THE 34TH DAY T MINUS SIX TWO EIGHT THREE: THE TAU OF MUNICIPAL ORDINANCE

PART THIRTY-FOUR IN THE ONGOING SAGA OF THE MUNICODE MYSTERY

PART TWO OF TWO IN THE GRIBBENS FRAUD TRANSCRIPT BREAKDOWN, REFER TO PART ONE IN THE LINK HERE AND BELOW

FOLLOWING FROM

THE MUNICODE MYSTERY

THE 34TH DAY T MINUS FOUR TWO: THE NET AND THE NEST

THE 34TH DAY T MINUS FOUR THIRTY-FOUR: EXTERMINATUS ENGAGED

THE 34TH DAY T MINUS THREE ZERO THREE: INQUIRIES TO THE TOWNSHIP MET WITH NO RESPONSE AND THE LATEST FRONT IN THE MUNICODE MYSTERY

PLAUSIBLE DUPLICATES, ROUND TWO

THE 34TH DAY T MINUS ZERO ONE TWO ONE: BREAK DOWN OF GRIBBEN’S HOWELL COURT TRANSCRIPT TRANSMIT VIA G MAILS IN UNSECURED PDF, PART ONE OF TWO

EPONYMOUS MAGISTRATUS



WE FIRST RETURN TO THE WELL KNOWN THING THAT HATH CALLED ITSELF THE TOWNSHIP OF HOWELL

WHEN ON THIRTY-ONE JANUARY TWO-THOUSAND NINETEEN WE DID INDEED DISCOVER THAT BRANCH OF THE COUNTY MONMOUTH PUBLIC LIBRARY SYSTEM, SITUATED IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT ABOVE RIGHT TO THE RATHER VEXING OCTAGON SO NAMED THE HOWELL COURT, WHICH DOES INDEED LACK A HARD COPY OF THE TEXT OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE FOR THE TOWNSHIP THAT IT SERVES. THIS FACT WAS CONVEYED BY A OR THE REFERENCE LIBRARIAN IN RECORDED AUDIO FOR WHICH A GENUINE TRANSCRIPT CAN BE FOUND AT THE LINK ABOVE AND RE-POSTED AGAIN BELOW,

AUTOMATED: HELLO, YOU HAVE REACHED THE MONMOUTH COUNTY LIBRARY HOWELL BRANCH. FOR DIRECTIONS PRESS ONE, TO RENEW MATERIALS, CHECK YOUR ACCOUNT, OR INQUIRE ABOUT BORROWING PRESS TWO, FOR INFORMATION ABOUT CHILDREN’S PROGRAMS OR FOR CHILDREN’S…

 

[BEEP]

 

UNNAMED ONE: MONMOUTH COUNTY LIBRARY, HOWELL BRANCH

 

ACM: HI, HOW ARE YOU DOING TODAY?

 

UNNAMED ONE: I’M FINE HOW ARE YOU?

 

ACM: I’M DOING WELL, THANK YOU. I’M CALLING TO SEE IF THE HOWELL LIBRARY HAS A COPY OF THE TOWNSHIP OF HOWELL MUNICIPAL CODE ON FILE

 

UNNAMED ONE: UM, I DON’T BELIEVE SO BUT LET ME SEND YOU OVER TO REFERENCE, HOLD ON

 

ACM: OK, THANK YOU VERY MUCH

 

UNNAMED TWO: YES

 

ACM: HELLO

 

UNNAMED TWO: OH, HELLO, THIS IS [UNNAMED TWO] AT THE REFERENCE DESK

 

ACM: HI [UNNAMED TWO], I’M CALLING TODAY TO SEE IF THE HOWELL LIBRARY HAS A COPY OF THE HOWELL TWP MUNICIPAL CODE ON FILE OR AVAILABLE FOR…OR AVAILABLE ON RESERVE FOR REFERENCE IN THE LIBRARY

 

UNNAMED TWO: I DON’T HAVE A PAPER COPY, ITS AVAILABLE ONLINE

 

ACM: OH, OK

 

UNNAMED TWO: THAT’S RIGHT

 

ACM: SO IF I JUST GO ON THE WEBSITE AND SEARCH FOR MUNICIPAL CODE I’LL COME ACROSS IT

 

UNNAMED TWO: YES, YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO, YEP

 

ACM: OK. AND THEY DON’T MAINTAIN A PHYSICAL COPY IN THE LIBRARY IN ANY CAPACITY?

 

UNNAMED TWO: I HAVEN’T HAD ONE HERE, I’VE BEEN HERE THREE YEARS, AND I DON’T RECALL EVER HAVING ONE HERE, UM, I DID INQUIRE OF THE TOWNSHIP AND ACTUALLY NEVER RECEIVED A RESPONSE SO I PROBABLY SHOULD…

 

ACM: OH, NOT SURPRISING

 

UNNAMED TWO: YEA BECAUSE SOMEONE ELSE HAD ASKED ABOUT IN, PROBABLY WITHIN THE LAST SIX MONTHS OR SO, UM, BUT YOU CAN SEE IT AS I SAID IN ELECTRONIC FORMAT

 

ACM: OK, VERY GOOD, THANK YOU VERY MUCH, APPRECIATE YOUR HELP

 

UNNAMED TWO: OK, YOU’RE WELCOME



IN LIEU OF THE PHYSICAL COPY OF THE BOOK

WE ARE FORCED TO ACCESS SOMETHING MOST CERTAINLY THIRD-PARTY SO NAMED E CODE THREE-HUNDRED SIXTY (DIRECT LINK WARNING) FROM THAT CAN BE FOUND THROUGH INTERNET SEARCH FOR THE HOWELL MUNICODE OR DIRECTLY FROM A LINK PUBLISHED ON A OR THE TOWNSHIP OF HOWELL WEBSITE. (HOWELL DIRECT LINKS ONE TWO THREE FOUR WARNING)

IT MAY BE FOUND IN ONE OF THE TWENTY OR SO LAW LIBRARIES TO BE FOUND IN THE SUPERIOR COURTHOUSE OF EACH COUNTY IN THE STATE, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF ZONE (REFER TO A OR THE BURST PIPE BELOW BROAD STREET), WHEREIN WE DOUBT THE TEXT IS TO BE FOUND ON RESERVE IN THE RATHER QUAINT LOWER LEVEL LAW LIBRARY AT SEVENTY-ONE MONUMENT STREET, INDEED OUR MONMOUTH VICINAGE RIGHT THERE LOCATED IN ONE THREE ONE FIVE AND/OR ONE THREE ONE SIX AND/OR SOMETHING ELSE ENTIRELY.

WHY DO WE NEED TO CONSULT THE AFORESAID REFERENCE WHATSOEVER?

FOLLOWING FROM THE CONDUCT OF THE HOWELL COURT VIS-A-VIS YOURS TRULY, MANY OTHERS, ALL OF WHOM HATH ENTERED INTO THIS HERE DILEMMA, ONGOING YES INDEED, WHEREIN WE WONDER HOW SUCH LEVELS OF EVIL (READ: CRIMINALITY IN THE EXTREME AND ON THE VERY REGULAR) CAN EVEN BE POSSIBLE OF A PODUNK LOCAL GOVERNMENT. AS SUCH, WE RETURN TO THE FRAUD COURT TRANSCRIPTS GENERATED BY THE GRIBBENS OUTFIT THAT APPARENTLY IS THE SOLE THIRD-PARTY CONTRACTOR EMPLOYED BY THE HOWELL COURT TO PRODUCE THE OH SO VERY ESSENTIAL LEGAL DOCUMENTS THAT BEAR A OR THE RECORD OF WHAT TRANSPIRES IN A COURT THAT CONDUCTS HEARINGS ON MATTERS OF LIFE AND DEATH, OR AT LEAST THEY DID IN THE PAST, AND WITHIN THOSE FRAUD TRANSCRIPTS WHICH THEY ROUTINELY ADMIT ARE GENERATED WITH SIGNIFICANT AND MATERIAL ERRORS MARKED DE FACTO OVERSIGHTS EXPECTED AND ENCOURAGED OF THE GRIBENNSES NEST BY [REDACTED], AND WHICH ARE ONGOING TO THE PRESENT BECAUSE THE FRAUD GRIBBENSES THAT TRANSCRIBE THE FRAUD TRANSCRIPTS COMMIT FELONY ACTS UPON ISSUANCE OF NEARLY EVERY DOCUMENT THAT IS SHUTTLED OUT THE DOOR, OUT THE DOOR AT SUCH TIME AND WITHIN SUCH CONTENT THAT THEY ARE TOLD TO REMOVE OR INPUT DESPITE WHAT IS ACTUALLY STATED ON A OR THE RECORD IN THE SHITBOX OCTAGON ON OR ABOUT THE SAME PLOT AS THE SHITBOX LIBRARY. THIS FRAUD WE DID INDEED CONFIRM IN PART ONE WHEREIN UPON BREACH OF PAGE SIX, PEACE AND CALLED IT A DAY HAVING AT THAT TIME ALREADY EXTRACTED THE ESSENTIAL EVIDENCE TO JUSTIFY THESE VERY STATEMENTS YOU ARE READING RIGHT NOW WHICH IS INDEED ALLEGING ORGANIZED CRIME IS AT WORK HERE, AND OF NOTE THESE STATEMENTS ARE PUBLISHED BY BAETYL, BAETYL & CO. IN LIEU OF BRINGING FORTH CIVIL ACTIONS AGAINST GRIBBENSES AND FELLOW NEST DWELLERS FOLLOWING FROM THEIR PURPORTED IMMUNITY TO ANY CONSEQUENCE OF MAGNITUDE INFLICTED BY PROSECUTION DUE TO A OR THE ANTI-INDEMNIFICATION CLAUSE THAT WE ARE BEING TOLD IS TO BE FOUND IN A OR THE CONTRACT BETWEEN GRIBBENSES AND THE TOWNSHIP OF HOWELL AND/OR THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY AND/OR COUNTY MONMOUTH AND/OR SOMETHING ELSE ENTIRELY. WE DID INDEED REQUEST THAT TOWNSHIP PROVIDE A COPY OF THAT VERY SAME CONTRACT PURSUANT TO OPRA IN THE RECENT PAST IN ADDITION TO THE CIVIC PLUS AMAZON WHISPER NET CONTRACT, FORMER IGNORED AND LATTER MOST OBSCENELY CLAIMED TO BE UNINTELLIGIBLE, ONE SENTENCE IN LENGTH, PROBABLY BY MANIFESTO-PRONE TOWNSHIP ATTORNEY JOSEPH CLARK GABLE, YES INDEED GONE WITH THE FUCKING WIND.

BREACH OF PEACE, PART ONE, STOP SIX

REVISIT THE FIRST SIX PAGES OF THE FRAUD TRANSCRIPT, OBTAIN THE CODE TWO-HUNDRED TWENTY DASH TWO, NOW WE REQUIRE THE MOST UP TO DATE TEXT OF THE TOWNSHIP OF HOWELL MUNICIPAL CODE THAT IS THE VERY SAME USED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL TO ASCERTAIN WHAT THE FUCK KEAN T KEAN IS REFERRING TO VIS-A-VIS THE NOW LEGENDARY BREACH OF JURISDICTION SO NAMED THE “BOROUGH ORDINANCE”, THAT OUR MONMOUTH VICINAGE RIGHT DOWN THE ROAD THERE IS HARD PRESSED TO WRITE DOWN IN SIMILITUDE TO THE MUNICODE EX-MACHINA SOON TO BE HEARD CASE WHEREIN ALL OF THESE THINGS ARE TO BE DISCUSSED AT SOME LENGTH. LIKE JUNE, RIGHT? PERHAPS NOT. WE HAVE A MOTION PREPARED THAT IS TO BE SOON PUBLISHED AND SUBMIT IN LIGHT OF THESE FACTS.

FIRST, THE DRAFT OF A MOTION IN THREE BELOW,

MOTION DRAFT PAGE ONE, NOTA BENE, MONCO STAFF WITH CLAIM THAT THREE MONTHS NOT ATYPICAL LENGTH OF TIME FOR AUDIO TRANSMISSION, TRANSCRIPT GENERATION AND SERVICE, PLAUSIBLY SO, ALBEIT WITHOUT ANY DATA TO VERIFY ANECDOTES, AND NO REFERENCE DATABASE TO OBTAIN RAW DATAS AND CONDUCT SOME INDEPENDENT ANALYSES. OR IS THERE? NO, THERE IS NOT. THE COURTS ARE VERY SECRETIVE, SO WE ARE TOLD AND SO WE SAY.  

MOTION DRAFT PAGE TWO

MOTION DRAFT PAGE THREE

SECOND, RETURNING TO THOSE SIX PAGES IN SIX BELOW,

PAGE ONE

PAGE TWO

PAGE THREE

PAGE FOUR

PAGE FIVE

PAGE SIX

WE HEREBY COMMENCE PART TWO OF THE GRIBBENS FRAUD TRANSCRIPT BREAK DOWN

COLLOQUY PAGE SEVEN

Colloquy Page 7, lines 2 through 7, the MATTERS before the Court had already been concluded in aforesaid “plea” and despite that fact THE COURT for whatever reasons continues to insist on affixing the name of one or both crooked nest attorneys to the record such that the APPELLANT not be construed to have any competence whatsoever in light of three PRO SE victories added to the ledger on the very same day the conduct of Howell Court as such became criminal in the extreme.

Colloquy Page 7, line 3, These MATTERS before the Howell Court have finally been disposed after malingering for 12 months and 21 days (YES INDEED, FINGERPRINT OF EX-JUDGE MCGANN), not one single day at trial, no one iota of testimony from the APPELLANT, and furthermore the disposition of a or the MATTER is indeed the primary subject of the entire transcript, what would an attorney then do for the proposed client at such time? This is a very, very important question and the Federal Government does indeed want to know, so we are told. Transmission of a certified letter does not require the assistance of an attorney. Yes indeed, KEAN T KEAN remarkably failed to respond to no less than 3 certified letters transmit by our APPELLANT pursuant to satisfying a or the “plea” that most remarkably still are not present in any record the Howell Court will keep or maintain, and the series of letters were then apparently ignored by THE COURT in subsequent mid March coercion. However the complete record of transmission and receipt of those letters is to be found in the BAETYL ARCHIVE. Also please do refer to the TOWNSHIP OF HOPEWELL, ZONE, that was called up to active duty on or about TENTH APRIL by the OFFICE OF THE MERCER COUNTY PROSECUTOR to run interference against our APPELLANT in the MATTERS that did result from the proceeding marked present by the GRIBBENSES, MATTERS still active and indeed very active as one might surmise in light of the volume of words hereupon approaching DELUGE character.

Colloquy Page 7, line 6, More than one full year of this same line of bullshit. No, no one here committed any crimes and there is no need for a nest attorney to infiltrate the successful and affirmative defense mounted by our APPELLANT. In fact, the reason THE COURT is so persistent in posing this question, appointing nest attorneys in secret and otherwise attempting to MAIM our APPELLANT via third-party actions, is because that is the order THE COURT hath been commanded to carry out by one or more individuals that are not on any record and are not anything but career criminals. YES INDEED, RODGERS AND CO., THE ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTOR OF THE COURTS IS CONSIDERING A NEW LIFE IN A FOREIGN COUNTRY IN LIGHT OF WHAT HATH BEEN POSTED HEREUPON ALREADY. WE ARE INDEED JUST WARMING UP.

Colloquy Page 7, lines 14,  Re-edit of actual statement, “most amenable going forward”, into “most amenable to go forward”, despite the sparingly few on record statements of our APPELLANT, the GRIBBENES transcription is so irrevocably faulted and the transcriptionist is remarkably incompetent such that the fraud entrances and re-edits can be overcome by the memory of otherwise unassociated parties present within the Howell Court during the proceeding.

Colloquy Page 7, line 16, Direct and remarkable contradiction of already exhibited fraud statement found on Colloquy Page 3, line 15, with false claim that a or the MATTER related to a “municipal disorderly persons offense” that does not exist pursuant one or more statutes in Chapter 1 of Title 2C that forbid municipalities from conducting criminal prosecutions under the guise of municipal code violations, and furthermore in that same chapter we do indeed find verbiage in the case history describing a “Borough Ordinance” that was indeed out from the MuniCode of the thing that hath called itself the Borough of Sayerville, cf. Club 35, LLC v. Borough of Sayerville, tautologically not a Township, but a Borough.

Colloquy Page 7, lines 18 through 20, UNFUCKINGBELIEAVABLE, fraud entrance of an ex post facto riposte to the six Civil Actions brought forth in Superior Court of New Jersey against six state employees, all for criminal acts contrary to N.J.S.A. 2C:13-5(a)(6), Criminal Coercion, inter alia, committed against the PLAINTIFF, indeed our very same APPELLANT, all marked FILED at such time after this specific proceeding in the OCTAGON had concluded and with 33% of those Civil Actions against named DEFENDANTS who are or were public employees of the Township of Howell.

STAY TUNED, DEVELOPMENTS IN PROGRESS

 

 

THE 34TH DAY T PLUS TWO ELEVEN: THAT “ATTORNEY” SO CLAIMED TO BE NAMED “JASON C. MATEY” DISMISSED UPON DATE THIRTY JULY TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN FOLLOWING FROM COMPLICITY IN THE PLOT OF DAY THREE HUNDRED AND THIRTY-FOUR, THAT PLOT TO EFFECT THE FRAUDULENT INCARCERATION OF YOURS TRULY HAVING ORIGIN IN ZONE ZERO EIGHT SIX ZERO EIGHT, TRENTON, STATE OF NEW JERSEY

“PLEASE DO CEASE AND DESIST AT ONCE”

THAT STRING OF WORDS IS IN-FACT HOW MISCREANT “ATTORNEYS” SHOULD BE DEALT WITH AND SOMETHING RATHER SIMILAR CAN BE HEARD HEREIN RECORDED AUDIO OF A DISMISSAL NOTICE PROVIDED TO ONE OF THOSE THREE OR MORE EMPLOYEES OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY WHO HATH BEEN SO NAMED “ATTORNEY” AND OVER THE COURSE OF THE PAST THREE HUNDRED AND TWENTY-TWO DAYS THOSE “ATTORNEYS” HATH BEEN INVOLUNTARILY AND/OR FRAUDULENTLY AND/OR IN SOME OTHER FASHION AS YET UNKNOWN* “APPOINTED” TO ME.

OF THAT TERRIBLE TRIO, NO LESS THAN ONE HATH BEEN “APPOINTED” DESPITE THAT “CLIENT” HAVING WITHDRAWN HIS APPLICATION FOR REPRESENTATION BY THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF PUBLIC DEFENDER SOME ONE HUNDRED AND THIRTEEN DAYS PRIOR.

“ALETHA FRANKLIN” BECOMES “ALETHA SHEPPARD”

“LOU” OF ROOM ONE ZERO NINE UPON DATE TWENTY-SECOND DECEMBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN DID INDEED CLAIM AT SUCH TIME WHEN HE AND I, ACM, WERE SEATED WITHIN ONE OF THE ROR CHECK-IN ROOMS FOUND RATHER NEAR TO ROOM ONE ZERO NINE AND INDEED CONVERSING UPON THOSE CRITICAL MATTERS HERETOFORE UNKNOWN REGARDING MY “CASE”. UPON INQUIRY OF THE IDENTITY OF THE “ATTORNEY” “LOU” CLAIMED HATH BEEN APPOINTED TO MY “CASE” UPON SOME DATE PRIOR TO MY ARRIVAL AT FOUR-HUNDRED SOUTH WARREN STREET TWENTY-SECOND DECEMBER DESPITE THAT EXPLICIT PURPOSE OF TRAVEL TO TRENTON FOR SUBMISSION OF AN APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT OF A PUBLIC DEFENDER THAT IN ALL LIKELIHOOD REQUIRED MY PRESENCE AT THAT COURTHOUSE PURSUANT TO A RECOMMENDATION MADE TO ME BY JUDGE SUSAN SCHROEDER CLARK OF HOWELL TWP MUNICIPAL COURT DURING A PROCEEDING CONDUCTED IN THE EARLY MORNING HOURS UPON DATE TWELFTH DECEMBER TWO-THOUSAND SEVENTEEN.

“LOU” DID NOT PROVIDE THE DATE OF APPOINTMENT OF THAT ATTORNEY AND FURTHERMORE NO NOTICE WHATSOEVER HATH BEEN PROVIDED INFORMING THAT ALLEGED “CLIENT” OF THE APPOINTMENT OF “ALETHA FRANKLIN”.

FURTHERMORE, NO ATTORNEY EMPLOYED BY THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY AT THE OFFICE(S) OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER, MERCER COUNTY HATH PROVIDED NOTICE OF APPOINTMENT UP TO THE PRESENT UPON DATE “LOU” ALLEGED ONE SO NAMED “ALETHA FRANKLIN” WAS ASSOCIATED WITH MY “CASE” AND THAT CLAIM MADE BY “LOU” FOLLOWING SOME MINUTES AFTER A PRIOR DESCRIBED “WARRANT” HATH BEEN TERMINATED BY ENTITY AT TIME UNKNOWN, HOWEVER UPON PRESENT DATE TERMINATION OF THAT WARRANT KNOWN TO HAVE BEEN ACCOMPLISHED BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.

REGARDING OPD ATTORNEYS, THE FIRST AND THE VERY WORST OF THAT LOT OF THREE WAS “APPOINTED” TO ME UPON THE DATE, THAT VERY DATE, ELEVENTH SEPTEMBER TWO-THOUSAND SEVENTEEN. HOWEVER DESPITE THE EARLY DATE OF THAT “APPOINTMENT”, THAT FEMALE INDIVIDUAL SO NAMED “ALETHA SHEPPARD” ASSIDUOUSLY HID HER IDENTITY AND IN ALL LIKELIHOOD STOLE* THE IDENTIFY OF THAT CLIENT ON NO LESS THAN THREE OCCASIONS DURING OVER THE COURSE OF ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY-SEVEN DAYS SUBSEQUENT TO ALLEGED FIRST DATE OF “APPOINTMENT” UPON ELEVENTH SEPTEMBER, AND FURTHERMORE DURING THAT TIME “ALETHA SHEPPARD” MADE NOT A SINGLE EFFORT TO CONTACT HER ALLEGED “CLIENT” IN ANY CAPACITY WHATSOEVER.

FURTHERMORE, NO RECORD OF THAT “APPOINTMENT” HATH BEEN PROVIDED TO THAT SAME CLIENT BY THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY* UNTIL ONE HUNDRED AND FORTY-ONE DAYS FOLLOWING THEREAFTER THAT ALLEGED “APPOINTMENT” AND IT WAS NOT UNTIL SUCH TIME UPON THIRTIETH JANUARY TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN WHEN THAT CLIENT TRAVELED ON FOOT TO THE GROTESQUE OFFICE(S) OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER THAT ARE FOUND WITHIN ZONE ZERO EIGHT SIX ZERO EIGHT, TRENTON, AND OBTAINED THAT CRITICAL DOCUMENT REPRODUCED WITH ONE SINGLE REDACTION TO BE FOUND BELOW WHEREUPON THAT NAME “ALETHA SHEPPARD” HATH BEEN IDENTIFIED FOR THE FIRST AND ONLY TIME AND SUCH IS THE SINGLE DOCUMENT PROVIDING ANY SHRED OF PROOF THAT AN “ATTORNEY” SO NAMED EVER EXISTED, LET ALONE HAD SOME ASSOCIATION WITH THAT “CASE” OFT DISCUSSED HEREUPON BAETYL HAVING ORIGIN IN MERCER COUNTY.

FOLLOWING FROM, TO DATE UPON MONDAY THIRTY JULY TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN IT REMAINS UNCLEAR WHETHER THAT NAME “ALETHA SHEPPARD” IS AND/OR WAS INDEED AN ALIAS FOR ONE OR MORE INDIVIDUAL(S) WHOSE NAMES WERE FOUND IN THE PAST, NO LONGER AT PRESENT, UPON THE EMPLOYEE ROSTER OF MONMOUTH MEDICAL CENTER, LONG BRANCH, STATE OF NEW JERSEY. THAT DOCUMENT OBTAINED FROM ZONE UPON DATE THIRTIETH JANUARY TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN AS SEEN BELOW,

THIRTIETH JANUARY TWO THOUSAND EIGHTEEN
OBTAINED THIRTIETH JANUARY TWO THOUSAND EIGHTEEN [CLICK TO EXPAND]
SVENGALI

FOLLOWING FROM THE CRITICAL KNOWLEDGE THAT “ALETHA SHEPPARD” WAS ALLEGEDLY APPOINTED TO THAT “CLIENT” UPON DATE ELEVENTH SEPTEMBER TWO-THOUSAND SEVENTEEN, AS SEEN UPON THE DOCUMENT AND/OR THING ONE ABOVE, A CLAIM OF THE HIGHEST EVIL HATH BEEN MADE SPECIFICALLY ALLEGING THAT AN APPLICATION FOR THE PUBLIC DEFENDER WOULD BE SUBMITTED ON MY BEHALF UPON DATE SECOND NOVEMBER TWO-THOUSAND SEVENTEEN BY AN ANONYMOUS AFRICAN-AMERICAN FEMALE NICKNAMED MISS MARTY WITH THAT SUBMISSION ALLEGED TO OCCUR AT SUCH TIME THAT I, ACM, HATH YET TO BE INFORMED IN ANY MANNER WHATSOEVER THAT “SHEPPARD” NAMED MY ATTORNEY AND FURTHERMORE AT SUCH TIME I, ACM, WAS ILLEGALLY DETAINED IN A FACILITY LOCATED IN THE VICINITY OF MT. ROSE, HOPEWELL, NEW JERSEY WHEREIN OF THE HIGHEST SIGNIFICANCE THAT CLAIM MADE AT SUCH TIME FOR PURPOSE ARIADNE DESIGN.

“MISS MARTY” MEETS BEAUREGARD UPON SECOND NOVEMBER TWO-THOUSAND SEVENTEEN

THAT AFRICAN-AMERICAN FEMALE WITH NICKNAME “MISS MARTY” WAS SOLE INDIVIDUAL WITH WHOM A “VIDEO EVENT” WAS CONDUCTED UPON DATE SECOND NOVEMBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN AFTER BEING INTERRUPTED ALMOST IMMEDIATELY UPON INITIATION ATTEMPT TO PLACE CONTACT WITH OUTSIDE WORLD BY AN AFRICAN-AMERICAN FEMALE WHO RATHER CURIOUSLY REFERRED TO ME AS “ADAM BLOW” IN RATHER CRUDE SEXUAL AND/OR DRUG VERNACULAR AT SUCH TIME WHEN WALKING TOWARDS UNKEMPT AND UNNAMED CUBICLES WHEREIN SINGLE UNIT TV SETS ARE TO BE FOUND FOREGROUND GARBAGE AND WHEREUPON THAT SCREEN THE INDIVIDUAL SO SEATED IS CONNECTED AND SEEN UPON VIDEO SCREEN AT THEN UNDISCLOSED LOCATION WITHIN ONE SEVEN FIVE SOUTH BROAD STREET, ZONE ONE EIGHT SIX ZERO EIGHT, ZONE WHEREIN THAT ROOM AT TIME AND TIME AGAIN THE PRODUCTION OF AWFUL THINGS HATH BEEN ESTABLISHED TO OCCUR IN A COURT OF THE FALLEN STATE OF NEW JERSEY WHEREIN THAT MISS MARTY “EMPLOYED” AND WHOSE REAL IDENTITY REMAINS UNKNOWN DID CONDUCT THAT UNTITLED “VIDEO COURT” EVENT AND AS SUCH THE RECORD OF THAT DISCUSSION IS ONLY TO BE FOUND UPON THE SERVERS OF THOSE INSTITUTIONS OF THE UNITED STATES FROM WHERE NOT A WHISTLE CAN BE HEARD.

DURING THAT CONVERSATION, I WAS ASKED NO LESS THAN ONE QUESTION SPECIFICALLY PERTAINING TO THE THE MONETARY VALUE OF STUDENT LOANS IN MY NAME THAT REMAINED OUTSTANDING.

FURTHERMORE AND OF THE HIGHEST SIGNIFICANCE, THAT AFRICAN-AMERICAN FEMALE REFUSED TO STATE HER NAME UPON MY DIRECT REQUEST FOR HER TO DO SO BECAUSE, NEAR VERBATIM, “I DON’T GIVE OUT MY NAME” AND AS SUCH BOTH THE PROFESSIONAL TITLE AND THE NAME OF THAT FEMALE REMAIN UNKNOWN. IT ALSO REMAINS LIKELY THAT MISS MARTY IS NOT AND HAS NEVER BEEN AN EMPLOYEE OF SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY.

HOWEVER, UPON DATE TWENTY-FIFTH JANUARY IN A RECEIVING CHAMBER OF COURTROOM 3C, FOUR-HUNDRED SOUTH WARREN, THAT SAME “LOU” FROM ROOM ONE ZERO NINE OF “ALETHA FRANKLIN” CLAIM DID STATE RATHER REMARKABLY IN BRIEF CONVERSATION REGARDING PUBLIC DEFENDER APPLICATION PROCESS THAT, NEAR VERBATIM, “MISS MARTY IS VERY GOOD” ALTHOUGH IT REMAINS TO BE WHAT EXACTLY IN WHAT FIELD SHE EXCELS.

FURTHERMORE, RETURN NOVEMBER PRIOR YEAR, “MISS MARTY” DID INDEED REACT IN A RATHER STRANGE MANNER UPON FURTHER INQUIRY INTO HER EXACT LOCATION WITH QUESTION POSED, NEAR VERBATIM, “DO YOU WORK IN THE VICINAGE?” FOLLOWING FROM MISS MARTY WRITHED AS IF “CAUGHT” AND IN ALL LIKELIHOOD WAS INDEED UPON THAT DATE SECOND NOVEMBER TWO-THOUSAND SEVENTEEN LOCATED IN, ON OR ABOUT THE MERCER COUNTY SUPERIOR COURTHOUSE LOCATED AT ONE SEVENTY-FIVE SOUTH BROAD STREET.

THE MOST CRITICAL STATEMENT MADE BY ANY INDIVIDUAL SO NAMED AND SO DESCRIBED HEREIN THIS POST WAS INDEED MADE BY MISS MARTY BY CLAIMING THAT SHE WOULD SUBMIT AN APPLICATION IN MY NAME FOR THE PUBLIC DEFENDER DESPITE “SHEPPARD” HAVING BEEN APPOINTED ON ELEVENTH SEPTEMBER FIFTY-TWO DAYS PRIOR ALTHOUGH DURING WHICH TIME HAVING MADE NO ATTEMPT TO CONTACT HER CLIENT, MYSELF, ACM, AND FURTHERMORE DURING THOSE EIGHT DAYS WITHIN ANON MT. ROSE “SHEPPARD” WITH NOT ONE SINGLE ATTEMPT TO CONTACT HER “CLIENT” FOR PURPOSE ESTABLISH HEALTH AND WELL-BEING PURSUANT TO THAT PROFESSIONAL CODE OF CONDUCT OF ATTORNEYS PRACTICING LAW IN THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY AS SET FORTH BY THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY FROM TIME TO TIME PURSUANT TO N.J.S.A. 2A:158.

WHAT WAS AND REMAINS WELL-ESTABLISHED AS AN ILLEGAL DETAINMENT FOLLOWING FROM A FRAUDULENT WARRANT THAT HATH BEEN ALLEGED BY A “CRIPP” TO HAVE BEEN ISSUED UPON DATE SEVENTEENTH OCTOBER TWO-THOUSAND SEVENTEEN AND DIRECTLY FOLLOWING FROM THAT CLAIM THAT EIGHT DAY PERIOD WITHIN MCCC FOR WHICH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT HATH CHARGED THAT COUNTY MERCER NEARLY EIGHTY-EIGHT MILLION DOLLARS FOR EACH DAY THAT I, ACM, SPENT INCARCERATED THEREIN. FOLLOWING FROM THAT CLAIM MADE BY MISS MARTY, AT NO POINT DURING THOSE EIGHT RATHER STRANGE DAYS I SPENT WITHIN MCCC DID I RECEIVE ANY CONTACT FROM ANY ATTORNEY EMPLOYED BY THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 

AS SUCH, THAT LETTER UNDERSIGNED “JANET VANFOSSEN, CDM” DATED TWENTY-THIRD MARCH TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN CLAIMED “SHEPPARD” REMAINED MY ATTORNEY ONE HUNDRED NINETY-THREE DAYS FOLLOWING FROM NINE ELEVEN PRIOR YEAR AND DESPITE THAT VILE CRETIN “SHEPPARD” HAVING ATTEMPTED TO EFFECT A LIFE SENTENCE UPON ME IN THAT FACILITY NEAR MT. ROSE, PRINCETON, NEW JERSEY, HELL ON EARTH AND THEN SOME, WITH BELOW SOME HUNDREDS OF LEVELS LAIR UPON LAYER, WITH THAT LIFE SENTENCE FORMALIZED IN COURSE OF CONDUCT EXHIBITED BY “SHEPPARD” WHEREIN NO CONTACT WHATSOEVER HATH BEEN INITIATED WITH HER “CLIENT(S)” AND IN ASSIDUOUS ATTEMPT TO HIDE THAT NAME “ALETHA SHEPPARD” AT ALL COSTS FROM HER CLIENT(S), IN ONE CASE SO DESCRIBED HEREIN THAT NAME UNKNOWN UNTIL SOMEWHERE ON OR ABOUT THE ONE HUNDRED TWENTY-EIGHTH DAY AFTER NINE-ELEVEN OF THE PRIOR YEAR WITH BOTH RADIO SILENCE AND ATTEMPT AT STEALTH CONDUCTED WITH FULL COOPERATION OF THE MERCER COUNTY PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE, WHETHER IN-PART OR IN TOTAL YET TO BE DETERMINED. RESULT THAT RATHER VEXING COLLUSION BETWEEN THOSE TWO ENTITIES WHOSE BUDGET WITH ORIGIN THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY PLANNED TO CONDUCT REGULAR CRIMINAL CAMPAIGNS TO FRAUDULENTLY INCARCERATE WHITE CHRISTIAN MEN AND WOMEN FOR EXCESSIVE LENGTHS OF TIME AND SPECIFICALLY THOSE HUMAN PERSONS LEAST LIKELY TO COMMIT ANY CRIME WHATSOEVER FOR PURPOSE SADISTIC MOCKERY THE RIGHTEOUS RIGHT HAND PATH OF JURISPRUDENCE THAT WILL NOT EVER SATIATE THE RAW HATRED OF ANY AND ALL WHITE CHRISTIAN MEAN AND WOMEN BY THOSE SO NAMED THE RAVENS.

“COURT EVENT” “SCHEDULED” FOR AND CONDUCTED UPON EIGHTH FEBRUARY TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN “NOT IN THE SYSTEM” AND FURTHERMORE NO “DEFENSE ATTY” NAMED OR PRESENT AT THAT “COURT EVENT”

THIRTIETH JANUARY TWO THOUSAND EIGHTEEN ROOM ONE ZERO NINE

TAKING A TRIP IN TIME BACK TO TWENTY-SECOND DECEMBER TWO-THOUSAND SEVENTEEN, SAME INFORMATION OBTAINED ON THIRTIETH JANUARY 30 TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN OBSERVED UPON ROOM 109 ZONE PROMIS PRINT-OUT OBTAINED TWENTY-SECOND DECEMBER, TWO-THOUSAND SEVENTEEN, AS SEEN BELOW,
TWENTY SECOND DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND SEVENTEEN ROOM 109
RED TEXT: NO NOTICE WHATSOEVER PROVIDED FOR “COURT EVENT” OF TWENTY-FIFTH JANUARY TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN AND THIS DOCUMENT OBTAINED IN EXPEDITION TO ZONE, WHEREIN ROOM 109 STAFF IMMEDIATELY MADE CLAIM “WARRANT” OUTSTANDING FOR MY ARREST. THAT FRAUDULENT “WARRANT” TERMINATED MINUTES THEREAFTER FOR REASON THAT REMAINS UNCLEAR* AND/OR GOOD EYE IN THE SKY LOOKING OUT FOR A GROUNDLING. OH, AND NO DEFENSE ATTORNEY NAMED. SAME DOCUMENT AS OBTAINED THIRTIETH JANUARY TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN UPON WHICH DATE “COURT EVENT” SCHEDULED AND CONDUCTED UPON EIGHTH FEBRUARY CLAIMED BY ONE BLACK MALE IN ROOM 109 SO NAMED “DEXTER WRIGHT” TO “NOT BE IN THE SYSTEM”. [CLICK TO EXPAND]
“HUDSON NOTICE” AND/OR OTHER TITLED DOCUMENT RECEIVED TWENTY-FIFTH JANUARY TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN, AS BELOW,
INCORRECT 3D NAMED DESPITE LYDON NAME ON DOOR OF 3C AND THIS EVENT NOT IN SYSTEM AS PER PROMIS ROOM 109
NO DEFENSE ATTORNEY FROM THE “OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER, MERCER COUNTY” DARED TO SHOW THEIR FACE AND AS SUCH YOURS TRULY ALONE PRO SE. OF NOTE, HIGH CRIME COMMITTED BY “CDM” JANET VANFOSSEN UPON A LETTER DATED TWENTY-THIRD MARCH TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN IN CLAIM THAT “SHEPPARD” STILL PUBLIC DEFENDER UPON THAT DATE DESPITE “SHEPPARD” HAVING NOT ONCE CONTACTED THAT CLIENT, YOURS TRULY, AND HAVING NEVER BEEN PRESENT AT ANY “COURT EVENT” WITH THAT CLIENT, FURTHERMORE VANFOSSEN IN SAME LETTER ILLITERATE CLAIM OF “CAN’T READ YOUR RECORD REQUEST TOO GOOD” AND LATER CLAIM MADE BY PHONE “I DON’T KNOW WHAT THAT EIGHTY PAGE FEE WAIVER IS” BOTH OF WHICH IMPLICIT ADMISSION OF COMPLICITY WITH THAT ONE SO NAMED “PORCELLO”. [CLICK TO EXPAND]
MORE “HUDSON” COURTESY ONE THREE ONE NINE SOUTH WHEREUPON CLAIMED “COURT EVENT” DID NOT ACTUALLY TAKE PLACE AND INDEED YOURS TRULY DID SHOW UP AND RECEIVE PROOF THAT SO ALLEGED “COURT EVENT” OF TWENTY-SECOND JANUARY TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN “COMPLETED” WITHOUT ANY NOTICE OF THAT COMPLETION HAVING BEEN PROVIDED TO THE RECIPIENT OF THIS “HUDSON” AND/OR OTHER THING AS SEEN BELOW,
THIRTEENTH DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND SEVENTEEN
THIS THING DIRECTLY FOLLOWING FROM BONDAREW’S FRAUDULENT CLAIM OF “NARCOTICS RELATED ARRESTS” AND DUPLICATE SBI NUMBERS IN ATTEMPT TO FRAME YOURS TRULY FOR DRUG ARRESTS OF ANOTHER INDIVIDUAL THAT MAY OR MAY NOT BE NAMED “ADAM MILLER”, AND OF NOTE FOR HOWELL TOWNSHIP POLICE OFFICER SO NAMED “BONDAREW” SUBJECT OF RATHER INTENSE FEDERAL INVESTIGATION AND MAY OR MAY NOT HAVE BEEN SENTENCED TO FEDERAL PRISON FOR THOSE CRIMES SO DESCRIBED HERE UPON BAETYL. THE JUDGE CHOSE TO HIDE HIS IDENTITY IN MOST COWARDLY MANNER. OF NOTE, IT WAS THAT “JUDGE” SO NAMED “FALCETANO” WHOSE CAREER PRESENTLY WINDING DOWN AND SCHEDULED TO BE TAKEN OUT TO PASTURE FOR WHAT IS SEEN HEREIN AND MANY OTHER HEINOUS CRIMES COMMITTED AGAINST THOUSANDS OF HUMAN PERSONS. [CLICK TO EXPAND]
“VANFOSSEN”
JANET OH JANET WHAT HATH YOU DONE TWENTY THIRD MARCH TWO THOUSAND EIGHTEEN
[CLICK TO EXPAND]
THIRTY JULY TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN

BRIEF VOICE MESSAGE PROVIDING FORMAL AND APPROPRIATE NOTICE OF TERMINATION TO THAT “ATTORNEY” SO NAMED “JASON C. MATEY” WHO HATH CLAIMED “REASSIGNMENT” TO “YOUR CASE” IN A LETTER DATED EIGHTEENTH MAY TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN DESPITE THAT CLIENT HAVING TERMINATED ANY RELATIONSHIP WITH THE OFFICE(S) OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER TO BE FOUND IN MERCER COUNTY ONE HUNDRED AND THIRTEEN DAYS PRIOR, THAT NOTICE OF TERMINATION IN THE RECORDED, UNEDITED AND COMPLETE AUDIO AS HEARD BELOW,

TWENTY-SIX JULY TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN

A LETTER RECEIVED FROM UNKNOWN INDIVIDUAL(S) POSTMARKED TWENTY-FOURTH JULY TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN CONTAINING THEREIN A SLIP OF PAPER WHEREUPON WAS WRITTEN THE OUTRAGEOUS CLAIM THAT AN “EVENT” ALLEGEDLY ENTITLED “[REDACTED]” HATH BEEN SCHEDULED UPON THE DATE THREE HUNDRED AND THIRTY-FOUR DAYS SUBSEQUENT TO SIXTH SEPTEMBER TWO-THOUSAND SEVENTEEN WHEREUPON THAT DAY IN SEPTEMBER THOSE PROCEEDING(S) THAT MAY OR MAY NOT HAVE EXISTED PRIOR IN A FEDERAL TRIBUNAL HAVING ORIGIN IN WHAT HATH BEEN SO NAMED “THE DEEP STATE” HATH BUBBLED TO THE SURFACE IN ZONE ZERO EIGHT SIX FOUR EIGHT.

OF NOTE AND OF THE HIGHEST SIGNIFICANCE, THAT “EVENT” HATH BEEN CLAIMED TO BE “SCHEDULED” UPON A DATE VERY NEAR TO THE PRESENT AND FURTHERMORE “SCHEDULED” DESPITE ANY AND ALL ACCUSATIONS AGAINST THE “DEFENDANT(S)” HAVING BEEN CONCEALED AND UPON DISCOVERY PROVEN FABRICATIONS.

THOSE “DEFENDANT(S)” HATH BEEN “COMMANDED” TO APPEAR AT “EVENT” DESPITE FAILING TO LEGALLY SERVE THE DOCUMENT ENTITLED EITHER “COMPLAINT”, “COMPLAINT – SUMMONS” AND/OR “COMPLAINT – WARRANT” IDENTIFIED BY ONE OF TWO ALPHANUMERICS, NJ/CDR1 AND NJ/CDR2, AND OF THE HIGHEST SIGNIFICANCE THAT “EVENT” CLAIMED TO FALL UPON THE THREE HUNDRED THIRTY-FOURTH DAY. THAT MAILING FROM ZONE ZERO EIGHT SIX ZERO EIGHT POSTMARKED TWENTY-FOURTH JULY TWO THOUSAND EIGHTEEN, WHAT HATH BEEN FOUND WITHIN, AND SCHEDULED DELIVERY DATE AS PER THE UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE AS SEEN IN THREE BELOW,

ONE
ZERO EIGHT SIX ZERO EIGHT AND ROCK HILL WHO SENT THIS THING CURIOUS THAT
ROCK HILL, EH? WHY PLEASE. [CLICK TO EXPAND]
TWO
THING THAT RESEMBLES HUDSON NOTICE WITH FRAUDULENT LOCATION CLAIM
NO DISCOVERY PROVIDED WHATSOEVER AND AS PER THE EXPLICIT LIE MADE BY “MATEY” THAT DEFENDANT SO NAMED WOULD UPON THE THREE HUNDRED THIRTY-FOURTH DAY WILL HAVE UPON START THAT “EVENT” RECEIVED NOT ONE IOTA OF THE “DISCOVERY” WHICH HATH EITHER BEEN ONGOING OR NEVER EXISTED IN THE FIRST PLACE. YET TO BE SEEN. NO COUNSEL IDENTIFIED UPON THING AND NO “ATTORNEY” SIGNATURE PRESENT AS WELL. THAT RATHER CRITICAL QUESTION RAISED YES AGAIN, WHO EXACTLY SENT THIS THING? [CLICK TO EXPAND]
THREE
THAT LETTER RECEIVED UPON DATE TWENTY SIXTH JULY TWO THOUSAND EIGHTEEN
NOTE FEMALE HANDWRITING [CLICK TO EXPAND]
EIGHTEENTH JUNE TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN

RECORDED AUDIO OF OUTRAGEOUS CLAIM MADE BY “ALEXANDRA” OF ROOM ONE ZERO NINE, FOUR-HUNDRED SOUTH WARREN, THAT “ALETHA SHEPPARD” WAS STILL “ATTORNEY” FOR THAT CLIENT DESPITE “SHEPPARD” HAVING MADE NO ATTEMPT TO CONTACT HER “CLIENT” IN THE TWO HUNDRED AND EIGHTY DAYS THAT HATH ELAPSED SINCE FIRST “APPOINTED” DURING WHICH TIME “SHEPPARD” DID NOT APPEAR AT ANY SINGLE ONE OF THOSE SCHEDULED “COURT EVENTS” FOR WHICH HER “CLIENT” SO “NAMED PARTY” DID INDEED APPEAR WHEN NOTIFIED AT ALL FOR THOSE AS YET STILL UNDEFINED PROCEEDING(S) BEING CONDUCTED AND/OR HAVING ALREADY BEEN CONCLUDED IN ZONE. RECORDED AUDIO OF “ALEXANDRA” FIRST POSTED ON PAREXP UPON DATE NINETEENTH JUNE TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN POSTED HERE AGAIN UPON BAETYL INTACT AND WITH FIDELITY AS HEARD BELOW,

TWENTY-FIRST JULY TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN

ATTEMPT AT CONTACT WITH “MATEY” REGARDING THE CLAIM AS HEARD ABOVE THAT THE VILE “SHEPPARD” STILL UPON THE FIELD, RECORDED, UNEDITED AND COMPLETE AUDIO OF THAT VOICE MESSAGE AS HEARD BELOW,

EIGHTH JUNE TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN

AUDIO OF THE FIRST AND ONLY CONVERSATION CONDUCTED BETWEEN THAT CLIENT AND THE “ATTORNEY” SO NAMED “MATEY“, RECORDED, UNEDITED AND COMPLETE AUDIO OF THAT CALL AS HEARD BELOW,


WHY?

WHY IS ALL OF THIS HAPPENING?

WHY DID IT START?

WHAT DOES THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY FEAR THE MOST?

THAT QUESTION TO BE ANSWERED IN-PART FOR PURPOSE OF BREVITY IN SOME MINUTES FOLLOWING AFTER THIS UPDATE


TITLE THIRTY

THOSE TITLE THIRTY “ASSESSORS” ARE SO TASKED WITH SPYING ON TARGETED INDIVIDUAL AND THE IMMEDIATE AND EXTENDED FAMILY OF SAME FOR PURPOSE DETERMINING THE NET WORTH OF THOSE ESTATE(S) OF PRIMARILY WHITE CHRISTIAN MEN AND WOMEN WHO ARE NATURAL BORN CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
THAT “ASSESSOR” IS SO TASKED WITH “ASSESSING” THE DOLLAR VALUE IN EACH AND EVERY ACCOUNT OF THAT TARGETED INDIVIDUAL ALONG WITH EACH AND EVERY INDIVIDUAL IN THE SOCIAL NETWORK OF SAME.
FURTHERMORE, THAT “ASSESSOR” IS FURTHER TASKED WITH OBTAINING INTELLIGENCE PURSUANT TO THE DISPOSITION OF EACH AND EVERY ASSET IN THOSE ESTATE(S).
THESE “ASSESSORS” ARE INDEED AGENTS OF FINANCIAL ENTITIES SUCH AS “BLACKROCK”, “GOLDMAN SACHS”, “JANUS” AND OTHERS WHO DO INDEED COMMUNICATE THAT FINANCIAL DATA TO FOREIGN ENEMY NATIONS. 
THAT VERY RATHER CRITICAL EMAIL DATED THIRTY ONE JULY TWO THOUSAND EIGHTEEN RE 3RD PTY AS
OF THE HIGHEST SIGNIFICANCE, THAT 3RD PTY” SO IDENTIFIED “AS” IS THE VERY SAME FEMALE INDIVIDUAL WHO MAY OR MAY NOT BE THE “VICTIM” OF “CRIME(S)” FOR WHICH A COURT “EVENT” HATH BEEN SCHEDULED UPON THE THREE HUNDRED THIRTY-FOURTH DAY FOLLOWING FROM THAT MORNING OF SIXTH SEPTEMBER TWO-THOUSAND SEVENTEEN WHEREUPON “AS” INITIATED CONTACT WITH THAT “CLIENT” AS DESCRIBED ABOVE AT A TIME PRIOR TO NINE AM EST IN THREE PHONE CALLS PLACED FROM A HERETOFORE UNKNOWN PHONE NUMBER, THE RESULT OF THOSE CALLS RECEIVED WAS RECOVERY OF ONE SINGLE TEXT ENTITLED “A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE CZECH LANDS TO 2004” AND INITIATION THIS AND/OR THOSE FRAUDULENT PROCEEDING(S). FURTHERMORE NO VISUAL OR PHYSICAL PROXIMITY HATH BEEN ESTABLISHED BY THAT “CLIENT” SUCH THAT “AS” COULD BE CONFIRMED TO HAVE BEEN IN THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY THAT VERY MORNING OF SIXTH SEPTEMBER. [CLICK TO EXPAND]
“3RD PTY” AND/OR “ATTORNEY” AND/OR OTHER

3RD PTY AS RATHER WELL KNOWN FEMALE INDIVIDUAL
OF HIGH NOTE, IN ALL PAPERS SERVED UPON ME ASSOCIATED WITH THE ABOVE MATTER SO NAMED “CACH LLC VS MILLER ADAM” THAT HATH BEEN COMPLETED IN THE YEAR TWO-THOUSAND FOURTEEN FOLLOWING FROM A STIPULATION IN LIEU OF JUDGMENT, NO “3RD PTY” WAS NAMED AND NOT A SINGLE INDIVIDUAL SO NAMED IN THAT PROCEEDING HAD INITIALS “AS”. [CLICK TO EXPAND]
AS SUCH, IT IS RATHER VEXING THAT THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY MAY OR MAY NOT CLAIM THAT SAME “AS” AS “VICTIM” IN THAT FRAUD PROCEEDING DESCRIBED HEREIN AND FOR WHICH SOME “EVENT” IN A “COURT” HATH BEEN ALLEGED TO BE SCHEDULED IN THE VERY NEAR FUTURE SOME DAYS AWAY AND “NOTICE” OF THAT “EVENT” HAVING BEEN “HIDDEN” AND FOR WHICH THAT CRIMINAL ELEMENT IN TRENTON FIRST INFORMED YOURS TRULY UPON ELEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THAT PROCEEDING. ELEVEN DAYS NOTICE. ELEVEN DAYS NOTICE.

AND THAT FOLLOWING FROM THE HEINOUS CRIMES COMMITTED BETWEEN DATES TWENTY-FIRST JULY AND TWENTY-THIRD JULY TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN CONTINUING AT PRESENT.

ESPIONAGE OR ARIADNE DESIGN?

AS SUCH, THIS RECORDS REQUEST OF THE HIGHEST SIGNIFICANCE REMAINS OUTSTANDING, “AS” AS SEEN BELOW,

3RD PTY AS RATHER WELL KNOWN FEMALE INDIVIDUAL RECORDS PLEASE
IF SUBMITTED TO THAT “SCCO” ADDRESS FOUND UPON LOWER BOTTOM, THE RESPONSE FROM THAT “OFFICE” IN ALL LIKELIHOOD WILL COME SOME DAYS LATER WHEREIN CLAIM MADE “WE DON’T DO THOSE TYPE OF RECORDS” DESPITE ACTUALLY BEING SO TASKED WITH SERVICE OF THOSE RECORDS UPON REQUEST AND FURTHERMORE THAT “OFFICE” HAVING BEEN OBSERVED TO TRANSMIT THAT SAME REQUEST FORM SUBMIT TO THE CLERK OF SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY RATHER RAPIDLY TO ONE OR MORE ENTITIES NOT INVOLVED IN THAT OR THOSE PROCEEDING(S). [CLICK TO EXPAND]
WHO IS “AS”?

[REDACTED AT PRESENT TIME]

CONSULT ARCHIVE FOR COPIOUS MATERIALS ON THAT ONE

THOSE ONE THOUSAND PLUS PHOTOS INCOMING

SO NAMED

SO FEARED

THE RAIN OF FROGS

UPON ALL OF YOUR OFFICIALS

UPON THE BOTTOM OF THE MONUMENT

CRITICAL NOTES

SEVENTEENTH DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND FOURTEEN NO 3RD PTY IDENTIFIED
[CLICK TO EXPAND]
UPON TWENTY-SIXTH JANUARY TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN ONE THREE ONE NINE SOUTH ABANDONS ALL PRETENSE OF LAW AND ORDER, AS SEEN IN THOSE THREE IMAGES POSTED BELOW, THE STAFF OF THAT MUNICIPAL COURT MADE NO EFFORT TO INFORM YOURS TRULY THAT A “COURT THING” AND/OR “COURT EVENT” AND/OR SCHEDULED “VICTIM TESTIMONY” HATH BEEN CANCELED. FURTHERMORE, AS IS PRUDENT IN DEALING WITH THAT ENTITY, OR ANY OTHER JUDICIAL ENTITY FOR THAT MATTER, ONE APPEARS UPON DATE FOUND WITHIN THOSE DOCUMENTS SO TITLED “OFFICIAL LEGAL NOTICE” THAT ARE TRANSMITTED AND RECEIVED VIA US MAILS, EVEN IN THOSE CASES WHEN THAT NOTICE MANAGES TO ARRIVE DESPITE HAVING BEEN DELIBERATELY SENT TO AN INCORRECT ADDRESS. IN BRIEF, HOWELL TWP MUNICIPAL COURT CHOSE NOT TO MAIL THE THREE “OFFICIAL LEGAL NOTICES” AS SEEN BELOW IN ONE PHOTOGRAPH TAKEN UPON DATE TWENTY-SIXTH JANUARY TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN,

TWENTY SIXTH JANUARY TWO THOUSAND EIGHTEEN HOWELL TWP MUNICIPAL ABANDONS ALL PRETENSE LAW AND ORDER
[CLICK TO EXPAND]
OF THE HIGHEST SIGNIFICANCE, THE “DATE OF NOTICE” PUBLISHED UPON THOSE THREE “OFFICIAL LEGAL NOTICES” IDENTIFIED TWENTY-FIFTH JANUARY TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN WHEREUPON NOTICE TO YOURS TRULY INFORMING THAT A “COURT EVENT” PRIOR SCHEDULED TO BE HELD SOME HOURS LATER HAD BEEN CANCELED. OF NOTE, THESE NOTICES ARE NOT POSTMARKED AND AS SUCH HAD NOT BEEN TRANSMITTED VIA US MAILS, RATHER THOSE THREE “DOCUMENTS” WERE HANDED TO YOURS TRULY IN PERSON BY THAT ONE SO NAMED “ROSEMARY O’DONNELL, C.M.C.A.”,AS FOLLOWS BELOW THAT “DATE OF NOTICE”,

TWENTY SIXTH JANUARY TWO THOUSAND EIGHTEEN HOWELL TWP MUNICIPAL ABANDONS ALL PRETENSE LAW AND ORDER TWO
[CLICK TO EXPAND]
ARRIVE ONE THREE ONE NINE AND UNABLE TO LOCATE IDENTITY UPON WALL OF SHAME, THAT REDACTED DISGRACE AS SEEN BELOW IN ONE,

TWENTY SIXTH JANUARY TWO THOUSAND EIGHTEEN HOWELL TWP MUNICIPAL COURT WALL OF SHAME
[CLICK TO EXPAND]
AND UPON CONCLUSION, NO LESS THAN FORTY-FOUR PIECES OF MAIL RECEIVED TO AN ADDRESS IN COUNTY MONMOUTH, THAT TSUNAMI OF HATRED TRANSMITTED BY POST DID OCCUR BETWEEN DATES SECOND OCTOBER AND FIRST NOVEMBER TWO-THOUSAND SEVENTEEN, N.J.S.A. 2C:12-10(F). PICKETERS’ CHARGE., AS SEEN BELOW,
UPDATE SECOND AUGUST TWO THOUSAND-EIGHTEEN

NINE ELEVEN ELEVEN NINE

NO SHEPPARD

DID JUST FINE

DIFFERENT PROSECUTOR EACH AND EVERY TIME

ELEVEN NINE TWO THOUSAND SEVENTEEN NO SHEPPARD NO DISCOVERY
[CLICK TO EXPAND]

THE 34TH DAY T PLUS TWO TEN: HOLLY MUHAMMAD AWAN OF ZONE ZERO EIGHT SIX ZERO EIGHT, TRENTON, STATE OF NEW JERSEY AND THE “JUDGE” WHO “RUNS” THAT STATE

AUDIO FOUND HEREIN FIRST POSTED UPON BAETYL FOURTH APRIL TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN

THE FRAUDULENT CLAIMS MADE WITHIN THAT SUBTERRANEAN ANTECHAMBER UPON DATE TWENTY-FIFTH JANUARY TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN AS SEEN UPON THAT ONE SCREEN SEEN AND SCENE ONE FLOOR ABOVE WHAT HATH BEEN FOUND BELOW TO BE HELL ON EARTH AND THEN SOME HATH INDEED PRECIPITATED PUBLICATION OF THE 34TH DAY T MINUS ZERO AND THEREFROM THAT REPEATED COURSE OF CONDUCT BY ONE OR MORE SO NAMED “COURT OFFICERS” HEARD HEREIN HATH BEEN FIRST PROVIDED TO THE PUBLIC UPON BAETYL WITHIN THAT POST OF FIFTH MAY, THE 34TH DAY T MINUS ONE: HELL ON EARTH CONFIRMED AND THEN SOME.

HOLLY MUHAMMAD AWAN: “JUDGE GRANT RUNS NEW JERSEY”
ZONE334 (33 of 43)
OF RATHER IMPORTANT NOTE DESPITE REPEATED CLAIM MADE BY AWAN, ZONE ZERO EIGHT SIX ZERO EIGHT, TRENTON, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ZERO ZERO SEVEN SO NAMED UPON THAT SCREEN ABOVE HATH NEVER BEEN CONVICTED OF A CRIME AND AS SUCH CANNOT BE ON PROBATION, PROOF OF WHICH TO BE FOUND HEREIN THIS LINK TO A POST UPON BAETYL DATED TWENTY-FIFTH APRIL TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN UPON THE 34TH DAY T MINUS ZERO.
ZERO ZERO SEVEN: “OH RLLY?”

HOLLY MUHAMMAD (HM): so what can I do for you?

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: so, I received two mailings from this department, I am not sentenced to probation

HM: ok

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: you made that clear last time

HM: mm hmm

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: and you had scheduled something called a comprehensive enforcement program for the thirty..

HM: what’s your first name again?

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: Adam

HM: Adam

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: for the 31st of this month

HM: ok

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: at I believe 8:30 am

HM: Adam C. Miller?

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: that’s correct

HM: ok, we did talk, or I don’t know if we talked, maybe I left a voicemail for you

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: I got your card

HM: no we talked

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: we talked

HM: ok

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: in person

HM: yea we did in December, ok

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: so I have a variety of proceedings in municipal court that day

HM: ok

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: so I’m not going to be able to make 8:30

HM: ok

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: and I need you to reschedule that

HM: all-right

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: um and furthermore its perplexing to me, um, that document describes the docket number for a restraining order

HM: mm hmm

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: and its called a case

HM: ok

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. ADAM C MILLER

HM: ok

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: now that case is..that’s not a case name

HM: its terminology that the court uses for paperwork only, you’re not on probation

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: that’s correct

HM: you don’t have a supervision CASE

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: that’s correct

HM: your CASE is assigned to a probation officer, you don’t have a probation officer, but its assigned a probation officer to monitor collections of 50 dollars

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: correct, 52 dollars

HM: 52

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: so…

HM: the 2 dollars is your transaction fee, unfortunately nothing we can do about that

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: so, why is the docket number for a temporary restraining order associated with a criminal case name, THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. ADAM C MILLER?

HM: that I don’t know, you’d probably have to contact SUPERIOR COURT for that and find out why that terminology…

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: well it came from this department

HM: …is done that way

HM: it came from this department but we don’t make the rules

HM: JUDGE GRANT, [stated with tactical pause, subtle grin and body language of elation] who runs NEW JERSEY

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: oh really

HM: does not ask me what I’d like it to say, he tells me what its going to say, and that’s the end of that

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: so those notices do not come from this department, the text of them

HM: they don’t come out of this building

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: oh really

HM: the language doesn’t come from us we don’t decide any of it

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: you just hit the button and say print?

HM: no we don’t even do that

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: hmm

HM: its an automated system

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: oh, ok

HM: the notices are generated from a location, I don’t know where, and they’re printed and sent out from there, my name is probably on your notice

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: mm hmm

HM: because I’m the coordinator for this program

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: correct

HM: but if I go in and I put in my wrong phone extension

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: mm hmm

HM: that’s what’s going on the notice

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: right

HM: so when people call whatever name is on that notice, they’re relying on that information to be accurate

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: mm hmm

HM: and right now it is, but it might not be in the future. A month ago it said Sally Fowler

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: that’s correct

HM: now it says Holly Muhammad

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: where did she go again? [RE: SALLY FOWLER]

HM: she’s a hearing officer, she’s going to be handling PASSAIC COUNTY, MONMOUTH COUNTY and OCEAN COUNTY, I believe

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: a hearing officer?

HM: two south and one north, yea

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: ok, interesting

HM: um [pause and muted laugh] and she technically still works for the judiciary, but not as a probation officer anymore and not in a collections capacity, now she is in, you know, the next chair over, and she makes these recommendations for payment plans, vacating of penalties, fees, whatever, to a judge who then ultimately signs off on them, but she never has any contact with the judge unless there is an appeal

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: ok, duly noted, um, now the next question is, there’s been some ambiguity in the source of that fee, that 52 dollar fee, where exactly does that come from?

HM: a judge

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: right, which judge?

HM: whatever judge is over the family part where you were for the restraining ord…, for the temporary restraining order

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: right

HM: apparently at some point, and this is based on my knowledge of how court works, not because I was there, somebody filed a temporary restraining order

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: right

HM: you were served or should have been served with that temporary restraining order, showed up for a final restraining order hearing

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: mm hmm

HM: a hearing officer initially may have gone as far as a judge, but initially a hearing officer heard from either yourself and the other party or you didn’t show up and they only heard from the other party

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: mm hmm

HM: determined that the temporary restraining order would be made a permanent restraining order

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: mm hmm

HM: which in the STATE OF NEW JERSEY is permanent forever until that person comes back and says hey I want to drop the restraining order

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: now…

HM: then they dismiss…

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: …can you in tell in your system what type of restraining order that is

HM: no

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: ok

HM: the rea..I don’t have access to it, could someone in family court? absolutely, they could look it up

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: right

HM: and see who the victim is, what the reliefs were that were granted, what reliefs were requested, and what reliefs were denied, I can’t and its appropriate I shouldn’t be able to see that

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: so what if I told you that no final restraining order had ever been granted

HM: then this shouldn’t be in the system

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: that’s correct

HM: ok

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: that’s correct

HM: ok

HM: do you have something that says that?

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: I do, but I don’t intend to share it

HM: that’s fine

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: so, right now what I need you to do is move that date to another date because I have municipal court that morning

HM: ok

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: which supersedes whatever that, that notice, notifies me of

HM: that’s fine

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: ok, um, and you could provide me a print out of the new date?

HM: I can write it down for you, sure

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: sure

HM: let’s see what we have [pause] this is the first notice that you ever received for CEP, right?

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: second

HM: second, I mean, court date, is this the second date that you received, or the second?

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: this is the second date I have received, and is it a court date, or, what exactly is it?

HM: its a court date, you’re going to a hearing room for a court proceeding

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: why do you do that

HM: because you’re not in a courtroom

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: right

HM: there is no judge in there, there is a hearing officer, and that hearing officer makes a recommendation to the court, to a judge

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: mm hmm

HM: that says I had a conversation with this gentleman, I am recommending that going forward we deal with the 50 dollars that’s owed in this way, she signs it, you sign it, it goes to a judge and a judge signs it

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: ok

HM: then its a court order, coming from the “court” not the physical place, but the man with robe who was is called the “court”

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: so that hearing officer that you said prior…

HM: in MERCER COUNTY is LISA LYNCH

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: in MERCER COUNTY is LISA LYNCH, ok

HM: she is the hearing officer that would be sitting in CEP at the time that you come in

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: ok

HM: she’s sitting there, I’m sitting there, there is a sheriff officer present and there is a court clerk to record the proceeding

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: mm hmm

HM: when that is done, that paperwork, after you sign it, I sign it, the hearing officer signs it, it goes to JUDGE WARSHAW, who is the presiding judge in MERCER COUNTY who signs all of the CEP orders

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: mm hmm

HM: um, he’ll review it, sign it, and then it comes back here for me to enter it into the computer and lets just say the recommendation or the agreement that you and Lisa work out is to pay 5 dollars a month from now until however long it takes to pay it effective such and such a date going forward, once I come back I change it in here, right now it says you just have to pay the 50 dollars period one payment

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: mm hmm

HM: you make an arrangement with her to to do it some other kind of way and we change that

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: mm hmm

HM: um, if there is, if you showed up say January 31st, you come into court and you tell LISA I don’t want a hearing officer to hear this matter I want it to go straight to a judge

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: mm hmm

HM: you do not have the hearing that day, she writes on the order that its being, its been requested for your case to go to the judge, it goes to JUDGE WARSHAW’S CHAMBERS, he decides, or maybe the law clerks decides, what the date and time of that hearing would be, and then that hearing happens in his courtroom, in his courtroom

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: so are you saying I can request right now..

HM: you can’t request it with me, you’d have to request it at a CEP meeting

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: so I have to show up to that

HM: mm hmm

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: ok

HM: and you’d have two opportunities to request it, the first one would be in the very beginning when she calls your case and you say I don’t want to discuss this case with you, you’re a hearing office, and that’s not disrespectful, its just I don’t want this heard by a hearing officer, I want it to go a judge, or after the back and forth with her you don’t agree with or you’re not satisfied with, at that point you can say, like, you know what, I’m not ok with this, I want it to go to a judge, thank you very much, I’ll take care of that

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: is there a way to contact LISA LYNCH beforehand and get it straight to the judge

HM: there’s not, it has to be on the record that you’re requesting it, and the only way for it to be on the record is for you to be in the hearing room while we are on the record being recorded

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: mm hmm

HM: um, because a judge gets that

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: and what, what judge, what part of the court is that from? Family part?

HM: The judge that would hear the appeal is a criminal court judge, who happens to be the criminal court presiding judge in MERCER COUNTY who handles CEP

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: so it’s not in this building?

HM: no, its not. Its in the building that’s like a block that way on Warren Street

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: Right yes, 400, ok, um, so that day its the hearing officer, and stenographer, sheriff, and I can elect to take it to a criminal court

HM: mm hmm

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: and then…what does that constitute?

HM: what do you mean

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: will I present evidence to say that this charge is in error?

HM: what you…no, that, if you were saying that the matter is in error, that would be on appeal for, for the fact that you have a case

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: right

HM: what you would be going to JUDGE WARSHAW, going before him for, would be I didn’t agree with what happened in CEP, I want you to change that

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: mm hmm

HM: he’s not determining whether or not that this 50 dollars should stand, he’s determining whether or not you should be having five dollar a month payment plan, or, if Lisa said, like if you said to her I’m not paying it I’m indigent I don’t have ability to pay it, he’s determining ability to pay, she could determine ability to pay, but if you disagree with her, then you would go to the judge and then he would determine it at which time you would bring…should bring that evidence with you before LISA, but if you chose not to…

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: but not the judge

HM: No, no, no, you would have, if you had it with LISA and she determined your ability to pay based on just you saying you don’t have the ability to pay, when you go before the judge, he’s not going to go with what you say

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: mm hmm

HM: he’s going to go with what you bring him

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: mm hmm

HM: some people will bring that information to the hearing officer, and if its gets to be too cumbersome or its, you know, beyond her scope, then she’ll say you know what your matter should go to the judge

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: right

HM: either one of you can make that determination in the proceeding while we’re on the record

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: now if I get the restraining order terminated or vacated before that CEP meeting, am I still required to go?

HM: …that…hmm, it would seem to me that you…if it becomes vacated and you have a court order, obviously, you’d bring that court order, say, say you do that on January 30th

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: but I still have to go?

HM: you bring that, you go to your matter on January 30th, get this vacated, you would, you would want to hurry up and bring it here so that we can take this out and then there’s no reason for you to be here on the 31st

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: right

HM: otherwise we don’t have a way of knowing that some other proceeding occurred

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: right

HM: …and vacated this

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: that’s correct, uh, last question, the notices you sent me, the two so far, state “you have been sentenced to a term of probation,” umm

HM: …again its

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: I’ve not been sentenced to probation

HM: you have not, again its the language that’s generated

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: so, could you remove that from the letter, because frankly its a little disturbing that it says that

HM: its a generated notice that’s…

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: so who actually sits there and writes the notice

HM: probably the administrative office of the court’s law division

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: and that would be where?

HM: Administrative office of courts, AOC is in the Hughes Justice Complex, I’m not sure which floor

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: oh I see

HM: but at the justice complex 25 Market Street

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: hmm, ok, very good, so that covers it and I’d appreciate if you could write the new date down

HM: Sure, I’ll pull out a date for you, when I was asking you if you’d gotten more than one date, um, January 31st, what other date did you have?

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: um, for a date, I would prefer..

HM: no, no, no, I mean I’m trying to figure out what the date was prior to this so that I know how far to push this matter

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: the date that was scheduled in the notice I got was the 31st, I would appreciate it scheduled for some time after the 8th

HM: so February is fine, let’s see here, I do not have those notices around so I cant add you to that one, I don’t know that the 20th, I think the 28th is a juvenile date, I’m going to put this down for March 7th because I know that’s an adult calendar there aren’t juveniles on that date, um, its a Wednesday March 7th, it would still be for 8:45

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: Wednesday March 7th [pause] now frankly, um, given I have the notice for the 31st, I would need a print out saying that I have this court date on this date, so otherwise I have no proof, right?

HM: you have no proof of what? That you have a court date for the March 7th?

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: right, that I have one on the 7th instead of the 31st

HM: I’m getting ready to take you off of the 31st so when I print the calendar on the 30th, your name is not going to be on it because your name is not going to be on this list

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: well, I understand that, but I myself have no proof, so let’s say, you know, like the letter..

HM: you would like me to write something that says..

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: last time I came here, like you know, I had a print out from, you know, from the PROMIS system just saying your next date for the CEP is this

HM: um hmm [pause] and you said you were looking for something after February 8th?

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: correct

[pause]

HM: summons notice is gonna go out with the March 7th date on it, it will say 8:45 or 1:30 because that entire day is an adult day

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: ok

HM: um, typically the computer determines which half go in the morning, which half go in the afternoon, I can put in a preference for morning, but its not guaranteed that I’d get it, I can’t print from here, I have to go to my own desk and print, so I will print this out this shows that I’ve transferred you from this calendar to this calendar

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: ok

HM: hmm ok, what you’ll get is a blue notice, peels open, and says your summoned to appear CEP, bla bla bla, March 7th, um, those notices go out four weeks prior to the hearing date, so the 7th is, let’s see what I got here, one, two, three, four…they will be generated on February the 5th and mailed out on February the 6th

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: ok

HM: hmm, excuse me, generated on February the 6th which is the Tuesday and mailed on February the 7th, um, you probably will not get a delinquency notice that says that you are past due, because that notice has already gone out when you were scheduled for January, so there will be one more notice that you will get for the summons, so I’m going to print this screen for you here, um, is this sufficient for what you’re looking for?

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: right.

HM: that you had this date and you now have a new date?

ZERO ZERO SEVEN: that is sufficient, that is correct

HM: ok, I will print you that…not that this matters, but this contact type CEP calendar transfer, that’s system generated what they call it, if you want me to put anything else on there I’ll do that when I come right back, walk to the other side of this room, print-out, be right back, you don’t need to leave, stay right where you are

 

[VIII/I] CRIMES OF TRENTON, ZONE, NEW JERSEY (ONE OF TWO, ONE OF N)

IMG_20180403_0001
A TERM PROBATION REQUIRES ONE TO BE CONVICTED OF A CRIME. AT NO POINT HAS ADAM C MILLER BEEN CONVICTED OF A CRIME IN THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY OR ANY OTHER STATE IN THE UNION.

 

PROBATION MEANS CONVICTED
AS PER JUDICIARY OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY

 

PROMIS/GAVEL DATABASE MAINTAINED BY THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY CONTAINING PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE RECORDS OF CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS (ed. UNKNOWN AT PRESENT IF DATABASE IS EXHAUSTIVE)