UPDATE TWENTY-THREE FIFTY. WHO THE FUCK IS DENISE RATTZO? GOOGLE PLEASE.
UPDATE SEVENTEEN MARCH TWO-THOUSAND NINETEEN. WHAT HAPPENED TO THE NJ COURTS ACMS PUBLIC DATABASE? REFER TO THIRD PARTY “AS” REFERENCE THAT NEVER IDENTIFIED ON ANY PAGE OF THE ORIGINAL SERIES SERVED IN DUPLICATE VIA US MAILS. FURTHERMORE, THE ONLY DIFFERENCE EXHIBITED IN THE RECORD PROVIDED BY THE MONMOUTH VICINAGE UPON REQUEST WAS THE RETURN RECEIPT SIGNED BY WAM.

BLACKROCK APOCALYPTO
HERE YOU GO, FROM YOURS TRULY, HERR BAETYL, AND BAETYL, BAETYL AND CO VERSUS RATTZO-DEVLIN-RETTZO AND THE UNDERHILL GANG, FEATURED ANYWHERE AND EVERYWHERE THROUGHOUT THE MERCER-MONMOUTH ANOMALY, PERHAPS IN THE TOP TEN TITLE-FIGHTS LEADING UP TO THE BATTLE OF ARMAGEDDON, CERTAINLY NOT SOMETHING TO JOKE ABOUT WITH A FAKE LAST NAME LIKE RATTZO WHO IS NOT AND WILL NOT EVER BE SERVED ASIDE FROM THE
PUBLIC NOTICE IN LIEU OF STANDARD SERVICE OF PROCESS
THAT YOU ALL CRETINS OF LAWRENCE ARE READING NOW, AND PLEASE NOTE RATTZO IS AN ALIAS CRAFTED BY THE MERCER SURROGATE FOR THE VERY WELL-DOCUMENTED PRACTICE OF CRYPSIS USED BY THE CLASS OF DEVLIN-RETTZO WHOSE MODUS OPERANDI IS CRIMINAL COERCION AND WHO IN-FACT DID MOST TRIVIALLY PLAN RETALIATION AGAINST THOSE WHO INITIATE CIVIL ACTIONS IDENTIFYING OFFICIAL CONDUCT AS SUCH, WHEREBY SERVICE OF PROCESS ON A RETTZO-DEVLIN WHOSE ALIAS “RATTZO” CONSTITUTES AN ALIAS TO BE SPECIFICALLY USED AS THE NAMED VICTIM OF TWO C TWELVE-TEN B IN REPETITION OF FAILED ATTEMPT TO COVER-UP THE IDENTITY OF
“3RD PTY AS”
WHOSE CONTACT IN DC
DID ARRANGE FOR DC ZERO ONE THREE ZERO ONE FOUR ONE FOUR

WHO WAS THE ALLEGED VICTIM IN PICKETTER’S CHARGE
W TWO-THOUSAND SEVENTEEN TRIPLE ZERO SEVEN SIX THREE
DESPITE SURREPTITIOUS THEFT OF MONEY FROM, YES INDEED YT, IN CASE ABOVE DC
AT SUCH TIME [REDACTED]
NOTE ONE, WHO WAS ALWAYS RATHER CURIOUS TO KNOW ABOUT THE [CV INSIDER]
NOTE TWO, WHO WAS RATHER FOND OF [SWISS BANK ACCOUNT] AND [RED SHIELD MONEY] ON OR ABOUT THE TWENTY-THIRD OF MAY TWO-THOUSAND SEVENTEEN HAD NO LESS THAN TWO ADP STYLE CHEQUES ON THE TABLE IN UNOPENED LETTERS ADDRESSED TO SAME LOCATION, DIFFERENT NAME, [REDACTED]
NOTE THREE, AND FOR WHOM A VERY SPECIAL BOTTLE OF WINE RETURNED TO SEA
NOTE FOUR, AS THE VICTIM IN PICKETTER’S CHARGE, AS THIRD PARTY IN DC ZERO ONE THREE ZERO ONE FOUR ONE FOUR, WHEREIN THE FALLBACK ABOVE [REDACTED]
