THE 34TH DAY T PLUS THREE ZERO: HUMAN REMAINS FOUND IN THE TOWNSHIP OF HOWELL

DIRECT LINK.

THE 34TH DAY T MINUS THREE THIRTY-FOUR: PEDOPHILE POLICE CHIEF IN BID TO KEEP STABBING NUMBERS UNCHANGED IN WELL-TIMED PUFF PIECE AMID ONGOING CRISIS AT THREE-HUNDRED OLD TAVERN ROAD

EIGHTEENTH SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND EIGHTEEN POLICE SERGEANT AMONG TWENTY FOUR ALLEGED CHILD PREDATORS BREAKING 911
DIRECT LINK. [CLICK TO EXPAND]

ERRATIC DRIVER AND DEPUTY DOG ON THE SCENE THE HOSPITALS OF CHOICE WITH SPECIAL MENTION
ARCHIVE LINK. [CLICK TO EXPAND]

APP UPDATE ON KUDRICK STATEMENT RE BELMAR DEATH AT MUSIC FESTIVAL
ARCHIVE LINK. [CLICK TO EXPAND]

AND COUNTY MIDDLESEX, EH?
PATCH KUDRICK ADMIN REVIEW WHO SCREENS THE ADMINS
DIRECT LINK. [CLICK TO EXPAND]

“DRUG INDUCED EXCITED DELIRIUM” IS NOT A CAUSE OF DEATH YOU FUCKING ILLITERATE

PATCH KUDRICK ADMIN REVIEW WHO SCREENS THE ADMINS WHAT IS THE CAUSE OF DEATH
[CLICK TO EXPAND]

PATCH KUDRICK ADMIN REVIEW WHO SCREENS THE ADMINS WHAT IS THE CAUSE OF DEATH YET AGAIN
MONMOUTH MEDICAL CENTER RATHER VEXED TO SEE THIS TODAY UPON THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN AS ONE OF THAT ROTTEN LOT RATHER WELL KNOWN TO CARRY A CONCEALED BARBITURATE INJECTION DEVICE WITH DESIGNS ARIADNE FOR YOURS TRULY, ALSO RATHER WELL KNOWN, TO INJECT AND THEN FLEE, THEN RETURN TO SUGGEST BACTERIAL INFECTION FROM A FLEA. [CLICK TO EXPAND]

WOULD YOU BE SURPRISED DEAR READER IF BAETYL DID INDEED PULL ONE OR MORE POLICE REPORTS FROM THE VAULT THAT DO SOUND REMARKABLY SIMILAR TO WHAT IS EXHIBITED ABOVE AND RATHER SUMMARIZED BELOW, 

“DISTURBANCE

“TOXICOLOGY”

“COCAINE, ALCOHOL AND MARIJUANA”

“DRUG INDUCED EXCITED DELIRIUM”

“JERSEY SHORE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER”

HELL ON EARTH CONFIRMED AND THEN SOME

“HOLDING DOWN A MAN”

“ACTING ERRATICALLY ALL DAY, ENDANGERING HIMSELF AND OTHERS…”

ANYBODY TAKE A VIDEO OF THE SCENE?

“BELLIGERENT, COMBATIVE…”

“DID YOU TAKE YOUR MEDS?”

“OFFICERS THEN RESTRAINED…”

“COMBATIVE WITH POLICE”

“CONTACTED MONOC PARAMEDICS SO THAT HE COULD BE SEDATED”

NEAR CERTAINTY ONE OF KUDRICK’S OVERDOSE RECOVERY COACHES ON THE SCENE.

“WHILE WAITING FOR THE PARAMEDICS TO ADMINISTER THE SEDATIVE, HARDEN SUDDENLY STOPPED BREATHING”

SO ITS A COCAINE-INDUCED HEART ATTACK?

WHAT “TREATMENT” DID HOWELL TOWNSHIP FIRST AID ADMINISTER?

DE-FIBRILLATION? V-TAC? OR STRAIGHT TO FLAT-LINE? HEART FAILURE?


ADJECTIVES ARE NOT CRIMES
CIVIL RENDITION [CLICK TO EXPAND]

THE ASBURY PARK PRESS WITH RATHER EXCELLENT TIMING.
WHAT ARRIVED IN THE MAILS TODAY FROM TOWNSHIP HOWELL POLICE?


STAY TUNED TO THE FIRST COLUMN


FIRST CONTACT

ON THE SIXTY-FIFTH DAY FOLLOWING FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THE DOCUMENTS EXHIBITED ABOVE IN COLUMNS ONE AND TWO, THE TOWNSHIP OF HOWELL WAS GRACIOUS ENOUGH TO PROVIDE A FACSIMILE REPRODUCTION OF THE FOUR PAGE DOCUMENT THAT HATH BEEN SEQUESTERED BY THE SHERIFF OF COUNTY MONMOUTH FOR PURPOSE REVELATION AT SUCH TIME MOST INIMICAL TO THE DEFENDANT SO NAMED [REDACTED].

THE DOCUMENT EXHIBITED BELOW TRANSMIT ELECTRONICALLY DID ELICIT A RESPONSE FROM THE TOWNSHIP OF HOWELL FOR THE VERY FIRST TIME IN FOUR HUNDRED AND FIFTY-EIGHT DAYS.

TENTH OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND EIGHTEEN REQUEST FOR FRAUD COURT DOCUMENT FROM HOWELL
WHEN A COURT RECORDS REQUEST BECOMES THE COURT RECORD. [CLICK TO EXPAND]

WHAT ARE WE LOOKING AT?

THE DOCUMENT CLASS EXHIBITED ABOVE IN THREE COLUMNS DO FALL UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF THE NEW JERSEY CODE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE TITLE 2C, CHAPTER TWENTY FIVE, SECTION SEVENTEEN FOLLOWING FROM WHAT IS PRINTED ATOP RIGHT PAGE ONE OF FOUR ON THE DOCS IN COLUMNS ONE AND TWO. THAT STATUTE IS IDENTIFIED AS FOLLOWS,

N.J.S.A. 2C:25-17 et seq.

THE ORIGIN AND TEXT OF THAT STATUTE ARE EXHIBITED IN EIGHT BELOW, WITH THE NINTH TO KEEP US UP TO DATE ON WHAT THE LEGISLATURE HATH BEEN DOING.



WHAT DID WE LEARN?

PAGE FOUR-HUNDRED AND NINETY-NINE, EXAMINATION OF WITNESSES

IN SUB-SECTION EIGHT WE FIND THE FOLLOWING TEXT,

“Defendant in assault prosecution had a confrontation right to use, in cross-examination for impeachment purposes, testimony of complainant in underlying proceedings on petition for domestic violence restraining order, despite section of Prevention of Domestic Violence Act precluding use of testimony given by a plaintiff or defendant in a domestic violence matter in a simultaneous or subsequent criminal proceeding against the defendant. State v. Duprey, 427 N.J. Super. 314, 48 A.3d 419 (A.D.2012).”

IN ORDER FOR THE DEFENDANT IN A CRIMINAL PROSECUTION TO IMPEACH THE TESTIMONY OF THE COMPLAINANT WHO IS BOTH VICTIM IN THAT CRIMINAL PROCEEDING AND PETITIONER OF A COURT FOR A DOMESTIC VIOLENCE RESTRAINING ORDER, THE FOLLOWING PRE-CONDITION IS REQUIRED,

“Right to confrontation requires that the trial testimony of a domestic violence complainant must be available for use by a defendant in a related criminal prosecution during cross-examination to impeach contradictory or inconsistent testimony that is material to the charges against the defendant, or to show bias, prejudice, or ulterior motives on the part of the witness. State v. Duprey, 427 N.J. Super. 314, 48 A.3d 419 (A.D.2012).”

THAT TRIAL TESTIMONY OF THE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE COMPLAINANT MUST BE PROVIDED TO THAT DEFENDANT BY THE ENTITY, THAT IS, A OR THE, LEGAL CUSTODIAN OF THOSE TRIAL RECORDS.

FURTHERMORE, THE ADMISSIBILITY OF ANY COURT RECORD IS CONTINGENT UPON THE WILLINGNESS OF THE KEEPERS OF THAT RECORD TO PROVIDE EXEMPLIFIED DOCUMENTS AS EXHIBITED IN ONLY COLUMN THREE OF THE THREE COLUMNS ABOVE.

DESPITE THE CLEARLY INDICATED REQUEST FOR EXEMPLIFIED RECORDS MARKED UPON THE NEW JERSEY JUDICIARY RECORDS FORM EXHIBITED ABOVE, THE TOWNSHIP OF HOWELL DID INDEED IGNORE THAT REQUEST.

SEAL OF EXEMPLIFICATION IN ALL LIKELIHOOD
THE SEAL

PAGE FIVE HUNDRED FIFTY-FOUR, TITLE TWO C, CHAPTER TWENTY-FIVE, SECTION TWENTY NINE, HEARING.

IN SUB-SECTION A IS FOUND THE FOLLOWING STATUTE TEXT,

“A copy of the complaint shall be served on the defendant in conformity with the Rules of Court. If a criminal complaint arising out of the same incident which is the subject matter of a complaint brought under P.L.1981, c. 426 (C.2C:25-1 et seq.) or P.L.1991, c. 261 (C.2C:25-17 et seq.) has been filed, testimony given by the plaintiff or defendant in the domestic violence matter shall not be used in the simultaneous or subsequent criminal proceeding against the defendant, other than domestic violence contempt matters and where it would otherwise be admissible hearsay under the rules of evidence that govern where a party is unavailable. At the hearing the standard for proving the allegations in the complaint shall be by a preponderance of the evidence.”

PAGE FIVE FIVE FOUR EXHIBITED BELOW,

PAGES FIVE FIVE FOUR AND FIVE FIVE FIVE TITLE TWO C CHAPTER TWENTY FIVE SECTION TWENTY NINE
[CLICK TO EXPAND]
TESTIMONY SHALL NOT BE USED
WHAT MANNER OF USAGE IS PROSCRIBED BY THIS STATUTE?

PONDER THE FOLLOWING,

ONE. TESTIMONY THAT DESCRIBES A SPECIFIC ACT.

TWO. TESTIMONY THAT WAS GIVEN AT A SPECIFIC TIME AND DATE.

THREE. TESTIMONY THAT DESCRIBES A SPECIFIC ACT THAT WAS GIVEN AT A SPECIFIC TIME AND DATE.

FOUR. TESTIMONY THAT WAS GIVEN IN ABSENTIA OF A DEFENDANT FOR REASON NO SERVICE OF PROCESS TOOK PLACE IN CONTRAVENTION OF THE RULES OF COURT.

WE ALREADY FOUND THE ANSWER TO THIS QUESTION IN CHAPTER TWENTY-FIVE, SECTION SEVENTEEN AS SEEN ABOVE AND BELOW,

CHAPTER TWENTY FIVE PAGE FOUR NINETY EIGHT TO NINETY NINE SECTION EIGHT
PLEASE DO NOTE THAT IN THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY “DOMESTIC VIOLENCE” IS AFFIXED TO ANY AND ALL MANNER OF CRIMINAL, CIVIL AND/OR OTHER PROCEEDINGS WHEREIN NO VIOLENCE HATH OCCURRED AND NO DOMICILE HATH BEEN SHARED BY PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT. [CLICK TO EXPAND]

FROM THE ABOVE EXCERPT WE LEARN THAT THE FOLLOWING STATUTE TEXT,

“…criminal complaint arising out of the same incident which is the subject matter of a complaint brought under P.L.1981, c. 426 (C.2C:25-1 et seq.) or P.L.1991, c. 261 (C.2C:25-17 et seq.) has been filed, testimony given by the plaintiff or defendant in the domestic violence matter shall not be used in the simultaneous or subsequent criminal proceeding against the defendant”

HATH BEEN INTENDED TO ENSURE THAT A PLAINTIFF BE SHIELDED FROM PERJURY WHEN THE SIMULTANEOUS OR SUBSEQUENT CRIMINAL PROSECUTION IS AT RISK FROM CONTRADICTORY TESTIMONY GIVEN BY THAT PLAINTIFF, AS FOLLOWS,

“…despite section of Prevention of Domestic Violence Act precluding use of testimony given by a plaintiff or defendant in a domestic violence manner in a simultaneous or subsequent criminal proceeding against the defendant”

WE NOW RETURN TO THE STIPULATION THAT THE ONLY TESTIMONY GIVEN THAT CAN BE USED AS AN AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE BY THE DEFENDANT IS THAT TESTIMONY “AVAILABLE FOR USE”, WHICH DOES INDEED IMPLY THAT PERHAPS ONE OR MORE UNNAMED COURT STAFFERS MAY STEAL YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO COUNSEL BASED ON A WHIM. THAT WHIM IS PARTISANSHIP IN THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY. PERIOD.

AND FROM THE SAME EXCERPT ABOVE, IN SUB-SECTION NINE WE FIND THE FOLLOWING GEM,

“…judgment of acquittal of the predicate act will not undercut the court’s authority to impose restraints or other relief permitted by the act.”

WHICH DOES INDEED MEAN THE FOLLOWING,

TESTIMONY IN WHEN IT SUITS THEM, TESTIMONY OUT WHEN IT DOESN’T, BECAUSE FUCK YOU WE HAVE AN ULTERIOR MOTIVE. AND THAT IS TO STEAL YOUR FUCKING CHILDREN. 

– UNNAMED SOURCE FROM THE COUNTY MONMOUTH FAMILY PART


ANT PEOPLE

HOWEVER, THAT MOBIUS-LIKE DOUBLE ENTENDRE IS INDEED THE INTENT OF THAT LAW AND IS INDEED EXPLICITLY ARTICULATED IN THE CASE HISTORIES MORE THAN ONCE. THAT RATHER VEXING OPTION DOES PERMIT A CORRUPT JUDICIARY TO WITHHOLD RECORDS OF COURT FOR PURPOSE OBSCURE THE CONTRADICTORY NATURE OF TESTIMONY FROM ONE DAY TO THE NEXT GIVEN BY THE SAME PLAINTIFF IN DESCRIBING THE VERY SAME INCIDENT, WHICH WOULD INVARIABLY BE THE ONE AND ONLY AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE NEEDED FOR DISMISSAL OF A CRIMINAL COMPLAINT. THIS IS MAINTAINED STILL IN THE LAW OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY AND AS SUCH THAT LAW DOES INDEED VIOLATE THE SIXTH AMENDMENT TO CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES WITH REGARD TO INFORMING A DEFENDANT OF THE NATURE AND CAUSE OF ACCUSATIONS AGAINST HIM.

THAT IS WHY IT IS SOVIET IN NATURE AND IDENTIFIED AS SUCH.


HOWEVER, IN THE MEANTIME, LET US DISCUSS THE MATTER OF A ONE-HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLAR HELICOPTER RIDE. 
AIRTRANS NEEDS TO GET PAID
YEA, THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT SAYS HELLO. [CLICK TO EXPAND]

SERVICE BY NJ MONOC FLIGHT CREW WHICH INDEED DOES APPEAR TO HAVE AFFILIATION WITH MED-TRANS AIR MEDICAL TRANSPORT OF WEST PLAINS, MISSOURI.
MED TRANS WEST PLAINS MISSOURI
[CLICK TO EXPAND]

FREEHOLD TWP POLICE RECORD
FREEHOLD TWP PD RECORDS
OBTAINED FIRST OCTOBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN. [CLICK TO EXPAND]

THIRTEEN OCTOBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN
WE’RE JUST SCRATCHING THE SURFACE
STAY TUNED

 

THE 34TH DAY T MINUS THREE TWENTY-EIGHT: EYE FOR AN EYE

WHAT HAPPENED THE NEXT DAY?
MONTGOMERY TWP FEB 7 2018
[CLICK TO EXPAND]
SOMEBODY WAS MISSING…

THE 34TH DAY T MINUS THREE TWENTY-TWO: RESULT OF OPEN PUBLIC RECORDS ACT (OPRA) REQUESTS TO THE TOWNSHIP OF LAWRENCE

IN MARKED CONTRAST TO TWP HOWELL WHICH DOES INDEED REFUSE TO HONOR OPRA REQUESTS
LAWRENCE TWP-1
PDF OF HEAVILY REDACTED POLICE REPORTS [CLICK TO EXPAND]

WHAT IS IN THAT PDF?

NINE PAGES OF EIGHTEEN TOTAL

ALL REDACTIONS BY YOURS TRULY IN RED WITH ENTIRE CONTENT OF THIS POLICE REPORT PRE-REDACTED IN BLACK BY THE ENTITY SO NAMED “LAWRENCE TOWNSHIP POLICE” AND/OR THE “LAWRENCE TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT”. AS SUCH, THE NATURE OF ANY ALLEGATIONS MADE BY THIS POLICE DEPARTMENT REMAIN UNCLEAR. PLEASE ALSO DO NOTE NO CRIMINAL COMPLAINT WAS EVER SERVED UPON THE ALLEGED DEFENDANT SO NAMED [REDACTED] IN THIS REPORT. MULTIPLE PRIOR ATTEMPTS WERE MADE TO OBTAIN THIS POLICE REPORT IN TWO-THOUSAND SEVENTEEN AND TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN ALL OF WHICH WERE REFUSED ON SPECIOUS GROUNDS AND THE MERCER COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE DOES INDEED REFUSE TO ADMIT THAT A CRIMINAL COMPLAINT WAS NEVER SERVED.


WHAT ABOUT THE PHONE?
WHAT ABOUT THE COMPUTER?
WHAT ABOUT THE VEHICLE?
TRACKING DEVICES?

THE OTHER NINE: BLACKROCK APOCALYPTO


EIGHTEEN REPEAT, UNDER THE AGE OF EIGHTEEN

NINE TWENTY FIVE TWENTY SEVENTEEN-18

PROVABLE.


LAWRENCE AND HOWELL
THE PEDOPHILE POLICE DEPARTMENTS

MISBEHAVIOR CAUGHT ONCE AND AGAIN
FIRST OPRA REQUEST TO LAWRENCE TOWNSHIP DID INDEED CONFIRM THAT NO CRIMINAL COMPLAINT HATH EVER BEEN SERVED. HOW?


OPRA REQUEST CLOSED AND NO DOCUMENTS SERVED OR RECORD OR SERVICE PROVIDED.


CASE CLOSED? NOT EXACTLY AS A NON-CORRUPT JUDICIARY IS REQUIRED TO HANDLE ACTUAL EVIDENCE. 

TWENTY-FOURTH SEPTEMBER TWO-THOUSAND SEVENTEEN

PSYOPS-2393276


THE 34TH DAY T MINUS THREE FIFTEEN: YOU ARE BEING MONITORED

N.J.S.A. 2C:12-10(F): PICKETERS’ CHARGE
PICKETTERS CHARGE
[CLICK TO EXPAND]
M009 GETS A LETTER
IMG_6669-509
[CLICK TO EXPAND]
WHAT HAPPENED ON FOURTEENTH AUGUST?
IMG_6672-510
[CLICK TO EXPAND]
WHAT DOES THIS RESEMBLE?
AR 10 25 2017_1_FRAUD THREAT AND PRE OPENED-509
[CLICK TO EXPAND]
M007 GOT A LETTER TOO
2-10252
[CLICK TO EXPAND]
NEITHER M009 NOR M007 HAVE EVER BEEN CONVICTED OF A CRIME AND AS SUCH HAVE NO CRIMINAL RECORD
1-10251
[CLICK TO EXPAND]
“MONITORING” DONE PURSUANT TO N.J.S.A. 2C:12-10(F): PICKETERS’ CHARGE AND DOES INDEED INVOLVE HUMINT USING PERSONNEL OF FOREIGN AND IN SOME CASES ENEMY NATIONS.

THE 34TH DAY T MINUS THREE EIGHT: THE TOP OF A BURIED WALL ATOP CAVERNS DEEP BELOW, THE REASON WHY LONE PINE WAS BUILT THIRTY-FOUR YEARS AGO, YES INDEED, COUNTY MONMOUTH AND MANY, MANY MORE, NOVA CAESAREA, HOME TO ANCIENT KNOWLEDGE LONG AGO BROUGHT FROM DISTANT SHORE

THAT WALL SEEN BELOW NOT TOO FAR AWAY FROM A BURNING BUSH CONSTRUCTED WITH SEDIMENTARY CONCRETE NOT SPECIFICALLY ANCIENT, ALTHOUGH WITH UNKNOWN* PROVENANCE AND MAY INDEED BE COLONIAL IN ORIGIN. HOWEVER, THE MOUND-BUILDING HOPEWELL INDIANS OF THE OHIO VALLEY, NOT SO FAR AWAY IN FACT, WERE KNOWN TO INDEED UTILIZE SEDIMENTARY CONCRETE. SEEN BELOW IN FOUR,

ONE

TWO

THREE

FOUR

SIMILAR STYLE OF MASONRY KNOWN TO EXIST AT SOURLAND MOUNTAIN LOCATED IN COUNTY SOMERSET AND THAT WALL RATHER NOT BURIED AND INDEED COLONIAL IN NATURE, HOWEVER WHICH COLONIAL ERA REMAINS UNKNOWN.

HOW DOES ONE TRAVERSE THE WILD AND ARRIVE ATOP THE WALL?

GOOD LUCK, DEAR READER, HERE IS THE CLUE: PHOTO ABOVE TAKEN ON SITE WHEREIN BELOW THE RUINS OF MANY EPOCHS COME AND GONE SINCE THE END OF THE PLEISTOCENE TO BE FOUND.

THE 34TH DAY T MINUS THREE TWO: INBOUND

TRACKING AS OF EIGHTH SEPTEMBER

UPDATES NINE SEPTEMBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN

UPDATES TEN SEPTEMBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN

UPDATES ELEVEN SEPTEMBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN

UPDATES TWELVE SEPTEMBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN

UPDATE. HURRICANE BOWL CANCELLED.