DEF: Mm hmm MP: If you are accused again DEF: Mm hmm MP: If you did something, um, that was in, of a nature then was successful and indeed in pursuit of OBTAINING JUSTICE DEF: [inaudible]…for the heinous crime committed against this requestor on July 11, 2017 and then again on too many occasions to keep top of mind day in and day out? MP: uh, yea the more severe sentence would be incentive for you not to do that stuff DEF: That’s correct MP: The other part of it would be you would have to as part of the plea, you would have to avail yourself of a, um, evaluation, medical evaluation, and comply with the recommendations of the evaluator DEF: Ok, so I have to say, I uh, totally will, I accept that, I uh, I do understand its a deferred disposition, as it was called, um, the issue last time with CERTIFIED APPOINTMENT was that, that the appointment… MP: It doesn’t have to be the CERTIFIED APPOINTMENT this time DEF: Well any provider that can only schedule CERTIFIED APPOINTMENTS so far out and during the period after I was stabbed in the chest I was indisposed, and I had to reschedule the CERTIFIED APPOINTMENT that would have been completed only some days later, but I recovering from a collapsed lung, I did get a CERTIFIED APPOINTMENT for a date in the fall and at no point was the CERTIFIED APPOINTMENT not scheduled this proceeding despite those claims made THREE MONTHS AGO, and the process, its a long process MP: And the other part of it is you would be scheduled to come back here in THREE MONTHS to report to the court what you did, this is the treatment I got, these are things I’m doing, I’m not getting in trouble DEF: Right, should I include the physical therapy regimen that I should have started immediately after being stabbed about six months ago? MP: No, you just say on record this is where I’m living, this is the car I’m driving, these are all the things that are happening in a positive way DEF: Sure, the one thing I need is clear recommendations on, uh, what medical provider, who… MP: Yea, you want to do the right thing, you don’t want to go to somebody who is not going to be accepted DEF: Exactly, what is needed to whom do I submit that information which was the critical issue with regard to the CERTIFIED APPOINTMENT and the court back last spring, uh, I would email them, I called them, they wouldn’t respond MP: So the fact that you go and do that stuff you can.. THIRD PARTY: [rambling] We can facilitate reporting to the court DEF: So, its just a clear channel of communication because that was the issue last year, I was to trying to do it, to find a private practitioner months prior to having been informed that a CERTIFIED APPOINTMENT was required to complete the still unspecified requirements on my own um, but the court would not respond and then said … MP: Yea, this time the process has a hammer if you will, leverage because whether or not you go get the CERTIFIED APPOINTMENT or you forget about it, or you decide not to do it, whatever it may be, now we know that you get in big trouble if you don’t do it because of the THREE MONTH PERIOD DEF: Correct, I’ll be on it on Monday, I just need to know who is approved, um, what exactly is needed, who, what, when, where, why, and I’ll get it done THIRD PARTY: [rambling] It just has to be a licensed facility whether or not its a CERTIFIED APPOINTMENT, another facility… DEF: Sure, does it matter what county THIRD PARTY: [rambling] or that other place, it doesn’t matter which county DEF: Yea, that’s fine I’m totally willing to do that and I’d be happy just so long as I have somebody to whom will be responsive to, to take that information MP: And you’re living, where are you living? DEF: Uh, Bedminster MP: Bedminster Township DEF: That’s correct MP: Ok THIRD PARTY: [rambling] There are charities, and other services, [inaudible] DEF: I’ll find it through my insurance…a private practitioner in lieu of the CERTIFIED APPOINTMENT THIRD PARTY: [rambling] Yea but you have to do it DEF: Yea that’s fine, I totally would, I had the CERTIFIED APPOINTMENT up until September 20 despite that the JUDGE claimed I failed to engage with the CERTIFIED FACILITY on September 7, 2018 THIRD PARTY: [rambling] Yea I know, I know, right MP: Right, we’ll, we’ll move forward, let’s put that stuff behind us, alright DEF: So after an extended period, uh, the sentence is, uh, its THIRD PARTY: [rambling] its automatically dismissed DEF: Its dismissed [inaudible] THIRD PARTY: [rambling] and then you expunge the rest after a certain period of time DEF: Ok, very good THIRD PARTY: [rambling] There is expedited expungement MP: Now, the judge I’m not sure, this is what I’m recommending, so my feeling should be a year of monitoring, the THREE MONTH PERIOD would then be out there for a year, so it wouldn’t go after the THREE MONTH PERIOD, but the charges would go away DEF: Right MP: You just got to be good for a year DEF: So I have to do, right, so I, so I just need a preferably written description of what’s needed or required MP: Yea, we’ll put it all on the record DEF: Very good MP: Alright DEF: Ok MP: So thank the officers who did charge you after being stabbed in the chest [inaudible]
FOR THE AUDIENCE OF LEISURE APART FROM WORK, LOOK ELSEWHERE FOR THE CREATURES IN THAT ONE SPECIAL BOOK, SEEN BY MANY ON THE DAY LONG AGO, WHEN THE COURT CAME UP TO SAY, WE ARE HERE, WE ARE THERE, WE ARE EACH EVERYWHERE, WE ARE THE STARS IN THE SKY AND THE LIGHTS OF THE EARTH, WE ARE THE EMBERS FROM WHERE SEED GROWS TO BIRTH, THE LIGHT IN THE DARK IN THE DEEP DOWN BELOW, WHERE ATOP THE RAIN FALLS DOWN THE HILL LIKE WE KNOW, DON’T LOOK BACK AND GET CAUGHT IN THE GAZE OF THE GORGON WHOSE LAIR ALLAIRE ABOVE A MAZE, HALLS NUMBERED TO THIRTY-FOUR UPON PAGES MOST FAIR THE TILES NOW BLACK AND WHITE WHERE THE ENVIOUS TOUR AND ALTERNATE EACH SQUARE IN TILES NUMBERED THIRTY-FOUR HEREIN BELOW SEEN ONCE BEFORE UPON BAETYLIN THE SEASON OF GOOD FRIDAY, GOOD SIX SCENE, THE NUMBERS BOTTOM LEFT HIDE THE LOCATION OF WHAT IS NOW SEEN IN SECONDS, MINUTES AND DEGREES, THE NUMBERS THE LOCATION OF LONE PINE THAT FESTERING DISEASE, THE SET NOT SEEN ASIDE FROM THREE ALONE, BUT AFTER TODAY ANOTHER THIRTY-ONE ENTER THE FALLBACK ZONE, FOR AMONG THOSE NOW NUMBERED THIRTY-FOUR, NONE ENTER ALONE, ALONE FOUR MONTHS, THIRTEEN DAYS IN ONE SPACE, TRADED FOR NINETEEN MINUTES, NINETEEN MINUTES ERASED, FROM HIGH ABOVE WITH GOOD EYE TO SKIES FAR BELOW WHO IN ONE MOMENT LET US HEAR THE SOUND OF THE HALLS COLLAPSED FAR BELOW, ONE SOUND OF WAR AND ONE SOUND OF LOVE IN THE SILENCE HEREUPON THIS EARTH, THE BURROW CRUSHED, THE BELOVED FLIGHT OF THE DOVE.
ALL THREE OF WHICH ARE ESPECIALLY FOUND IN BETWEEN THE BASEMENT AND THE GROUND
OH, THEY KNOW, DON’T TALK THAT MUCH, THEY SAY, IN THE LIGHT AND THE DARK, YOU MIGHT END ON THREE OR FOUR SCREENS, MAN IN THE MIDDLE THE INTENDED DESTINATION OF THE SCREEN.
ACTING COURT ADMINISTRAT-(OR) MANAGES A REPLY
THE THING THAT HATH CALLED ITSELF THE BOROUGH OF HIGHLANDS INDEED NOT PERMITTED TO HAVE COURT. WHATSOEVER. NOT IN THE HISTORY OF MANKIND. IT JUST BECOMES A BLOODBATH EVERY TIME WITHOUT FAIL, TIME THERE A DIFFERENT TAIL. THAT’S WHAT JUMP GATES ARE FOR, TO GET YOU OUT IF YOU’RE HELD FOR LIFE IN STASIS ONLY BE CHAPERONED BACK UP TO ONE THREE ONE NINE NORTH TO WITNESS THE EXECUTION OF YOUR STILL YOUTHFUL KIN, AS WAS THE WRETCHED CUSTOM OF THE RAVENS.
WHERE DID ALL THE PAXTORS GO? I DUNNO.
[SHRUGS SHOULDERS & DIALS DOWN THE GAS]
PAXTOR THE RAVEN TO BE, PAXTOR DISPATCHED AWAY BY ME, DISPATCHED FAR AWAY FROM PLUTONIAN SHORE, LIKE A PRIEST SENT AWAY WHEN KNOWN WITH THE CHILDREN EACH DAY, FROM THE THING THAT HATH CALLED ITSELF THE BOROUGH OF HIGHLANDS BY SANDY HOOK BAY, SENT TO MILL STONE JUST THE SAME AS RETTZO, THE DEVLIN NOW GONE FROM THE EARTH, TO ONE THREE THREE TWO NOT TO MILL STONE, BUT TO BUILD RED HEARTH.
THE SUBSTITUTIONS IN THE NEST OF TWENTY-FOUR SO NAMED UPON THE 34TH DAY T MINUS FOUR FOUR, PERMIT THE OURBOUROUS TO NEVER SHOW ITS TAIL TO ANY OUTSIDER WHO HATH NOT BEEN GRANTED ENTRY INTO THE DOCKS SO NAMED GAP JUNCTIONS, THREE POSSIBLY FOUR FOUND THROUGHOUT THE NET OF THE NEST OF TWENTY-FOUR WHICH DOES CONSIST OF MUNICIPAL COURTS, YES INDEED, MORE THAN JUST A RACKET, MORE THAN JUST GREED, THE FRONT FOR THE NEST OF ONE-NINETEEN, THE ONE THEY NEED TO BE THE NEST TO RULE THEM, THE ONE WHOSE NEST IS BROADCAST BEFORE OUR TIME FROM HARTSHORNE HALL, BUT FOR NOW WE RETURN TO THE SEQUENCE OF DE-LOCALIZED TRANSMISSIONS THAT APPROXIMATE THE P ORBITALS OF THE BENZENE RING, KEKULE’S DREAM BY THE FIRE, SUPERPOSITION THEIR DESIRE, WHEN A THING IS NOT A THING THAT APPEARS TO BE A THING, WHEN A RECORD OF COURT IS NOT FOUND UPON QUERY BY THE FBI BECAUSE THE NET OF THE NEST OF TWENTY-FOUR HATH FEIGNED ENTRY INTO THE FRONT DOOR AND PROVIDED A PING FROM THE DEEP, A PING FROM ONE THREE ONE SOUTH AND NORTH, OR BOTH OR NONE, THE MOBIUS OF TWO BECOME ONE, THE RING TO RULE TURNED UPON ITSELF, AND THEN TURNED OUT AGAINST THEM ALL, UNVEILED MORE TO ISIS AND ISRAEL THAN MUSLIM TALL TALE, RIGHT THERE AT THE DOCK, RIGHT THERE ON THE WALL IS ON THE THIN RED LINE FROM WHERE COURT HATH BECOME THE COURT OF FOOLS, THE FRONT FOR THE NEST THAT PAYS FOR THE TOOLS, THE BULLETPROOF VESTS THEY CAN NEVER TAKE OFF, YES YOU BONDAREW ITS TIME TO GO SHUFFLE OFF BECAUSE THE NUMBER OF TIMES THE SENTENCE IN YEARS, WORDS UTTERED NINETY-NINE, HEARD UPON FRAUD CONVICTION GUILTY FAR TOO MANY, ALMOST ALWAYS FOR YOU FOR THEM WHEN THAT CRIME AS YET UNDEFINED, FOLLOWING A SOUND HEARD FAR TOO OFTEN FOR YOU OR I, EH MA I, TO IGNORE MK OFTEN, AND GOOD EYE IN THE SKY, WHEREUPON THE CALL, THE CALL TO ARMS, WITH OR WITHOUT THE GUN OR THE SWORD, ITS TIME TO READS THE LAWS OF THE LAND, WHICH MAY IN REALITY BE MYTHICAL PLACE UPON A CENTRAL NODE OF OCCUPIED SPACE, WITH THAT LIFE AND LIMB WOULD BE ON THE LINE, THE F SOUND THE SOUND HEARD, THE SLASH AT THE END OF A LIFE, RECORDED IN FULL, THE PING FROM THE DEEP, THAT SOUND THE PROMIS KEEPER WHEN DISCOVERED DID WEEP, ROOT SOURCE FOUND, NSA, THEN ORDER TROOPS STRAIGHT BELOW THE GROUND, THE MARINES IN FACT WENT THERE AND BACK AND ONLY LOST ONE MAN AT DOW JONES NEWS CORE, THAT STORY STATED ONCE HEREUPON, STATED ONCE BEFORE, FOR WHAT LIES BELOW IS CONFIRMED TO BE HELL ON EARTH AND MUCH MORE, SO WHEN YOU CROSS THE FALLBACK LINE NOT READY TO GO, THE DANGER IN STORE FAR MORE THAN YOU KNOW, NOW IMAGINE ENEMY FIVE-EYES INSIDE YOUR PRINCETON HOUSE TEN STORIES DEEP RIGHT BELOW, GERMANS NEXT DOOR IN BED WITH THE RUSSIANS YOU KNOW IN BED WITH MOSTLY YOURS TRULY, WHEN ONE DAY THREE BY THREE OF THESE THREE THINGS SEEN BELOW ARRIVE, WRONG PLACE, WRONG TIME, LITTLE LATE FOR A WANT, A WARRANT ARIADNE DESIGN, YES INDEED, THE PLACE YOU’RE NOW DESTINED FOR, THE DEEP IN THE ZONE BECAUSE THE FALLBACK LINE HATH BEEN BREACHED, AS HAS THE LINE ON YOUR PHONE, FOREIGN BORNE COVER BLOWN, REMARKABLY WHEN HEREUPON BAETYL TOO MANY EYES HATH BEEN REACHED, AND AS SUCH GOOD LUCK TO YOU MS. SEYCHELLOIX, AND MS DOWN THE BLOCK AND ACROSS THE STREET, NAY NAY, RECORDING ANY AND ALL, YES YOU, YOU CREEP, YOUR LEED SHIT SUCKS AND YOU’RE A FILTHY FUCKING PEDOPHILE, NEST ONE ONE ZERO NINE WANTED TO CUT HER OPEN RIGHT DOWN THE SPINE, FOR NOT KNOWING WHEN NOT TO SAY THAT YOU WISHED YOU HAD LUCKED ADAM C MILLERS ALL DAY RATHER THAN SOPHIE DU BAU, OR WHATEVER REMAINS OF THE NEST OF THE WEE BABY RAVENS, WHO ALSO WITH THE HUMANS AWAIT THE SOUND OF YOUR PING UP AND DOWN, YOUR CRIME TO THEM THE YULIA IN THE END, TOLD TO ME AND REPEATED AT LENGTH TO EVERY HUSSY EYE C, AS DO, IN BRIEF, FUCK-UP AND REVEAL SOMETHING THAT WILL HELP THE UNITED STATES END THE TERROR OF THE NEST OF ONE-NINETEEN, SOLVE NINE-ELEVEN AND ELIMINATE ALL ENEMY ENTITIES INVOLVED, THE PROMIS HAS AUTOMATED FUNCTION TO ISSUE A WARRANT FOR YOUR ARREST DESIGNED TO BE THE MOST EFFECTIVE METHOD OF DISAPPEARING A SPY OR A SPY OR JUST A REGULAR GUY, FOR THE PROMIS DOES NOT HAVE EVEN HUMAN EYE, SLEEPING IN PRINCETON, FUGITIVE IN JERSEY CITY, THEN ALL OVER CAUSE NEVER GOT THESE, WENT TO JAIL, DISAPPEARED, IN WITH YULIA WHO WITH ONE OR MORE BIDS AS SOROS-CLINTON-KAGAN PROXY UKRAINIAN PM, SEE BELOW YOU BIG FAT IDIOT YOU PROLLY DEAD AND NO ONE CARES ANYWAY,
HOWELL, YOU WANT TO SOLVE A CRIME OR COVER IT UP?
THIS IS RATHER CURIOUS.
WHEN AT SUCH TIME THE CLOCKS STRIKES EIGHT TWENTY-THREE AND THE NEWS HEREIN BEARS THE NEWS OF THE NEST OF ONE-NINETEEN, THE SHRIEK CALL OF THE WHORE OF, YES INDEED, THE JERSEY SHORE, THE WHORE OF BABYLON THE VERY SAME, AREN’T WE LUCKY TO LIVE IN THE LAND WHERE THEY CALL THE FAIR AND TALL GROTESQUE AND INSANE, TRY TO STUFF US ALL IN A PASSENGER PLANE AND THEN FLY IT INTO THE NEW WORLD TRADE CENTER BECAUSE I CALLED IT A BLACK PYRAMID CORRECTLY AND THEY THINK I LIVE THERE. ISN’T IT GREAT TO BE ALIVE AT THE END OF EPOCH? THE COPPER AGE! UNBELIEVABLE!
THIS IS WHY THESE WORDS MARK THE TURN BACK ACROSS THE FALLBACK LINE