THE 34TH DAY T MINUS THREE TWENTY-ONE: THIRD PARTY AS AND THE BLACKROCK BOND CONNECTION

BLACKROCK APOCALYPTO
THE ELUSIVE THIRD PARTY AS

WHO IN ALL LIKELIHOOD IS AN INDIAN FEMALE SO NAMED “SREENIVASAN, ANAGHA” WHO AT ONE TIME DID INDEED WORK FOR THAT ENTITY SO NAMED BLACKROCK LOCATED IN THE TOWNSHIP OF WEST WINDSOR, NEW JERSEY WITH ONE UNIVERSITY PLACE PRINCETON MAILING ADDRESS.

HOWEVER, NOT A SINGLE COURT DOCUMENT FROM THE CASE OF CACH LLC OF DENVER, COLORADO VS YOURS TRULY IDENTIFIES ANY INDIVIDUAL, MALE OR FEMALE, WITH INITIALS AS. THE PUBLICLY AVAILABLE INFORMATION EXHIBITED IN TWO IMAGES ABOVE FROM THE NJ COURTS PUBLIC ACCESS DATABASE DOES NOT YIELD ANY FURTHER INFORMATION ON THE IDENTITY OF THAT “3RD PTY” AND FURTHERMORE NO OTHER REFERENCE TO “AS” OR WHAT ROLE A “3RD PTY” HAD IN THIS CASE IS CURRENTLY IN THE POSSESSION OF THE PRO SE DEFENDANT IN THAT LAWSUIT CONCLUDED TWO-THOUSAND FIFTEEN WITH A STIPULATION IN LIEU OF JUDGMENT.

THIS IS INDEED CERTAINLY NOT THE FIRST REFERENCE TO THE THIRD PARTY ON BAETYL, HOWEVER UPDATES FURTHER ATTEMPTS TO OBTAIN INFORMATION ON THE ELUSIVE THIRD PARTY AS TO FOLLOW BELOW.

IN THE MEANTIME PLEASE DO CHECK BACK WITH SINALOA SEX CRIMES FOR INTRO READING ON THAT ONE SO NAMED AS.


THE LOST FAX OF NINE TWENTY-EIGHT

img_8142
[CLICK TO EXPAND]

I SUPPOSE IT CAN BE SENT BY EMAIL
img_8143
[CLICK TO EXPAND]

img_8144
[CLICK TO EXPAND]

BUTTON IN THE OVEN

CURIOUS WHAT HAPPENED WHEN THIS SAME REQUEST WAS SUBMIT TO THE CLERK OF SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY KNOWING THAT OFFICE IN THE RJ HUGHES “JUSTICE” COMPLEX DOES NOT HANDLE SPECIAL CIVIL PART RECORDS.


img_8149
[CLICK TO EXPAND]

“MOST” SPECIAL CIVIL PART RECORDS, SPECIFICALLY “DC” DOCKETS WHICH IS INDEED WHAT WE ARE CONCERNED WITH HEREIN.

img_8147-1
[CLICK TO EXPAND]

WHICH DID INDEED WARRANT THE MOST SUBSTANTIVE RESPONSE FROM THE SCCO OF THE MANY EMAILS AND MAILINGS THAT INDEED HAVE BEEN TRANSMITTED TO THAT OFFICE.

img_8148
[CLICK TO EXPAND]

SO WHY EXACTLY DID THAT FAX DISAPPEAR?

img_8152
[CLICK TO EXPAND]

AS PER THE SCCO, ONE IS NOT ABLE TO OBTAIN EXEMPLIFIED RECORDS VIA EMAIL. SO DOES THAT EXCLUDE TODAY’S REQUEST FOR EXEMPLIFIED (ADMISSIBLE) RECORDS THAT HAD TO BE TRANSMIT VIA EMAIL BECAUSE THE FAX WENT MISSING?


THE SAGA CONTINUES.

NOT SPECIFIED IN THE SCCO COURT RECORDS EXEMPTION IS THE “FV” DOCKET UNDER WHICH SINALOA SEX CRIMES DOES FALL AND AS SUCH THIS MESSAGE RECEIVED FROM SCCO STAFF DOES REMAIN RATHER VEXING AND PERPLEXING,

img_8154
[CLICK TO EXPAND]

THAT REQUEST MADE SPECIFICALLY PURSUANT TO EXCALIBUR.EXE.


IN RECENT DEVELOPMENTS, THAT SCCO EMAIL ADDRESS DOES NO LONGER APPEAR TO BE FUNCTIONAL.


ELUSIVE THIRD PARTY REMAINS ELUSIVE AS TO DOES THE JUDGE

WHAT MAKES THE “3RD PTY” “AS” DATUM EVEN MORE COMPELLING IS THE CLAIMED TERM OF EMPLOYMENT “AS” HAD WITH MERRILL LYNCH AT APPROXIMATELY THE TIME BANK OF AMERICA PURCHASED THAT FIRM.


UNIQUE CASE

SO FURTHER INQUIRY HATH BEEN CONDUCTED VIA USPS CERTIFIED MAILS TRANSMIT UPON DATE NINTH DECEMBER TWO-THOUSAND SEVENTEEN AS SEEN BELOW IN ONE,

NINTH DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND SEVENTEEN


SO WHAT HAPPENED TO THAT LETTER?
ELEVEN DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND SEVENTEEN REFUSED
ALTHOUGH NEVER QUITE DID GET THE LETTER BACK. [CLICK TO EXPAND]

THE PLOT THICKENS 
PRE SHIPMENT NEVER RETURNED
NO GREEN CARD. REFUSED ON WHAT GROUNDS? [CLICK TO EXPAND]

JULY 28, 1972

AND FROM THE FILE OF THINGS THAT WRAP THIS PLOT IN NEAT LITTLE BOW,

BIRTHDAY: TWENTY-EIGHTH JULY NINETEEN SEVENTY-TWO
“BLACKROCK LIFEPATH RETIREMENT”
STATEMENT DATE: APRIL TWO-THOUSAND TEN
ENDING UNIT VALUE/PRICE: ELEVEN DOLLARS NINETY SEVEN CENTS



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s