THE 34TH DAY T MINUS ONE TWO THREE ZERO: DAY TIME CONTINUITY

ONE, WE CONTINUE ALONG, FIRST, THE MATTER OF BODY CAM FOOTAGE FROM ZONE POLICE,

TWO, EDGAR SEAMANS IS BACK WITH A VENGEANCE, AND NOTE, THE STRANGE CLAIM FROM A OR THE ZONE ATTORNEY REGARDING BODY CAM FOOTAGE, BODY CAM FOOTAGE, AND IN ADDITION THE OTHER ANOMALIES IN THAT LETTER BELOW WE SURMISE STRANGE HISTORIES RUNNING DIVERGENT FROM THE TRUTH OR PAINFULLY SEQUESTERED PROCESS DETAILS ARE FIRST COMING TO LIGHT, OTHERWISE IN THE MATTER OF PICKETTERS CHARGE FROM MANY YEARS AGO, STILL ONGOING IN THESE CASES THE OTHER WAY ROUND, AND NOTE WE ARE ALMOST AT THE THREE YEAR ANNIVERSARY OF THE START DATE OF BACK TO WARK NINE ONE OFF WE GO NINE SIX, AND THE MATTER POLICE BODY CAMERA FOOTAGE SETTLED IN LAWRENCE TOWNSHIP IN TWENTY-FOURTH SEPTEMBER TWO-THOUSAND SEVENTEEN IN REGARDS TO THE SPECIFIC CONTENTS OF THAT VIDEO AND THE SPECIFIC CONTENTS OF THE CLAIMS AGAINST A DEFENDANT, WHEREIN PROPERTY HAD BEEN EXCHANGED BUT WAS NOT REGARDED AS WORTHY OF MENTION, AND FURTHERMORE RHE ACT OF THAT EXCHANGE DID SPECIFICALLY INVALIDATE TEXT CLAUSE IN THE COMPLAINT WHEREBY THE DOOR THAT WAS NEVER OPENED WAS INDEED OPENED IN FACT SO THE PROPERTY COULD BE DELIVERED, YES INDEED THEY KNEW IT WAS ABOUT A BOOK, A NINETY-NINE CENT ACADEMIC TEXT PURCHASED ON AMAZON MARKETPLACE FOR PURPOSE OF RETURNING TO VENDOR AND MAKING A REVIEW, MAKING A REVIEW FOR A FAVORABLE EXCHANGE OF GOODS AND SERVICES, QUITE LITERALLY THE MOST PROSAIC AND BORING, LIKE, REAL DEAL, THE BOOK AND ITS CONTENT ON EXTERNAL SURFACES WAS DOCUMENTED IN THE BODY CAMERA FOOTAGE OF A LAWRENCE TOWNSHIP POLICE OFFICER WHO AT ONCE FAILED TO DISCLOSE THAT FACT IN SUBSEQUENT DOCUMENTATION, AND FURTHERMORE WHO TAMPERED WITH EVIDENCE IN ANOTHER SCENARIO, RETURNING TO THE BOOK WHATSOEVER ABSENT FROM ALL BUT THE BODY CAMERA FOOTAGE AND STILL IMAGES SHOWN TO YOURS TRULY BY LTPD, AFTER BEING SLIGHTLY TRICKED, TO NOTE, AND LTPD WHOSE CLAIMS THEN MADE BY ANGRY FEMALE OFFICER A. TARA, AFTER STORMING OUT OF THE BACK, LIKE YOU GOT THE BOOK BACK ALREADY SEE, YEA YOU IDIOT THAT’S THE POINT, AND LT. CALAIRO BY HER SIDE, BEMUSED WOULD EVENTUALLY WITHHOLD HIS NAME FROM THE REPORT OF NINE TWENTY-FOUR, AND ALL THAT IN LIEU OF MENTIONING THE BOOK BECAUSE THEY DID SEEM TO BE ACUTELY AWARE THAT THE OTHER CLAIMS OF LTPD WOULD BE CALLED INTO DOUBT, INDEED FALSIFIED INSTANTANEOUSLY BY VIRTUE OF THE FACT THE TEXT WAS CAUGHT ON CAMERA, CASE CLOSED, YET STILL WE HAVE WHAT FOLLOWS IN BODY CAM FOOTAGE NEVER SEEN EXCEPT FOR ON ONE DATE ALONE, THE TWENTY-FOURTH OF SEPTEMBER TWO-THOUSAND SEVENTEEN, WHICH IS ABSENT THE EDGAR SEAMANS HISTORY BUT WAS COVERED ON DAY ONE OF THE CASE IN MATERIALS PRESENTED BY YOURS TRULY, THANK YOU MUCH, TO THE BEST OF RECOLLECTION THAT LAST STATEMENT IS TRUE,

THREE, THE OPRA CASE IS LIKE WHATEVER THEY DO THE STATE DOES NOT LOSE AND THESE DEMANDS FOR ALLEGEDLY FRIVOLOUS INQUIRIES TO BE DISMISSED IMMEDIATELY AS PER EDGAR SEAMANS ARE INDEED SHREIKS OF TERROR AND HATE THAT ANYTHING AT ALL, ANYTHING AT ALL WOULD BE DONE IN THE DEFENDANT’S FAVOR, AND NOTING THE ALLEGED CASE HISTORY SET FORTH BY EDGARIS NOT EXACTLY KNOWN TO YT OR PROVEN TO BE CORRECT IN THE SENSE THAT THIS LETTER CONTAINS THE FIRST MENTION OF SUCH ACTS, NOTE THESE GRC OPRA CASES ARE VICTORIES FOR HAVING BEEN FILED AND OCCUPY THE TOWNSHIPS WITH SUCH ACTS AS DEFENSE AGAINST CLAIMS THAT ARE TRUE, AND THE DECISIONS ARE OFTEN REMEDIAL IN THE EXTREME AND INCORRECT IN THE FACTS CLAIMED, LIKE YES WE KNOW, WE COVERED THIS DAY, BUT FOR REASON UH THE CASE IS OVER, THESE BEING THE LOW RENT NOT TRUE COURT BUT INDEED INVOLVING BIG MONEY, BIG MONEY INDEED, TAXPAYER MONEY AT THAT, GOOD OLD TAXPAYER, DEAR LEGISLATOR,

FOUR, WHY IS THE BODY CAM RELEVANT AGAIN NOW, WE WILL GET TO THAT IN A SEC,

FIVE, BODY CAM FALSIFIES CASE STRAIGHT UP THAT WENT ON FOR NEARLY TWO YEARS AND IN HOPEWELL IN ABJECT FAILURE OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY TO DO ANYTHING AT ALL REASONABLE OR LAWFUL, THEY COULDN’T LET GO AND STILL CAN’T, THE BODY CAM FOOTAGE IS ALSO RELEVANT FOR CLAIMS THE TOWNSHIP AND BOROUGH OF HOPEWELL, BROUGHT IN ON LAST LEGS OF THE CASE AND MADE INTO SOMETHING GROTESQUE INVOLVING A WEBSITE, STILL UNNAMED, STILL UNNAMED TO THIS DAY THAT IS AGAIN SOMETHING FALSE IMPLICITLY FOR REASON IT IS UNDEFINED, IT IS UNDEFINED THE THING THAT HATH BECAME THE PICKETTERS’ CHARGE WHEN THE TRUTH OF WHAT IS AND WAS ON THE BODY CAM CAME TO LIGHT, OR SOMETHING APPROXIMATELY SIMILAR AS THE CASE WAS FALSIFIABLE FROM MANY ANGLES, FROM MANY ANGLES THE MCPO DID APPEAR TO HOLD A SUBSTANTIAL GRUDGE AGAINST THE DEFENDANT WHO LATER RE-ACCUSED AFTER BEING ACQUITTED OF SOMETHING ENTIRELY DIFFERENT, IF AT ALL POSSIBLE, BUT INVOLVING THE SAME SET OF CIRCUMSTANCE THAT WOULD BE PART OF THE BODY CAMERA FOOTAGE AND FURTHERMORE THAT FOOTAGE EXTREMELY RELEVANT FOR CLAIMS HOPEWELL, LAWRENCE AND THE MCPO SET FORTH FOR ACTIVITIES ON A SINGLE DATE, A SINGLE DATE IN SEPTEMBER TWO-THOUSAND SEVENTEEN THAT WAS CAPTURED ON BODY CAMERA FOOTAGE AS SUCH IS ONE THE MANY WAYS BY WHICH THE HOPEWELL CLAIMS MAY BE TORN TO SHREDS, LIKE THIS IS WHAT THE DEFENDANT WAS DOING YOU IDIOTS YOU CAN’T MAKE NEW SHIT UP IN LIGHT OF THESE IDIOTIC FACTS ALREADY ESTABLISHED LONG AGO IN FORMAL AND OFFICIAL RECORDS OF THE STATE, BUT HELL NO WE WON’T GO, RESIST WE MUCH, IDIOT FACE IDIOT OF ALL YOURS TRULY WOULD NOT GIVE AN INCH AN INDEED WON IN THE END, AND INDEED WON IN THE END.