THE 34TH DAY T MINUS ELEVEN OH SIX: THE HOPEWELL PAPERS

FOLLOWING FROM

SIXTH JUNE TWO-THOUSAND NINETEEN, THE SEVERELY ABRIDGED PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

NINTH APRIL TWO-THOUSAND NINETEEN, GONE DARK, THE LOST CASE AND THE MISSING AFFIDAVIT HELD IN LIMBO BY TECHNICAL DIFFICULTY THAT WITH PLAUSIBLE ORIGIN ONE MACHINE AND/OR ONE FEDERAL AGENCY.

TENTH APRIL TWO-THOUSAND NINETEEN, THE HOPEWELL TOWNSHIP MUNICIPALITY APPEARS OUT OF NOWHERE AS A GUEST HOST OF THE MUNICIPAL PROSECUTION FEATURING ONE SPURIOUS CHARGE OF PHANTASMAGORICAL CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF TWO SEE DOT DOT THIRTY-THREE DASH FOUR C, THE ACTIONS OF SOMEONE MAY MAY NOT BE THE DUPLICATE SBI VERSION OF ADAM C, ONLY ONE OF WHOM EXISTS IN OUR REALITY.

TEN COUNT INDICTMENT OF HOPEWELL

ONE, REGARDING THE CASE AT THE FORE IN HOPEWELL TOWNSHIP AND/OR BOROUGH, PLEASE REFER TO LETTER DATED TWELFTH APRIL TWO-THOUSAND NINETEEN AT LINK TO OBSERVE THAT CLAIM IN TEXT, OF THE HIGHEST SIGNIFICANCE AS OTHERWISE INAPPROPRIATE ENTITIES PROFLIGATE IN THIS MATTER FOR NO REASON THAT IS PLAUSIBLY LAWFUL.

TWO, THE ACQUITTED, YOURS TRULY, INDEED ACM, HAS NEVER ONCE INTERACTED WITH LAW ENFORCEMENT IN EITHER THE BOROUGH OR TOWNSHIP OF HOPEWELL.

THREE, AS SUCH, YOURS TRULY HAS NEVER BEEN QUESTIONED, DETAINED, ARRESTED, CHASED OR INDEED CHARGED BY A HOPEWELL T OR B COP.

FOUR, THE ACQUITTED HAS NEVER RESIDED IN THE BOROUGH OR TOWNSHIP OF HOPEWELL, AND NEVER DID LEASE P.O. BOX OR OTHER PARCELS DELIVERY RECEPTACLE IN SAME.

FIVE, IN ELEVENTH APRIL TWO-THOUSAND NINETEEN LETTER, SEE LINK BELOW, THE COURT IN QUESTION HATH DECREED THAT DISCOVER REQUESTS BE SUBMIT TO THE ATTENTION OF DISCOVERY DEPARTMENT AT LAWRENCE TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT IN BOLD MOVE TO EFFECT A TRAP WHEN WE ASK WHY THE Y IS NOT THERE, BUT THERE IT IS BELOW, CAN’T EVEN YOU SPELL, YOU BIG FAT ILLITERATE, THE PLAUSIBLE DUPLICATE THE TELL, THERE IS NO WHY FOR YOU IN THIS MATTER, WHY INDEED ARE WE IN THIS TOWN OR BOROUGH, WHY EVEN AT ALL WHEN NO HOPEWELL COP FROM A OR B WOULD EVER APPEAR IN COURT TO BE CROSS-EXAMNINED, FURTHERMORE THE SINGLE COMPLAINANT DET. J. ALMONTE IS IDENTIFIED AS “DET” WHO OUT OF THE COUNTY COURTHOUSE OR MCPO OR NOTHING AT ALL, GANG OF COUNTY COURTHOUSES NONE OF THREE KNOWN SPECIFIED, WITH PLAUSIBLE FAKE NAME AND PLAUSIBLE INMATE ALREADY INCARCERATED FOR THE EGREGIOUS PERJURY STILL ACTIVE IN THIS HOPEWELL MATTER ALLEGEDLY THE RESULT OF OUR DET. J. ALMONTE ALONE, IN LIEU OF THE PRECEDING YEARS OF RECORDED HISTORY MAINTAINED IN THE BAETYL ARCHIVE, AN INTENDED TARGET AS HATH BEEN PRIOR STATED.

EXHIBIT FIVE

REGARDING THE AFORESAID ACTS OF EGREGIOUS PERJURY, DO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING ITEM, PAGE FOUR OF SEVEN EXCERPTED FROM THE TWENTY-FIRST APRIL TWO-THOUSAND NINETEEN SCCO CORRESPONDENCE IN THEN AND STILL UNKNOWN ARRANGEMENT FOR MENSE PROCESS OF PRODUCING RECORDS IN THE HANDS OF A PURPORTED PROXY CUSTODIAN OF RECORDS WHEREBY THE HOPEWELL MUNICIPALITY RELIEVED OF LAWFUL DUTIES, THE WORST OF THE SEVEN WHICH EXHIBITED IN ONE BELOW,

FIRST, ENLARGE

SECOND, NOTE THE TIME MARKED ATOP, FOUR OH SIX DOT DOT THIRTY FIVE PM.

THIRD, NOTE THE SIXTH FEBRUARY TWO-THOUSAND NINETEEN DATE OF ACTION AT RIGHT OF ALMONTE E-SIGNATURE CERTIFYING UNDER IMPLICIT OATH AS UNDERSIGNED LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT WITH EGREGIOUS FRAUD CLAIM OF OH SO DILIGENT ATTEMPTS TO SERVE YOURS TRULY, THE ACQUITTED, IN THE FIFTY-THREE* MINUTES AFTER THE THING ABOVE WAS CREATED, THE MARKED FIRST EDITION, WHICH THE MAIL, THE INTERNET, THE COURIERS, AND THE PHONES ALL FAILED TO TRANSMIT THE SEVEN PAGE DOCUMENT EXCERPTED ABOVE IN BRAZEN ATTEMPT TO WITHHOLD THE EXISTENCE OF THE CASE SO NAMED THE UNDEAD CHARGE. THIS IS A CRIME OF THE FIRST DEGREE AND IN ALL LIKELIHOOD BEARS MINIMUM SENTENCE OF TWENTY YEARS IN PRISON BY STATE LAW ALONE. FEDERAL LAW WOULD PROBABLY REQUIRE LIFE ON THE TABLE IN LIGHT OF INTENT TO WITHHOLD IN PARRALEL TO THE ASTRONOMICAL NUMBER OF ACTS IN VIOLATION OF PERJURY STATUTE AMONG MANY OTHERS WILLFULLY COMMITTED IN ONE SINGLE DAY THAT INDEED HISTORIC IN THE ANNALS OF LAW AS WE ARE TOLD FROM TIMES PAST NOT YET ON THE EARTH, INDEED CURIOUS TO SEE WHAT THE FUSS WAS ALL ABOUT.

FOURTH, * THAT WOULD BE TWENTY-THREE MINUTES AND SOME SECONDS IN ALL LIKELIHOOD NINE ON THE DOT IF COUNTY COURTHOUSE WITH SIXTEEN-THIRTY EST CONCLUSION OF WORKDAY. SYMBOLIC DATES, TIMES, NUMBERS, INTER ALIA, WHEN USED TO MOCK A HUMAN PERSON BY LAW ENFORCEMENT INDEED RATHER SERIOUS CRIME. IT BEHOOVES YOU TIP THE CLERK FOR THE LAY-UP BECAUSE THE FINACCHIO SERIES TRANSMIT USING UNSECURED GMAIL [NOT APPROPRIATE] FOR USE IN LEGAL DEFENSE OR LEGAL CLAIMS, ALSO UNAVAILABLE AT [PRESENT MOMENT. F FIVE UNDERWAY].

EXHIBIT FIVE B

EXHIBIT FIVE C

[JUST IN FRESH SCANDAL BREWING AS CLARK OF HOPEWELL JUST IN THE NICK OF TIME FOR THIRTEEN-NINETEEN EST, CLOCKS IN ON GMAILS OF YT, ALSO NOT OPERATIVE ATTACHMENT DESPITE OTHERWISE PERFECTLY FINE INTERNET CONNECTION. THE GOOGLE DOES MODIFY, DULY NOTE.]

JOSEPH CLARK IS A LIAR AND HAS DEMONSTRABLY COMMITED A CRIME BY ALLEGIG THAT NO BRIEF HAS BEEN SUBMIT IN ENUMERATED DESPITE RECORDED IN FULL HISTORY OF SUBMISSION IN-PERSON ON THIRTIETH MAY TWO-THOUSAND NINETEEN WITH EXPLICIT INSTRUCTION BY COURT STAFF TO NOT SEND THE BRIEF TO HOWELL FOR THE VERY REASON THAT HOWELL DOES NOT PICK-UP THEIR MAIL, DOES NOT RESPOND TO CERITFIED LETTERS, DOES NOT RESPOND TO MOTION PAPERS, AND CLARK MOST SPECIFICALLY ON FOURTEENTH DECEMBER TWO-THOUSAND TRANSMKT THE MOST CHICKEN-SHIT OF THREATS AGAINST YOURS TRULY IN BID TO BLOCK THIS VERY CASE FROM BEING FILED, WHEREBY FRAUD CLAIM FROM CLARK, IN WRITING AND TO APPEAR IN THE COMING MINUTES DID STATE, APPROX “THE HOEWELL JUDGE ISSUED AN ORDER SAYING YOU’RE NOT ALLOWED TO COMMINICATE WITH ANYONE IN THE HOWELL TOWNSHIP MUNICIPALITY EXCEPT FOR THE MUNICIPAL PROSECUTOR” AT SUCH TIME SEVEN CALENDAR DAYS INTO TWENTY DAY FILING PERIOD FOR MA CASES, THAT IF TRUE WOULD INTENTIONALLY RESTRICT FREEDOM OF ACTION OF PERSON TO ENGAGE IN CONDUCT VIA THREAT OF SPURIOUS PROSECUTION UPON TRANSMITTAL OF CERTIFIED US MAILS TO NO LESS THAN ONE COURT STAFFER WITH WHOM LAWFUL COMMINICATION FORBIDDEN AND THE BASIC SERVICE OF PROCESS INTENTIONALLY AND UNLAWFULLY WITHHELD IN ORDER TO RESTRICT ABILITY OF PERSON TO LEGAL CLAIMS, ALSO TOWNSHIP ATTORNEY OF HOWELL PROMULGATING FRAUDULENT CLAIM THAT DEFENDANT COMMITTED ACTS NEVER SPECIFIED THAT RESULTED IN A COURT ORDER THAT NEVER EXISTED, OR WHICH DID EXIST BUT WAS WITHHELD FROM THE ACCUSED. NOTE LATTER SCENARIO ACTUAL PRACTICE OF THE HOWELL COURT, CONSULT THE ARCHIVE.

HERE IT IS, AS PROMISED

DO PLEASE NOTE, THE RULES OF COURT EXPLICITLY SET FORTH THE BROAD SWATH OF COURT RECORDS THAT CAN AND NOT BE PROVIDED UPON REQUEST MADE PURSUANT TO THE OPEN PUBLIC RECORDS ACT, BELOW HERE WE GO,

CLARK WITH COURT RECORDS PRIMA FACIE AND IN TOTAL NOT UNDER JURISDICTION OF THE OPEN PUBLIC RECORDS ACT. YOU MAY PROCEED TO HAND YOURSELF IN, WELCOME TO THE END OF YOUR CAREER, YOU ARE AND WILL STYLED ON FOR ALL OF ETERNITY, YES INDEED, BEAT THE FUCK OUT, THE TREE OF LIBERTY MUST BE QUENCHED WITH THE INK OF PATRIOTS FROM TIME TO TIME.

EXHIBITS N ET SEQ, HOWELL INTERFERES IN HOPEWELL ANALYSIS

SUBMIT IN-PERSON TO [REDACT] OF OFFICE ON OR ABOUT FOURTEEN TWENTY-FIVE EST ON THIRTIETH MAY TWO-THOUSAND NINETEEN, MONMOUTH VICINAGE, AS PER INSTRUCTION OF [REDACT] IN THIRTIETH MAY TWO-THOUSAND NINETEEN CALL DO NOT BOTHER TRANSMITTING BRIEF TO HOWELL, DOCUMENTED PRESENCE AT VICINAGE UPON DATE VIA SCREENSHOT AND EXIF SEEN BELOW IN TWO,

TWO COPIES OF EIGHTEEN PAGE BRIEF AND APPENDIX HANDED TO [REDACT], DEPARTING NOTE TO BE ENTERED INTO FILE.

HOWELL MUNI PROVEN TO IGNORE MAILS TRANSMIT IN THIS VERY SAME CASE. ALSO THE BRIEF IS PRETTY SCATHING AND MOST IMPORTANTLY TRUTHFUL IN FULL.

FIFTH, TO NOTE ON THE THIRD-PARTY AS, PLAUSIBLE DUPLICATE TO BE READ AS WHO FOLLOWS AS OR THE INITIALS AS, AS CONTENT OF CERTIFIED COMPLAINT DOES BEAR NO INDICATION OF WHO COULD PLAUSIBLY BE A VICTIM, SUPPLEMENTARY AFFIDAVIT IS NOT COGNIZABLE TO WHAT IS PURPORTED IN THE COMPLAINT, RECYCLED LOGORRHEA THAT FAILS TO DISCUSS ANY INTERNET RELATED MATTERS. GOING FOR THE HAT TRICK, YEP, GONE FOR DECADES.

SIX, WHEREBY HOPEWELL T/B COERCION COVER-UP OF TRUE HISTORY OF LAWRENCE TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT OFFICERS AND DETECTIVES EFFECTED BY PURPOSEFUL OMISSION FROM THE NEW RECORD. NOW KNOWN THAT HOPEWELL T/B WITH INENT TO UNLAWFULLY RESTRICT TESTIMONY OF ANY KIND REGARDING EITHER AFORESAID PUBLIC AGENCY

SEVEN, AS SUCH, NO LAWRENCE TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT OFFICER OR INVESTIGATION DIVISION DETECTIVE IS LIKELY TO BE SUMMONED TO APPEAR IN OPEN COURT TO THE FACE THE WRATH OF CROSS-EXAMINATION BY [REDACTED], WHOSE MARK IS MEASURED IN [REDACTED] YEARS PER MINUTE.

EIGHT, NO HOPEWELL T/B COP CAN OR WILL BE SUMMONED BEFORE A MUNI JUDGE BECAUSE NO HOPEWELL COP WAS GENUINELY INVOLVED IN PRECIPITATING INCIDENT THAT NOW ALMOST TWO YEARS OLD AT SUCH LOCATION OUTSIDE THE JURISDICTION OF EITHER HOPEWELL. HOWEVER, THING IS STILL ONGOING IN A PLACED CALLED HOPEWELL. BUT YOU HAVE TO ASK THE OTHER PLACE FOR RECORDS, WHICH ABOUT TWO YEARS LATER STILL HAS YET TO PRODUCE THE ORIGINAL POLICE REPORT. NOTE ONCE. PROSECUTE EVERY LAWRENCE COP EVER INVOLVED FOR PERJURY, COERCION, FALSIFICATION OF A POLICE REPORT, POSSIBLY OTHERS.

NINE, HOPEWELL COP(S) WILL NOT APPEAR COURT FOR CROSS-EXAMINE UNLESS DASTARDLY PLOT OF LAST MINUTE PLAUSIBLE DUPLICATION OF CASE WITH ALTERNATE HISTORY AND COMPLAINT IN LIEU SUBSTITUTED FOR THE SOLE VERSION MADE PUBLIC HEREUPON, INDEED THE SOVIET METHOD OF DISAPPEARING A HUMAN PERSON.

TEN, THERE IS NO JURY AND THERE IS NO GRAND JURY BECAUSE THIS A PETTY DISORDERLY PERSONS OFFENSE THAT IS BEING CONDUCTED IN JURY FREE SAFE SPACE OF A JERSEY MUNICIPAL COURT. THE WHIM OF THE SCUM OF HOPEWELL IS ALL THAT MATTERS INSIDE OF THAT BUILDING.

[FURTHER EXHIBITS]

PAGE TWO OF SEVEN, SCCO

TWENTY-FIRST APRIL TWO-THOUSAND NINETEEN, PAGE TWO OF SEVEN TRANSMIT BY THE CLERK OF SUPERIOR COURT OFFICE, ENLARGE THE BLANK SHEET THAT INDEED IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL INTENT TO WITHHOLD ALL PRIOR HISTORY IN THE MATTER.

NOTE ONE, CAN YOU GUESS THE DATE IN FEBRUARY SCHEDULED FOR THE FIRST HEARING? GREATER OR LESSER THAN TWO WEEKS TIME FROM DATE OF CERTIFICATION? LESSER BY ONE DAY.

NOTE TWO, WHAT IS THE POSITION OF THE FEDERAL ON THE ERSTWHILE ABSENCE OF A MIDDLE INITIAL IN CAPTION OF SAME CASE? NOT A GOOD SIGN WHEN TWO SETS OF DOCUMENTS [ALLEGEDLY] FOUND IN TWO SEPARATE FOLDERS FOR THIS VERY CASE. NOT GOOD NEWS FOR THE ACCUSED, THE WORST CASE SCENARIO INDEED BOTH PLAUSIBLE AND REAL.

NOTE THREE, THE THIRTEEN DAY HISTORY FROM SIXTH FEB TO NINETEENTH FEB TWO-THOUSAND NINETEEN, FULL MOON ON THE LATTER DATE. NO COURT TO BE HELD THAT NIGHT.

[ONWARD]