THE 34TH DAY T MINUS THREE ZERO FIVE: ONOFRI HAS SOME EXPLAINING TO DO

WHAT EXACTLY IS THIS?

THE CASE OF ORIGIN WAS NOT RELATED TO ANY DRUG RELATED ISSUE.

DID THE MERCER COUNTY PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE ATTEMPT TO FABRICATE A DRUG CHARGE?

ONOFRI?

OF NOTE, THE CASE IN QUESTION CLAIMED TO HAVE BEEN REMANDED DOWN TO MUNICIPAL COURT FOR PROSECUTION AS SEPARATE PETTY DISORDERLY PERSONS OFFENSE VERUS FOURTH DEGREE 2C:12-10(B) MISDEMEANOR. NO OTHER INFORMATION REGARDING DRUG ALLEGATION ASIDE FROM SINGLE DOCUMENT EXHIBITED ABOVE. ONE ATTORNEY ASSOCIATED WITH CASE DID FAIL TO COMMENT. OPRA INBOUND.

END OF INQUIRY

EXCEPT NOT REALLY

SO WHERE DID IT GO? REMAINS UNKNOWN AS OF SEVEN FEBRUARY.


UPDATES SEVEN FEBRUARY FOURTEEN TWENTY-TWO EST.

MONMOUTH COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT RECORDS INDICATE THAT THIS MATTER IS COMPLETELY DISPOSED, FURTHERMORE A CLAIM WAS MADE THAT THE MUNICIPAL DISORDERLY PERSONS VIOLATION TO BE REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROSECUTION HAS ALSO BEEN DISMISSED UPON THE MOTION OF A MUNICIPAL PROSECUTOR. HOWEVER, THE MUNICIPALITY TO WHICH THAT DISORDERLY PERSONS VIOLATION WAS REMANDED WAS NOT IDENTIFIED IN A DATABASE USED BY ONE OR MORE UNIDENTIFIED VICINAGE STAFF.

SO WHERE DID IT GO?
YES INDEED
PICKETTERS’ CHARGE

STAY TUNED


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s