THE 34TH DAY T MINUS FOUR TWENTY-FIVE: LITTLE KELLY CHARGED

THINGS ON ABOUT

MERCER COUNTY PROSECUTOR ONOFRI IN BID TO CLEAR THE FIELD OF REPUBLICAN INCUMBENT TO ENSURE DEMOCRAT ONE-PARTY STATE SEIZURE OF ZONE STRONGHOLD OF POOR AND MIDDLE CLASS WHITES, LONG MALIGNED, ONCE PERHAPS TWICE ANTHRAXED, HOST TO THE FORGOTTEN MAILS SAGA OF NINE-ELEVEN, RIP IN PEACE IF APPLICABLE, NOW FACING OFF AGAINST THE CONCERTED EFFORTS OF TRENTON BUREAUCRACY IN STATE SPONSORED CAMPAIGN FULL STEAM AHEAD, SPEARHEAD BY MERCER COUNTY PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE ALLEGEDLY AT FORE OF PROSECUTION MAYOR STILL IN OFFICE ALONGSIDE CAMPAIGN MANAGER FOLLOWING FROM OPRA REVELATION OF UNLAWFUL DISCLOSURE OF EXPUNGED CASE RECORDS OF REPUBLICAN MAYORAL CANDIDATE HENDERSON ALREADY OUT OF THE RACE FOLLOWING PRIMARY DEFEAT, WITH REMARK OF NOTE VAGUE AND UNORTHODOX PROSECUTION OF THE MAYOR OF HAMILTON ALLEGED TO BE PENDING IN THE NO JURY HAMILTON TOWNSHIP MUNICIPAL COURT FOR CHAPTER FIFTY SOMETHING DISORDERLY PERSONS OFFENSE, JUDGE ABSENT REMARKS RELATIONSHIP NO GOOD SO TOLD, FURTHER CLAIM CASE(S) RELATED TO ANONYMOUS OPRA REQUEST DESCRIBED BY IDIOTIC NEW JERSEY MEDIA TO HAVE ORIGIN WITH MAYOR’S CHIEF OF STAFF WHO MAY OR NOT STILL HOLD THE POSITION IN WHATEVER IN THE HOLY HELL THIS THING IS, NOT ANONYMOUS MAYBE NOT, THE SHIT IS LIKE ON A PUBLIC BLOG WHAT DOES OPRA HAVE TO DO WITH IT, MOST INVARIABLY CLASSIC NEW JERSEY CATASTROPHE OF CRIMINALS ON ALL SIDES, WHEREBY OUTSIDERS HEREBY WARNED AGAINST SYMPATHY FOR THE REPUBLICAN PARTY IN COUNTY MERCER, TRUST NO ONE, INCLUDING ANY AND ALL INVOLVED PLEASE ABIDE, LITTLE KELLY YAEDE DIPSHIT OF ALL TIME REPUBLICAN IN NAME ONLY, OPPOSITION COMMUNIST IN ALL BUT NAME AND MOST LIKELY HORRIFIC RACIST SOCIALIST STRAIN OF DEMOCRAT INTENT ON ETHNIC CLEANSING WHITES OUT OF HAMILTON ON BASIS OF WELL KNOWN HATRED FOR WHITES PROMOTED VIRTUE LONG SINCE NORMALIZED IN DEMOCRAT MAINSTREAM PLATFORM, VOTE SCHEMES FACILITATED BY SEVERAL RESIST CELLS ON THE GROUND IN VICINITY OF ZONE AFTER SPONTANEOUS EMERGENCE OF FULLY FORMED RACE OBSESSED ANY WHITE HATE GRANDFATHERED INTO ZONE POLITICS LONG AGO NOW OUT FOR BLOOD LET’S JUST CALL THEM A RAPE AND MURDER GANG, BURROW SWINE, REASON WHY NO TOURISTS IN TRENTON, NEWARK MAYBE, CAMDEN PLEASE NO, JERSEY URBAN BLIGHT WORST IN NATION BY FAR AND ON THE MOVE, ONE-PARTY STATE BY LAW DANGEROUS AND HOSTILE IN THE EXTREME TO OUTSIDERS FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC WHO MIGHT CATCH ON TO THE THING THAT LIES NOT SO FAR BELOW ZONE SPECIFICALLY, DYSTOPIAN CLUSTER OF SOMETHING THAT NEEDS TO BE QUARANTINED, PLEASE GOD JUST SHUT IT DOWN, OTHERWISE YAEDE CHARGE MOST RECENT DEVELOPMENT IN HEATED ZONE FIGHT ONGOING SINCE WINTER, PROBABLY WITH ORIGIN LONG BEFORE, POLITICS OF MOB LACKING SOPHISTICATION TO BE CALLED MAFIA HISTORICALLY SADISTIC YET IN FEAR OF IMPLACABLE FACTION OF JERSEY PICKETER POLITICS SO NAMED THE BURROW, HAMILTON TOWN OTHERWISE DEER IN HEADLIGHTS, DIPSHITS THE WHOLE LOT SAVE MAYBE ONE OR TWO STALKED AND HARASSED BY THE REST WITH BONUS WORDS ALLUDING TO ATTEMPTS TO IMPRISON, HUMILIATE AND IMPOVERISH OPPOSITION CANDIDATES, ANY REPUBLICAN LEGITIMATELY CONSERVATIVE KNOWS QUITE WELL DANGEROUS TO GO OUTSIDE, CIRCLE OF SHAME GOES ON, INDEED LITTLE KELLY YAEDE CHARGED IN MCPO BID TO HUMILIATE MAYOR WITH LONG HISTORY OF ATTEMPTS TO HUMILIATE OPPOSITION CANDIDATES, THIS CASE GADFLY HENDERSON ALREADY OUT OF THIS RACE, OPRA PLAINTIFF ONGOING SO WE ARE TOLD, ALL OF THIS ALLEGEDLY OF COURSE, DETAILS NOT FORTHCOMING AND LITTLE AT ALL FOR THE PUBLIC TO GAIN, ABANDON ALL HOPE YE WHO ENTER HERE. [NJ DOT COM ARCHIVE]

YAEDE-SCHARFENBERGER MAYOR, CAMPAIGN MANGER, BOTH CHARGED, MAYBE CO-DEFENDANTS

UNIDENTIFIED WEBSITE ALLEGEDLY OPERATED BY LITTLE KELLY YAEDE AND CAMPAIGN MANAGER DAN SCHARFENBERGER, REPORTED AS LIKELY CO-DEFENDANT IN CASE REPORTEDLY FILED BY MCPO IN HAMILTON MUNI COURT, FANCY THAT, MAYOR OF HAMILTON AT THE READY, FOR CHARGE(S) RELATED TO UNLAWFUL DISCLOSURE OF ALLEGEDLY DISMISSED AND EXPUNGED CASE RECORD OF REPUBLICAN PRIMARY CHALLENGER AND OFT DESCRIBED HAMILTON GADFLY DAVID HENDERSON, SPECIFICALLY DESCRIBED AS MANY YEARS OLD MATTER OF CRIMINAL DOMESTIC VIOLENCE DISMISSED AND EXPUNGED, OFF-LIMITS INDEED, WHICH UNFORTUNATELY PROVIDES NO INSIGHT WHATSOEVER INTO THE DOMESTIC LIFE OF MR. HENDERSON, WHO JUST THE SAME AS THE REST OF STATE MAY HAVE BEEN THE VICTIM OF PERJURY AND/OR OTHER FOR REASON PD INVOCATION OF MAGIC INDEMNIFICATION LETTERS GRUESOME TWOSOME D AND V, CAN’T SUE IF DV SO EVERYTHING IS DV EVEN WHEN NO FUCKING CHANCE TWO PEOPLE COULD BE CONSTRUED SHARE A DOMESTIC SPACE AND INDEED WHEN WHATEVER THE HECK HAPPENED NOWHERE INSIDE OF A DOMICILE, PERJURY ASIDE, AT SUCH TIME NO SUCH THING AS A RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THOSE TWO PEOPLE PLAUSIBLY CONSTRUED, IN DV FOR ONCE TALKING TO SOMEONE, CLASSMATE IN MIDDLE SCHOOL MANY YEARS THEREAFTER, NO RELATIONSHIP WHATSOEVER, DV ALL THE SAME IF NJ EVER HAD A SAY, OTHERWISE THAT STATUTE BULLSHIT IN THE EXTREME AND DOES NOT PERMIT PERJURY, AT LEAST THEORETICALLY AT THE FEDERAL LEVEL, DV CHARGE TACTIC OF DENOUEMENT FOLLOWING PICKETER STALK PHASE AFTER BEING RED-LISTED POLITICAL NON-COMPLIANT, DOMESTIC VIOLENCE RATHER POTENT SLANDER AND AS WE OBSERVE IN HENDERSON CASE NO INKLING OF WHAT ISSUE WAS AT STAKE, VIOLENCE IN THE NAME EVEN IF NO VIOLENCE AT ALL, DESPICABLE TACTIC OF CROOKED COPS FOR WHOM EVERYTHING UNDER THE SUN DV FOR LAWSUIT INSURANCE, MAYBE FOR NO REASON AT ALL, ONE CASE QUITE SO JUST DECLARED DV IN SUPPLEMENTARY AFFIDAVIT WITHOUT SHARED DOMESTIC SPACE OR ANY VIOLENCE WHATSOEVER, AS WE LEARNED IN LAWRENCE RIGHT DOWN THE WAY THERE, SLANDER FORMALIZED WITH REASON FOR DV LITERALLY AND WE DO QUOTE JUST D AND V, TARS, JUST A BIT TOO AFFLUENT, MAYBE QUITE THE OPPOSITE, RATHER NICE PROPERTY THERE BOTH YOU LOT, THANK YOU MUCH, SOMETHING ELSE ENTIRELY ALONG WITH ALL OF THE AFORESAID, NO ONE TOO MUCH RESPECT FOR CANDIDATE IF DV HISTORY MADE PUBLIC TWENTY YEARS LATER DESPITE COMPLETE INNOCENCE IN THE MATTER, EXPUNGEMENT AND LAW ON THE BOOKS FORBIDDING KNOWING DISCLOSURE OF RECORDS FROM CASE AS SUCH. DO NOTE, MR. HENDERSON LIKELY RECENT PLAINTIFF IN PRIOR DESCRIBED OPRA LAWSUITS AGAINST THAT SAME TOWNSHIP, AND WITH DOCUMENTED HISTORY OF SO DESCRIBED LOW-LEVEL HARASSMENT BY TOWNSHIP STAFF THAT INDEED IS AND WAS MORE ACCURATELY DESCRIBED BY THE TEXT IN STALK STATUTE OF NJ CRIMINAL CODE, AND IN SIMILITUDE TO THE EXPERIENCE OF YOURS TRULY, WHEREUPON SUBSEQUENT INTERVIEWS WITH LAW ENFORCEMENT FOUND OUT THAT LOCAL POLICE MOST UNWILLING TO DESCRIBE DESCRIPTIONS OF STALKING AS STALKING INDEED, RATHER LOCAL PD OF CENTRAL NJ RATHER FAVOR CLASSIFICATION AS TWO C THIRTY-THREE FOURS, HARASSMENTS, NOT A FELONY UNLESS CHARGES FILED AGAINST PERSON ALREADY A FELON OR THEREABOUT, MAYBE NOT, AND WE DO SUSPECT IN NEAR CERTAINTY PD DO SO IN LIEU RISK OF UPSET TO ESTABLISHED UNION ORDER KNOWN TO ALL P AND D,  AND FURTHER KNOWN TO BE THE OPERATING PRINCIPLE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT IN THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ONE TACTIC USED IN AFORESAID ONE-PARTY STATE BY LAW, ENTRATA TO ENDLESS LAW-FARE MEANT TO RUIN AND KILL. THEORY AND PRACTICE OF SUBSECTION F DID INDEED BECOME THE RAISON D’ETRE OF BAETYL AND THOSE MANY MONTHS AND INDEED YEARS OF EXPERIENCE IN CONDITIONS AS SUCH ARE DESCRIBED AT CONSIDERABLE LENGTH IN THE BAETYL ARCHIVE. GOOD LUCK INDEED, DEAR READER, YOU ARE MOST LIKELY TO SUCCEED BY FOLLOWING IN CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER FROM DAY ONE. DO NOTE, NJ LOCAL POLICE ARE INDEED UNIONIZED AND WE HAVE LONG WONDERED HOW AND WHEN THE STALK CRIME HATH BEEN APPLIED TO UNIFORMED POLICE OFFICERS IN THE CIVIL AND CRIMINAL CASE HISTORIES, IF AT ALL, WHERE FOLLOWING EITHER ON OR OFF DUTY ACTS OF STALK AND MAUCH, ONE OR MORE OFFICERS WERE CHARGED WITH ONE OR MORE FELONY OFFENSES, SPECIFICALLY IN CONTEXT OF REPORTED INTENT, BUSINESS OR PLEASURE, INSANITY PERHAPS, NOT TO BE OVERLOOKED KEY POINT INDEED CONCLUSION WITH OR WITHOUT ABSOLUTION AT THE READY FROM N J S A, TITLE TWO C, CHAPTER TWELVE, SECTION TEN, SUBSECTION F, PICKETTER’S CHARGE, FREE PASS FOR CRIMES COMMITTED AGAINST ENEMIES OF STATE, REPUBLICANS IN NAME ONLY OF NEW JERSEY INDEED DO ALSO USE THE ESTABLISHED PARADIGM OF MAUCH STALK TO MAINTAIN THEIR OWN FIEFDOMS WHEREVER THEY MAY BE FOUND, OR PERMITTED, HOWEVER, ALL REPUBLICANS, NOT DEMOCRATS IN NEAR EXCLUSION OF UNCERTAINTY OF INTENT, ARE MOST RIGOROUSLY SURVEILLED AT NEARLY ALL TIMES IN STATE, THE MACHINE INDEED, ONE MOMENT OF WEAKNESS AND STATE-SPONSORED UNDOING TO FOLLOW. TRUTH IS NOT THAT IMPORTANT IN THESE MATTERS OF PARTY AND STATE, AND THE MOST EGREGIOUS OFFENDER OF ALL TIME IS THE MERCER COUNTY PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE, INDEED THIS MATTER IN HAMILTON ALLEGEDLY BROUGHT FORTH FROM ONE ANONYMOUS OPEN PUBLIC RECORDS ACT REQUEST NJ DOT COM REPORTS HAD BEEN SUBMIT BY YAEDE’S VERY OWN CHIEF OF STAFF, SO NAMED MARTY FLYNN, AFTER SAYING MICROS BEFORE THAT REQUEST WAS ANONYMOUS, AND RESULTS OF WHICH LATER POSTED TO UNNAMED WEBSITE, UNREMARKED UPON IN DETAIL AND THAT MAY OR MAY NOT EXIST WHATSOEVER, GREAT CATCH THE HOPEWELL MOON SAGA BACK AGAIN AND THIS TIME WITH MAYBE A URL AND MOST READILY RESPONSIVE OPRA FULFILLMENT INTENDED IN MAUCH OF ZONE DEFEAT REMARKED HEREUPON IN THE HISTORY STILL WITH GAPS IN EXISTENT PUBLIC RECORD MAINTAINED IN NEAR PERFECT COMPLETION AT ALL TIMES BY [REDACT], RATHER LIKE MCPO NEARLY SIMPATICO WITH NJ ADVANCE MEDIA SHITSTAIN NEOLIBERAL AGENDA JUST CARE NOT FOR WHAT THEY REPORT UPON AND DID WITHHOLD WHERE YAEDE AND CO BLOG CAN BE FOUND PROBABLY BECAUSE RUN AROUND OF ONE-STATE DEMAND FOR COVER-UP AT ALL TIMES, FIRST, SECOND AND LAST TACTIC IN COMMUNIST LIGHT SOP OF CRIMINAL COERCION IN ALL MATTERS JUDICIAL, MOST OTHERS TOO, LEST DEFENSE OF AN INNOCENT BECOME PUBLIC RECORD AND COMMON KNOWLEDGE AS WELL, SO LONG AS POSTED ON SUCH DOMAIN NEITHER OBSCENE OR PORNOGRAPHIC, ALSO PROOF OF LIFE DAY TO DAY, AND THE PLAUSIBLY GENUINE RECORD OF HISTORY, ONGOING AT ALL TIMES, HINT HINT, WINK NOD, WHATEVER THE HECK, ALL THE WHILE THE DEMOCRAT CONTENDER IN APPARENT HAMILTON MAYORAL OR PERHAPS COUNCIL CREATURE AT-LARGE ELECTION UPCOMING THIS NOVEMBER NOW WITH THE GIFT FROM ZONE OF CHAOS INFLICTED UPON OPPONENT CAMP IN LIKELY PLOY TO EFFECT THAT VERY CONDITION AND BOOST DEMOCRAT ONE-PARTY STATE IN OTHERWISE BESIEGED CONSERVATIVE, READ:AMERICAN, HEAVY TOWNSHIP THAT DOES NOT DESERVE EITHER YAEDE OR THE DEMOCRAT CONTENDER. [NJ DOT COM ARCHIVE]

WHERE DID MAYOR YAEDE GO WRONG?

AS WE ARE TOLD THUS FAR, NO PERMISSION IN THE FORM OF AN ORDER FROM SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY WAS EITHER SOUGHT OR ISSUED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CAMPAIGN MANAGER WHO MAY OR MAY NOT BE AWARE THAT THERE ARE LEGITIMATE REASONS TO PERMIT DISCLOSURE OF CASE RECORDS, INCLUDING ARREST RECORDS, FROM MATTERS THAT WERE DISMISSED OR WHERE DEFENDANT DETERMINED NOT GUILTY, OTHER SUCH CASES OF CONVICTIONS AS WELL. WE DO NOW PUT FORTH THE SCENARIO IN WHICH DAVID HENDERSON THERE DID PHYSICALLY ASSAULT HIS WIFE OR CHILDREN SOME YEARS AGO, PERHAPS KNOWN INTIMATELY TO A NEIGHBOR OR FAMILY WHO ALSO AWARE THE SUBSEQUENT CASE RESULT EXONERATION OF A VIOLENT CRIMINAL, AS THE WIND BLOWS ABSENT CRIMINAL RECORD AT PRESENT AND INDEED BECOME PROMINENT PUBLIC RUNNING FOR ELECTED OFFICE IN YA, THAT PLACE. RATHER IN LIEU OF DISORDERLY PERSONS CHARGE, ONE SEEKING RECORDS AS SUCH WITH OR WITHOUT PRIOR KNOWLEDGE MAY PETITION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, LAW DIVISION, CRIMINAL PART JUDGE TO ISSUE AN ORDER PERMITTING DISCLOSURE OF THOSE RECORDS IN QUESTION PURSUANT TO N J S A TWO C FIFTY-TWO DASH NINETEEN. OF ALL THINGS TO CONSIDER, THE DRAFT MACHINE OF BAETYL DOES INDEED POSSESS NO LESS THAN ONE DRAFT MOTION EXHIBITING WHY ONE MAY SEEK TO OBTAIN FORBIDDEN RECORDS OF COURT PERTAINING TO CASES OF ANOTHER PERSON, IN BOTH THE CASE AND THE DRAFT EXHIBITION THE RECORDS SOUGHT ARE ASSOCIATED WITH ONE OR MORE INDIVIDUALS AGAINST WHOM MATTERS IN SUPERIOR COURT LIKELY ONGOING, AND SPECIFICALLY IF THE RESTRICTED ARE THE SUBJECT OF TESTIMONY THAT REQUIRE STATEMENTS DESCRIBED AN EXPUNGED CRIMINAL ACTION FOR REASON OF THE UTMOST NECESSITY, SEE BELOW, OR PERHAPS AS IDITOTIC AND CAPRICIOUS SLANDER PROMULGATED IN NEAR CERTAIN IGNORANCE OF STATUTE DISCUSSED AT LENGTH IN THING BELOW, WHICH DOES REQUIRE FORE KNOWLEDGE OF UNKNOWN STATUS OF CASE IN QUESTION THAT WAD AND IS DIRECTLY RELATED TO CRIMINAL ACTION ONGOING AGAINST ONE OR MORE INDIVIDUALS DESCRIBED ABSENT NAME AND FORMAL PROFESSIONAL TITLES, HOWEVER WE WILL TELL STRAIGHT AWAY THAT THE MOST ROTTEN ENTITY IN THE THING THAT HATH CALLED THE TOWNSHIP OF [REDACT] IS THE SUBJECT OF TESTIMONY THAT MAY OR MAY NOT HAVE BEEN EXPUNGED SURREPTITIOUSLY FOR THE VERY REASON THAT JUDICIAL ENTITY WELL AWARE SEVERE CRIMINAL PENALTIES UP TO AND INCLUDING SUBSTANTIAL PRISON TIME MORE THAN LIKELY TO FOLLOW LAWFUL DISCLOSURES HEREUPON AND ELSEWHERE.

MANEUVERS OF THE HIGHEST SIGNIFICANCE

THE SET IS AS FOLLOWS: AN INDIVIDUAL WAS SUMMONED TO APPEAR BEFORE STATE IN CAPACITY AS A WITNESS TO A CRIME, THE WITNESS DULY APPEARS ON THE APPOINTED DATE AND TIME MARKED ON SUMMONS TRANSMIT BY POST SOME WEEKS PRIOR, HOWEVER UPON ARRIVAL THE WITNESS DOES FIRST BECOME INFORMED THAT THE DAY’S EVENT, UNDER OATH WE DID PRESUME, HAD BEEN CANCELLED WITHOUT ANY PRIOR NOTICE PROVIDED TO THE WITNESS WHO DID TRAVEL AND PREPARE FOR THE DAY AS SUMMONED TO APPEAR, THE WITNESS IS TOLD THIS AND THAT BY STAFF RIGHT THERE IN PERSON, QUESTIONABLE CLAIMS NEVER PROVEN WHATSOEVER, HOWEVER THE WITNESS IS INFORMED OF A FUTURE FOR A OR THE EVENT, NOTE THE TESTIMONY AS SUCH FROM OUR WITNESS WAS NOT EVER HEARD BY STATE FOR REASON STATE DID MOST CERTAINLY COLLUDE WITH OPPOSING COUNSEL TO CANCEL THE DATE IN PERPETUITY SO THE AFORESAID TESTIMONY COULD NEVER BE HEARD, WITNESSED STACK OF SUMMONS INTERNALLY MARKED WITH CREATION ONE SINGLE CALENDAR BEFORE THE CANCELED DATE, ALL DOCUMENTS ARE MEANT AND DESIGNED TO BE TRANSMIT BY POST, INDEED WITNESS WITH OVERLARGE COLLECTIONS OF DOCUMENTS AS SUCH, THE STACK THAT DAY ABSENT ANY POSTMARK WHATSOEVER IN CONFIRMATION THAT STATE MADE EXPLICIT ATTEMPT TO HIDE KNOWLEDGE OF CANCELLATION FROM OUR WITNESS WHO WOULD NOT HAVE EVEN RECEIVED THE AFORESAID SUMMONSES BY POST UNTIL DAYS AFTER TRAVELLING TO THE CANCELLED EVENT, THE VERY SAME STAFF IN QUESTION DID IN FOLLOWING MONTHS SEEK RAPID DISMISSAL OF THE CASE IN WHICH OUR WITNESS NEVER TESTIFIED, AND IN PLAUSIBLE SCENARIO THE SAME COURT IN COLLUSION WITH ONE OR MORE SUPERIOR COURT JUDGES DID RAPIDLY EXPUNGE THE CASE IN QUESTION FOR THE EXPLICIT PURPOSE OF RENDERING THESE DESCRIPTIONS HEREIN UNLAWFUL, ALBEIT NEVER MADE KNOWN AS SUCH IN FURTHER ACT OF COERCION COMMITTED AGAINST THE WITNESS UNDER DURESS AND VICTIM OF MOST EXTREME CRIMINAL COERCION, PURPOSEFUL AND KNOWING EACH AND EVERY TIME, SUCH THAT THE ACTORS AT STATE, SUPERIOR AND BELOW, DID PLACE THE WITNESS IN PLAUSIBLE DANGER OF PROSECUTION FOR DISORDERLY PERSONS OFFENSE IF OUR WITNESS SOUGHT RELIEF AT ANY TIME FOR THE CRIMES SO DESCRIBED, MOST CERTAINLY CRIMES INDEED, THE CRIMES OF THE THING THAT CALLED ITSELF THE TOWNSHIP OF HOWELL, WHOSE CONDUCT IN VOLUMES MAINTAINED IN PERPETUITY BEYOND COMPREHENSION, FOR WHOM LITIGATION DESCRIBING THEIR CONDUCT IN TRUTH NEARLY AT ALL TIMES FOUND TO INCLUDE FORGED RECORDS OF COURTS, FORGED TRANSCRIPTS, FORGED ORDERS, FALSIFIED POLICE REPORTS, OUTLANDISH AND OBSCENE CLAIMS INTENDED TO HUMILIATE, AND OF COURSE MOST CURIOUS ASSERTIONS OF PARALLEL UNIVERSES WHERE THE SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER OF A CRIMINAL WAS FOUND TO BELONG TO YOU, DEAR WITNESS, WHO MAY NOW REVEAL WHAT IS IN STORE FROM THE YEARS OF STUDY MANDATORY NEAR THE BURROW DOOR, THE SOUNDS ON TAPE, HARD PROOF, CHECK AND CHECKMATE, NOW WE WONDER OK GREAT, WHAT NOW IN RESPONSE DOES AWAIT, RETALIATION OF COURSE MOST SEVERE IS PLANNED, WHEN THE BURROW GETS THE SHIT KICKED OUT OF THEM ACROSS THE STATE, THANK YOU MUCH BAETYL, BAETYL & CO, THEY DO INDEED RESORT TO THE RAPE AND MURDER GANG, ENCOUNTERED ON ABOUT MERMON ONCE SOME WEEKS AGO, MAUCH STALK AND SUBSECTION F THE CRITICAL INFORMATION THAT YOU NEED TO KNOW, IT IS NOT ABOUT THE GANG STALK NORMALIZATION OF THE WORDS, STALKED BY THREE OR MORE INDIVIDUALS INDEED STALKED BY GANG IN TERMS OF STATE LAW, RATHER MOST PRESSING CONCERN IS WHAT DOES OCCUR WHEN COURTS TO FAIL AND ACT IN ANYTHING BUT SOVIET OR MAOIST FASHION MOST PREJUDICED INDEED, THERE ARE LAWS ON THE BOOKS BUT WITH KNOWLEDGE OF THE BURROW, LAW BOOKS ONE DOES UNDERSTAND BURROW COURT BELOW DOES NOT HEED, BUT DOES RATHER MAUCH IN TONGUES THAT CAME UP FROM BELOW, QUITE LITERALLY THE FLOORS BENEATH ARE WEAPONS OF WAR DEPLOYED AGAINST THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NOW AND FOR SOME TIME INTO THE PAST, THE ORIGIN OF THE CONCEPT NEARLY CERTAIN TO BE OF BOLSHEVIK DESIGN, THE HORROR OF SOVIET COURTS NOT TO BE FORGOTTEN IN RUSSIA OR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ANY TIME SOON, THE POWER OF THE TRAPDOOR WHEN UNKNOWN DOUBLE THE STRENGTH OF A NUCLEAR MONSOON, NO PERSON SAFE AT HOME OR ABROAD, THE BEST AMONG US THE TARGET IN MOST LOGICAL ASSUMPTION THAT MOST FIT AMONG, MOST CLEVER AS WELL, BOTH IN TANDEM, FILL IN THE BLANKS, CONCRETE AND STONE, TOOK A LONG TIME UNTIL STATE DATE WHO IS BEFORE TRULY PRIOR KNOWN. EXHIBIT AS FOLLOWS,

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
LAW DIVISION ─ CRIMINAL PART
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
COUNTY VICINAGE

 

CASE TYPE
CASE NUMBER

 

BRIEF AND APPENDIX IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO PERMIT DISCLOSURE OF POSSIBLY EXPUNGED CASE RECORD PURSUANT TO N.J.S.A. 2C:52-19
DRAFT TEXT

 

CERTIFICATION IN SUPPORT OF PROCEDURAL MOTION SEEKING RELIEF IN THE FORM OF AN ORDER FROM SUPERIOR COURT PERMITTING INSPECTION OF RECORDS AND RELEASE OF INFORMATION PURSUANT TO N.J.S.A. 2C:52-19 IN A SINGLE DISPOSED AND LIKELY EXPUNGED CASE THAT IS AND WAS DIRECTLY LINKED TO [MATTER NOW BEFORE THE COURT], AND PURSUANT TO N.J.S.A. 2C:52-6 (a) THE CASE IN QUESTION WAS LIKELY DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE ABSENT ANY SUBSEQUENT PENALTIES IMPOSED BY THE LOWER COURT UP TO AND INCLUDING CONVICTION UPON ENTRY OF GUILTY VERDICT AT DATE NECESSARILY AFTER THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROCEEDING IN QUESTION FOR ONE OR MORE REASONS MOST SPECIFICALLY IN EVENT OF DEFENDANT FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE TERMS SET FORTH IN THE PRESENCE OF [REDACT] IN LOWER COURT UPON THE DATE THAT THIS MATTER IN QUESTION WAS MOST LIKELY DISPOSED WITH CONDITION UPON CONSENT OF DEFENDANT WHO BY COUNSEL DID SET FORTH CONSENT ON THE RECORD AND WHEREBY TERMS OF CONDITION PROPOSED UPON REQUEST OF [REDACT] FOR RECIPROCAL CONDITION IN BOTH MATTERS HEARD IN PARALLEL DISPOSITION HEARINGS WITH RESULT ENTRY OF TWO CONDITIONAL DISMISSALS PURSUANT TO P.L.2013, c.158 (C.2C:43-13.1 et al.). THE VICTIM AND [REDACT] DID IN CONFERENCE WITH PROSECUTION REQUEST THAT SUCH CONDITION AS AFORESAID BE SET FORTH AND TO WHICH PROSECUTION DID READILY ASSENT AND FOLLOWING THE PROCEEDING WITH MUTUAL DISMISSAL CONTINGENT UPON EQUANIMITY OF TASK, AS OTHERWISE CAPRICIOUS OVERSIGHT OF LOWER COURT IN UNILATERAL CONDITION PREJUDICED AGAINST THE VICTIM, CONSISTENT WITH [COMPLAINTS ELSEWHERE]. THE AFORESAID WAS SUBSEQUENTLY DESCRIBED ON RECORD DURING THE FINAL COURT EVENT THAT LIKELY INFORMALLY DESCRIBED AS THE LAST KNOWN HEARING, CONDUCTED WITHOUT REMARKS INDICATING THE LOWER COURT SOUGHT TO BRING THEN ONGOING OPEN-ENDED SEQUENCE OF HEARINGS TO TRIAL, HEARINGS CONDUCTED AT REGULAR INTERVALS FOR MANY MONTHS OVER TOTAL ELAPSED COURSE OF GREATER THAN ONE YEAR, [OFTEN SADISTIC] WHEREIN THE LAST HEARING CONDUCTED IN PARALLEL TO THE DISPOSED CASE AT ISSUE HEREIN DID CONCLUDE TRANSMITTAL OF SUMMONS TO APPEAR FROM LOWER COURT IN CAPACITY AS BOTH VICTIM AND [WITNESS], IN SUBSEQUENT PROCEEDINGS IN LOWER COURT [REDACT] WAS SUMMONED TO APPEAR AS SOLE [WITNESS] WITH NO SUBSEQUENT CORRESPONDENCE OR COMMUNICATION THEN RECEIVED FROM THE LOWER COURT INDICATING THE AGGRESSOR IN PREDICATE MATTER NOW BEFORE THE COURT DID OR DID NOT SUCCESSFULLY MEET AFORESAID CONDITIONS FOR DISMISSAL, AND AS SUCH THE LOWER COURT IS AND WAS IN DERELICTION OF LAWFUL OBLIGATIONS TO DULY NOTIFY SOLE DEFENDANT THEREAFTER OF EXPUNGED STATUS FOR CASE THAT IS AND WAS THE PRECIPITATING INCIDENT BEFORE THE MATTER THEN BROUGHT FORTH IN [RETALIATION] BY THE LOWER COURT ON THE VERY NEXT CALENDAR DAY, WITH REMARKABLE ABSENCE OF TRUTHFUL AND COMPLETE DESCRIPTIONS OF THAT EVENT IN ASSOCIATED RECORDS PLAUSIBLY WITHHELD STILL IN BOTH CASES. WHEREBY RESTRICTED TESTIMONY REGARDING THAT INCIDENT MOST PROXIMAL AND MOST DIRECTLY RELATED TO THE PREDICATE MATTER NOW BEFORE THE COURT DOES PRIMA FACIE CONSTITUTE PLAUSIBLE COERCION OF [WITNESS] RIGHT TO ENGAGE IN LAWFUL CONDUCT PRIOR KNOWN AS SUCH, THAT MAY APPEAR TO THE LOWER COURT AS UNLAWFUL BY PRESUMPTION COUNSEL AS APPOINTED BY LOWER COURT AGAINST THE WILL OF [WITNESS] DID FIRST INFORM OF THAT APPOINTMENT, AND FURTHERMORE UNDER PRESUMPTION COUNSEL ACTING IN GOOD FAITH DID DULY INFORM [WITNESS] OF RECORDS IN POSSESSION, [NOTE, WITHHELD AT ALL TIMES] THAT IN ALL LIKELIHOOD WOULD BEAR RECORDS OF ANY AND ALL EXPUNGED MATTERS AFFECTING BOUNDS OF TESTIMONY IN LOWER COURT PROCEEDING WHICH DID NOT ON ANY SINGLE DATE HEAR TESTIMONY FROM THE [WITNESS] THAT WOULD NECESSARILY REQUIRE ORDER TO DISCLOSE EXPUNGED CASE RECORD, IF APPLICABLE, PURSUANT TO FREEDOM FROM RESTRICTION TO PURSUE AFFIRMATIVE AND LAWFUL DEFENSE. HOWEVER, THE COURT FROM BELOW DOES HAVE MANY CASES HISTORIES OF FRAUDULENT APPOINTMENTS OF COUNSEL, WITH CONDUCTED COMMUNICATIONS IN PURSUIT COORDINATED ACTION AGAINST DEFENDANTS AND [WITNESSES] WHO ARE DENIED KNOWLEDGE COUNSEL APPOINTED BY ORDERS WITHHELD UNTIL MOMENTS PRIOR TO THE START OF HEARINGS, WITH ADVERSARIAL COUNSEL CONVICTED OF CRIMINAL COERCION IN ONE CASE WITH INTENT TO AFFECT CONSEQUENCE OF MAGNITUDE UPON DEFENDANTS AND [WITNESSES], IN THE MATTER IN QUESTIONS VICTIMS AS WELL, MOST DISTURBING IN THE EXTREME, FOR WHOM THE LOWER COURT DOES APPEAR TO ACT AGAINST WITH PREMEDITATION AND WITH UNDUE PREJUDICE THAT A REASONABLE PERSON WOULD CALL [SADISTIC AND ILLEGAL], WHEREBY VICTIM OF ASSAULT BEFORE THE LOWER COURT IN SUCH CAPACITY IS SOUGHT TO BE ISOLATED AS [DEFENDANT] ALONE AND WAS ON [DATE] PROHIBITED FROM TESTIFYING IN THE MATTER IN QUESTION FOR CLAIMS OF CANCELED COURT EVENT THAT LOWER COURT DID PROVABLY AND EXPLICITLY FAIL TO INFORM [WITNESS], DID WITHHOLD SUMMONS TO APPEAR INFORMING OF RESCHEDULED EVENT, AND DID SO IN SUCH FASHION REQUIRING [WITNESS] TRAVEL TO THE LOWER COURT PURSUANT TO LAWFUL ADHERENCE TO SUMMONS AND DONE SO IN FULL EXPECTATION OF TESTIFYING AS [VICTIM] IN THE MATTER IN QUESTION, HOWEVER, UPON ARRIVAL VICTIM WAS INFORMED BY LOWER COURT THAT EVENT HAD BEEN CANCELED AS PER VERBAL CLAIMS FROM NO LESS THAN TWO FEMALE ADMINISTRATORS, ONE OF WHOM DID CLAIM THE EVENT HAD BEEN RESCHEDULED UPON REQUEST OF OPPOSING COUNSEL IN A LETTER WITH CONTENT NOT DISCLOSED PRIOR TO ARRIVAL OR THEREAFTER EITHER IN FULL OR IN PART, AND SUBSEQUENT DISCUSSIONS ON THAT SAME DAY WITH THE THEN MOST SENIOR COURT ADMINISTRATOR DID RESULT IN VICTIM OBTAINING [MORE THAN ONE] HARD-COPY SUMMONS TO APPEAR FOR COURT EVENT RESCHEDULED ON SUCH DATE MORE THAN ONE CALENDAR MONTH THEREAFTER. ALL SUMMONSES RECEIVED BY THE VICTIM ON [DATE] WITH DATE OF GENERATION MARKED ONE CALENDAR DAY PRIOR, ALL ABSENT POSTMARKS, AND ALL [MORE THAN ONE] OF THE SUMMONSES AS DESCRIBED WERE DOCUMENTED BY MOBILE PHONE PHOTOGRAPHY IN SUPPORT OF PROVING [CLAIMS] TO BE SET FORTH REGARDING EGREGIOUS COERCION AND UNDUE PREJUDICE OF LOWER COURT IN WITHHOLDING MOST CRITICAL INFORMATION THEY ARE LEGALLY OBLIGED TO PROVIDE. IN FURTHER CONSIDERATION, [REDACT] DOES REQUEST THE COURT TO DISCLOSE THE MATTER IN QUESTION IN ORDER TO MOST LAWFULLY PROCEED IN DETERRING FURTHER CRIMINAL ACTS IN SIMILITUDE THAT MAY BE COMMITTED BY LOWER COURT STAFF WITHOUT FEAR OF REPRISAL IF THE MATTER IN QUESTION IS NOT DISCLOSED AND TESTIMONY NECESSARILY RELATED TO THOSE ACTS OF COERCION AND INTIMIDATION IS RESTRICTED BY SURREPTITIOUS EXPUNGEMENT PROCESSES THAT OTHERWISE WOULD APPEAR LAWFUL AND ROUTINE ACTS OF THE LOWER COURT, THAT CONSISTENT WITH THESE FACTS WOULD MOST PLAUSIBLY BE SOUGHT IN PURSUIT OF THE LOWER COURT INITIATING FURTHER ACTIONS AGAINST [WITNESS] IN EXPLICIT ACTS OF RETALIATION DIRECTLY RELATED TO THE MATTER IN QUESTION, SPECIFICALLY IF LAWFUL TESTIMONY IS BROUGHT FORTH AND AT SUCH TIME THE LOWER COURT ADMINISTRATORS PERCEIVE IMMINENT THREAT OF PROSECUTION FOLLOWING FROM, OR FURTHERMORE IN THE EVENT THE SAME INDIVIDUALS BECOME INFORMED THAT THE AFORESAID CONDUCT DESCRIBED TRUTHFULLY HEREIN THAT IS AND WILL BE SUPPORTED WITH DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES BY THE [VICTIM] HAS BEEN MADE AVAILABLE TO ANY COURT IN STATE OR ELSEWHERE WITH LIKELY CRIMINAL ACTION TO FOLLOW.

 

CF. R. 1:5, R. 1:6, R. 2:8, R. 3:10, R. 3:18, R. 3:23, R. 3:24, R. 3:29, R. 4:6, R. 4:40, R. 4:42, R. 4:46, R. 4:63A, R. 4:74, R. 4:105, R. 6:3, R. 7:13, R. 8:7

AHA!

OF NOTE, HAMILTON THING AFFIXED TO THE NJ FOURTH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT THAT IS GERRYMANDERED ALL THE WAY TO THE ATLANTIC OCEAN AT THE BORDER OF THE THING THAT HATH CALLED ITSELF THE BOROUGH OF HIGHLANDS, HOST OF THE ONLY REPUBLICAN HELD CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT IN THE STATE AT PRESENT TIME, WITH CONGRESSMAN MR. FOSSIL SMITH RATHER ENAMORED OF A CERTAIN FOREIGN NATION JUST A BIT TOO MUCH, ALTHOUGH MOST RECENTLY PUBLIC CURIOSITY ON TOPIC OF TICK BLIGHT OF ALL TIME INDEED MOST REFRESHING, THREAT TO FOREIGN NATIONALS HERE ABROAD INDEED, LYME DISEASE PLAUSIBLY WITH ORIGIN IN YAHTZEE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS PROGRAMS, PLUM ISLAND, THING HIGHLANDS HAS ONE TOO AND IT DOES THE SAME THING. SAME FOREIGN NATIONALS IN ALL LIKELIHOOD BEHIND THING AS SUCH.

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s