THE 34TH DAY T MINUS ZERO ONE TWO ONE: BREAK DOWN OF GRIBBEN’S HOWELL COURT TRANSCRIPT TRANSMIT VIA G MAILS IN UNSECURED PDF, PART ONE OF TWO

TRACEY GRIBEEN DECEMBER EIGTHTEEN COVER PAGE

COVER PAGE ENLARGE

TRACEY GRIBEEN DECEMBER EIGTHTEEN PAGE TWO

COLLOQUY PAGE TWO ENLARGE

NOTES

WHICH ARE? (2-6)

NO, YOU HAVEN’T, YOU STORMED OUT OF THE ROOM RED-FACED AND THEN YOU NEGOTIATED VIA THIRD-PARTY OFF THE RECORD. (2-10)

WHY NOT GUILTY? NO EVIDENCE OR TESTIMONY AT ANY POINT PROVIDED. (2-12)

WHICH IS? (2-14)


TRACEY GRIBEEN DECEMBER EIGTHTEEN PAGE THREE

COLLOQUY PAGE THREE ENLARGE

NOTES

THERE ARE NO TICKETS ASSOCIATED WITH THESE MATTERS, THERE ARE ONLY NJ/CDR1 AND/OR NJ/CDR2 CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS. (3-6)

DOWNGRADED, REVISED* AND WITHHELD. (3-10)

THIS IS TOWNSHIP, NOT A BOROUGH, WHAT IN THE HOLY HAVE A NICE DAY IS A BOROUGH ORDINANCE? (3-10)

220-C AS PER MONMOUTH VICINAGE. (3-11)

THE TELL. (3-14)

NO SUCH THING. (3-15) TO BE DISCUSSED IN MUCH GREATER DETAIL.

THE POINT OF THE CRIMINAL COERCION. (3-20)

READ: LAWSUIT PREVENTION VIS-A-VIS JULY 11, 2017, NOVEMBER 28, 2017, ET CETERA. (3-19)


TRACEY GRIBEEN DECEMBER EIGTHTEEN PAGE FOUR

COLLOQUY PAGE FOUR ENLARGE

NOTES

WHY MEDICAL AND NOT PSYCHIATRIC? (4-1)

AND WHAT “MEDICAL” TREATMENT COULD THAT PLAUSIBLY BE AND FOR WHAT REASON? (4-6, 4-7)

AS EVALUATED BY WHOM? NOT A PHYSICIAN MOST CERTAINLY. (4-9 THROUGH 4-11)

MR. KEAN SUBSEQUENTLY IGNORES ALL SUBSEQUENT MAILINGS AND REFUSES TO BE PRESENT AT NEXT SCHEDULED MUNICIPAL HEARING IN MARCH 2019. (4-12 THROUGH 4-17)

NON-SEQUITUR. (4-18 THROUGH 4-25)

PLAUSIBLE DUPLICATES DENIED. (4-24)


TRACEY GRIBEEN DECEMBER EIGTHTEEN PAGE FIVE

COLLOQUY PAGE FIVE ENLARGE

NOTES

TO EFFECT AS MUCH DISRUPTION TO VICTIM’S LIFE AS POSSIBLE. (5-13)

THIS TRANSCRIPT IS SHIT AND IS IN-FACT WRONG. (5-15, 5-16)

DEAR GRIBBEN, DO NOT CORRECT WHAT IS STATED ON THE RECORD. (5-21) “LSCW” WAS MOST CERTAINLY AND MOST DELIBERATELY STATED ON THE RECORD, WHICH WAS THEN MOST EDITORIALLY CORRECTED TO “LCSW” BY GRIBBEN TRANSCRIPTIONIST IN LIKELY UNLAWFUL ENTRY INTO A OR THE OFFICIAL RECORD, MOST UNBELIEVABLY AT THAT, IN ACT OF RE-ANALYSIS OF WHAT THE SPEAKER WAS PRESUMED TO HAVE MEANT IN A SPECIFIC UTTERANCE, AS OBSERVED IN LINE TWENTY-ONE ABOVE, WHEN IN IN-FACT THE CLAIMED ABBREVIATION WAS NEVER SPOKEN ALOUD. IS THIS TRANSCRIPT EVEN ADMISSIBLE? IT IS CERTAINLY NOT EXEMPLIFIED.

FOR A MEDICAL ASPECT OF A PLEA? NO, THIS IS SIMPLY INANE VERBIAGE AND IN ALL LIKELIHOOD WAS USED TO EFFECT MAXIMUM CONFUSION. (5-24)


TRACEY GRIBEEN DECEMBER EIGTHTEEN PAGE SIX

COLLOQUY PAGE SIX ENLARGE

NOTES

IN ALL LIKELIHOOD, THE RESULT OF THIS LINE OF QUESTIONING WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ELUCIDATED IF MR. KEAN WERE LEFT TO HIS OWN DEVICES. (6-1)

SO WHY DID MR. KEAN FAIL TO STATE THAT FACT WITH CLARITY FROM THE VERY START? THERE IS ONLY ONE PROFESSION THAT IS MEDICALLY LICENSED, AND THOSE WOULD BE PHYSICIANS, M.D.’S AND D.O.’S, WAS MR. KEAN MAKING THIS UP ON THE FLY? CERTAINLY APPEARS PLAUSIBLE. (6-4 THROUGH 6-9)

BIZARRE EPISTEMOLOGICAL STATEMENT WHEREIN THE COURT IS THE JUDGE AND THE JUDGE IS THE COURT IN CONTRAST TO THE LEGAL SETTLEMENT OF THE CORPORATION TO BE VIEWED BEFORE THE LAW AS AN INDIVIDUAL PERSON. WHO IS THE COURT EXACTLY? DO NOTE MR. KEAN OSTENSIBLY WORKS FOR THE VERY SAME COURT. OR DOES HE? PLAUSIBLE DUPLICATES YET AGAIN. (6-10, 6-14, 6-20, 6-25)

“LET US PROCEED TO GET THE HAVE A NICE DAY OUT OF HERE AS SOON AS POSSIBLE FOLLOWING HOWELL POLICE THREATS, LOPEZ VIA REGINA, TO ARREST THE VICTIM FOR MAKING NEVER-SPECIFIED AND NEVER-MADE THREATS AGAINST NEVER-SPECIFIED “COURT STAFF” IMMEDIATELY UPON ENTRY INTO THE BUILDING THAT WERE SUBSEQUENTLY NEVER ACTED UPON AND OF NOTE WHERE OUR VICTIM DID APPEAR TO COME AND GO FROM THE VERY SAME COMPLEX TWO DAYS PRIOR WITHOUT ANY ISSUE WHATSOEVER. (6-12)

COERCED. (6-13)

THE NAME “MS. BRENNAN” WAS NEVER UTTERED DURING THE PROCEEDING IN WHAT IS THE MOST LIKELY SPOT WHERE PERJURY AND/OR ONE OR MORE OTHER VIOLATIONS OF CHAPTER TWENTY-EIGHT OF THE CRIMINAL CODE OF NEW JERSEY MAY BEGIN PROSECUTION. DO NOTE, THE STORY OF “MS. BRENNAN” WAS DOCUMENTED LIVE, IN-FACT, HEREUPON BAETYL. THIS IS THE REASON WHY THE MERCER COUNTY PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE IS SO DESPERATE TO REMOVE THE BAETYL ARCHIVE FROM THE INTERNET, INTER ALIA, ALTHOUGH THAT CANNOT AND WILL NOT EVER HAPPEN. STRAIGHT CACHE. (6-15)

HOWELL COURT STAFF WHO DID FAIL TO INFORM OF ANY STANDBY COUNSEL APPOINTMENT UNTIL THE SECOND REQUEST BY YOURS TRULY IN REGULAR SWEEP TO DETECT ANY FURTHER PLOTS AGAINST DEFENSE, CRIMINAL COERCION IN THE EXTREME, AND FURTHERMORE WHEREBY FIRST KNOWN IN NOVEMBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN THAT “MS. BRENNAN” APPOINTMENT IN RETALIATION AND IN-SECRET ON TWENTY-SIXTH OCTOBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN, THE VERY SAME DAY THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY DULY FIRST INFORMED BOTH YOURS TRULY AND THE TOWNSHIP OF HOWELL THAT THE FIRST THREE GOVERNMENT RECORD COUNCIL DENIAL OF ACCESS COMPLAINTS HAD BEEN FILED AGAINST THAT TOWNSHIP, WITH SEVERAL MORE TO FOLLOW, AND INDEED ALL DIRECTLY RELATED TO ATTEMPTS BY YOURS TRULY TO UTILIZE THE OPEN PUBLIC RECORDS ACT (OPRA) TO OVERCOME THE S.O.P. OF CRIMINAL COERCION EXHIBITED BY THE HOWELL COURT AND THE TOWNSHIP OF HOWELL WHEREBY ANY AND ALL RECORDS IN THE FAVOR OF DEFENSE WERE AND ARE WITHHELD BY BOTH SUCH THAT MAXIMUM DAMAGES MAY BE EFFECTED UPON ANY AND ALL DEFENDANTS IN THE TREACHEROUS POSITION OF SUMMONED BEFORE, INCLUDING AND ESPECIALLY YOURS TRULY IN LIGHT OF WHAT IS DISCUSSED HEREUPON BAETYL. (6-16, 6-17)

M.K. CAOLA NAME WITHHELD. (6-20 THROUGH 6-23)

THIS WAS ALREADY ESTABLISHED IN MAY OF TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN AND DISCUSSED AT EXTREME LENGTH HEREUPON BAETYL. (6-24, 6-25)


TO BE CONTINUED IN PART TWO

NOVA CAESAREA.JPG