PART THIRTY-FOUR IN THE ONGOING SAGA OF THE MUNICODE MYSTERY
PART TWO OF TWO IN THE GRIBBENS FRAUD TRANSCRIPT BREAKDOWN, REFER TO PART ONE IN THE LINK HERE AND BELOW
WE FIRST RETURN TO THE WELL KNOWN THING THAT HATH CALLED ITSELF THE TOWNSHIP OF HOWELL
WHEN ON THIRTY-ONE JANUARY TWO-THOUSAND NINETEEN WE DID INDEED DISCOVER THAT BRANCH OF THE COUNTY MONMOUTH PUBLIC LIBRARY SYSTEM, SITUATED IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT ABOVE RIGHT TO THE RATHER VEXING OCTAGON SO NAMED THE HOWELL COURT, WHICH DOES INDEED LACK A HARD COPY OF THE TEXT OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE FOR THE TOWNSHIP THAT IT SERVES. THIS FACT WAS CONVEYED BY A OR THE REFERENCE LIBRARIAN IN RECORDED AUDIO FOR WHICH A GENUINE TRANSCRIPT CAN BE FOUND AT THE LINK ABOVE AND RE-POSTED AGAIN BELOW,
AUTOMATED: HELLO, YOU HAVE REACHED THE MONMOUTH COUNTY LIBRARY HOWELL BRANCH. FOR DIRECTIONS PRESS ONE, TO RENEW MATERIALS, CHECK YOUR ACCOUNT, OR INQUIRE ABOUT BORROWING PRESS TWO, FOR INFORMATION ABOUT CHILDREN’S PROGRAMS OR FOR CHILDREN’S…
UNNAMED ONE: MONMOUTH COUNTY LIBRARY, HOWELL BRANCH
ACM: HI, HOW ARE YOU DOING TODAY?
UNNAMED ONE: I’M FINE HOW ARE YOU?
ACM: I’M DOING WELL, THANK YOU. I’M CALLING TO SEE IF THE HOWELL LIBRARY HAS A COPY OF THE TOWNSHIP OF HOWELL MUNICIPAL CODE ON FILE
UNNAMED ONE: UM, I DON’T BELIEVE SO BUT LET ME SEND YOU OVER TO REFERENCE, HOLD ON
ACM: OK, THANK YOU VERY MUCH
UNNAMED TWO: YES
UNNAMED TWO: OH, HELLO, THIS IS [UNNAMED TWO] AT THE REFERENCE DESK
ACM: HI [UNNAMED TWO], I’M CALLING TODAY TO SEE IF THE HOWELL LIBRARY HAS A COPY OF THE HOWELL TWP MUNICIPAL CODE ON FILE OR AVAILABLE FOR…OR AVAILABLE ON RESERVE FOR REFERENCE IN THE LIBRARY
UNNAMED TWO: I DON’T HAVE A PAPER COPY, ITS AVAILABLE ONLINE
ACM: OH, OK
UNNAMED TWO: THAT’S RIGHT
ACM: SO IF I JUST GO ON THE WEBSITE AND SEARCH FOR MUNICIPAL CODE I’LL COME ACROSS IT
UNNAMED TWO: YES, YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO, YEP
ACM: OK. AND THEY DON’T MAINTAIN A PHYSICAL COPY IN THE LIBRARY IN ANY CAPACITY?
UNNAMED TWO: I HAVEN’T HAD ONE HERE, I’VE BEEN HERE THREE YEARS, AND I DON’T RECALL EVER HAVING ONE HERE, UM, I DID INQUIRE OF THE TOWNSHIP AND ACTUALLY NEVER RECEIVED A RESPONSE SO I PROBABLY SHOULD…
ACM: OH, NOT SURPRISING
UNNAMED TWO: YEA BECAUSE SOMEONE ELSE HAD ASKED ABOUT IN, PROBABLY WITHIN THE LAST SIX MONTHS OR SO, UM, BUT YOU CAN SEE IT AS I SAID IN ELECTRONIC FORMAT
ACM: OK, VERY GOOD, THANK YOU VERY MUCH, APPRECIATE YOUR HELP
UNNAMED TWO: OK, YOU’RE WELCOME
IN LIEU OF THE PHYSICAL COPY OF THE BOOK
WE ARE FORCED TO ACCESS SOMETHING MOST CERTAINLY THIRD-PARTY SO NAMED E CODE THREE-HUNDRED SIXTY (DIRECT LINK WARNING) FROM THAT CAN BE FOUND THROUGH INTERNET SEARCH FOR THE HOWELL MUNICODE OR DIRECTLY FROM A LINK PUBLISHED ON A OR THE TOWNSHIP OF HOWELL WEBSITE. (HOWELL DIRECT LINKS ONE TWO THREE FOUR WARNING)
IT MAY BE FOUND IN ONE OF THE TWENTY OR SO LAW LIBRARIES TO BE FOUND IN THE SUPERIOR COURTHOUSE OF EACH COUNTY IN THE STATE, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF ZONE (REFER TO A OR THE BURST PIPE BELOW BROAD STREET), WHEREIN WE DOUBT THE TEXT IS TO BE FOUND ON RESERVE IN THE RATHER QUAINT LOWER LEVEL LAW LIBRARY AT SEVENTY-ONE MONUMENT STREET, INDEED OUR MONMOUTH VICINAGE RIGHT THERE LOCATED IN ONE THREE ONE FIVE AND/OR ONE THREE ONE SIX AND/OR SOMETHING ELSE ENTIRELY.
WHY DO WE NEED TO CONSULT THE AFORESAID REFERENCE WHATSOEVER?
FOLLOWING FROM THE CONDUCT OF THE HOWELL COURT VIS-A-VIS YOURS TRULY, MANY OTHERS, ALL OF WHOM HATH ENTERED INTO THIS HERE DILEMMA, ONGOING YES INDEED, WHEREIN WE WONDER HOW SUCH LEVELS OF EVIL (READ: CRIMINALITY IN THE EXTREME AND ON THE VERY REGULAR) CAN EVEN BE POSSIBLE OF A PODUNK LOCAL GOVERNMENT. AS SUCH, WE RETURN TO THE FRAUD COURT TRANSCRIPTS GENERATED BY THE GRIBBENS OUTFIT THAT APPARENTLY IS THE SOLE THIRD-PARTY CONTRACTOR EMPLOYED BY THE HOWELL COURT TO PRODUCE THE OH SO VERY ESSENTIAL LEGAL DOCUMENTS THAT BEAR A OR THE RECORD OF WHAT TRANSPIRES IN A COURT THAT CONDUCTS HEARINGS ON MATTERS OF LIFE AND DEATH, OR AT LEAST THEY DID IN THE PAST, AND WITHIN THOSE FRAUD TRANSCRIPTS WHICH THEY ROUTINELY ADMIT ARE GENERATED WITH SIGNIFICANT AND MATERIAL ERRORS MARKED DE FACTO OVERSIGHTS EXPECTED AND ENCOURAGED OF THE GRIBENNSES NEST BY [REDACTED], AND WHICH ARE ONGOING TO THE PRESENT BECAUSE THE FRAUD GRIBBENSES THAT TRANSCRIBE THE FRAUD TRANSCRIPTS COMMIT FELONY ACTS UPON ISSUANCE OF NEARLY EVERY DOCUMENT THAT IS SHUTTLED OUT THE DOOR, OUT THE DOOR AT SUCH TIME AND WITHIN SUCH CONTENT THAT THEY ARE TOLD TO REMOVE OR INPUT DESPITE WHAT IS ACTUALLY STATED ON A OR THE RECORD IN THE SHITBOX OCTAGON ON OR ABOUT THE SAME PLOT AS THE SHITBOX LIBRARY. THIS FRAUD WE DID INDEED CONFIRM IN PART ONE WHEREIN UPON BREACH OF PAGE SIX, PEACE AND CALLED IT A DAY HAVING AT THAT TIME ALREADY EXTRACTED THE ESSENTIAL EVIDENCE TO JUSTIFY THESE VERY STATEMENTS YOU ARE READING RIGHT NOW WHICH IS INDEED ALLEGING ORGANIZED CRIME IS AT WORK HERE, AND OF NOTE THESE STATEMENTS ARE PUBLISHED BY BAETYL, BAETYL & CO. IN LIEU OF BRINGING FORTH CIVIL ACTIONS AGAINST GRIBBENSES AND FELLOW NEST DWELLERS FOLLOWING FROM THEIR PURPORTED IMMUNITY TO ANY CONSEQUENCE OF MAGNITUDE INFLICTED BY PROSECUTION DUE TO A OR THE ANTI-INDEMNIFICATION CLAUSE THAT WE ARE BEING TOLD IS TO BE FOUND IN A OR THE CONTRACT BETWEEN GRIBBENSES AND THE TOWNSHIP OF HOWELL AND/OR THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY AND/OR COUNTY MONMOUTH AND/OR SOMETHING ELSE ENTIRELY. WE DID INDEED REQUEST THAT TOWNSHIP PROVIDE A COPY OF THAT VERY SAME CONTRACT PURSUANT TO OPRA IN THE RECENT PAST IN ADDITION TO THE CIVIC PLUS AMAZON WHISPER NET CONTRACT, FORMER IGNORED AND LATTER MOST OBSCENELY CLAIMED TO BE UNINTELLIGIBLE, ONE SENTENCE IN LENGTH, PROBABLY BY MANIFESTO-PRONE TOWNSHIP ATTORNEY JOSEPH CLARK GABLE, YES INDEED GONE WITH THE FUCKING WIND.
BREACH OF PEACE, PART ONE, STOP SIX
REVISIT THE FIRST SIX PAGES OF THE FRAUD TRANSCRIPT, OBTAIN THE CODE TWO-HUNDRED TWENTY DASH TWO, NOW WE REQUIRE THE MOST UP TO DATE TEXT OF THE TOWNSHIP OF HOWELL MUNICIPAL CODE THAT IS THE VERY SAME USED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL TO ASCERTAIN WHAT THE FUCK KEAN T KEAN IS REFERRING TO VIS-A-VIS THE NOW LEGENDARY BREACH OF JURISDICTION SO NAMED THE “BOROUGH ORDINANCE”, THAT OUR MONMOUTH VICINAGE RIGHT DOWN THE ROAD THERE IS HARD PRESSED TO WRITE DOWN IN SIMILITUDE TO THE MUNICODE EX-MACHINA SOON TO BE HEARD CASE WHEREIN ALL OF THESE THINGS ARE TO BE DISCUSSED AT SOME LENGTH. LIKE JUNE, RIGHT? PERHAPS NOT. WE HAVE A MOTION PREPARED THAT IS TO BE SOON PUBLISHED AND SUBMIT IN LIGHT OF THESE FACTS.
FIRST, THE DRAFT OF A MOTION IN THREE BELOW,
MOTION DRAFT PAGE ONE, NOTA BENE, MONCO STAFF WITH CLAIM THAT THREE MONTHS NOT ATYPICAL LENGTH OF TIME FOR AUDIO TRANSMISSION, TRANSCRIPT GENERATION AND SERVICE, PLAUSIBLY SO, ALBEIT WITHOUT ANY DATA TO VERIFY ANECDOTES, AND NO REFERENCE DATABASE TO OBTAIN RAW DATAS AND CONDUCT SOME INDEPENDENT ANALYSES. OR IS THERE? NO, THERE IS NOT. THE COURTS ARE VERY SECRETIVE, SO WE ARE TOLD AND SO WE SAY.
SECOND, RETURNING TO THOSE SIX PAGES IN SIX BELOW,
WE HEREBY COMMENCE PART TWO OF THE GRIBBENS FRAUD TRANSCRIPT BREAK DOWN
Colloquy Page 7, lines 2 through 7, the MATTERS before the Court had already been concluded in aforesaid “plea” and despite that fact THE COURT for whatever reasons continues to insist on affixing the name of one or both crooked nest attorneys to the record such that the APPELLANT not be construed to have any competence whatsoever in light of three PRO SE victories added to the ledger on the very same day the conduct of Howell Court as such became criminal in the extreme.
Colloquy Page 7, line 3, These MATTERS before the Howell Court have finally been disposed after malingering for 12 months and 21 days (YES INDEED, FINGERPRINT OF EX-JUDGE MCGANN), not one single day at trial, no one iota of testimony from the APPELLANT, and furthermore the disposition of a or the MATTER is indeed the primary subject of the entire transcript, what would an attorney then do for the proposed client at such time? This is a very, very important question and the Federal Government does indeed want to know, so we are told. Transmission of a certified letter does not require the assistance of an attorney. Yes indeed, KEAN T KEAN remarkably failed to respond to no less than 3 certified letters transmit by our APPELLANT pursuant to satisfying a or the “plea” that most remarkably still are not present in any record the Howell Court will keep or maintain, and the series of letters were then apparently ignored by THE COURT in subsequent mid March coercion. However the complete record of transmission and receipt of those letters is to be found in the BAETYL ARCHIVE. Also please do refer to the TOWNSHIP OF HOPEWELL, ZONE, that was called up to active duty on or about TENTH APRIL by the OFFICE OF THE MERCER COUNTY PROSECUTOR to run interference against our APPELLANT in the MATTERS that did result from the proceeding marked present by the GRIBBENSES, MATTERS still active and indeed very active as one might surmise in light of the volume of words hereupon approaching DELUGE character.
Colloquy Page 7, line 6, More than one full year of this same line of bullshit. No, no one here committed any crimes and there is no need for a nest attorney to infiltrate the successful and affirmative defense mounted by our APPELLANT. In fact, the reason THE COURT is so persistent in posing this question, appointing nest attorneys in secret and otherwise attempting to MAIM our APPELLANT via third-party actions, is because that is the order THE COURT hath been commanded to carry out by one or more individuals that are not on any record and are not anything but career criminals. YES INDEED, RODGERS AND CO., THE ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTOR OF THE COURTS IS CONSIDERING A NEW LIFE IN A FOREIGN COUNTRY IN LIGHT OF WHAT HATH BEEN POSTED HEREUPON ALREADY. WE ARE INDEED JUST WARMING UP.
Colloquy Page 7, lines 14, Re-edit of actual statement, “most amenable going forward”, into “most amenable to go forward”, despite the sparingly few on record statements of our APPELLANT, the GRIBBENES transcription is so irrevocably faulted and the transcriptionist is remarkably incompetent such that the fraud entrances and re-edits can be overcome by the memory of otherwise unassociated parties present within the Howell Court during the proceeding.
Colloquy Page 7, line 16, Direct and remarkable contradiction of already exhibited fraud statement found on Colloquy Page 3, line 15, with false claim that a or the MATTER related to a “municipal disorderly persons offense” that does not exist pursuant one or more statutes in Chapter 1 of Title 2C that forbid municipalities from conducting criminal prosecutions under the guise of municipal code violations, and furthermore in that same chapter we do indeed find verbiage in the case history describing a “Borough Ordinance” that was indeed out from the MuniCode of the thing that hath called itself the Borough of Sayerville, cf. Club 35, LLC v. Borough of Sayerville, tautologically not a Township, but a Borough.
Colloquy Page 7, lines 18 through 20, UNFUCKINGBELIEAVABLE, fraud entrance of an ex post facto riposte to the six Civil Actions brought forth in Superior Court of New Jersey against six state employees, all for criminal acts contrary to N.J.S.A. 2C:13-5(a)(6), Criminal Coercion, inter alia, committed against the PLAINTIFF, indeed our very same APPELLANT, all marked FILED at such time after this specific proceeding in the OCTAGON had concluded and with 33% of those Civil Actions against named DEFENDANTS who are or were public employees of the Township of Howell.
STAY TUNED, DEVELOPMENTS IN PROGRESS