THE 34TH DAY T PLUS THREE FOUR: “MAY NEVER SEE THE LIGHT OF DAY”


MORE (DIRECT LINK)


THE 34TH DAY T PLUS THREE TWO: TAMPERING WITH EVIDENCE

WELCOME TO ZONE
THIRTY FOUR

FIFTY-TWO PAGES OF DISCOVERY IN THE EXACT SEQUENCE PROVIDED BY THE MERCER COUNTY PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE


CONTAINING NO INFORMATION ABOUT THAT FRAUD WARRANT “RECALLED, RETURNED, T” FIFTH OCTOBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN

VACATED WARRANT FOR ARREST ACM WITH RECORD NUMBER INDICATING SAME







THE 34TH DAY T MINUS THREE THIRTY-FOUR: PEDOPHILE POLICE CHIEF IN BID TO KEEP STABBING NUMBERS UNCHANGED IN WELL-TIMED PUFF PIECE AMID ONGOING CRISIS AT THREE-HUNDRED OLD TAVERN ROAD

EIGHTEENTH SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND EIGHTEEN POLICE SERGEANT AMONG TWENTY FOUR ALLEGED CHILD PREDATORS BREAKING 911
DIRECT LINK. [CLICK TO EXPAND]

ERRATIC DRIVER AND DEPUTY DOG ON THE SCENE THE HOSPITALS OF CHOICE WITH SPECIAL MENTION
ARCHIVE LINK. [CLICK TO EXPAND]

APP UPDATE ON KUDRICK STATEMENT RE BELMAR DEATH AT MUSIC FESTIVAL
ARCHIVE LINK. [CLICK TO EXPAND]

AND COUNTY MIDDLESEX, EH?
PATCH KUDRICK ADMIN REVIEW WHO SCREENS THE ADMINS
DIRECT LINK. [CLICK TO EXPAND]

“DRUG INDUCED EXCITED DELIRIUM” IS NOT A CAUSE OF DEATH YOU FUCKING ILLITERATE

PATCH KUDRICK ADMIN REVIEW WHO SCREENS THE ADMINS WHAT IS THE CAUSE OF DEATH
[CLICK TO EXPAND]

PATCH KUDRICK ADMIN REVIEW WHO SCREENS THE ADMINS WHAT IS THE CAUSE OF DEATH YET AGAIN
MONMOUTH MEDICAL CENTER RATHER VEXED TO SEE THIS TODAY UPON THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN AS ONE OF THAT ROTTEN LOT RATHER WELL KNOWN TO CARRY A CONCEALED BARBITURATE INJECTION DEVICE WITH DESIGNS ARIADNE FOR YOURS TRULY, ALSO RATHER WELL KNOWN, TO INJECT AND THEN FLEE, THEN RETURN TO SUGGEST BACTERIAL INFECTION FROM A FLEA. [CLICK TO EXPAND]

WOULD YOU BE SURPRISED DEAR READER IF BAETYL DID INDEED PULL ONE OR MORE POLICE REPORTS FROM THE VAULT THAT DO SOUND REMARKABLY SIMILAR TO WHAT IS EXHIBITED ABOVE AND RATHER SUMMARIZED BELOW, 

“DISTURBANCE

“TOXICOLOGY”

“COCAINE, ALCOHOL AND MARIJUANA”

“DRUG INDUCED EXCITED DELIRIUM”

“JERSEY SHORE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER”

HELL ON EARTH CONFIRMED AND THEN SOME

“HOLDING DOWN A MAN”

“ACTING ERRATICALLY ALL DAY, ENDANGERING HIMSELF AND OTHERS…”

ANYBODY TAKE A VIDEO OF THE SCENE?

“BELLIGERENT, COMBATIVE…”

“DID YOU TAKE YOUR MEDS?”

“OFFICERS THEN RESTRAINED…”

“COMBATIVE WITH POLICE”

“CONTACTED MONOC PARAMEDICS SO THAT HE COULD BE SEDATED”

NEAR CERTAINTY ONE OF KUDRICK’S OVERDOSE RECOVERY COACHES ON THE SCENE.

“WHILE WAITING FOR THE PARAMEDICS TO ADMINISTER THE SEDATIVE, HARDEN SUDDENLY STOPPED BREATHING”

SO ITS A COCAINE-INDUCED HEART ATTACK?

WHAT “TREATMENT” DID HOWELL TOWNSHIP FIRST AID ADMINISTER?

DE-FIBRILLATION? V-TAC? OR STRAIGHT TO FLAT-LINE? HEART FAILURE?


ADJECTIVES ARE NOT CRIMES
CIVIL RENDITION [CLICK TO EXPAND]

THE ASBURY PARK PRESS WITH RATHER EXCELLENT TIMING.
WHAT ARRIVED IN THE MAILS TODAY FROM TOWNSHIP HOWELL POLICE?


STAY TUNED TO THE FIRST COLUMN


FIRST CONTACT

ON THE SIXTY-FIFTH DAY FOLLOWING FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THE DOCUMENTS EXHIBITED ABOVE IN COLUMNS ONE AND TWO, THE TOWNSHIP OF HOWELL WAS GRACIOUS ENOUGH TO PROVIDE A FACSIMILE REPRODUCTION OF THE FOUR PAGE DOCUMENT THAT HATH BEEN SEQUESTERED BY THE SHERIFF OF COUNTY MONMOUTH FOR PURPOSE REVELATION AT SUCH TIME MOST INIMICAL TO THE DEFENDANT SO NAMED [REDACTED].

THE DOCUMENT EXHIBITED BELOW TRANSMIT ELECTRONICALLY DID ELICIT A RESPONSE FROM THE TOWNSHIP OF HOWELL FOR THE VERY FIRST TIME IN FOUR HUNDRED AND FIFTY-EIGHT DAYS.

TENTH OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND EIGHTEEN REQUEST FOR FRAUD COURT DOCUMENT FROM HOWELL
WHEN A COURT RECORDS REQUEST BECOMES THE COURT RECORD. [CLICK TO EXPAND]

WHAT ARE WE LOOKING AT?

THE DOCUMENT CLASS EXHIBITED ABOVE IN THREE COLUMNS DO FALL UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF THE NEW JERSEY CODE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE TITLE 2C, CHAPTER TWENTY FIVE, SECTION SEVENTEEN FOLLOWING FROM WHAT IS PRINTED ATOP RIGHT PAGE ONE OF FOUR ON THE DOCS IN COLUMNS ONE AND TWO. THAT STATUTE IS IDENTIFIED AS FOLLOWS,

N.J.S.A. 2C:25-17 et seq.

THE ORIGIN AND TEXT OF THAT STATUTE ARE EXHIBITED IN EIGHT BELOW, WITH THE NINTH TO KEEP US UP TO DATE ON WHAT THE LEGISLATURE HATH BEEN DOING.



WHAT DID WE LEARN?

PAGE FOUR-HUNDRED AND NINETY-NINE, EXAMINATION OF WITNESSES

IN SUB-SECTION EIGHT WE FIND THE FOLLOWING TEXT,

“Defendant in assault prosecution had a confrontation right to use, in cross-examination for impeachment purposes, testimony of complainant in underlying proceedings on petition for domestic violence restraining order, despite section of Prevention of Domestic Violence Act precluding use of testimony given by a plaintiff or defendant in a domestic violence matter in a simultaneous or subsequent criminal proceeding against the defendant. State v. Duprey, 427 N.J. Super. 314, 48 A.3d 419 (A.D.2012).”

IN ORDER FOR THE DEFENDANT IN A CRIMINAL PROSECUTION TO IMPEACH THE TESTIMONY OF THE COMPLAINANT WHO IS BOTH VICTIM IN THAT CRIMINAL PROCEEDING AND PETITIONER OF A COURT FOR A DOMESTIC VIOLENCE RESTRAINING ORDER, THE FOLLOWING PRE-CONDITION IS REQUIRED,

“Right to confrontation requires that the trial testimony of a domestic violence complainant must be available for use by a defendant in a related criminal prosecution during cross-examination to impeach contradictory or inconsistent testimony that is material to the charges against the defendant, or to show bias, prejudice, or ulterior motives on the part of the witness. State v. Duprey, 427 N.J. Super. 314, 48 A.3d 419 (A.D.2012).”

THAT TRIAL TESTIMONY OF THE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE COMPLAINANT MUST BE PROVIDED TO THAT DEFENDANT BY THE ENTITY, THAT IS, A OR THE, LEGAL CUSTODIAN OF THOSE TRIAL RECORDS.

FURTHERMORE, THE ADMISSIBILITY OF ANY COURT RECORD IS CONTINGENT UPON THE WILLINGNESS OF THE KEEPERS OF THAT RECORD TO PROVIDE EXEMPLIFIED DOCUMENTS AS EXHIBITED IN ONLY COLUMN THREE OF THE THREE COLUMNS ABOVE.

DESPITE THE CLEARLY INDICATED REQUEST FOR EXEMPLIFIED RECORDS MARKED UPON THE NEW JERSEY JUDICIARY RECORDS FORM EXHIBITED ABOVE, THE TOWNSHIP OF HOWELL DID INDEED IGNORE THAT REQUEST.

SEAL OF EXEMPLIFICATION IN ALL LIKELIHOOD
THE SEAL

PAGE FIVE HUNDRED FIFTY-FOUR, TITLE TWO C, CHAPTER TWENTY-FIVE, SECTION TWENTY NINE, HEARING.

IN SUB-SECTION A IS FOUND THE FOLLOWING STATUTE TEXT,

“A copy of the complaint shall be served on the defendant in conformity with the Rules of Court. If a criminal complaint arising out of the same incident which is the subject matter of a complaint brought under P.L.1981, c. 426 (C.2C:25-1 et seq.) or P.L.1991, c. 261 (C.2C:25-17 et seq.) has been filed, testimony given by the plaintiff or defendant in the domestic violence matter shall not be used in the simultaneous or subsequent criminal proceeding against the defendant, other than domestic violence contempt matters and where it would otherwise be admissible hearsay under the rules of evidence that govern where a party is unavailable. At the hearing the standard for proving the allegations in the complaint shall be by a preponderance of the evidence.”

PAGE FIVE FIVE FOUR EXHIBITED BELOW,

PAGES FIVE FIVE FOUR AND FIVE FIVE FIVE TITLE TWO C CHAPTER TWENTY FIVE SECTION TWENTY NINE
[CLICK TO EXPAND]
TESTIMONY SHALL NOT BE USED
WHAT MANNER OF USAGE IS PROSCRIBED BY THIS STATUTE?

PONDER THE FOLLOWING,

ONE. TESTIMONY THAT DESCRIBES A SPECIFIC ACT.

TWO. TESTIMONY THAT WAS GIVEN AT A SPECIFIC TIME AND DATE.

THREE. TESTIMONY THAT DESCRIBES A SPECIFIC ACT THAT WAS GIVEN AT A SPECIFIC TIME AND DATE.

FOUR. TESTIMONY THAT WAS GIVEN IN ABSENTIA OF A DEFENDANT FOR REASON NO SERVICE OF PROCESS TOOK PLACE IN CONTRAVENTION OF THE RULES OF COURT.

WE ALREADY FOUND THE ANSWER TO THIS QUESTION IN CHAPTER TWENTY-FIVE, SECTION SEVENTEEN AS SEEN ABOVE AND BELOW,

CHAPTER TWENTY FIVE PAGE FOUR NINETY EIGHT TO NINETY NINE SECTION EIGHT
PLEASE DO NOTE THAT IN THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY “DOMESTIC VIOLENCE” IS AFFIXED TO ANY AND ALL MANNER OF CRIMINAL, CIVIL AND/OR OTHER PROCEEDINGS WHEREIN NO VIOLENCE HATH OCCURRED AND NO DOMICILE HATH BEEN SHARED BY PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT. [CLICK TO EXPAND]

FROM THE ABOVE EXCERPT WE LEARN THAT THE FOLLOWING STATUTE TEXT,

“…criminal complaint arising out of the same incident which is the subject matter of a complaint brought under P.L.1981, c. 426 (C.2C:25-1 et seq.) or P.L.1991, c. 261 (C.2C:25-17 et seq.) has been filed, testimony given by the plaintiff or defendant in the domestic violence matter shall not be used in the simultaneous or subsequent criminal proceeding against the defendant”

HATH BEEN INTENDED TO ENSURE THAT A PLAINTIFF BE SHIELDED FROM PERJURY WHEN THE SIMULTANEOUS OR SUBSEQUENT CRIMINAL PROSECUTION IS AT RISK FROM CONTRADICTORY TESTIMONY GIVEN BY THAT PLAINTIFF, AS FOLLOWS,

“…despite section of Prevention of Domestic Violence Act precluding use of testimony given by a plaintiff or defendant in a domestic violence manner in a simultaneous or subsequent criminal proceeding against the defendant”

WE NOW RETURN TO THE STIPULATION THAT THE ONLY TESTIMONY GIVEN THAT CAN BE USED AS AN AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE BY THE DEFENDANT IS THAT TESTIMONY “AVAILABLE FOR USE”, WHICH DOES INDEED IMPLY THAT PERHAPS ONE OR MORE UNNAMED COURT STAFFERS MAY STEAL YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO COUNSEL BASED ON A WHIM. THAT WHIM IS PARTISANSHIP IN THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY. PERIOD.

AND FROM THE SAME EXCERPT ABOVE, IN SUB-SECTION NINE WE FIND THE FOLLOWING GEM,

“…judgment of acquittal of the predicate act will not undercut the court’s authority to impose restraints or other relief permitted by the act.”

WHICH DOES INDEED MEAN THE FOLLOWING,

TESTIMONY IN WHEN IT SUITS THEM, TESTIMONY OUT WHEN IT DOESN’T, BECAUSE FUCK YOU WE HAVE AN ULTERIOR MOTIVE. AND THAT IS TO STEAL YOUR FUCKING CHILDREN. 

– UNNAMED SOURCE FROM THE COUNTY MONMOUTH FAMILY PART


ANT PEOPLE

HOWEVER, THAT MOBIUS-LIKE DOUBLE ENTENDRE IS INDEED THE INTENT OF THAT LAW AND IS INDEED EXPLICITLY ARTICULATED IN THE CASE HISTORIES MORE THAN ONCE. THAT RATHER VEXING OPTION DOES PERMIT A CORRUPT JUDICIARY TO WITHHOLD RECORDS OF COURT FOR PURPOSE OBSCURE THE CONTRADICTORY NATURE OF TESTIMONY FROM ONE DAY TO THE NEXT GIVEN BY THE SAME PLAINTIFF IN DESCRIBING THE VERY SAME INCIDENT, WHICH WOULD INVARIABLY BE THE ONE AND ONLY AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE NEEDED FOR DISMISSAL OF A CRIMINAL COMPLAINT. THIS IS MAINTAINED STILL IN THE LAW OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY AND AS SUCH THAT LAW DOES INDEED VIOLATE THE SIXTH AMENDMENT TO CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES WITH REGARD TO INFORMING A DEFENDANT OF THE NATURE AND CAUSE OF ACCUSATIONS AGAINST HIM.

THAT IS WHY IT IS SOVIET IN NATURE AND IDENTIFIED AS SUCH.


HOWEVER, IN THE MEANTIME, LET US DISCUSS THE MATTER OF A ONE-HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLAR HELICOPTER RIDE. 
AIRTRANS NEEDS TO GET PAID
YEA, THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT SAYS HELLO. [CLICK TO EXPAND]

SERVICE BY NJ MONOC FLIGHT CREW WHICH INDEED DOES APPEAR TO HAVE AFFILIATION WITH MED-TRANS AIR MEDICAL TRANSPORT OF WEST PLAINS, MISSOURI.
MED TRANS WEST PLAINS MISSOURI
[CLICK TO EXPAND]

FREEHOLD TWP POLICE RECORD
FREEHOLD TWP PD RECORDS
OBTAINED FIRST OCTOBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN. [CLICK TO EXPAND]

THIRTEEN OCTOBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN
WE’RE JUST SCRATCHING THE SURFACE
STAY TUNED

 

THE 34TH DAY T MINUS THREE THIRTY-ONE: THOU SHALL NOT BEAR FALSE WITNESS

PERJURY IS A CRIME OF THE SECOND DEGREE IN THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
20181009-MECER COUNTY PROSECUTOR RESPONSE
[CLICK TO EXPAND]
THIRD PARTY “AS”
NINE OCTOBETR TWO THOUSAND EIGHTEEN
[CLICK TO EXPAND]
NOWHERE TO BE FOUND IN THE COURT RECORD PROVIDED BY MONMOUTH COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT NOR IS ANY OTHER THIRD PARTY WITH INITIALS “AS” TO BE FOUND. IDENTITY OF THE JUDGE ALSO REMAINS OBSCURED IN THESE RECORDS, IN ALL LIKELIHOOD PRESIDING CIVIL DIVISION JUDGE OF MONMOUTH COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT SO NAMED BIG BOSS QUINN.
REFER TO THE 34TH DAY T MINUS THREE TWENTY-ONE: THIRD PARTY AS AND THE BLACKROCK BOND CONNECTION FOR FURTHER CONTEXT

THE 34TH DAY T MINUS THREE TWENTY-SEVEN: [REPOST] THE FEMALE INDIVIDUAL WITH DUAL IDENTITY REBECCA KENYON, REBECCA KANE EMPLOYED AT PRESENT TIME AT MERCER COUNTY SUPERIOR COURTHOUSE LOCATED AT ONE HUNDRED SEVENTY-FIVE SOUTH BROAD STREET, TRENTON, NJ 08650-0068 DID INDEED ATTEMPT IN THE PRECEDING MINUTES TO EFFECT THE FRAUDULENT ISSUANCE OF A WARRANT FOR THE ARREST OF YOURS TRULY IN NEARLY IDENTICAL FASHION TO PRIOR ATTEMPT AT SAME IN OCTOBER TWO-THOUSAND SEVENTEEN WITH RESULT ISSUANCE OF A FRAUD “WARRANT” SUBSEQUENTLY VACATED BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT UPON DATE FIFTH OCTOBER TWO-THOUSAND SEVENTEEN WITH PROOF THAT “WARRANT” EXISTED EXHIBITED HEREIN

THE RECORD NUMBER OBSERVED BELOW WOULD OTHERWISE BE AN INVALID ENTRY INTO THE FBI DATABASE FOR EVERY SINGLE WARRANT ISSUED ACROSS THESE UNITED STATES AND FURTHERMORE A “WARRANT” OR “WANT” WITH THREE ZERO’S FOLLOWING THAT “W” WOULD NECESSARILY MEAN THAT WARRANT HATH BEEN VACATED.

VACATED WARRANT FOR ARREST ACM WITH RECORD NUMBER INDICATING SAME

THE QUESTION OF WHAT SPECIFIC FRAUD CLAIM HATH BEEN MADE PURSUANT TO THE ISSUANCE OF THAT WARRANT NOW WELL-KNOWN AND WITH THIS DOCUMENT HERETOFORE PUBLISHED UPON <strong><em>BAETYL</em></strong>.

CONVERSATION WITH THAT ONE SO NAMED, SO CLAIMED DUAL IDENTITY KANE AND KENYON,

OF NOTE, KENYON KANE IN POSESSION OF PROMIS SEQUESTRATION IN ALREADY SEQUESTERED ZONE ZERO EIGHT SIX ZERO EIGHT PROMIS SOFTWARE.

THE 34TH DAY T MINUS TWENTY-FIVE: WHO IS TRYING TO STEAL MY VOTE AGAIN?

VOTER REGISTRATION “DEACTIVATED” WITHOUT PRIOR CONSENT AND RATHER SUDDENLY. FOR THE FIRST TIME IN OVER A DECADE YOURS TRULY DOES NEED TO RE-REGISTER TO VOTE. CURIOUS TIMING INDEED.

THE 34TH DAY T MINUS THREE TWENTY-ONE: THIRD PARTY AS AND THE BLACKROCK BOND CONNECTION

BLACKROCK APOCALYPTO
THE ELUSIVE THIRD PARTY AS

WHO IN ALL LIKELIHOOD IS AN INDIAN FEMALE SO NAMED “SREENIVASAN, ANAGHA” WHO AT ONE TIME DID INDEED WORK FOR THAT ENTITY SO NAMED BLACKROCK LOCATED IN THE TOWNSHIP OF WEST WINDSOR, NEW JERSEY WITH ONE UNIVERSITY PLACE PRINCETON MAILING ADDRESS.

HOWEVER, NOT A SINGLE COURT DOCUMENT FROM THE CASE OF CACH LLC OF DENVER, COLORADO VS YOURS TRULY IDENTIFIES ANY INDIVIDUAL, MALE OR FEMALE, WITH INITIALS AS. THE PUBLICLY AVAILABLE INFORMATION EXHIBITED IN TWO IMAGES ABOVE FROM THE NJ COURTS PUBLIC ACCESS DATABASE DOES NOT YIELD ANY FURTHER INFORMATION ON THE IDENTITY OF THAT “3RD PTY” AND FURTHERMORE NO OTHER REFERENCE TO “AS” OR WHAT ROLE A “3RD PTY” HAD IN THIS CASE IS CURRENTLY IN THE POSSESSION OF THE PRO SE DEFENDANT IN THAT LAWSUIT CONCLUDED TWO-THOUSAND FIFTEEN WITH A STIPULATION IN LIEU OF JUDGMENT.

THIS IS INDEED CERTAINLY NOT THE FIRST REFERENCE TO THE THIRD PARTY ON BAETYL, HOWEVER UPDATES FURTHER ATTEMPTS TO OBTAIN INFORMATION ON THE ELUSIVE THIRD PARTY AS TO FOLLOW BELOW.

IN THE MEANTIME PLEASE DO CHECK BACK WITH SINALOA SEX CRIMES FOR INTRO READING ON THAT ONE SO NAMED AS.


THE LOST FAX OF NINE TWENTY-EIGHT

img_8142
[CLICK TO EXPAND]

I SUPPOSE IT CAN BE SENT BY EMAIL
img_8143
[CLICK TO EXPAND]

img_8144
[CLICK TO EXPAND]

BUTTON IN THE OVEN

CURIOUS WHAT HAPPENED WHEN THIS SAME REQUEST WAS SUBMIT TO THE CLERK OF SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY KNOWING THAT OFFICE IN THE RJ HUGHES “JUSTICE” COMPLEX DOES NOT HANDLE SPECIAL CIVIL PART RECORDS.


img_8149
[CLICK TO EXPAND]

“MOST” SPECIAL CIVIL PART RECORDS, SPECIFICALLY “DC” DOCKETS WHICH IS INDEED WHAT WE ARE CONCERNED WITH HEREIN.

img_8147-1
[CLICK TO EXPAND]

WHICH DID INDEED WARRANT THE MOST SUBSTANTIVE RESPONSE FROM THE SCCO OF THE MANY EMAILS AND MAILINGS THAT INDEED HAVE BEEN TRANSMITTED TO THAT OFFICE.

img_8148
[CLICK TO EXPAND]

SO WHY EXACTLY DID THAT FAX DISAPPEAR?

img_8152
[CLICK TO EXPAND]

AS PER THE SCCO, ONE IS NOT ABLE TO OBTAIN EXEMPLIFIED RECORDS VIA EMAIL. SO DOES THAT EXCLUDE TODAY’S REQUEST FOR EXEMPLIFIED (ADMISSIBLE) RECORDS THAT HAD TO BE TRANSMIT VIA EMAIL BECAUSE THE FAX WENT MISSING?


THE SAGA CONTINUES.

NOT SPECIFIED IN THE SCCO COURT RECORDS EXEMPTION IS THE “FV” DOCKET UNDER WHICH SINALOA SEX CRIMES DOES FALL AND AS SUCH THIS MESSAGE RECEIVED FROM SCCO STAFF DOES REMAIN RATHER VEXING AND PERPLEXING,

img_8154
[CLICK TO EXPAND]

THAT REQUEST MADE SPECIFICALLY PURSUANT TO EXCALIBUR.EXE.


IN RECENT DEVELOPMENTS, THAT SCCO EMAIL ADDRESS DOES NO LONGER APPEAR TO BE FUNCTIONAL.


ELUSIVE THIRD PARTY REMAINS ELUSIVE AS TO DOES THE JUDGE

WHAT MAKES THE “3RD PTY” “AS” DATUM EVEN MORE COMPELLING IS THE CLAIMED TERM OF EMPLOYMENT “AS” HAD WITH MERRILL LYNCH AT APPROXIMATELY THE TIME BANK OF AMERICA PURCHASED THAT FIRM.


UNIQUE CASE

SO FURTHER INQUIRY HATH BEEN CONDUCTED VIA USPS CERTIFIED MAILS TRANSMIT UPON DATE NINTH DECEMBER TWO-THOUSAND SEVENTEEN AS SEEN BELOW IN ONE,

NINTH DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND SEVENTEEN


SO WHAT HAPPENED TO THAT LETTER?
ELEVEN DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND SEVENTEEN REFUSED
ALTHOUGH NEVER QUITE DID GET THE LETTER BACK. [CLICK TO EXPAND]

THE PLOT THICKENS 
PRE SHIPMENT NEVER RETURNED
NO GREEN CARD. REFUSED ON WHAT GROUNDS? [CLICK TO EXPAND]

JULY 28, 1972

AND FROM THE FILE OF THINGS THAT WRAP THIS PLOT IN NEAT LITTLE BOW,

BIRTHDAY: TWENTY-EIGHTH JULY NINETEEN SEVENTY-TWO
“BLACKROCK LIFEPATH RETIREMENT”
STATEMENT DATE: APRIL TWO-THOUSAND TEN
ENDING UNIT VALUE/PRICE: ELEVEN DOLLARS NINETY SEVEN CENTS