WHAT IS A LUNAR-CALENDAR TEMPLE?
We once posted the illustration of an antique Celt-Iberic stone mound of cut limestone blocks on the Spanish island of Menorca called a talayot, purportedly dating to as early as the sixteenth century BC, and upon recognition of such terms describing the accompanying megalithic formation of the fourth century BC as a lunar calendar, lunar calendar, the alleged lunar-calendar temple, that is seen below, and is the “huge T-shaped stone structure” called a taula, which must then be present on that site in Menorca with some intrinsic recognition and exhibition of lunar dynamics, which is to say, it must have something to do with the Moon. However, that would be, remains the mystery, what is it that we see, compound of the mound, our first, our first, our first, our very first topic into antiquity and the allegations abound that they are temples of Moon, Sun, or something in between. We do believe very much that they are these things, indeed in full, however, we have yet to meet the explanation we require to understand, at least partially, at the most basic level academically what those structures have to do with the movement, observation and study of the Moon, notwithstanding esoteric religious practices associated with Moon worship that may be beyond anthropology, beyond archaeology, beyond archaeology, beyond history, and left to you and me. The Moon demands satisfaction and it shall be given as it should. The engraving, illustration that is, seen below and originally posted in THE ANCIENT OIL WELLS OF PENNSYLVANIA is excerpted from The Search for Lost America: The Mysteries of the Stone Ruins, courtesy Salvatore Trento, seen before, thank you much, and comes to us via one John Armstrong, circa 1756 or earlier, is presented in the context of our ongoing exegesis on lunar temples of the ancient past and their presence in both the new and the old worlds, specifically in the context of ONOKO and why we began calling anything at all a lunar calenar, Temple of the Moon, Temple of the Sun, or otherwise, here we begin, in-part, our work to explain the workings of the Moon and how that body, the Luminary consort-twin of the Sun, just like Artemis and Apollo in Greek mythology, twins in the sky in apparent size, apparent diameter equivalent, indeed, the trick of the eye, to the eye, the trick of all time and space. Modern science does agree and we do further see much more to the mystery of how such perfection in the heavens and on the Earth made man the prize of who could behold beyond two eyes, three eyes required, for the following things that hath conspired, the story of the temples of the Moon, from antiquity to the present, as much as we can see, the post of all time in the works here, the taula below at left,
What lunar function or property of the Luminary is in the stone in analogy, or directly, directly by record in glyphs, writings, or representations symbolically. Do note, only one of the two structures above is technically megalithic, the lunar-calendar temple, not the much older stone mound built from normally sized and shaped limestone blocks, as per the engraving, repeat, as we are told in lieu of photography or direct access to the primary source, and furthermore only one component of the site is referred to as anything at all related to a lunar calendar, this note on that title, lunar-calendar temple, rather than an article of Baleraric antiquities, and how the authority of history came to even see such a thing at all related to the Moon, and that title most intriguingly left upon the figure legend there above, and there too, note the title of that linked post which does include the phrase Children of the Sun, that came before, that being the Sun, and why a temple of the Moon, a lunar-calendar temple, would be without an accompanying facility for and or of the Sun. Indeed, indeed, perhaps this is the core job of anthropology, anthropology, in doing the work of decoding ancient religions and their symbolic and place-specific activity, including the construction of stone buildings and earthworks, megaliths as well. Point being, where, if not here, where would the accompanying temple of the Sun, a solar-calendar temple, be located, if at all, in the system at hand, conscious of Moon related sciences and artes, but why, but why, but why, that is the core question of our NEW HISTORY.
WAVES OF MEGALITHIC BUILDERS
Note, the taula is claimed to be a latter addition to the site and is not explicitly recorded, recorded, to repeat, to have any known function that pertains to the lunar cycles or the Moon itself. Why then do we perceive these Megaliths as lunar calendars remains mysterious, and furthermore we suggest the most famous, the most famous Stonehenge is questionably at all a lunar calendar or solar observation point at that. Typically, most casually, at such, one is informed that the stones here or there align to the solstice and equinox on these and that dates and times and superficially we are never told the full mechanics of the site in that regard, specifically how the Moon comes into play, and its alignments on those dates beyond something something Sun, perhaps Newgrange in Ireland the exception of greater detail in the solar alignment and as such far greater clarity vis-a-vis the most precise placement of solar energy onto stones within the interior of the structure through a specific date range. Not quite, not quite, not quite ready to provide anything at all on the lunar cycle however, that still to the viewing public harder for good reason, indeed, at night the Moon comes out, the Moon comes out, the Moon comes out at night, and because the lunar cycle and the behavior of the Moon is indeed probably and definitely far more complex than fit for casual discussion, visually and textually both, indeed, however, it does not appear that we are led to any definite conclusions on the ancient Moon religions, Moon religions, Moon religions, religions of the Moon, and who on that topic is prepared to inform the interested public when the topic of human sacrifice is first and foremost, foremost in the speculative history of the druids, Druids are almost universally described in some capacity, some association with the Megaliths must be, however there is always a seventeenth or eighteenth century engraving of some wild sacrificial practice adorned with garlands and signage at the megaliths that likely have little to do with the actual intended purpose of the Megaliths, and questionably, questionably real the practice itself, of human sacrifice, by Druids who are little known outside of the Roman commentators, that is the truth indeed, even in France and the United Kingdom, furthermore, the scientific, academic, mostly in that community, seem content to be the literate academic community, not sure why the Moon is involved, but content to leave the situation in a hanging speculative case, most probably a lunar-calendar temple, why, good luck, good luck finding out, refer to other places and things and faces. The Moon does what it does, or doesn’t do, there are many mysteries to the Moon that we will see, still mysteries, and still part of our sequence, our sequence to be. Following from,
WHO BUILT THE MEGALITHS OF ANCIENT EUROPE AND THE MEDITERRANEAN?
In brief, citing from no less than three or four texts, see REFERENCES below, we outline prevailing thoughts on who the megalithic builders of ancient Europe and the Near East actually were in terms some of the most classic debates of the twentieth century on this very topic.
AGRICULTURE AND THE BEAKER PEOPLE
First, the spread of agriculture to Europe is said and thought to predate the arrival of the megalithic builders by one or two generations. To repeat, the agricultural, agricultural revolution in the Near and Middle East did spread to the European hinterlands thereafter and this is most likely true in full.
However, the different waves of migration from the ancient Middle East likely arrived here and there, and came with this or that, which is to say they arrived with one crop or more, one crop or less, one crop or all of them, and they were regarded as they were, the patchwork of history here for all to see, ebb and flow and not steady grow.
CAUCASIAN INVASION AND ARYAN MIGRATION
The Beaker People is one of the names for the settlers of Europe in the times of great antiquity, likely bearers of agriculture, and or present in one or more waves before and after a or the colonisers of Europe, indeed Caucasian, repeat, the original migrations of European settlement did occur prior, the hunter gatherer there presently at the time of Beaker-Agriculturalist migration is a testament to that simple fact, but the waves of migration were not all created equally. Some were warlike, some were smart, some were highly advanced, others were very average, there are sub divisions and more likely infantry divisions as well, indeed, these are the hinterlands of Europe, Northern Europe, the Balearic Islanda bore witness to one later migration of either traders or missionaries, Phoenicians or Egyptians, roughly, who brought the art of Megalithic Building and Religion, Religion, Religion, especially, the priest-caste with knowledge of the astronomical, astrological, ancient past, that priest-caste would have been and was indeed the very same Aryan priest-caste that extended from India to North and South America, see WJ Perry below for more on these matters, which are both surreal and mundane, advanced and simple, all at once the most boring notes on history, and the most fascinating, most fascinating indeed, most fascinating gaps in history that are being truly reconstructed here and there, here especially, as best we can be, what was the transcontinental, transoceanic vessel for the Megalithic Technology, Religion as we will see was imported to Europe. These are primordial conflicts with man and between man, and not necessarily of firsts and lasts, and nature and the sea, the sea, and the Sea, the all of the above having been made moot by the movement of peoples, having tautologically, tautologically occurred as evidenced by the archaeological record, archaeological record, and that very reason why academia and the Sea do not necessarily in principle disagree, but it is the true, the true history of the ways and means and the technology that really, really captivates the senses, the sense of archaeology when it knows not to dig, to dig, not to write, to write, here must be the way it is done right, thank you much indeed.
THE NILE DELTA AND MEGALITHIC MISSIONARIES TO NORTHERN EUROPE
The other peoples before and the Beaker People themselves, what we will say are the waves of Nile Delta Peoples who fanned out across the Mediterranean and into the north of Europe at the time somewhere around 5,000 years before the present, commonly, most probably, referred to around 3,500 BC, this wave of peopling of the European coasts was most specifically done by Euro-Asiatic, or Caucasian, Caucasian haplogroups of the Ancient Egyptian, Ancient Egyptian, Ancient Egyptian, pre-dynastic, pre-dynastic, pre-dynastic, old kingdom before, old kingdom before, old kingdom before, and Old Kingdom itself, most likely, and then long before that in the era of the Sage and thereafter, do see below please, and the essence of what we are saying is controversial to none who know, or suspect, or know in-part, the Aryan migrations of the ancient past and more, the recent past and before are suspected of having carried the Megalithic Religion off around the coasts of the Mediterranean Sea and Ancient Europe, and elsewhere, and to the point of Mr. Perry’s hypotheses, we do rely on that piece of pedantistry, The Children of the Sun, to say that Egypt indeed, indeed, indeed, indeed, they indeed did have their very own colonies, in Europe, in Europe, in Europe, in Europe, and America, America, America, where else but America, small, maybe, smaller, maybe still, small enough to make an impact, large too, Mayax and who came first, Old or New World, The Old is the New and the New is the Old, can you believe that, indeed, our stance in full, on the priest class as they would have been the very same priest class that we here speak of and that is recorded in Stone at ONOKO and elsewhere. The very same priest class that is and was, remains unknown to science as it is today. They are not well liked, we are told, not well liked at all, but by who and what would even know they were around, someone does, in mason town. More on that to come.
THE CHILDREN OF THE SUN AND THE REMARKABLE HYPOTHESIS THAT EUROPEAN MEGALITHS CAME AFTER THE NORTH AMERICAN AND INDIAN, INDIAN CONSTRUCTIONS
This is also distilled from The Children of the Sun by W.J. Perry, lecturer in comparative religion at Manchester University, eminently controversial, and the bane of mainstream academic anthropology and archaeology apparently, they who reject outright any diffusion from Egypt, at minimum that is, while Perry suggested that “a wave of civilization originating in Egypt and carried by trading missionaries spreading the sun cult of Egypt and seeking out precious metals and jewels” in his bid to “attempt to fit the whole puzzling megalith complex into a single generalized framework.” (Bibby 234). Furthermore, the description of Perry’s attempts to explain the origins of the Megalithic Religion in Children of the Sun is most importantly regarded as an “attempt to find a connecting thread running through certain megalithic remains, mostly of the types differing radically from the European, found throughout a broad belt running eastward from India across the Pacific to America and New Zealand.” (Bibby 233-34).
So we have more to the older type of Megaliths in nearly everywhere but Europe it seems, indeed most curious that, the similarity between India and North America, and South America, we presume both, we presume both continents must be included in any cogent or meaningful analysis of the true range of Megalithic Building across the world, all arguments to the contrary nonsense in full, not Classical Civilization, Megalithic Civilization. Although he regards one migratory wave in exclusion of Europe, Perry does go on to make an attempt to explain the Megaliths of Europe by a second or nth migration out of Egypt, that as follows, “the megalithic remains there are the result of a similar movement of missionary traders from Egypt exploiting the gold, tin, copper, and amber deposits of western and northern Europe. This theory he elaborated the next year in a further book entitled The Growth of Civilisation.” (Bibby, 234).
OPHIOLATREIA AND ITS MISSING COGNATE WITH THE MOON, THE GREEK ARTEMIS AND APOLLO ALL WE HAVE TO GO ON THUS FAR, HERMES AND THOTH AS WELL
In light of the rejection of out of Egypt hypotheses by mainstream academics in favor of the Phoenician baseline presumption, traders in full, very much the marxist school, school of thought whereby everything in history is labor and energy, nothing more, nothing less, all economy, economy to the detriment of any religion we fail to see expounded upon in any great detail, or any detail at all for that matter, unless we turn to the supposedly alternative, unorthodox, exiled, verboten, and blacklisted, historians who often write the classics of all time, the very best texts on Religion and Spirituality, no surprise Perry was a lecturer on comparative religion, who else would we turn to for the true archaeology and anthropology, the Moon we still have yet to see, but we are maybe getting closer now that we have a clue who to inquire about, what of Ancient Egyptian Temples of the Moon, we are not sure how to say, BELOVED THOTH, indeed, the HERMES of the GREEKS, both to the MOON, of the Moon, we return to the Moon, whereby the serpent and the Sun are found to be at nearest center to universality, the universality of Ophiolatreia, J. Bathurst Deane, the believer in Ancient Egyptian serpent temples, the figure of the serpent temples, the primordial solar god (Michell 84) and the serpent, indeed, indeed, indeed, the Serpent of Onoko, refer to the day above.
MISSIONARY VERSUS TRADER, WHY NOT BOTH
We return to the original dilemma in the Near and Middle East, whereby the origin of the megalithic culture or cultures in Europe “must be sought in the eastern Mediterranean; and with the exclusion of the trader there remained the missionary.” (Bibby 234). This does seem to refer to the antiquities departments’ utter lack of fascination with ancient Phoenicia, who would be the traders referred to, and the Egyptians, the missionaries of the Megalithic Religion, whatever that exactly may be. Here we suggest that it is indeed the children of the sun, the children of the moon, the children of the Sea, thank you much indeed, all that sailing and the New World in play, just like before, on that, to come much more.
There is more to these migrations and waves of populations making their way from the ancestral homelands of the Aryan peoples, including Egypt, no joke, blonde mummies are far more abundant then we have been led to believe, and that same haplogroup, most likely indeed, went to the far fringes of Europe, maybe North America as well in small numbers, the older the better, indeed, but we shall perceive this bit of still rather mainstream history and anthropology as well regarded historiography and the data point required, at bare minimum, to understand anything at all about the Megalithic structures of Europe, France and the UK in particular. We furthermore, have not much spoken upon matters in those countries except in passing, in brief, why, because they are big and complex and must be understood in the context of the solar and lunar cycles which they are allegedly, allegedly in effigy, in effigy, in effigy, in effigy, capital E, Effigy, like the day below, something to know, the visage of a Goddess in rough and old stone, not rough or old, but very rough and very old, very old, very old, very old indeed, that would be the River Goddess, an ISIS that we need, and the matters of native america, native america, Native America, and who are you, the tribe unto, both Gaul and France and the eastern seaboard of these United States, the Old Country, the Old Country indeed, the Old Country, the Old Country that we need. Long before this present day, the Egyptians learned what they did from who we say, is the Sage at Onoko, ONE OF THREE, ONE OF THREE, ONE OF THREE, ONE OF THREE.
A STONEHENGE SERIES NOT TO BE
We turn to views of Stonehenge, earliest legends pertain to battle and or slaughter, the whiff of human sacrifice already here. We read of a large swath of peoples who may or may not have had anything to do with stonehenge. We furthermore are informed of one of these theories that involves the “Red Man” of North America making his way over there and hurling stones up and indeed, more interesting than we believe we convey right now. What is the oeuvre of the Red Man that would make one think him a megalithic builder at all, when in the modern era we find almost nothing at all on topic between literature and books on the Native Americans and Stonework, precious little, precious little indeed, that citation as follows, Blacket, W.S. The Lost Histories of America, 1883.
THE ORRERY AND MISSING PLATFORM, ALL WE WANT TO SEE, WHERE DID THE ANCIENTS LOOK TOWARDS THE MOON
Back to Stonehenge, what is it, many ideas, we are told (Michell 84), some of the theories pertinent to our eventual elucidation of the lunar-calendar temple would be as follows, observatory, memorial, parliament, necropolis, orrery, that would be a model of the solar system, some sort of unspecified technology, a temple obviously, John Aubrey, seventeenth century, allegedly the first author to record an opinion on the matter, the builders notwithstanding, where in the Monumenta Britannica, unpublished as well we are told, he records the claim that Stonehenge, temple of the Druids, which he calls “Priests of the most eminent Order,” indeed why is that, we suspect a fair reverence for Druids, obviously, but why “the most eminent” for the Cultus of the Oak, often barely ascribed to reality, in that they barely made history at all, an organized priesthood is not exactly what they are known for, quite the contrary, maybe something we can’t see, something that one who catalogues Megalithic Monuments may come to see in time or know far better than before, more better than before, far, far better, the very truth, ledbetter, why a Temple of the Moon would be a Temple of the Moon, The Temple of the Moon, The Temple of the Sun, The Temple of the Sea, why must be all three, that here we decree, in time you will see, you will see, you will see, you will see, already it is seen, most often on the BAETYL we mean to say in Effigy captial E, the righteous energy, of not unspecified, High Technology, High Technology, maybe not the same, the same, the same, the same text not at all, the same place not at all, the same function maybe yes and no, maybe attenuated, in lesser you should know, in resonance following from analogy, like the earthquake wave made to be lesser by a structure or piece thereof some part of that structure that interacts with the wave of energy from the earthquake by knowledge beforehand encoded into the piece or system that as such results, results in that quake taken to another place and that place is the same place but orthogonal to physics not to be displaced, like the Moon brought to the Earth, thank you much indeed, its the translation that we need, stone to sky, period. We will try. Following from,
ONE, The axis of Stonehenge, what direction please, compass wise, we are told that along the avenue and right through the stones a line of sunlight, or shadow and sunlight, runs to the point in the interior of stonehenge at the sunrise of midsummer, what is that exactly, and is that the same as midsommar, indeed probably, close to June 24 and the time about the summer solstice, solstice, solstice, and do note the range of dates at Newgrange mentioned above, when the Solar Dot dances on the Rocks and accords us a knowledge of the approximately seven to ten days in that solstice or equinox range, or in this case the winter solstice week or more, and as such we expect much of the same at all megalithic sites, exactitude included. Which is to say, the period of before and after an astronomical event is just as important at the date itself, and that date is often in question, and we wonder if the maths of precession and the other solar, and or lunar, and or other cycles, inexact as they are, at the boundaries of their true widths, repeat, are we observing the work of master scientists, the priest-caste indeed, far more better than modern science we can all agree, or not at all, because the science of today has yet to catch up, or is mad, or is ignorant, or combinations thereof, and natures, natures, Nature hides her secrets, as we once said, the Sun and Moon are as apart as they are, the eclipses as well, to hide the Nature of Time and Space from all Creation until they reconcile the higher principles and the Higher Realms, together and without none and nothing.
TWO, Perhaps a Pre-Celtic sun temple, as set forth in 1793 by one James Douglas in Nenia Britannica, so much for the Druids who thought to be astronomically ignorant and as such the pre date, pre date, pre date culture must be involved exclusively, however there is no further astronomical work the henge does, the henge does, or does not do, what else are we gonna find, not much probably unless we go to Thom.
THREE, As we will see in Thom’s lunar considerations, the Sun may indeed be the foresight in lieu of a star that the entire site is set forth upon. We presume that an accurate foresight of the sun at solstice is in hand of the builders beforehand. This means that the “declination of the sun is then equal to the obliquity of the ecliptic” (Thom 15).
ONE, “The Moon’s orbit round the Earth is inclined to the ecliptic at an angle i.” (Thom 16). We are told the mean value of i is 5 degrees 8 minutes 43 seconds, and this apparently is unknown to be constant but is rather thought to have been constant for the preceding hundreds or thousands of years. Which is to say, the angle of the Moon’s great circle to the ecliptic varies in known amplitude over the span of a lunar cycle, many years, but it is unknown if the orbit of the Moon has ever been different than the way it is now, specifically in regard to the angle of its great circle, its orbit, to that of the sun, variation included, variation included, in relation to the ecliptic, the orbit of the Sun. Quite interesting indeed that it is unknown if the Moon varies in this regard and as such the Sun’s variation is also questionably cyclic or periodic in unvarying dimension, which is to say the rate of change of the declination of the sun may not be static and indeed no commentary is first seen, is first seen on this probably disastrous, disastrous outcome for precession orthodoxy, orthodoxy of the way the constellations change before the sun and furthermore the way a foresight might be improperly apprehended as the way to correctly date anything at all. Short version, the moon is a mystery and the sun as well may have more to tell, both secrets here big, big deals for this kind of work. More readers of Graham Hancock today alive than perhaps people living for many, many millennia who never heard of much of anything at all, let alone precession of the equinoxes which he did indeed teach the world, most necessarily, even if in time it is to be proven wrong or require a constant, one or more, or a calculus, to adjust for a changing rate of change, indeed, indeed, when and where is what we need.
TWO, The value i above oscillates “with a small amplitude” of approximately nine arc minutes over the course of approximately 173 days. We are led to believe by Thom here that this variation was known by the megalithic builders, megalithic builders, megalithic builders, the Megalithic Religion must have been the form of Sun and Moon and Sea worship in the antiquarian period of humanity, before the Fall we like to say, before the Fall, the Fall indeed, the priest class is exactly what we need, we have the best lead on who and what came before that deduced all of the known, then long before, long before the high civilizations of now remote antiquity, the hunter gatherer atlantis as we like to call, the Atlantean Civilization, and their relationship with Egypt, the Most Ancient and the Ancient and the Classical and the Contemporary, the first, back to the very first days of man when the first man set forth to record the motion of the heavens, this story sometimes told to us through the Chaldeans, as the star watchers of all time, the record keepers as well, perhaps far older, far older, far older, far older, far older, far, far older, we speak of the time of hunter gatherer man and mind before the dawn of even hieroglyphics, at such time when the mind was far, far different, removed from many of the ways it is entangled today, in the modern times, entangled yet free, far more free, the language of our Kind made for us along the line, the line of how much more we wee babies can know and process and for the whole tribe the numbers in success, for an age of far more man all around. The end of this point, the priest class does not disappoint, find photographs at that link, at this link, and at this link, find the photograph of the carved male visage with an earring that is partially occluded by verdure, a rhododendron if I recall. That is the proto-typical form of the priest-caste. They are very many at Onoko and elsewhere along alignments thus far discovered only upon the Eastern Onoko line.
THREE, The ZENITH OF THE MOON is one of the most important astronomical figures we need to consider in temples of the moon, lunar-calendar temples. We are informed that the ZENITH is a figure of position or perspective whereby at such place on the Earth it would appear that the Moon is directly overhead, same principle for the Sun. Right now, in the autumn of the northern hemisphere, it does appear that the ZENITH of the both the Moon and Sun are to be found in the southern hemisphere, as their spring approaching summer means that probably correlation exactly be, and indeed related to apogee, apogee, apogee, apogee, indeed and at least superficially, points on the Earth is indeed what differs in the hemispheres, hence the seasons, and the distance from the Moon. Where are places on the Earth most best for ZENITH maximized lunar-calendar temples, we saw one example at the Goseck Circle in Germany remarked Auspicious Coordinates, north latitude 51 degrees 11 minutes 54 seconds, longitude east 11 degrees, 51 minutes, 53 seconds, indeed, something there very big, what exactly, what exactly, what exactly, what exactly is the point of this post on ZENITH, which is to say, position on the Earth is the most important facet of a lunar-calendar temple, why, because the Moon interacts with the Earth in energetic ways, in energetic ways, in energetic ways, in ways of energy, waves of energy, what and how, we could measure if we tried. That is all for now. Big takeaway, the north of the northern hemisphere and the middle of the southern hemisphere are the critical points for ZENITH Sun and Moon.
FOUR, The Moon’s orbit, as per Thom, “We see the Moon’s orbit as a great circle intersecting the plane of the ecliptic in the line of nodes N1 N2 at angle i.” (Thom 16).
FIVE, The 18.61 year cycle of the moon and the relationship to the N1 N2 line bisecting the plane of the ecliptic (Thom 16).
SIX, The 18.61 year cycle of the moon is such that the line described by nodes N1 and N2 rotates fully counterclockwise once every 18.61 years, indeed, if, we are told, there were no difference between the orbit of the Moon and the ecliptic, ecliptic at an angle to the great circle that describes the Moon’s orbit, then we would not be able to see anything other than a monthly or bi-monthly eclipse, at every new Moon and every full Moon, that excluding the other considerations of Vedic astronomy, at least in one theory, the exclusion of the Sun and the Moon from each other and from us, from us exclusively in the first category, hath made the task of reducing the formulae for eclipses rather simple, and incorrect, not at all, not at all indeed, just what kind of lunatic could disagree with the conclusion of science proven right by predictability that is correct, correctly, correct over and over again, this is what we mean by an exclusion zone of man on the Earth from the Heavens up above, and furthermore, we record the relationship between the Sun and the Moon at equinox and the solstice not at all in this post, in this post, in this post not to be dragged on by a repetition of all science to be, rather vast, and considered, we have yet to deduce, adduce, reduce, or refute one single lunar alignment at stonehenge or otherwise, we here started with the list of attributes each temple had in mind, for the Moon, for the Moon, for the Moon, for the Moon, we believe there is more complexity than even what we have to see or yet to see, the technology of a or the Megalithic Religion may have more secrets that are more wild than one can apprehend without witnessing them firsthand. That is all for now, not at all, we respectfully submit point SEVEN as follows, the Platforms of the Moon may be ultimately apart from the Platforms of the Sun, one below for your consideration, ONOKO please, indeed,
THE VISAGE OF A MEGALITHIC BUILDER, THE SAGE AND THE RISHI, VISHNU AND ALL THE DIVINITY ALL THROUGHOUT THE WORLD, ONLY ONE OF THREE, ONE OF THREE, ONE OF THREE
ONE, The sites considered by Thom in Megalithic Lunar Observatories are dated by two methods, the first is by presumption that some star or constellation is essentially the keystone to the site.
TWO, Star declination will change over the centuries and millennia, whereby declination is the degree north or south of the star from the celestial equator, equator, equator, equator, equator, equator projected out into space or the heavens or what have you, whatever it may be, indeed, that we want to see, what they believed, and what we believe.
ONE, Armstrong, John. The History of the Island of Menorca. Second Edition. London: The Royal Society, 1756. Online Edition, Incomplete.
TWO, Bibby, Geoffrey. The Testimony of the Spade. Book Three: The Opening-Up of Europe. Chapter 14, The Giants’ Graves. 1956, First Edition, Alfred A. Knopf, New York.
THREE, Thom, A. Megalithic Lunar Observatories. 1971, Reprinted 2002, Oxford University Press, Clarendon Street, Oxford. Online Edition, Incomplete.
FOUR, Michell, John. Megalithomania: Artists, antiquarians and archaeologists at the old stone monuments. 1982, Cornell University Press. Ithaca, New York.
FIVE, Blacket, W.S. The Lost Histories of America, 1883, London, Trubner and Co. Online Edition.