THE 34TH DAY T MINUS SIX TWO EIGHT THREE: THE TAU OF MUNICIPAL ORDINANCE

PART THIRTY-FOUR IN THE ONGOING SAGA OF THE MUNICODE MYSTERY

PART TWO OF TWO IN THE GRIBBENS FRAUD TRANSCRIPT BREAKDOWN, REFER TO PART ONE IN THE LINK HERE AND BELOW

FOLLOWING FROM

THE MUNICODE MYSTERY

THE 34TH DAY T MINUS FOUR TWO: THE NET AND THE NEST

THE 34TH DAY T MINUS FOUR THIRTY-FOUR: EXTERMINATUS ENGAGED

THE 34TH DAY T MINUS THREE ZERO THREE: INQUIRIES TO THE TOWNSHIP MET WITH NO RESPONSE AND THE LATEST FRONT IN THE MUNICODE MYSTERY

PLAUSIBLE DUPLICATES, ROUND TWO

THE 34TH DAY T MINUS ZERO ONE TWO ONE: BREAK DOWN OF GRIBBEN’S HOWELL COURT TRANSCRIPT TRANSMIT VIA G MAILS IN UNSECURED PDF, PART ONE OF TWO

EPONYMOUS MAGISTRATUS



WE FIRST RETURN TO THE WELL KNOWN THING THAT HATH CALLED ITSELF THE TOWNSHIP OF HOWELL

WHEN ON THIRTY-ONE JANUARY TWO-THOUSAND NINETEEN WE DID INDEED DISCOVER THAT BRANCH OF THE COUNTY MONMOUTH PUBLIC LIBRARY SYSTEM, SITUATED IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT ABOVE RIGHT TO THE RATHER VEXING OCTAGON SO NAMED THE HOWELL COURT, WHICH DOES INDEED LACK A HARD COPY OF THE TEXT OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE FOR THE TOWNSHIP THAT IT SERVES. THIS FACT WAS CONVEYED BY A OR THE REFERENCE LIBRARIAN IN RECORDED AUDIO FOR WHICH A GENUINE TRANSCRIPT CAN BE FOUND AT THE LINK ABOVE AND RE-POSTED AGAIN BELOW,

AUTOMATED: HELLO, YOU HAVE REACHED THE MONMOUTH COUNTY LIBRARY HOWELL BRANCH. FOR DIRECTIONS PRESS ONE, TO RENEW MATERIALS, CHECK YOUR ACCOUNT, OR INQUIRE ABOUT BORROWING PRESS TWO, FOR INFORMATION ABOUT CHILDREN’S PROGRAMS OR FOR CHILDREN’S…

 

[BEEP]

 

UNNAMED ONE: MONMOUTH COUNTY LIBRARY, HOWELL BRANCH

 

ACM: HI, HOW ARE YOU DOING TODAY?

 

UNNAMED ONE: I’M FINE HOW ARE YOU?

 

ACM: I’M DOING WELL, THANK YOU. I’M CALLING TO SEE IF THE HOWELL LIBRARY HAS A COPY OF THE TOWNSHIP OF HOWELL MUNICIPAL CODE ON FILE

 

UNNAMED ONE: UM, I DON’T BELIEVE SO BUT LET ME SEND YOU OVER TO REFERENCE, HOLD ON

 

ACM: OK, THANK YOU VERY MUCH

 

UNNAMED TWO: YES

 

ACM: HELLO

 

UNNAMED TWO: OH, HELLO, THIS IS [UNNAMED TWO] AT THE REFERENCE DESK

 

ACM: HI [UNNAMED TWO], I’M CALLING TODAY TO SEE IF THE HOWELL LIBRARY HAS A COPY OF THE HOWELL TWP MUNICIPAL CODE ON FILE OR AVAILABLE FOR…OR AVAILABLE ON RESERVE FOR REFERENCE IN THE LIBRARY

 

UNNAMED TWO: I DON’T HAVE A PAPER COPY, ITS AVAILABLE ONLINE

 

ACM: OH, OK

 

UNNAMED TWO: THAT’S RIGHT

 

ACM: SO IF I JUST GO ON THE WEBSITE AND SEARCH FOR MUNICIPAL CODE I’LL COME ACROSS IT

 

UNNAMED TWO: YES, YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO, YEP

 

ACM: OK. AND THEY DON’T MAINTAIN A PHYSICAL COPY IN THE LIBRARY IN ANY CAPACITY?

 

UNNAMED TWO: I HAVEN’T HAD ONE HERE, I’VE BEEN HERE THREE YEARS, AND I DON’T RECALL EVER HAVING ONE HERE, UM, I DID INQUIRE OF THE TOWNSHIP AND ACTUALLY NEVER RECEIVED A RESPONSE SO I PROBABLY SHOULD…

 

ACM: OH, NOT SURPRISING

 

UNNAMED TWO: YEA BECAUSE SOMEONE ELSE HAD ASKED ABOUT IN, PROBABLY WITHIN THE LAST SIX MONTHS OR SO, UM, BUT YOU CAN SEE IT AS I SAID IN ELECTRONIC FORMAT

 

ACM: OK, VERY GOOD, THANK YOU VERY MUCH, APPRECIATE YOUR HELP

 

UNNAMED TWO: OK, YOU’RE WELCOME



IN LIEU OF THE PHYSICAL COPY OF THE BOOK

WE ARE FORCED TO ACCESS SOMETHING MOST CERTAINLY THIRD-PARTY SO NAMED E CODE THREE-HUNDRED SIXTY (DIRECT LINK WARNING) FROM THAT CAN BE FOUND THROUGH INTERNET SEARCH FOR THE HOWELL MUNICODE OR DIRECTLY FROM A LINK PUBLISHED ON A OR THE TOWNSHIP OF HOWELL WEBSITE. (HOWELL DIRECT LINKS ONE TWO THREE FOUR WARNING)

IT MAY BE FOUND IN ONE OF THE TWENTY OR SO LAW LIBRARIES TO BE FOUND IN THE SUPERIOR COURTHOUSE OF EACH COUNTY IN THE STATE, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF ZONE (REFER TO A OR THE BURST PIPE BELOW BROAD STREET), WHEREIN WE DOUBT THE TEXT IS TO BE FOUND ON RESERVE IN THE RATHER QUAINT LOWER LEVEL LAW LIBRARY AT SEVENTY-ONE MONUMENT STREET, INDEED OUR MONMOUTH VICINAGE RIGHT THERE LOCATED IN ONE THREE ONE FIVE AND/OR ONE THREE ONE SIX AND/OR SOMETHING ELSE ENTIRELY.

WHY DO WE NEED TO CONSULT THE AFORESAID REFERENCE WHATSOEVER?

FOLLOWING FROM THE CONDUCT OF THE HOWELL COURT VIS-A-VIS YOURS TRULY, MANY OTHERS, ALL OF WHOM HATH ENTERED INTO THIS HERE DILEMMA, ONGOING YES INDEED, WHEREIN WE WONDER HOW SUCH LEVELS OF EVIL (READ: CRIMINALITY IN THE EXTREME AND ON THE VERY REGULAR) CAN EVEN BE POSSIBLE OF A PODUNK LOCAL GOVERNMENT. AS SUCH, WE RETURN TO THE FRAUD COURT TRANSCRIPTS GENERATED BY THE GRIBBENS OUTFIT THAT APPARENTLY IS THE SOLE THIRD-PARTY CONTRACTOR EMPLOYED BY THE HOWELL COURT TO PRODUCE THE OH SO VERY ESSENTIAL LEGAL DOCUMENTS THAT BEAR A OR THE RECORD OF WHAT TRANSPIRES IN A COURT THAT CONDUCTS HEARINGS ON MATTERS OF LIFE AND DEATH, OR AT LEAST THEY DID IN THE PAST, AND WITHIN THOSE FRAUD TRANSCRIPTS WHICH THEY ROUTINELY ADMIT ARE GENERATED WITH SIGNIFICANT AND MATERIAL ERRORS MARKED DE FACTO OVERSIGHTS EXPECTED AND ENCOURAGED OF THE GRIBENNSES NEST BY [REDACTED], AND WHICH ARE ONGOING TO THE PRESENT BECAUSE THE FRAUD GRIBBENSES THAT TRANSCRIBE THE FRAUD TRANSCRIPTS COMMIT FELONY ACTS UPON ISSUANCE OF NEARLY EVERY DOCUMENT THAT IS SHUTTLED OUT THE DOOR, OUT THE DOOR AT SUCH TIME AND WITHIN SUCH CONTENT THAT THEY ARE TOLD TO REMOVE OR INPUT DESPITE WHAT IS ACTUALLY STATED ON A OR THE RECORD IN THE SHITBOX OCTAGON ON OR ABOUT THE SAME PLOT AS THE SHITBOX LIBRARY. THIS FRAUD WE DID INDEED CONFIRM IN PART ONE WHEREIN UPON BREACH OF PAGE SIX, PEACE AND CALLED IT A DAY HAVING AT THAT TIME ALREADY EXTRACTED THE ESSENTIAL EVIDENCE TO JUSTIFY THESE VERY STATEMENTS YOU ARE READING RIGHT NOW WHICH IS INDEED ALLEGING ORGANIZED CRIME IS AT WORK HERE, AND OF NOTE THESE STATEMENTS ARE PUBLISHED BY BAETYL, BAETYL & CO. IN LIEU OF BRINGING FORTH CIVIL ACTIONS AGAINST GRIBBENSES AND FELLOW NEST DWELLERS FOLLOWING FROM THEIR PURPORTED IMMUNITY TO ANY CONSEQUENCE OF MAGNITUDE INFLICTED BY PROSECUTION DUE TO A OR THE ANTI-INDEMNIFICATION CLAUSE THAT WE ARE BEING TOLD IS TO BE FOUND IN A OR THE CONTRACT BETWEEN GRIBBENSES AND THE TOWNSHIP OF HOWELL AND/OR THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY AND/OR COUNTY MONMOUTH AND/OR SOMETHING ELSE ENTIRELY. WE DID INDEED REQUEST THAT TOWNSHIP PROVIDE A COPY OF THAT VERY SAME CONTRACT PURSUANT TO OPRA IN THE RECENT PAST IN ADDITION TO THE CIVIC PLUS AMAZON WHISPER NET CONTRACT, FORMER IGNORED AND LATTER MOST OBSCENELY CLAIMED TO BE UNINTELLIGIBLE, ONE SENTENCE IN LENGTH, PROBABLY BY MANIFESTO-PRONE TOWNSHIP ATTORNEY JOSEPH CLARK GABLE, YES INDEED GONE WITH THE FUCKING WIND.

BREACH OF PEACE, PART ONE, STOP SIX

REVISIT THE FIRST SIX PAGES OF THE FRAUD TRANSCRIPT, OBTAIN THE CODE TWO-HUNDRED TWENTY DASH TWO, NOW WE REQUIRE THE MOST UP TO DATE TEXT OF THE TOWNSHIP OF HOWELL MUNICIPAL CODE THAT IS THE VERY SAME USED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL TO ASCERTAIN WHAT THE FUCK KEAN T KEAN IS REFERRING TO VIS-A-VIS THE NOW LEGENDARY BREACH OF JURISDICTION SO NAMED THE “BOROUGH ORDINANCE”, THAT OUR MONMOUTH VICINAGE RIGHT DOWN THE ROAD THERE IS HARD PRESSED TO WRITE DOWN IN SIMILITUDE TO THE MUNICODE EX-MACHINA SOON TO BE HEARD CASE WHEREIN ALL OF THESE THINGS ARE TO BE DISCUSSED AT SOME LENGTH. LIKE JUNE, RIGHT? PERHAPS NOT. WE HAVE A MOTION PREPARED THAT IS TO BE SOON PUBLISHED AND SUBMIT IN LIGHT OF THESE FACTS.

FIRST, THE DRAFT OF A MOTION IN THREE BELOW,

MOTION DRAFT PAGE ONE, NOTA BENE, MONCO STAFF WITH CLAIM THAT THREE MONTHS NOT ATYPICAL LENGTH OF TIME FOR AUDIO TRANSMISSION, TRANSCRIPT GENERATION AND SERVICE, PLAUSIBLY SO, ALBEIT WITHOUT ANY DATA TO VERIFY ANECDOTES, AND NO REFERENCE DATABASE TO OBTAIN RAW DATAS AND CONDUCT SOME INDEPENDENT ANALYSES. OR IS THERE? NO, THERE IS NOT. THE COURTS ARE VERY SECRETIVE, SO WE ARE TOLD AND SO WE SAY.  

MOTION DRAFT PAGE TWO

MOTION DRAFT PAGE THREE

SECOND, RETURNING TO THOSE SIX PAGES IN SIX BELOW,

PAGE ONE

PAGE TWO

PAGE THREE

PAGE FOUR

PAGE FIVE

PAGE SIX

WE HEREBY COMMENCE PART TWO OF THE GRIBBENS FRAUD TRANSCRIPT BREAK DOWN

COLLOQUY PAGE SEVEN

Colloquy Page 7, lines 2 through 7, the MATTERS before the Court had already been concluded in aforesaid “plea” and despite that fact THE COURT for whatever reasons continues to insist on affixing the name of one or both crooked nest attorneys to the record such that the APPELLANT not be construed to have any competence whatsoever in light of three PRO SE victories added to the ledger on the very same day the conduct of Howell Court as such became criminal in the extreme.

Colloquy Page 7, line 3, These MATTERS before the Howell Court have finally been disposed after malingering for 12 months and 21 days (YES INDEED, FINGERPRINT OF EX-JUDGE MCGANN), not one single day at trial, no one iota of testimony from the APPELLANT, and furthermore the disposition of a or the MATTER is indeed the primary subject of the entire transcript, what would an attorney then do for the proposed client at such time? This is a very, very important question and the Federal Government does indeed want to know, so we are told. Transmission of a certified letter does not require the assistance of an attorney. Yes indeed, KEAN T KEAN remarkably failed to respond to no less than 3 certified letters transmit by our APPELLANT pursuant to satisfying a or the “plea” that most remarkably still are not present in any record the Howell Court will keep or maintain, and the series of letters were then apparently ignored by THE COURT in subsequent mid March coercion. However the complete record of transmission and receipt of those letters is to be found in the BAETYL ARCHIVE. Also please do refer to the TOWNSHIP OF HOPEWELL, ZONE, that was called up to active duty on or about TENTH APRIL by the OFFICE OF THE MERCER COUNTY PROSECUTOR to run interference against our APPELLANT in the MATTERS that did result from the proceeding marked present by the GRIBBENSES, MATTERS still active and indeed very active as one might surmise in light of the volume of words hereupon approaching DELUGE character.

Colloquy Page 7, line 6, More than one full year of this same line of bullshit. No, no one here committed any crimes and there is no need for a nest attorney to infiltrate the successful and affirmative defense mounted by our APPELLANT. In fact, the reason THE COURT is so persistent in posing this question, appointing nest attorneys in secret and otherwise attempting to MAIM our APPELLANT via third-party actions, is because that is the order THE COURT hath been commanded to carry out by one or more individuals that are not on any record and are not anything but career criminals. YES INDEED, RODGERS AND CO., THE ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTOR OF THE COURTS IS CONSIDERING A NEW LIFE IN A FOREIGN COUNTRY IN LIGHT OF WHAT HATH BEEN POSTED HEREUPON ALREADY. WE ARE INDEED JUST WARMING UP.

Colloquy Page 7, lines 14,  Re-edit of actual statement, “most amenable going forward”, into “most amenable to go forward”, despite the sparingly few on record statements of our APPELLANT, the GRIBBENES transcription is so irrevocably faulted and the transcriptionist is remarkably incompetent such that the fraud entrances and re-edits can be overcome by the memory of otherwise unassociated parties present within the Howell Court during the proceeding.

Colloquy Page 7, line 16, Direct and remarkable contradiction of already exhibited fraud statement found on Colloquy Page 3, line 15, with false claim that a or the MATTER related to a “municipal disorderly persons offense” that does not exist pursuant one or more statutes in Chapter 1 of Title 2C that forbid municipalities from conducting criminal prosecutions under the guise of municipal code violations, and furthermore in that same chapter we do indeed find verbiage in the case history describing a “Borough Ordinance” that was indeed out from the MuniCode of the thing that hath called itself the Borough of Sayerville, cf. Club 35, LLC v. Borough of Sayerville, tautologically not a Township, but a Borough.

Colloquy Page 7, lines 18 through 20, UNFUCKINGBELIEAVABLE, fraud entrance of an ex post facto riposte to the six Civil Actions brought forth in Superior Court of New Jersey against six state employees, all for criminal acts contrary to N.J.S.A. 2C:13-5(a)(6), Criminal Coercion, inter alia, committed against the PLAINTIFF, indeed our very same APPELLANT, all marked FILED at such time after this specific proceeding in the OCTAGON had concluded and with 33% of those Civil Actions against named DEFENDANTS who are or were public employees of the Township of Howell.

STAY TUNED, DEVELOPMENTS IN PROGRESS

 

 

THE 34TH DAY T MINUS THREE ZERO TWENTY: THE ANNIVERSARY OF THE DAY THAT BECAME THE DAY SO NAMED THE 34TH DAY T MINUS THIRTY-FOUR, IN THIS OUR ONE AND ONLY HOLY WAR, NAQOYQATSI, THE SWORD OF THE ARCHANGEL, YES INDEED, THE SWORD EXCALIBUR AT THE LEAD

THE ANNUNCIATION

THE ANNUNCIATION
BY NOSADELLA, OR GIOVANNI FRANCESCO BEZZI, FIFTEEN-SIXTY OR THEREABOUT, WHEREIN THE ARCHANGEL GABRIEL ENTERS FROM THE RIGHT. ESSENCE, OUSIA, THE PENTIMENTO AND PROSOPON THE DOVE.

THE THIRTY-FOURTH DAY BY DAY

[XXXIV/II] THE 34TH DAY T MINUS THIRTY-FOUR: EIGHTEENTH FEBRUARY TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN

[XXXIV/I] THE 34TH DAY T MINUS THIRTY-FOUR: THE THIRTY-FOURTH WARD

[XXXIII/I] THE 34TH DAY T MINUS THIRTY-THREE: STORM UPON SIEGE, THE MOMENTS BEFORE, THE SWORD OF MICH A EL, EXCALIBUR DEPLOYED, IN THIS, OUR ONE AND ONLY HOLY WAR, NAQOYQATSI, THROUGH THE KILL ROOM DOOR

THE L’ANGELIC LAUNGE

SAINT MARTHA BELOVED SISTER OF LAZARUS
ACCORDING TO THE GOLDEN LEGEND COMPILED IN THIRTEENTH CENTURY FRANCE, OR THEREABOUTS, ONE OF THE THREE SISTERS OF LAZARUS, WHO WAS RAISED FROM THE DEAD BY JESUS, SO NAMED SAINT MARTHA FLED FROM THE HOLY LAND TO THE PYRENEES WITH HER SISTER MARY, LAZARUS, SAINT MAXIMIN AND WITH PERHAPS MANY MORE AFTER SAILING IN A VESSEL FIRST DAMAGED BY WAR, DAMAGED AGAIN DURING THEIR ESCAPE FROM NEAR EASTERN SHORE. SOME TIME AFTER LANDING, TAMING A MONSTROUS MONSTROUS DRAGON ON THE RHONE RIVER DID COST SAINT MARTHA HER LEFT HAND. SHE ALSO WAS KNOWN TO BE FLUENT IN THE LANGUAGE OF THE BIRDS, TO WHOM SHE DID SPEAK WITH THAT CHATTY LOT WHO SPOKE BACK IN RETURN THAT SHE REFERRED TO AS THE LITTLE BIRDIE BABY BIRDS, PETITS OISEAUX DE BÉBÉ, AND YES PLEASE WITH AND OFTEN FROM SAINT CATHERINE DO GIVE US RELIEF.

 

 

THE 34TH DAY T MINUS THREE ZERO THIRTEEN: A VERY CURIOUS COINCIDENCE

DO YOU SEE WHAT EYE SITS BY THE SEA?
SECOND JANUARY THE DAY OF THREE THIRTEEN ONE
[ENLARGE]
SECOND JANUARY TWO-THOUSAND NINETEEN
AND ON THE VERY SAME DAY
THREE-THIRTEEN IS OUT
THE PRINCETON MUNICIPALITY
DID YOU CATCH IT?
FOLLOWING FROM

THIRD FEBRUARY TWO-THOUSAND NINETEEN, THE 34TH DAY T MINUS THREE ZERO FIVE: ONOFRI HAS SOME EXPLAINING TO DO, AND THE UNCERTAIN CONCLUSION OF THE CASE NAMED HEREUPON BAETYL PICKETTERS’ CHARGE.

TWENTY-FIRST DECEMBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN, THREE ZERO THREE

EIGHTEENTH NOVEMBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN, THE 34TH DAY T PLUS THREE THIRTY-FOUR: THE OPRA HARVEST

SEVENTEENTH NOVEMBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN, “REPORTING THAT THE ACCUSED TOOK A PHOTO OF SOMEONE ELSE’S PHONE WITH SECURITY CODES AND PUBLISHED IT ONLINE. CALLER WAS ADVISED OF HIS RIGHTS TO SIGN COMPLAINTS”

SEVENTEENTH NOVEMBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN, THE 34TH DAY T PLUS THREE THIRTY-THREE: THE MANIFESTO OF JOSEPH CLARK, THE ATTORNEY FOR THE TOWNSHIP OF HOWELL

SIXTEENTH NOVEMBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN, THE 34TH DAY T PLUS THREE TWO: TAMPERING WITH EVIDENCE, REFER TO THE THIRTY-FOURTH PAGE ENUMERATED THIRTY-SIX IN THE FIFTY-TWO PAGE DISCOVERY PACKET FOR PICKETTERS’ CHARGE THAT WAS EXHIBITED ON SIXTEENTH NOVEMBER SANS COMMENTARY ALBEIT WITH NECESSARY REDACTIONS. THAT PRESENCE OF THAT PAGE AND THE NAME THEREUPON, CARA MCCOLLUM, HATH BEEN REMARKED UPON IN THE ORIGINAL SEQUENCE OF THE 34TH DAY. HOWEVER, THAT DOCUMENT IN THAT SPACE REMAINS A MYSTERY FOR WHICH NEITHER THE MERCER COUNTY PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE, NOR THE TOWNSHIP OF LAWRENCE HATH PROFFERED AN EXPLANATION. THAT PAGE APART OF TWO THREE NINE.

FOURTEENTH NOVEMBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN, THE 34TH DAY T PLUS THREE THIRTY: ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC AND THE MISSING EMAIL

THIRTEENTH NOVEMBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN, TWO FOUR THREE AND TWO FOUR FOUR

FIRST NOVEMBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN, THE 34TH DAY T PLUS THREE SEVENTEEN: THREE MORE DOCUMENTS FROM BEHIND THE CURTAIN AND A STRANGE ARTICLE OBSERVED IN THE ASBURY PARK PRESS, WHEN THE LINE HATH BEEN REVERSED ON THE PLOT OF NINE TWENTY-THREE, NOT FOR THE VERY FIRST TIME, THOUGH THIS TIME RATHER ELEGANT IN TANDEM WITH TWO MORE IN THE TRIO, ONE ABOVE AND ONE BELOW, TWO THREE FOUR AND TWO FOUR THREE, THANK YOU MUCH, THE ARTICLE FROM THE ASBURY PARK PRESS EXHIBITED ON THE FIRST OF NOVEMBER DATED THE SAME, THE SAME DATE A TRIO AGAINST LAWRENCE ISSUED DATE THE SAME, THAT ARTICLE REGARDING THE CONDUCT OF THE HOWELL TOWNSHIP MUNICIPALITY ON THE SAME TOPIC OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAW OF LAND IN THE MATTER OF THE OPEN PUBLIC RECORDS ACT, DAMAGE CONTROL AFTER THE FIRST SALVO UNLEASHED AGAINST THAT TOWN SOME DAYS BEFORE, NUMBERED ONE, TWO AND THREE FOLLOWING FROM TWO-HUNDRED THIRTY-FOUR.

TWENTY-SIXTH OCTOBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN, TWO THREE FOUR, TWO THREE FIVE, AND TWO THREE SIX, WHERE FOLLOWING FROM THE HOWELL TOWNSHIP MUNICIPALITY MOST CERTAINLY DID RETALIATE AGAINST THE REQUESTOR NAMED THRICE BELOW.

TWENTY-THIRD OCTOBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN, THE 34TH DAY T PLUS THREE EIGHT: THE MOBIUS DEFINED, COUNTY MONMOUTH THROUGH ZONE, COUNTY MERCER

WHAT DID WE LEARN?

RETALIATION IS ALREADY ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE MATHS OF OBTAINING PUBLIC RECORDS FROM THE MUNICIPAL RACKET, YES INDEED, FACTORED INTO WHAT OTHERWISE SHOULD BE ROUTINE AND LAWFUL CONDUCT OF ENTITIES IN THIS STATE WHEREIN RETALIATION AS SUCH HATH BEEN SO NAMED HEREUPON BAETYL MANY TIMES, EYE FOR AN EYE, FOR EVERY SINGLE THING IN FAVOR OF THE TARGET, ONE POINT, AYE, THE ADVERSARY DEMANDS AN EYE IN REVENGE, AYE AYE.

IN ONE OR MORE CASES, THAT EYE IS LEFT OF FIELD TO THE FIELD OF PLAY, BROUGHT TO FIELD IN PRINT THE VERY SAME DAY, ABOUT THE RACKET, MAYBE AFTER A CALL TO THE PRESS, CALL IN A FAVOR, PLEASE TO THE PUBLIC, PUT THE TRUTH UNDER DURESS.

IN ONE OR MORE CASES STILL, RETALIATION DID INDEED OCCUR IN THE CASES ALREADY THEN BEFORE A COURT, THE HOWELL TOWNSHIP BUT OF COURSE, WHEREIN THE VERY ACT OF LITERACY RISKS LIFE AND LIMB, WHERE ONE NEED REQUEST AT REGULAR INTERVALS IF THE COURT HATH APPOINTED COUNSEL IN SECRET, AND WHEREUPON BECOMING INFORMED OF THE VERY FACT THAT COUNSEL HATH BEEN APPOINTED SURREPTITIOUSLY, THE NEXT EYE IS SOUGHT AFTER THE LAST EYE HATH BEEN FOUND, THE CASE OF TWENTY-SIXTH OCTOBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN, WHEREUPON THE VERY SAME DAY THE FIRST THREE BECAME KNOWN, TWO THREE FOUR, FIVE AND SIX, THE COURT APPOINTED ONE ITS OWN EMPLOYEES AS DEFENSE COUNSEL, HID THAT FACT FOR GREATER THAN TWO WEEKS, THEN LIED ABOUT THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THAT INVOLUNTARY APPOINTMENT WHICH WAS ONLY DISCOVERED FOLLOWING FROM PERSISTENT INQUIRIES AS TO WHETHER COUNSEL HAD APPOINTED APPOINTED IN SECRET, AS THAT COURT DID THE VERY SAME THING IN THE PAST. OF NOTE, BOTH FEMALE APPOINTEES DID FAIL TO INFORM THEIR CLIENT THEY HAD BEEN APPOINTED, AND THE ALL FEMALE STAFF OF THE COURT DID ALSO FAIL TO PROVIDE ANY NOTICE WHATSOEVER. VERY GROTESQUE ACTS COMPOUNDED BY LIES ABOUT THOSE SAME ACTS.

AT WHICH TIME WE RETURN TO SEVENTH DECEMBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN

FIRST, A FACTUAL DESCRIPTION OF EVENTS, HERETOFORE PUBLISHED ON THIRTY-FIRST JANUARY OF THIS YEAR, AND AGAIN REPRODUCED BELOW TO PROVIDE FULL CONTEXT FOR WHAT FOLLOWS FROM.

Pursuant to P.L.1963, c.73 (C.47:1A-1 et seq.), records kept or maintained by the Township of Howell, the Howell Township Municipal Court, the Howell Township Police Department and/or any other department in the jurisdiction of the Township of Howell, are requested and again marked required on this date of Request, January 30, 2019, to be in possession of both named parties in MUNICIPAL APPEAL NO: 18-040 that has been FILED and is now pending in SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, LAW DIVISION – CRIMINAL PART, MONMOUTH VICINAGE, and despite receiving no less than one form of notice marked FILED in the present year, no formal acknowledgment of that matter has been forthcoming from the Township of Howell, with that notice consisting of a one page document stamped “DAVID F. BAUMAN, P.J.Cr.”, whereupon the date of “JAN 10 2019”, the Howell Township Municipal Court was ORDERED to pay all fees and costs associated with preparation of the court transcript from the Municipal Hearing that did take place on just the one Hearing date of December 7, 2018, despite a multitude of other Hearings that did take place and are all directly related. Of note, the Violation enumerated “220-C” and/or “220-2” that did result in MA 18-040 was coerced on December 7, 2018, on which date a plea was agreed upon in light of a false presumption provided to this requestor while seated in the Howell Township Municipal Court with no less than one Howell Township Police Officer standing nearby following from alleged threats that on this date of Request have are not described in language beyond the general description of “threats”otherwise absent any official record(s) known to this requestor. The aforementioned proximity was maintained by HTPD on what had been scheduled as the first day of a trial, during which time each and every moment this requestor was present within either the Howell Township Municipal Court or in the antechamber that presence was maintained by the female Howell Township Police Department Officer whose badge number was identified #676 upon request and subsequently identified in a handwritten OPRA Request dated December 7, 2018 that was transmit on or about 12:10 PM EST to “Dianne”, who in all likelihood is or was employed by the Howell Township Police Department Records Bureau on that date. Furthermore, that Request has not yet been fulfilled or acknowledged as of the present time, and the text of that OPRA Request dated “12/07/18” was photographed on or about 12:08 PM EST and is reproduced in full, including errors, as follows hereafter: “All written documents in possession of Howell Police and/or the Township of Howell describing thereupon all alleged threats this requestor made, allegedly, against Howell Court staff, the judge(s) of Howell Court, and/or other Township of Howell employees, specifically following from the allegation made by PTL S. Regin (sic), #676 that SGT. J. Lopez as her supervisor ordered one to one monitoring of this requestor following from unspecified, allegedly and explicitly false claims that threats were made one or more (sic) employees of the Township of Howell.” The OPRA Request was handwritten on one of the handful of blank four page “OPEN PUBLIC RECORDS ACT REQUEST FORM” packets observed stacked on the counter of the public facing side of the Howell Township Police Department Records Bureau window that is also located in the antechamber to the Howell Township Municipal Court. Furthermore, that packet was obtained and completed in both physical and visual proximity to the male HTPD Class II Officer #324, whose surname remains unknown, and the female HTPD Officer PTL S. REGINA #676, as prior stated. Both HTPD Officers were so kind as to state their badge numbers aloud following from requests for identification made in the moments prior to handing the completed Request form to “Dianne”, despite only identifying #676 thereupon. The specific record(s) requested herein are the very same requested on December 7, 2018 and in at least one OPRA Request dated prior, both of which remain unfulfilled, wherein the prior dated and nearly identical Request regarding alleged threats is highlighted in GRC Complaint 2018-303 entitled Miller v. Twp. of Howell (Monmouth), for which the original Denial of Access Complaint submit by this requestor was stamped “RECEIVED” by the New Jersey Government Records Council on “2018 DEC 3 PM 1 26” at such time four GRC Complaints entitled Miller v. Twp. of Howell (Monmouth) had already been filed. Furthermore, the specific government record(s) that would bear the requested, required and otherwise absent information are not known to be anything other than police reports. As such, any and all Howell Township Police Department reports are requested herein, if not otherwise exempt, thereupon describing any and all threats allegedly made by this requestor against anyone who claims to have been threatened by that very same person in the period between the present date of January 30, 2019 and the nominal date of September 23, 1986.

SECOND, DOES THE CONDUCT OF LOPEZ PRIMA FACIE CONSTITUTE PROBABLE CAUSE FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST THAT REQUESTOR FOR MAKING TERRORISTIC THREATS? CONVERSELY, IF NO THREATS WERE ACTUALLY MADE BY THE ACCUSED, AS IS THE FACTUAL REALITY, DOES THE CONDUCT OF LOPEZ, WITH PERHAPS OTHER ACTORS, CONSTITUTE ONE OR MORE VIOLATIONS OF,

 N.J.S.A. 2C:13-5. Criminal coercion

SPECIFICALLY IN REGARD TO 2C:13-5 A(2), 2C:13-5 A(4), 2C:13-5 A(6), AND/OR 2C:13-5 A(7), DESCRIPTIONS OF WHICH CAN BE FOUND IN THE TEXT OF THE NEW JERSEY CRIMINAL CODE EXHIBITED BELOW FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION.

CRIMINAL COERCION
[ENLARGE]
AN ACTOR COMMITS CRIMINAL COERCION IF HE OR SHE PURPOSEFULLY AND UNLAWFULLY RESTRICTS A PERSON’S ABILITY TO ENGAGE OR REFRAIN FROM ENGAGING IN CONDUCT THROUGH THREATS:

N.J.S.A. 2C:13-5 A(2), CONSISTING OF FALSE ACCUSATIONS THAT A PERSON COMMITTED A CRIMINAL AND/OR OTHER OFFENSE.

 

N.J.S.A. 2C:13-5 A(4), CONSISTING OF AN ACTION TAKEN OR WITHHELD BY AN OFFICIAL, OR CONSISTING OF AN ACTION THAT WOULD CAUSE AN OFFICIAL TO TAKE OR WITHHOLD ACTION.

 

N.J.S.A. 2C:13-5 A(6), CONSISTING OF PROVIDING TESTIMONY OR INFORMATION, OR WITHHOLDING TESTIMONY OR INFORMATION WITH REGARD TO A PERSON’S LEGAL CLAIM OR DEFENSE.

 

N.J.S.A. 2C:13-5 A(7), CONSISTING OF ANY OTHER ACT THAT IS INTENDED TO HARM A TARGETED PERSON WITH REGARD TO HIS OR HER HEALTH, SAFETY, BUSINESS, CALLING, CAREER, FINANCIAL CONDITION, REPUTATION OR PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS.

THIRDWITH REGARD TO THE ABOVE DESCRIBED ALBEIT NON-SPECIFIC ALLEGATIONS THAT THREATS WERE MADE, WE FIRST CONSIDER POTENTIAL VIOLATIONS OF,

N.J.S.A. 2C:12-3. Terroristic threats

WITH ABBREVIATED TEXT OF THAT STATUTE EXHIBITED BELOW AS EXCERPTED FROM THE PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE DATABASE MAINTAINED THE NEW JERSEY STATE LEGISLATURE.

TERRORISTIC THREATS
[EXPAND]
AN ACTOR IS GUILTY OF MAKING TERRORISTIC THREATS IF HE OR SHE,

N.J.S.A. 2C:12-3 (A), THREATENS TO COMMIT ANY CRIME OF VIOLENCE WITH INTENT TO TERRORIZE THE TARGETED PERSON, OR MAKES A THREAT THAT RESULTS IN THE EVACUATION OF A BUILDING, PUBLIC SPACE AND/OR OTHER DEFINED LOCATIONS, AND THE SEVERITY OF THE VIOLATION IS GREATER IF THE ACT IS COMMITTED DURING A TIME OF DECLARED EMERGENCY. FURTHERMORE, THE ACTOR SHALL BE STRICTLY LIABLE UPON PROOF THAT THE CRIME OCCURRED.

 

N.J.S.A. 2C:12-3 (B), THREATENS TO KILL ANOTHER PERSON WITH INTENT TO PUT THE TARGETED INDIVIDUAL IN IMMEDIATE FEAR OF DEATH.

FOURTH, AGAIN CONSIDERING THE UNSPECIFIED NATURE OF THE ALLEGED THREATS, THE DESCRIPTIONS OF CRIMINAL HARASSMENT AND CYBER-HARASSMENT FOUND IN CHAPTER THIRTY-THREE ARE IN ALL LIKELIHOOD WHAT WOULD BE CONSIDERED NEXT FOR ALLEGED COMMUNICATIONS NOT EXPLICITLY THREATENING THE LIFE OF AN INDIVIDUAL. EXCERPTS BELOW FROM THE TEXT DESCRIBING VIOLATIONS OF,

N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4. Harassment

AND

N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4.1. Cyber-harassment

AN ACTOR COMMITS A PETTY DISORDERLY PERSONS OFFENSE OF HARASSMENT IF HE OR SHE PURPOSEFULLY HARASSES ANOTHER PERSON:

N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4 (A), BY MAKING OR EFFECTING COMMUNICATION(S) KNOWN TO HAVE BEEN INITIATED BY THE ACTOR AT VERY INCONVENIENT HOURS, USING OFFENSIVE LANGUAGE, OR IN SUCH A MANNER LIKELY TO CAUSE ANNOYANCE OR ALARM.

 

N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4 (B), BY EITHER STRIKING, KICKING, SHOVING, OR OFFENSIVELY TOUCHING THE VICTIM, OR THREATENING TO DO SO.

 

N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4 (C), BY ENGAGING IN ANY OTHER COURSE OF ALARMING CONDUCT OR BY REPEATEDLY COMMITTING ACTS INTENDED TO ALARM OR SERIOUSLY ANNOY THE VICTIM.

 

N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4 (E), WHEREBY THE OTHERWISE NON-FELONY CRIMINAL ACTS DESCRIBED IN THE PRECEDING THREE SUBSECTIONS ARE GRADED AS A CRIME OF THE FOURTH DEGREE IN THE EVENT THE ACTOR ENGAGES IN SUCH CONDUCT WHILE SERVING A TERM OF IMPRISONMENT, WHILE ON PAROLE, OR WHILE ON PROBATION FOLLOWING FROM CONVICTION OF AN INDICTABLE OFFENSE UNDER THE LAWS OF NEW JERSEY, ANY OTHER STATE OR THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.

AN ACTOR COMMITS THE FOURTH DEGREE CRIME OF CYBER-HARASSMENT IF HE OR SHE MAKES A COMMUNICATION IN AN ONLINE CAPACITY USING ANY ELECTRONIC DEVICE OR THROUGH A SOCIAL NETWORKING SITE WITH THE PURPOSE TO HARASS THE TARGETED VICTIM THAT DOES:

N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4.1 (A)(1), THREATEN TO INFLICT INJURY OR PHYSICAL HARM TO THE TARGETED VICTIM OR HIS OR HER PROPERTY.

 

N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4.1 (A)(2), KNOWINGLY SEND, POSTS, COMMENTS, REQUESTS, SUGGESTS, OR PROPOSES ANY LEWD, INDECENT OR OBSCENE MATERIAL TO OR ABOUT A PERSON WITH THE INTENT TO EMOTIONALLY HARM A REASONABLE PERSON OR PLACE A REASONABLE PERSON IN FEAR OF PHYSICAL OR EMOTIONAL HARM.

 

N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4.1 (A)(3), THREATEN TO COMMIT ANY CRIME AGAINST THE TARGETED VICTIM OR HIS OR HER PROPERTY.

 

N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4.1 (B), OF NOTE, WHEN COMMUNICATIONS ARE MADE CONTRARY TO THE PRECEDING THREE SUBSECTIONS AT SUCH TIME THE ACTOR IS OVER THE AGE OF TWENTY-ONE AND THE TARGETED VICTIM IS A MINOR, THE ACT BECOMES A VIOLATION OF THE THIRD-DEGREE.

WHEN THE ACTOR IS MINOR UNDER THE AGE OF SIXTEEN, THE COURT MAY ORDER AS A CONDITION OF SENTENCE:

N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4.1 (C)(1), A CLASS OR TRAINING PROGRAM INTENDED TO REDUCE THE MINOR’S PROCLIVITY TO COMMIT ACTS IN VIOLATION OF THE STATUTE.

 

N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4.1 (C)(2), A CLASS OR TRAINING PROGRAM INTENDED TO INSTRUCT THE MINOR TO THE DANGERS ASSOCIATED WITH CYBER-HARASSMENT.

WHEN A PARENT OR GUARDIAN FAILS TO COMPLY THE CONDITIONS OF SENTENCE SET FORTH IN (C)(1) AND C(2) ABOVE, THAT PARENT OR GUARDIAN IS ADJUDICATED:

N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4.1 (D), A DISORDERLY PERSON WHO SHALL BE FINED NO MORE THAN TWENTY-FIVE DOLLARS FOR A FIRST OFFENSE AND NO MORE THAN ONE-HUNDRED DOLLARS FOR EACH SUBSEQUENT OFFENSE.

FIFTH, THE CASE OF PICKETTERS’ CHARGE DID INCLUDE FOR A PERIOD OF SIXTY-SEVEN DAYS THE PERCEIVED THREAT OF IMMINENT ARREST OR SERVICE OF PROCESS OF ONE OR MORE BRAND NEW CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS FOR ONE OR MORE ALLEGED CRIMINAL ACTS DESCRIBED AS “CYBER-HARASSMENT” BY A FEMALE INDIVIDUAL WHO DURING THAT SIXTY-SEVEN DAY PERIOD WAS ALLEGEDLY THE DEFENSE ATTORNEY OF THE ONE DEFENDANT IN PICKETTERS’ CHARGE, AND SHE WHO DESPITE NO LESS THAN THREE NOTIFICATIONS THAT HER SERVICES WERE NOT DESIRED DID IGNORE THOSE REQUESTS FOR SUBSTITUTION AS DID ANOTHER FEMALE EMPLOYEE OF THE MERCER COUNTY TRIAL REGION OPD WHO DID CLAIM TO BE HER SUPERIOR. FURTHERMORE, THE ATTORNEY DID MAKE A COMMUNICATION ON OR ABOUT TWENTY-NINTH NOVEMBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN BY PHONE CALL PLACED TO HER CLIENT, DURING WHICH TIME SHE DID STATE MULTIPLE TIMES THAT “THE MERCER COUNTY PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE IS LOOKING TO CHARGE YOU”, FOR COMMUNICATIONS DESCRIBING A VICTIM THAT SHE DID NOT IDENTIFY BY NAME AND SPECIFICALLY REGARDING PUBLIC DISCLOSURES RELATED A DIVORCE THAT WERE ALSO NOT SUBSEQUENTLY DESCRIBED BY DOCKET NUMBER, IDENTITY OF A JUDGE, THE NAME OF EITHER PARTY OR BY WHAT SPECIFIC PUBLIC DISCLOSURES WERE DEEMED CONTRARY TO N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4.1 (A) et seq. THE COMMUNICATIONS AS SUCH WERE NEVER DESCRIBED AS HAVING BEEN MADE OR CAUSED TO HAVE BEEN MADE BY THE DEFENDANT, NEVER CLAIMED TO HAVE BEEN MADE ON ANY ELECTRONIC DEVICE OR THROUGH A SOCIAL NETWORKING SITE THAT WAS IN ACTUAL FACT OWNED OR OPERATED BY THE DEFENDANT, AND OF THE HIGHEST SIGNIFICANCE SOMETHING WAS CLAIMED TO HAVE BEEN POSTED TO A WEBSITE THAT MAY OR MAY NOT HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS “SOMETHING AWFUL”, AND REGARDLESS OF WHAT SPECIFIC DOMAIN WAS UTTERED BY THAT ATTORNEY, THE DEFENDANT REMAINS UNAWARES OF ANY PUBLIC DISCLOSURES RELATED TO THE CASE POSTED TO ANY WEBSITE THAT SHE MAY OR MAY NOT HAVE ACTUALLY NAMED, AND FURTHERMORE THE DEFENDANT HER THEN CLIENT WAS CERTAINLY NOT AFFILIATED WITH ANY WEBSITE AS SUCH.

THE FOLLOWING CLAIMS WERE ALSO MADE BY THAT ATTORNEY DURING THE TWENTY-NINTH NOVEMBER PHONE CONVERSATION:

ONE, ASSERTION THAT ANY DIVORCE PROCEEDING INVOLVING THE ALLEGED VICTIM IN PICKETTERS’ CHARGE ACTIVE CONCOMITANT TO THE CASE COULD NOT POSSIBLY BE RELEVANT TO AN AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE. THIS CLAIM WAS MADE VERY EMPHATICALLY, IN MANNER ONE MIGHT DESCRIBE NEAR BORDERLINE HYSTERICAL, REPEATEDLY ASSERTED, APPROX “THERE IS NO POSSIBLE WAY IT COULD BE RELATED”.

 

TWO, EXPLICIT REFUSALS TO ASCERTAIN WHETHER A OR THE DIVORCE PROCEEDING RESULTED IN FINANCIAL GAIN OR LOSS FOR EITHER PARTY.

 

THREE, WOULD NOT ENTERTAIN POSSIBILITY THAT DEFENDANT MAY HAVE BEEN SUBJECT OF DIVORCE ON-RECORD TESTIMONY AND/OR DESCRIBED IN OTHER COURT DOCUMENTS. OF NOTE, ATTORNEY WITH NO KNOWLEDGE OF HISTORY BETWEEN DEFENDANT AND ALLEGED VICTIM PROVIDED BY DEFENDANT UNLESS SHE DID READ DOAC SERES VS LAWRENCE, NOTE RETURNED TWENTY-EIGHTH JANUARY TWO-THOUSAND NINETEEN, INCLUDING INVITE TO WEDDING OF THE ALLEGED VICTIM AND HUSBAND, BOTH OF WHOM NAMED ON EACH OF THREE VERSIONS OF A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER THAT DID APPEAR TO BE MADE AVAILABLE FOR USE AGAINST THE DEFENDANT IN A SIMULTANEOUS CRIMINAL PROCEEDING CONTRARY TO N.J.S.A. 2C: 25-29 BY VIRTUE OF INCLUSION IN FIFTY-TWO PAGE DISCOVERY PACKET FIRST PROVIDED TO DEFENDANT FIRST OCTOBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN AT INITIAL DISPOSITION CONFERENCE.

 

FOUR, CLAIM THAT ENTIRE DOAC SERIES VS LAWRENCE DID NOT MATTER, UNCLEAR IF SHE WAS EVEN AWARE OF CONTENT OR HOW THAT CONTENT RELATED TO AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE.

SIXTHTHE HISTORY OF PICKETTERS’ CHARGE AS RECORDED BY ZONE ON FOURTEENTH JANUARY TWO-THOUSAND NINETEEN, EXHIBITED IN THE TWENTY-TWO IMAGES SEEN BELOW,

SEVENTH, THE TWENTY-EIGHTH JANUARY TWO-THOUSAND NINETEEN SERIES OF A NEARLY IDENTICAL GROUP OF SHEETS THIS TIME DIRECTLY REQUESTED USING THE FORM EXHIBITED IN POSITION ONE WHICH DID YIELD THIS SERIES PURPORTING TO DESCRIBE A HISTORY OF PICKETTERS’ CHARGE. SPOT THE DIFFERENCE FROM THE FOURTEENTH JANUARY LOT IN THE TWENTY-SEVEN IMAGES EXHIBITED BELOW,

EIGHTH, THE FOURTH FEBRUARY TWO-THOUSAND NINETEEN SERIES THAT DID MARK THE CONCLUSION OF PICKETTERS’ CHARGE IN ZONE IS EXHIBITED IN FIVE IMAGES BELOW, AND DO INDEED PAY SPECIAL ATTENTION TO THE REMARK ON CORRESPONDENCE ALLEGEDLY NEVER SENT TO HUNTERDON COUNTY.


STAY TUNED!

 

 

THE 34TH DAY T MINUS THREE ZERO ZERO: TO ZONE

[REGARDING ONE OR MORE FRAUD DRUG CLAIMS]

…WHICH FOUND TO EXIST YET NOT EXIST

AND OUT SAFE FROM LAST TRIP TO ZONE FIVE HUNDRED AND THREE DAYS LATER.

AT WHICH THIS RECENT DISCOVERY EXHIBITED ABOVE REMAINS INEXPLICABLE. NO HISTORY OF DRUG RELATED ARRESTS WHATSOEVER. FURTHERMORE, NO ON RECORD QUESTIONS PERMITTED. AS SUCH, THIS REMAINS A MYSTERY. SUSPECT THE INVOLVEMENT OF HOWELL.

THE 34TH DAY T MINUS FOUR SEVEN: THE EMERGENCY IN COUNTY MONMOUTH HATH BEEN DECLARED OVER ON THE SEVENTH DAY FOLLOWING A HOME INVASION, HOSTAGE SITUATION AND QUADRUPLE MURDER DIRECTLY LINKED TO THREE OR FOUR EPISODES OF AGGRAVATED ARSON THAT DID SWEEP THE FLOOR CLEAN OF ANY IMPRIMATUR THAT LAW AND ORDER EXISTS IN THE COUNTY SO NAMED, NO TRUE SUSPECTS YET CLAIMED, THE ONLY ONE BROTHER PAUL, YES INDEED FRAMED, WHAT OF THE THIRD CANEIRO BROTHER COREY, ABSENT IN ALL PRESS UNTIL “KEITH MARTIN CANEIRO” OBITUARY NAMED, WHO IF STILL AMONG THE LIVING MAY BE THE ONLY CREDIBLE WITNESS TO WHAT TRANSPIRED SIX DAYS AGO AT FIFTEEN WILLOW BROOK ROAD, COLTS NECK, NEW JERSEY

FIRST, THE TITLE IS THE STORY
SECOND, PART ONE OF THE JUDGE MCGANN SERIES, THE VERY SAME JUDGE SITTING ON THE BENCH IN SUPERIOR COURT IN COUNTY MONMOUTH WHO WILL IN TWO DAYS TIME ALLEGEDLY OVERHEAR THE DETENTION HEARING FOR PAUL CANEIRO. WE HERE BEGIN IN SEVENTEEN PARTS FROM THE FAMILY PART PAST, THE DARK SIDE OF THE COURT, FORGED RECORDS EACH ONE AND EACH ORDER UPON THE NAME OF THAT JUDGE SO NAMED J MCGANN, AS SEEN BELOW THE CRITICAL INFORMATION WE NEED TO KNOW,

NOTABLE EXCERPTS FROM THE RED-TEXT ABOVE

YOU MAY PREPARE FOR THE APOCALYPSE IN THE COURTS, BROUGHT TO YOU BY BAETYL IN ZONE.

ONE

TWENTY-FOURTH JANUARY TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN AT THREE-THIRTY FOUR PM INDEED ONE DAY PRIOR TO A PICKETTERS’ CHARGE COURT EVENT IN ZONE, THE SECOND OF THREE, JUDGE LYDON AT THE HELM, DEEP WATERS UNKNOWN CAPSIZED THAT SHIP, SS ZONE, THIS DOCUMENT IN-FACT RESULTED IN THAT HUMILIATING DEFEAT FOR THE DEMOCRAT PARTY OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, A PANICKED RUSH FOR INAUDIBLE SOUND, OFF THE “RECORD” IN THE CHAMBERS OF THEN JUDGE LYDON, EMERGENCY MEETING CALLED FOR THE THREE ALIGNED ALL TOGETHER AGAINST YOURS TRULY. ONE, THE RESTRAINED ATTORNEY NAMED HEREUPON. TWO, A DEPUTY ASSISTANT PROSECUTOR FROM THE MCPO, OBESE BLACK FEMALE WHO DID RATHER RUDELY SHOUT IN MY FACE THAT SHE WAS NOT ALLOWED TO TALK THE DEFENDANT, PRO SE ONLY LOGICAL CONCLUSION THAT DAY, AND THEN OF COURSE LYDON IN BID TO COERCE ALL OF THE ABOVE TO PLEAD GUILTY FOR THE PLEASURE OF THIRTY-SIX MONTHS IN ZONE, YET NO COMPLAINT, NO DISCOVERY FROM THE MCPO, NOT A SINGLE SHRED, NOT ONE DOCUMENT YOU KNOW, HOWEVER THERE WAS ONE PAGE THAT DAY, THIS DOCUMENT IN-FACT, THE MOST VEXING TRUMP CARD TO PLAY, THE RAMIFICATIONS OF WHICH LYDON DID LEARN THAT MORNING AND ECHO IN WHAT HE SAID, THAT YOURS TRULY FORCED THOSE WORDS “THIRTY-SIX” RIGHT OUT OF HIS HEAD, ON TOP OF WHICH THE COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY ENGINEERING BACKPACK THAT HE SAW ON CCTV AS I WALKED IN DID RESULT IN A CALL FROM LYDON TO A FIXER IN NEW YORK CITY IN ORDER TO RULE OUT ANY CHANCE THAT COLUMBIA WITH ANY AFFILIATION TO YOURS TRULY, THAT STORY TO BE CONTINUED. EXIT CHAMBERS BY THREE, THE PRE-RESTRAINED ATTORNEY FROM YESTERDAY AGREED TO LEAVE THE COURT WITHOUT CHARGE OF THE FOURTH DEGREE, THAT ONE INDEED EMPLOYED BY THE SAME COURT IDENTIFIED ATOP THIS DOCUMENT, YES INDEED, COUNTY MONMOUTH, RED CARD THEN EJECTED FROM THE COURT IN ZONE FOR WHAT HE DID INDEED NOT DO THE DAY PRIOR, TESTIFY AGAINST HIS CLIENT IN THE “TRIAL” DESCRIBED HEREUPON THIS DOCUMENT WHICH HAD BEEN SCHEDULED AND THEN CANCELED ON OR ABOUT THREE THIRTY-FOUR PM BY JUDGE MCGANN OF THE CHANCERY DIVISION, FAMILY PART, MONMOUTH COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, ROOM ONE TWO THREE WHEREIN THE DAY WAS CALLED EARLY TO PREVENT THAT STAR-CHAMBERED ATTORNEY FROM TESTIFYING AGAINST THE CLIENT HE WOULD ATTEMPT TO ADVOCATE FOR THE NEXT DAY. HOWEVER, THAT TESTIMONY WAS ALREADY SCHEDULED, AND AS SUCH SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF JERSEY DID PERMIT A DEFENSE ATTORNEY TO PLAY BOTH SIDES AND THEN PLAY DUMB ABOUT THE WHOLE THING. THE HONECKER SPECIAL. WHICH IS TO SAY, YOU SHOW UP FOR COURT EXPECTING YOUR ATTORNEY TO BE THERE, YOU EVEN MADE A PHONE CALL TO CONFIRM ATTENDANCE, YES INDEED ALETHA L. SHEPPARD-FRANKLIN-LATOYA, THE ECKERT SEAMANS PROXY, NO SHOW, THEN UPON ARRIVAL IN COURT SOMEONE ELSE IS THERE, IN FACT SOMEONE WHO IS NOT A DEFENSE ATTORNEY AT ALL, AND AGAINST WHOM YOU HAVE AN ACTIVE RESTRAINING ORDER. UNBELIEVABLE! THE RESTRAINED ATTORNEY IS THEN REMARKABLY PERMITTED TO DISCUSS A PLEA DEAL WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF THE ACCUSED, THE NOT-GUILTY PLEA FIRST ENTERED NOW SUDDENLY VOIDED, ONLY GUILTY WILL BE PERMITTED IN THIS COURT OF ZONE, WITH RESULT OF THE DAY PLEAD NOT-GUILTY AGAIN, THEN LYDON SAYS WE’LL SEE YOU IN TWO WEEKS AND TRY THIS AGAIN, FOR REASON THIS DOCUMENT PROVING RESTRAINT WAS SHOWN TO COURT STAFF AND BLEW THEIR SHIP OUT OF THE WATER, SPOKE WITH BOTH SHERIFF OF MERCER COURT GOONS WHO WEAR KEDS WITH VELCRO STRAPS, AND THE COURT ENTITY SO NAMED LOU, YES INDEED, FULLY KNOWN TO ALL PRESENT THAT ATTORNEY HAD NO BUSINESS THERE. YET HE WAS ALLOWED TO SPEAK WITH BOTH PROSECUTOR AND JUDGE WITH THE RESULT AN ATTEMPT TO EFFECT A THIRTY-SIX MONTH SENTENCE AGAINST YOURS TRULY FOR A CRIME NEVER DEFINED AND WITH A SENTENCE DOUBLE THE LENGTH OF THE MAXIMUM SENTENCE PERMITTED BY LAW FOR THAT ALLEGED OFFENSE, THAT SENTENCE SOMETHING THAT STILL REMAINS UNDEFINED, WHICH IS TO SAY IT WAS A SHIT PLOT THAT ULTIMATELY FAILED. YES INDEED, A CONFLICT OF INTEREST OF THE FIRST DEGREE. YOU MAY PREPARE FOR THE APOCALYPSE IN THE COURTS, BROUGHT TO YOU BY BAETYL IN ZONE.


TWO

THIS IS A FORGED RECORD, YES INDEED, FALSE INFORMATION PURPOSEFULLY ENTERED ON A COURT DOCUMENT. THE PLAINTIFF NEVER BOTHERED TO APPEAR IN COURT ON DAY ONE AND FURTHERMORE MADE NO ATTEMPT TO INFORM THE COURT OF COERCION OR DURESS PREVENTING ATTENDANCE PRIOR TO START. THIS JUDGE MCGANN OF THE FAMILY PART IS THE SAME CRIMINAL DIVISION JUDGE PRESIDING OVER THE PAUL CANEIRO AGGRAVATED ARSON CASE. PLEASE TAKE NOTE, MCGANN IS A CROOK AND A CRETIN OF THE FIRST ORDER WHO ALLOWED A NO-SHOW PLAINTIFF A DO-OVER WHICH THEN ROLLED INTO A SERIES OF COURT EVENTS THAT CONTINUED UNTIL SOMETIME ON OR ABOUT GOOD FRIDAY TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN, THE END NOT EXACTLY CLEAR, WITH EACH “TRIAL” AS HE CALLED IT, CONDUCTED AT THE TIME AND DATE SEEN IN THE SPACE WRITTEN ABOVE, BECAME THE NEXT CHANCE FOR OUR PATSY TO PERJURE HIMSELF INTO A LIFE SENTENCE, WHICH IN THE END DID RESULT IN THE NO-SHOW PLAINTIFF WITHDRAWING ALL TESTIMONY. WHAT THEN BECAME OF THIS SERIES WAS THE REMOVAL OF MCGANN FROM THE MONMOUTH COUNTY FAMILY PART FOR YES INDEED HEINOUS CRIMES, STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE, THAT WILL BE DISCUSSED AT LENGTH HEREUPON. MCGANN THEN BEGGED FOR HIS JOB TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTOR OF THE COURTS SO NAMED GLENN A. GRANT IN ZONE, WHO THEN DID GRANT MCGANN A STAY ON THE BAR AS THE BOTTOM BITCH IN THE MONMOUTH COUNTY CRIMINAL DIVISION, WHERE WE NOW FIND HIM IN THE MOST FITTING POSITION OF ENSURING A FAIR TRIAL IS CONDUCTED FOR THE MAN FRAMED FOR A CRIME COMMITTED BY THE SAME PICKETTERS TO WHOM MGCANN PETITIONED FOR THAT STAY ON THE BENCH.


THIRD, THE THIRD CANEIRO BROTHER
AND GIVEN THE SECOND DEGREE FROM COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY

FOLLOWING FROM

WHAT HAPPENED THERE MCGANN?

THE 34TH DAY T MINUS FOUR FIVE: HONECKER RUNS COVER FOR THE MAFIA

THE 34TH DAY T MINUS FOUR ONE: FOUR FOUND DEAD IN ASSOCIATION WITH COLTS NECK MANSION FIRE INCLUDING CEO OF SQUARE ONE WHO WAS FOUND SHOT DEAD OUTSIDE HIS HOME, RELATED INCIDENT OF ARSON IN OCEAN TOWNSHIP, UPDATES TO FOLLOW

THE 34TH DAY T PLUS TWO TEN: HOLLY MUHAMMAD AWAN OF ZONE ZERO EIGHT SIX ZERO EIGHT, TRENTON, STATE OF NEW JERSEY AND THE “JUDGE” WHO “RUNS” THAT STATE


[UPDATE] SOME MINUTES FOLLOWING PUBLICATION OF THIS POST, YOURS TRULY DID RECEIVE A PHONE CALL FROM THE COMBINED COURTS OF COUNTY SOMERSET, HUNTERDON AND WARREN, AT WHICH TIME A VERY NERVOUS FEMALE DID ALLEGE THAT A GLITCH IN HER PROGRAM USED BY THE LAW DIVISION TO TRACK THESE AND THOSE DID INDICATE THAT I WAS IN SOME SORT OF TROUBLE, AND FURTHERMORE I SHOULD BEGIN TO ACCUMULATE ALL EVIDENCE OF WHERE I WAS AND WITH WHOM I SPOKE ON THREE SPECIFIC DATES, ONE OF WHICH THE IMMENSELY OBSCENE CLAIM THAT ON TWENTY-FIRST NOVEMBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN I HAD BEEN ABSENT A REQUIRED APPEARANCE AT THE SOMERSET COUNTY COURT DESPITE THE SAME VERY NERVOUS FEMALE CANCELING OUR APPOINTMENT BECAUSE “ITS THANKSGIVING” THE WEEK PRIOR, AND UPON CALLING HER ON THAT LIE SHE BECAME MORE NERVOUS STILL AND BEGAN TO REPEAT GET ALL OF YOUR PROOF TOGETHER, BECAUSE YOU REQUIRE PROOF, YOUR PAPERS PLEASE, NOT YOUR DISCS OR RECORDS THAT WILL PROVE YOUR CASE, YES INDEED, FORGED RECORDS OF MY LOCATION IN A COURT DATABASE, DATES ONE AND TWO FOR WHICH WE NOW REQUIRE POLICE REPORTS, AND NO LESS THAN ONE OTHER CCTV FEED FROM DOWN SOUTH JUST A BIT, YES YOUR LOCATION ALL DAY, WHERE YOU LIVE, WHERE YOU FEED, WE REQUIRE, WE NEED, YOUR VISAGE, YOUR SEED, WE DESIRE, YES PLEASE, NO THANKS, NO PROOF FROM ME, JUST LOOK RIGHT THERE ON YOUR SCREEN, YES THAT’S ME, THAT’S ALL THAT YOU SEE, YOU KNEW IT BEFORE YOU PLACED THE CALL, NOW GO FIND YOUR RECORD OF MY WALK DOWN THE HALL, BUT WE KNOW THAT VOID ROOT LEVEL IS THE GOAL, THREE OR FOUR VOID LEVELS BELOW YOUR OFFICE WHERE FROM LEFT EYE SEEKS MONTHLY TOLL, AND WITH WHOM EXACTLY DID G A GRANT SPEAK, EYE FOR AN EYE, FORGED RECORDS THE EYE, CONSEQUENCE OF MAGNITUDE FOR YOU JUST AS I, EH MA I. NOW GRANT US SOME PEACE FROM THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, FOR WHAT A WRETCHED STATE IT IS.

THE SEASON IS UPON US

“CAN YOU CHECK YOUR CALL RECORD?”

“NO, I’M ON THE PHONE RIGHT NOW”

YES INDEED YOU ARE


THE ABOVE DESCRIBES THE MANNER IN WHICH FRAUD WARRANTS ARE BORNE IN THE DARK
VACATED WARRANT FOR ARREST ACM WITH RECORD NUMBER INDICATING SAME
STILL AWAITING OFFICIAL EXPLANATION FROM THE TOWNSHIP OF LAWRENCE. [EXPAND]