THE 34TH DAY T MINUS THREE ZERO THIRTEEN: A VERY CURIOUS COINCIDENCE

DO YOU SEE WHAT EYE SITS BY THE SEA?
SECOND JANUARY THE DAY OF THREE THIRTEEN ONE
[ENLARGE]
SECOND JANUARY TWO-THOUSAND NINETEEN
AND ON THE VERY SAME DAY
THREE-THIRTEEN IS OUT
THE PRINCETON MUNICIPALITY
DID YOU CATCH IT?
FOLLOWING FROM

THIRD FEBRUARY TWO-THOUSAND NINETEEN, THE 34TH DAY T MINUS THREE ZERO FIVE: ONOFRI HAS SOME EXPLAINING TO DO, AND THE UNCERTAIN CONCLUSION OF THE CASE NAMED HEREUPON BAETYL PICKETTERS’ CHARGE.

TWENTY-FIRST DECEMBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN, THREE ZERO THREE

EIGHTEENTH NOVEMBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN, THE 34TH DAY T PLUS THREE THIRTY-FOUR: THE OPRA HARVEST

SEVENTEENTH NOVEMBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN, “REPORTING THAT THE ACCUSED TOOK A PHOTO OF SOMEONE ELSE’S PHONE WITH SECURITY CODES AND PUBLISHED IT ONLINE. CALLER WAS ADVISED OF HIS RIGHTS TO SIGN COMPLAINTS”

SEVENTEENTH NOVEMBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN, THE 34TH DAY T PLUS THREE THIRTY-THREE: THE MANIFESTO OF JOSEPH CLARK, THE ATTORNEY FOR THE TOWNSHIP OF HOWELL

SIXTEENTH NOVEMBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN, THE 34TH DAY T PLUS THREE TWO: TAMPERING WITH EVIDENCE, REFER TO THE THIRTY-FOURTH PAGE ENUMERATED THIRTY-SIX IN THE FIFTY-TWO PAGE DISCOVERY PACKET FOR PICKETTERS’ CHARGE THAT WAS EXHIBITED ON SIXTEENTH NOVEMBER SANS COMMENTARY ALBEIT WITH NECESSARY REDACTIONS. THAT PRESENCE OF THAT PAGE AND THE NAME THEREUPON, CARA MCCOLLUM, HATH BEEN REMARKED UPON IN THE ORIGINAL SEQUENCE OF THE 34TH DAY. HOWEVER, THAT DOCUMENT IN THAT SPACE REMAINS A MYSTERY FOR WHICH NEITHER THE MERCER COUNTY PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE, NOR THE TOWNSHIP OF LAWRENCE HATH PROFFERED AN EXPLANATION. THAT PAGE APART OF TWO THREE NINE.

FOURTEENTH NOVEMBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN, THE 34TH DAY T PLUS THREE THIRTY: ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC AND THE MISSING EMAIL

THIRTEENTH NOVEMBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN, TWO FOUR THREE AND TWO FOUR FOUR

FIRST NOVEMBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN, THE 34TH DAY T PLUS THREE SEVENTEEN: THREE MORE DOCUMENTS FROM BEHIND THE CURTAIN AND A STRANGE ARTICLE OBSERVED IN THE ASBURY PARK PRESS, WHEN THE LINE HATH BEEN REVERSED ON THE PLOT OF NINE TWENTY-THREE, NOT FOR THE VERY FIRST TIME, THOUGH THIS TIME RATHER ELEGANT IN TANDEM WITH TWO MORE IN THE TRIO, ONE ABOVE AND ONE BELOW, TWO THREE FOUR AND TWO FOUR THREE, THANK YOU MUCH, THE ARTICLE FROM THE ASBURY PARK PRESS EXHIBITED ON THE FIRST OF NOVEMBER DATED THE SAME, THE SAME DATE A TRIO AGAINST LAWRENCE ISSUED DATE THE SAME, THAT ARTICLE REGARDING THE CONDUCT OF THE HOWELL TOWNSHIP MUNICIPALITY ON THE SAME TOPIC OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAW OF LAND IN THE MATTER OF THE OPEN PUBLIC RECORDS ACT, DAMAGE CONTROL AFTER THE FIRST SALVO UNLEASHED AGAINST THAT TOWN SOME DAYS BEFORE, NUMBERED ONE, TWO AND THREE FOLLOWING FROM TWO-HUNDRED THIRTY-FOUR.

TWENTY-SIXTH OCTOBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN, TWO THREE FOUR, TWO THREE FIVE, AND TWO THREE SIX, WHERE FOLLOWING FROM THE HOWELL TOWNSHIP MUNICIPALITY MOST CERTAINLY DID RETALIATE AGAINST THE REQUESTOR NAMED THRICE BELOW.

TWENTY-THIRD OCTOBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN, THE 34TH DAY T PLUS THREE EIGHT: THE MOBIUS DEFINED, COUNTY MONMOUTH THROUGH ZONE, COUNTY MERCER

WHAT DID WE LEARN?

RETALIATION IS ALREADY ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE MATHS OF OBTAINING PUBLIC RECORDS FROM THE MUNICIPAL RACKET, YES INDEED, FACTORED INTO WHAT OTHERWISE SHOULD BE ROUTINE AND LAWFUL CONDUCT OF ENTITIES IN THIS STATE WHEREIN RETALIATION AS SUCH HATH BEEN SO NAMED HEREUPON BAETYL MANY TIMES, EYE FOR AN EYE, FOR EVERY SINGLE THING IN FAVOR OF THE TARGET, ONE POINT, AYE, THE ADVERSARY DEMANDS AN EYE IN REVENGE, AYE AYE.

IN ONE OR MORE CASES, THAT EYE IS LEFT OF FIELD TO THE FIELD OF PLAY, BROUGHT TO FIELD IN PRINT THE VERY SAME DAY, ABOUT THE RACKET, MAYBE AFTER A CALL TO THE PRESS, CALL IN A FAVOR, PLEASE TO THE PUBLIC, PUT THE TRUTH UNDER DURESS.

IN ONE OR MORE CASES STILL, RETALIATION DID INDEED OCCUR IN THE CASES ALREADY THEN BEFORE A COURT, THE HOWELL TOWNSHIP BUT OF COURSE, WHEREIN THE VERY ACT OF LITERACY RISKS LIFE AND LIMB, WHERE ONE NEED REQUEST AT REGULAR INTERVALS IF THE COURT HATH APPOINTED COUNSEL IN SECRET, AND WHEREUPON BECOMING INFORMED OF THE VERY FACT THAT COUNSEL HATH BEEN APPOINTED SURREPTITIOUSLY, THE NEXT EYE IS SOUGHT AFTER THE LAST EYE HATH BEEN FOUND, THE CASE OF TWENTY-SIXTH OCTOBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN, WHEREUPON THE VERY SAME DAY THE FIRST THREE BECAME KNOWN, TWO THREE FOUR, FIVE AND SIX, THE COURT APPOINTED ONE ITS OWN EMPLOYEES AS DEFENSE COUNSEL, HID THAT FACT FOR GREATER THAN TWO WEEKS, THEN LIED ABOUT THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THAT INVOLUNTARY APPOINTMENT WHICH WAS ONLY DISCOVERED FOLLOWING FROM PERSISTENT INQUIRIES AS TO WHETHER COUNSEL HAD APPOINTED APPOINTED IN SECRET, AS THAT COURT DID THE VERY SAME THING IN THE PAST. OF NOTE, BOTH FEMALE APPOINTEES DID FAIL TO INFORM THEIR CLIENT THEY HAD BEEN APPOINTED, AND THE ALL FEMALE STAFF OF THE COURT DID ALSO FAIL TO PROVIDE ANY NOTICE WHATSOEVER. VERY GROTESQUE ACTS COMPOUNDED BY LIES ABOUT THOSE SAME ACTS.

AT WHICH TIME WE RETURN TO SEVENTH DECEMBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN

FIRST, A FACTUAL DESCRIPTION OF EVENTS, HERETOFORE PUBLISHED ON THIRTY-FIRST JANUARY OF THIS YEAR, AND AGAIN REPRODUCED BELOW TO PROVIDE FULL CONTEXT FOR WHAT FOLLOWS FROM.

Pursuant to P.L.1963, c.73 (C.47:1A-1 et seq.), records kept or maintained by the Township of Howell, the Howell Township Municipal Court, the Howell Township Police Department and/or any other department in the jurisdiction of the Township of Howell, are requested and again marked required on this date of Request, January 30, 2019, to be in possession of both named parties in MUNICIPAL APPEAL NO: 18-040 that has been FILED and is now pending in SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, LAW DIVISION – CRIMINAL PART, MONMOUTH VICINAGE, and despite receiving no less than one form of notice marked FILED in the present year, no formal acknowledgment of that matter has been forthcoming from the Township of Howell, with that notice consisting of a one page document stamped “DAVID F. BAUMAN, P.J.Cr.”, whereupon the date of “JAN 10 2019”, the Howell Township Municipal Court was ORDERED to pay all fees and costs associated with preparation of the court transcript from the Municipal Hearing that did take place on just the one Hearing date of December 7, 2018, despite a multitude of other Hearings that did take place and are all directly related. Of note, the Violation enumerated “220-C” and/or “220-2” that did result in MA 18-040 was coerced on December 7, 2018, on which date a plea was agreed upon in light of a false presumption provided to this requestor while seated in the Howell Township Municipal Court with no less than one Howell Township Police Officer standing nearby following from alleged threats that on this date of Request have are not described in language beyond the general description of “threats”otherwise absent any official record(s) known to this requestor. The aforementioned proximity was maintained by HTPD on what had been scheduled as the first day of a trial, during which time each and every moment this requestor was present within either the Howell Township Municipal Court or in the antechamber that presence was maintained by the female Howell Township Police Department Officer whose badge number was identified #676 upon request and subsequently identified in a handwritten OPRA Request dated December 7, 2018 that was transmit on or about 12:10 PM EST to “Dianne”, who in all likelihood is or was employed by the Howell Township Police Department Records Bureau on that date. Furthermore, that Request has not yet been fulfilled or acknowledged as of the present time, and the text of that OPRA Request dated “12/07/18” was photographed on or about 12:08 PM EST and is reproduced in full, including errors, as follows hereafter: “All written documents in possession of Howell Police and/or the Township of Howell describing thereupon all alleged threats this requestor made, allegedly, against Howell Court staff, the judge(s) of Howell Court, and/or other Township of Howell employees, specifically following from the allegation made by PTL S. Regin (sic), #676 that SGT. J. Lopez as her supervisor ordered one to one monitoring of this requestor following from unspecified, allegedly and explicitly false claims that threats were made one or more (sic) employees of the Township of Howell.” The OPRA Request was handwritten on one of the handful of blank four page “OPEN PUBLIC RECORDS ACT REQUEST FORM” packets observed stacked on the counter of the public facing side of the Howell Township Police Department Records Bureau window that is also located in the antechamber to the Howell Township Municipal Court. Furthermore, that packet was obtained and completed in both physical and visual proximity to the male HTPD Class II Officer #324, whose surname remains unknown, and the female HTPD Officer PTL S. REGINA #676, as prior stated. Both HTPD Officers were so kind as to state their badge numbers aloud following from requests for identification made in the moments prior to handing the completed Request form to “Dianne”, despite only identifying #676 thereupon. The specific record(s) requested herein are the very same requested on December 7, 2018 and in at least one OPRA Request dated prior, both of which remain unfulfilled, wherein the prior dated and nearly identical Request regarding alleged threats is highlighted in GRC Complaint 2018-303 entitled Miller v. Twp. of Howell (Monmouth), for which the original Denial of Access Complaint submit by this requestor was stamped “RECEIVED” by the New Jersey Government Records Council on “2018 DEC 3 PM 1 26” at such time four GRC Complaints entitled Miller v. Twp. of Howell (Monmouth) had already been filed. Furthermore, the specific government record(s) that would bear the requested, required and otherwise absent information are not known to be anything other than police reports. As such, any and all Howell Township Police Department reports are requested herein, if not otherwise exempt, thereupon describing any and all threats allegedly made by this requestor against anyone who claims to have been threatened by that very same person in the period between the present date of January 30, 2019 and the nominal date of September 23, 1986.

SECOND, DOES THE CONDUCT OF LOPEZ PRIMA FACIE CONSTITUTE PROBABLE CAUSE FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST THAT REQUESTOR FOR MAKING TERRORISTIC THREATS? CONVERSELY, IF NO THREATS WERE ACTUALLY MADE BY THE ACCUSED, AS IS THE FACTUAL REALITY, DOES THE CONDUCT OF LOPEZ, WITH PERHAPS OTHER ACTORS, CONSTITUTE ONE OR MORE VIOLATIONS OF,

 N.J.S.A. 2C:13-5. Criminal coercion

SPECIFICALLY IN REGARD TO 2C:13-5 A(2), 2C:13-5 A(4), 2C:13-5 A(6), AND/OR 2C:13-5 A(7), DESCRIPTIONS OF WHICH CAN BE FOUND IN THE TEXT OF THE NEW JERSEY CRIMINAL CODE EXHIBITED BELOW FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION.

CRIMINAL COERCION
[ENLARGE]
AN ACTOR COMMITS CRIMINAL COERCION IF HE OR SHE PURPOSEFULLY AND UNLAWFULLY RESTRICTS A PERSON’S ABILITY TO ENGAGE OR REFRAIN FROM ENGAGING IN CONDUCT THROUGH THREATS:

N.J.S.A. 2C:13-5 A(2), CONSISTING OF FALSE ACCUSATIONS THAT A PERSON COMMITTED A CRIMINAL AND/OR OTHER OFFENSE.

 

N.J.S.A. 2C:13-5 A(4), CONSISTING OF AN ACTION TAKEN OR WITHHELD BY AN OFFICIAL, OR CONSISTING OF AN ACTION THAT WOULD CAUSE AN OFFICIAL TO TAKE OR WITHHOLD ACTION.

 

N.J.S.A. 2C:13-5 A(6), CONSISTING OF PROVIDING TESTIMONY OR INFORMATION, OR WITHHOLDING TESTIMONY OR INFORMATION WITH REGARD TO A PERSON’S LEGAL CLAIM OR DEFENSE.

 

N.J.S.A. 2C:13-5 A(7), CONSISTING OF ANY OTHER ACT THAT IS INTENDED TO HARM A TARGETED PERSON WITH REGARD TO HIS OR HER HEALTH, SAFETY, BUSINESS, CALLING, CAREER, FINANCIAL CONDITION, REPUTATION OR PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS.

THIRDWITH REGARD TO THE ABOVE DESCRIBED ALBEIT NON-SPECIFIC ALLEGATIONS THAT THREATS WERE MADE, WE FIRST CONSIDER POTENTIAL VIOLATIONS OF,

N.J.S.A. 2C:12-3. Terroristic threats

WITH ABBREVIATED TEXT OF THAT STATUTE EXHIBITED BELOW AS EXCERPTED FROM THE PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE DATABASE MAINTAINED THE NEW JERSEY STATE LEGISLATURE.

TERRORISTIC THREATS
[EXPAND]
AN ACTOR IS GUILTY OF MAKING TERRORISTIC THREATS IF HE OR SHE,

N.J.S.A. 2C:12-3 (A), THREATENS TO COMMIT ANY CRIME OF VIOLENCE WITH INTENT TO TERRORIZE THE TARGETED PERSON, OR MAKES A THREAT THAT RESULTS IN THE EVACUATION OF A BUILDING, PUBLIC SPACE AND/OR OTHER DEFINED LOCATIONS, AND THE SEVERITY OF THE VIOLATION IS GREATER IF THE ACT IS COMMITTED DURING A TIME OF DECLARED EMERGENCY. FURTHERMORE, THE ACTOR SHALL BE STRICTLY LIABLE UPON PROOF THAT THE CRIME OCCURRED.

 

N.J.S.A. 2C:12-3 (B), THREATENS TO KILL ANOTHER PERSON WITH INTENT TO PUT THE TARGETED INDIVIDUAL IN IMMEDIATE FEAR OF DEATH.

FOURTH, AGAIN CONSIDERING THE UNSPECIFIED NATURE OF THE ALLEGED THREATS, THE DESCRIPTIONS OF CRIMINAL HARASSMENT AND CYBER-HARASSMENT FOUND IN CHAPTER THIRTY-THREE ARE IN ALL LIKELIHOOD WHAT WOULD BE CONSIDERED NEXT FOR ALLEGED COMMUNICATIONS NOT EXPLICITLY THREATENING THE LIFE OF AN INDIVIDUAL. EXCERPTS BELOW FROM THE TEXT DESCRIBING VIOLATIONS OF,

N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4. Harassment

AND

N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4.1. Cyber-harassment

AN ACTOR COMMITS A PETTY DISORDERLY PERSONS OFFENSE OF HARASSMENT IF HE OR SHE PURPOSEFULLY HARASSES ANOTHER PERSON:

N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4 (A), BY MAKING OR EFFECTING COMMUNICATION(S) KNOWN TO HAVE BEEN INITIATED BY THE ACTOR AT VERY INCONVENIENT HOURS, USING OFFENSIVE LANGUAGE, OR IN SUCH A MANNER LIKELY TO CAUSE ANNOYANCE OR ALARM.

 

N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4 (B), BY EITHER STRIKING, KICKING, SHOVING, OR OFFENSIVELY TOUCHING THE VICTIM, OR THREATENING TO DO SO.

 

N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4 (C), BY ENGAGING IN ANY OTHER COURSE OF ALARMING CONDUCT OR BY REPEATEDLY COMMITTING ACTS INTENDED TO ALARM OR SERIOUSLY ANNOY THE VICTIM.

 

N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4 (E), WHEREBY THE OTHERWISE NON-FELONY CRIMINAL ACTS DESCRIBED IN THE PRECEDING THREE SUBSECTIONS ARE GRADED AS A CRIME OF THE FOURTH DEGREE IN THE EVENT THE ACTOR ENGAGES IN SUCH CONDUCT WHILE SERVING A TERM OF IMPRISONMENT, WHILE ON PAROLE, OR WHILE ON PROBATION FOLLOWING FROM CONVICTION OF AN INDICTABLE OFFENSE UNDER THE LAWS OF NEW JERSEY, ANY OTHER STATE OR THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.

AN ACTOR COMMITS THE FOURTH DEGREE CRIME OF CYBER-HARASSMENT IF HE OR SHE MAKES A COMMUNICATION IN AN ONLINE CAPACITY USING ANY ELECTRONIC DEVICE OR THROUGH A SOCIAL NETWORKING SITE WITH THE PURPOSE TO HARASS THE TARGETED VICTIM THAT DOES:

N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4.1 (A)(1), THREATEN TO INFLICT INJURY OR PHYSICAL HARM TO THE TARGETED VICTIM OR HIS OR HER PROPERTY.

 

N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4.1 (A)(2), KNOWINGLY SEND, POSTS, COMMENTS, REQUESTS, SUGGESTS, OR PROPOSES ANY LEWD, INDECENT OR OBSCENE MATERIAL TO OR ABOUT A PERSON WITH THE INTENT TO EMOTIONALLY HARM A REASONABLE PERSON OR PLACE A REASONABLE PERSON IN FEAR OF PHYSICAL OR EMOTIONAL HARM.

 

N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4.1 (A)(3), THREATEN TO COMMIT ANY CRIME AGAINST THE TARGETED VICTIM OR HIS OR HER PROPERTY.

 

N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4.1 (B), OF NOTE, WHEN COMMUNICATIONS ARE MADE CONTRARY TO THE PRECEDING THREE SUBSECTIONS AT SUCH TIME THE ACTOR IS OVER THE AGE OF TWENTY-ONE AND THE TARGETED VICTIM IS A MINOR, THE ACT BECOMES A VIOLATION OF THE THIRD-DEGREE.

WHEN THE ACTOR IS MINOR UNDER THE AGE OF SIXTEEN, THE COURT MAY ORDER AS A CONDITION OF SENTENCE:

N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4.1 (C)(1), A CLASS OR TRAINING PROGRAM INTENDED TO REDUCE THE MINOR’S PROCLIVITY TO COMMIT ACTS IN VIOLATION OF THE STATUTE.

 

N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4.1 (C)(2), A CLASS OR TRAINING PROGRAM INTENDED TO INSTRUCT THE MINOR TO THE DANGERS ASSOCIATED WITH CYBER-HARASSMENT.

WHEN A PARENT OR GUARDIAN FAILS TO COMPLY THE CONDITIONS OF SENTENCE SET FORTH IN (C)(1) AND C(2) ABOVE, THAT PARENT OR GUARDIAN IS ADJUDICATED:

N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4.1 (D), A DISORDERLY PERSON WHO SHALL BE FINED NO MORE THAN TWENTY-FIVE DOLLARS FOR A FIRST OFFENSE AND NO MORE THAN ONE-HUNDRED DOLLARS FOR EACH SUBSEQUENT OFFENSE.

FIFTH, THE CASE OF PICKETTERS’ CHARGE DID INCLUDE FOR A PERIOD OF SIXTY-SEVEN DAYS THE PERCEIVED THREAT OF IMMINENT ARREST OR SERVICE OF PROCESS OF ONE OR MORE BRAND NEW CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS FOR ONE OR MORE ALLEGED CRIMINAL ACTS DESCRIBED AS “CYBER-HARASSMENT” BY A FEMALE INDIVIDUAL WHO DURING THAT SIXTY-SEVEN DAY PERIOD WAS ALLEGEDLY THE DEFENSE ATTORNEY OF THE ONE DEFENDANT IN PICKETTERS’ CHARGE, AND SHE WHO DESPITE NO LESS THAN THREE NOTIFICATIONS THAT HER SERVICES WERE NOT DESIRED DID IGNORE THOSE REQUESTS FOR SUBSTITUTION AS DID ANOTHER FEMALE EMPLOYEE OF THE MERCER COUNTY TRIAL REGION OPD WHO DID CLAIM TO BE HER SUPERIOR. FURTHERMORE, THE ATTORNEY DID MAKE A COMMUNICATION ON OR ABOUT TWENTY-NINTH NOVEMBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN BY PHONE CALL PLACED TO HER CLIENT, DURING WHICH TIME SHE DID STATE MULTIPLE TIMES THAT “THE MERCER COUNTY PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE IS LOOKING TO CHARGE YOU”, FOR COMMUNICATIONS DESCRIBING A VICTIM THAT SHE DID NOT IDENTIFY BY NAME AND SPECIFICALLY REGARDING PUBLIC DISCLOSURES RELATED A DIVORCE THAT WERE ALSO NOT SUBSEQUENTLY DESCRIBED BY DOCKET NUMBER, IDENTITY OF A JUDGE, THE NAME OF EITHER PARTY OR BY WHAT SPECIFIC PUBLIC DISCLOSURES WERE DEEMED CONTRARY TO N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4.1 (A) et seq. THE COMMUNICATIONS AS SUCH WERE NEVER DESCRIBED AS HAVING BEEN MADE OR CAUSED TO HAVE BEEN MADE BY THE DEFENDANT, NEVER CLAIMED TO HAVE BEEN MADE ON ANY ELECTRONIC DEVICE OR THROUGH A SOCIAL NETWORKING SITE THAT WAS IN ACTUAL FACT OWNED OR OPERATED BY THE DEFENDANT, AND OF THE HIGHEST SIGNIFICANCE SOMETHING WAS CLAIMED TO HAVE BEEN POSTED TO A WEBSITE THAT MAY OR MAY NOT HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS “SOMETHING AWFUL”, AND REGARDLESS OF WHAT SPECIFIC DOMAIN WAS UTTERED BY THAT ATTORNEY, THE DEFENDANT REMAINS UNAWARES OF ANY PUBLIC DISCLOSURES RELATED TO THE CASE POSTED TO ANY WEBSITE THAT SHE MAY OR MAY NOT HAVE ACTUALLY NAMED, AND FURTHERMORE THE DEFENDANT HER THEN CLIENT WAS CERTAINLY NOT AFFILIATED WITH ANY WEBSITE AS SUCH.

THE FOLLOWING CLAIMS WERE ALSO MADE BY THAT ATTORNEY DURING THE TWENTY-NINTH NOVEMBER PHONE CONVERSATION:

ONE, ASSERTION THAT ANY DIVORCE PROCEEDING INVOLVING THE ALLEGED VICTIM IN PICKETTERS’ CHARGE ACTIVE CONCOMITANT TO THE CASE COULD NOT POSSIBLY BE RELEVANT TO AN AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE. THIS CLAIM WAS MADE VERY EMPHATICALLY, IN MANNER ONE MIGHT DESCRIBE NEAR BORDERLINE HYSTERICAL, REPEATEDLY ASSERTED, APPROX “THERE IS NO POSSIBLE WAY IT COULD BE RELATED”.

 

TWO, EXPLICIT REFUSALS TO ASCERTAIN WHETHER A OR THE DIVORCE PROCEEDING RESULTED IN FINANCIAL GAIN OR LOSS FOR EITHER PARTY.

 

THREE, WOULD NOT ENTERTAIN POSSIBILITY THAT DEFENDANT MAY HAVE BEEN SUBJECT OF DIVORCE ON-RECORD TESTIMONY AND/OR DESCRIBED IN OTHER COURT DOCUMENTS. OF NOTE, ATTORNEY WITH NO KNOWLEDGE OF HISTORY BETWEEN DEFENDANT AND ALLEGED VICTIM PROVIDED BY DEFENDANT UNLESS SHE DID READ DOAC SERES VS LAWRENCE, NOTE RETURNED TWENTY-EIGHTH JANUARY TWO-THOUSAND NINETEEN, INCLUDING INVITE TO WEDDING OF THE ALLEGED VICTIM AND HUSBAND, BOTH OF WHOM NAMED ON EACH OF THREE VERSIONS OF A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER THAT DID APPEAR TO BE MADE AVAILABLE FOR USE AGAINST THE DEFENDANT IN A SIMULTANEOUS CRIMINAL PROCEEDING CONTRARY TO N.J.S.A. 2C: 25-29 BY VIRTUE OF INCLUSION IN FIFTY-TWO PAGE DISCOVERY PACKET FIRST PROVIDED TO DEFENDANT FIRST OCTOBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN AT INITIAL DISPOSITION CONFERENCE.

 

FOUR, CLAIM THAT ENTIRE DOAC SERIES VS LAWRENCE DID NOT MATTER, UNCLEAR IF SHE WAS EVEN AWARE OF CONTENT OR HOW THAT CONTENT RELATED TO AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE.

SIXTHTHE HISTORY OF PICKETTERS’ CHARGE AS RECORDED BY ZONE ON FOURTEENTH JANUARY TWO-THOUSAND NINETEEN, EXHIBITED IN THE TWENTY-TWO IMAGES SEEN BELOW,

SEVENTH, THE TWENTY-EIGHTH JANUARY TWO-THOUSAND NINETEEN SERIES OF A NEARLY IDENTICAL GROUP OF SHEETS THIS TIME DIRECTLY REQUESTED USING THE FORM EXHIBITED IN POSITION ONE WHICH DID YIELD THIS SERIES PURPORTING TO DESCRIBE A HISTORY OF PICKETTERS’ CHARGE. SPOT THE DIFFERENCE FROM THE FOURTEENTH JANUARY LOT IN THE TWENTY-SEVEN IMAGES EXHIBITED BELOW,

EIGHTH, THE FOURTH FEBRUARY TWO-THOUSAND NINETEEN SERIES THAT DID MARK THE CONCLUSION OF PICKETTERS’ CHARGE IN ZONE IS EXHIBITED IN FIVE IMAGES BELOW, AND DO INDEED PAY SPECIAL ATTENTION TO THE REMARK ON CORRESPONDENCE ALLEGEDLY NEVER SENT TO HUNTERDON COUNTY.


STAY TUNED!

 

 

WHAT THE HELL HOWELL, JUST SEND A LETTER, NOW YOU GO TO JAIL, THANKS THOUGH FOR THE LAYUP

WORST BEHAVED ONE THREE ONE NINE

DIANE ALVATOR OF OUR THING THAT HATH CALLED ITSELF THE BOROUGH OF HIGHLANDS DEMONSTRATES HOW TO RESPOND TO AN OPRA REQUEST BY RESPONDING AT ALL, YOUR WORDS VERY PRETTY, VERY NICE, I’LL READ THEM ALL, WHILE HOWELL DOES NOTHING IN RESPONSE TO OPRA REQUESTS OF THE HIGHEST SIGNIFICANCE WHILE HAVING FIVE ACTIVE DENIAL OF ACCESS COMPLAINTS AGAINST THEM. FIVE HOWELL, YOU MORONS. GET TO JAIL, ALL OF YOU. THE REST OF YOU DEAR READERS MAY NOW PROCEED TO OOGA BOOGA AND SECRET CODES BELOW.


THE OPRA HARVEST CONTINUES APACE

THE 34TH DAY T MINUS FOUR TWO: THE NET AND THE NEST


THE NINETY-NINETY FIVE FILM DIRECTED BY IRWIN WINKLER AND WRITTEN BY JOHN BRANCATO AND MICHAEL FERRIS WHEREIN ANGELA BENNETT (SANDRA BULLOCK) IS LOCKED IN A DEATH-GRIP WITH JACK DEVLIN (JEREMY NORTHAM) FOR CONTROL OF THE NUMBER THIRTY-FOUR.



THE NET AND THE NEST 
THE LOCAL VICINITY OF A NEST
DIRECT LINK TO FULL TEXT [EXPAND]

FOLLOWING FROM

THE 34TH DAY T PLUS THREE ONE: THE BATTLE FOR TOWNSHIP HOWELL, COUNTY MONMOUTH TWENTY-THREE DAYS OUT


RETURNING TO THE WEBSITE OF OCEAN HEALTH INITIATIVES OF NEW JERSEY
OHI BERGER CEO ALSO MAYOR OF HOWELL
ARCHIVE OF BIO. [EXPAND]

ICANN WHOIS LOOKUP FOR OHINJ.ORG
OCEAN HEALTH INITIATIVES WHOIS
THE FIRST INDICATION THAT WE ARE DEALING WITH PERFECT PRIVACY OBSERVED IN “FL US” MAILING ADDRESS. HOWEVER, WE HAVE YET TO CONFIRM. [EXPAND]

A REFRESHER ON PERFECT PRIVACY
BREITBART ON PERFECT PRIVACY IN TWENTY FIFTEEN
SERVER IN NAME, MORE LIKE NETWORK WORLDWIDE. ARCHIVE OF STORY. [EXPAND]

BREITBART ON PERFECT PRIVACY IN TWENTY FIFTEEN JACKSONVILLE OFFICE
HOW MANY CLIENTS DOES PERFECT PRIVACY, LLC HAVE? NOT AS MANY AS YOU THINK. [EXPAND]

ARIADNE DESIGN DOT COM DOES INDEED USE PERFECT PRIVACY

TWO DAYS AWAY UNTIL OUR NOM DE PLUME FOR THE NEST OF THIRTY-FOUR EXPIRES.


RETURNING TO OCEAN HEALTH INITIATIVES OF NEW JERSEY WHOSE WEBSITE IS ASSOCIATED WITH THE NAME SERVERS EXHIBITED BELOW

NAME SERVERS

AS STATED ABOVE AND PRIOR, THE CEO OF OCEAN HEALTH INITIATIVES OF NEW JERSEY IS THE CURRENT DEMOCRAT MAYOR OF THE TOWNSHIP OF HOWELL SO NAMED THERESA BERGER. THAT SAME MAYOR DID COME TO POWER IN HOWELL IN THE YEAR OF TWO-THOUSAND AND SEVENTEEN.

SHORTLY THEREAFTER, THE EPOCHAL EVENTS OF THE SPRING AND SUMMER OF THAT YEAR DID TRANSPIRE. THAT SEQUENCE WAS ALLUDED TO IN THE POST BELOW ENTITLED THE COLTS NECK FIRE AND SOME CURIOUS COURT RECORDS AND THUS FAR HAS BEEN EXPOUNDED UPON AT LENGTH UPON BAETYL DESPITE ONLY A HANDFUL OF ADJECTIVES EXPENDED IN THE DESCRIPTION OF THE MOST HIGH SEASON THAT DID PRECEDE OUR DESCENT INTO THE PRESENT.

THE DISPOSITION OF OUR LOCAL VICINITY DID TAKE A TURN FOR THE WORST UPON INITIATION OF THE GREAT STRUGGLE FOR THE POWER OF THIRTY-FOUR, WHICH NOW IS FOUGHT IN THE JUDICIARY WITH TEXT, SUBTERFUGE AND LEGERDEMAIN OF LEFT HAND AGAINST RIGHT.


PERFECT PRIVACY AND WHAT IS HIDDEN IN THE NIGHT
MYIP NAME SERVER DNS100 A REGISTER DOT COM PERFECT PRIVACY CONFIRMED
DNS100.A.REGISTER.COM CONFIRMED PERFECT PRIVACY, ONE OF FOUR. WHAT DOES THAT MEAN? THE ENTITY SO NAMED OCEAN HEALTH INITIATIVES OF NEW JERSEY IS ON THE RATHER SELECT LIST OF CLIENTÈLE SERVICED BY PERFECT PRIVACY. [EXPAND]

ALL FOUR NAME SERVERS ASSOCIATED WITH WEBSITE OF THERESA BERGER COMPANY OHI CONFIRMED TO USE SERVICES OF PERFECT PRIVACY
DNS066.B.REGISTER.COM_DNS014.C.REGISTER.COM_DNS010.D.REGISTER.COM_OHINJ DOT ORG
DNS066.B.REGISTER.COM, DNS014.C.REGISTER.COM, AND DNS010.D.REGISTER.COM. [EXPAND]

WHAT DOES THAT MEAN?

DNS066.B.REGISTER.COM IP RANGE WITH SOME RATHER CURIOUS CO TENANTS
DNS066.B.REGISTER.COM [EXPAND]
A SERIES OF WEBSITE ARE ASSOCIATED WITH THE SAME NAME SERVER THAT THE BERGER COMPANY OHI USES AND THOSE SITES MAY OR MAY NOT BE RELATED, HOWEVER THEY ALL DO INDEED UTILIZE THE SERVICES OF PERFECT PRIVACY. IN THE CASE OF DNS066.B.REGISTER.COM EXHIBITED ABOVE, WE FIND THE CLAIM THAT ONE HUNDRED AND SIX LIVES WEBSITE USE THAT NAME SERVER.


CONTRASTING TO THE NUMBER OF LIVE WEBSITES USING THE WORDPRESS SERVER THAT BAETYL IS ASSOCIATED WITH
NAME SERVER NS1 WORDPRESS DOT COME ONE OF TWO FOR BAETYL
THIRTY-NINE EIGHT THIRTY-NINE TOGETHER ON NS1.WORDPRESS.COM. [EXPAND]

CLOSER LOOK AT THESE ENTITIES
NAME SERVER DNS100 A REGISTER DOT COM PAGE ONE OF ONE HUNDRED ELEVEN SITES
ONE HUNDRED AND ELEVEN LIVE WEBSITES ON DNS100.A.REGISTER.COM. NOTICE ANYTHING YET? WHAT IS INITIALLY OBSERVED IS A SERIES OF APPARENTLY RANDOM WEB SITES THAT ONLY HAVE A NAME SERVER IN COMMON. [EXPAND]

HOWEVER, CLOSER INSPECTION OF DNS014.C.REGISTER.COM DOES RAISE THE ALARM
NAME SERVER DNS014 C REGISTER DOT COM PAGE ONE
FIVE-HUNDRED AND THIRTY-TWO LIVE SITES USING DNS014.C.REGISTER.COM. FIRST SITES LISTED DO NOT PRIMA FACIE SEEM RELATED. [EXPAND]

A SERIES OF EDUCATIONAL ENTITIES ARE OBSERVED
ELIZABETH SETON HIGH SCHOOL ON SAME NAMESERVER AS BERGER CLINIC TWO
WEBSITE OF ELIZABETH SETON HIGH SCHOOL OF BLADENSBURG, MARYLAND (ARCHIVE). WHO DO WE KNOW THAT ATTENDED SETON? [EXPAND]

ELIZABETH SETON HIGH SCHOOL

ELIZABETH SETON HIGH SCHOOL ON SAME NAMESERVER AS BERGER CLINIC
WE OBSERVE THE IMPROBABLE ASSOCIATION OF PERFECT PRIVACY, THE CLINTON MACHINE, ARIADNE DESIGN, THE WEBSITE OF A PRIVATE ALL GIRLS CATHOLIC SCHOOL, THE WEBSITE OF BRICK TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS (SEE BELOW), THE WEBSITE OF A COMPANY OPERATED BY THE MAYOR OF HOWELL WHO ALSO HAS A DIRECT FINANCIAL RELATIONSHIP WITH MONMOUTH MEDICAL CENTER, SOUTH CAMPUS, AMONG MANY OTHER CURIOUS ENTITIES ON A SHORT LIST OF FIVE-HUNDRED AND THIRTY-TWO LIVE WEBSITES THAT USE THE NAME SERVER DNS014.C.REGISTER.COM. [EXPAND]

CHAMINADE COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL, CATAWBA COUNTY SCHOOLS, ET AL.
NAME SERVER DNS014 C REGISTER DOT COM PAGE ONE SCROLL DOWN FIND SCHOOL WEBSITES
LIVE SCHOOL WEBSITES OBSERVED TO USE DNS014.C.REGISTER.COM AND AS SUCH USE PERFECT PRIVACY. [EXPAND]

BRICK TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS
NAME SERVER DNS014 C REGISTER DOT COM PAGE TWO BRICK SCHOOLS NJ
DNS014.C.REGISTER.COM [EXPAND]

RATHER CONCERNING THAT BRICK TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS HAVE ANY ASSOCIATION WITH THERESA BERGER GIVEN THE HISTORY OF THE TOWNSHIP OF HOWELL OVER THE PAST TWENTY-ONE MONTHS.
BRICK TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS WEBSITE
DNS014.C.REGISTER.COM, ARCHIVE [EXPAND]

AND ON TO THE DENOUEMENT 

NAME SERVER DNS066 B REGISTER DOT COM PAGE ONE RANDOM
DNS066.B.REGISTER.COM [EXPAND]
WHEREUPON THE LIST OF LIVE WEBSITES USING THE NAME SERVED IDENTIFIED AS DNS066.B.REGISTER.COM WHEREIN THE LISTS ASSOCIATED SITES IS FOUND A DOOR TO HELL ON EARTH CONFIRMED AND THEN SOME VIS-A-VIS OBSERVATION OF A PIZZA RELATED WEBSITE.


YES INDEED, PERFECT PRIVACY
NAME SERVER DNS066 B REGISTER DOT COM PAGE THREE OH BOY WHAT IS THIS
DNS066.B.REGISTER.COM [EXPAND]

WHAT MANNER OF SLAVIC?

WHAT IS THIS AND WHY DOES IT SHARE A NAME SERVER WITH BERGER CLINIC


WHAT DOES THIS MEAN?
ONE WAY MIRROR
THE ONE-WAY MIRROR WATCHES YOU, WHAT YOU DO ON THE INTERNET, AND WHAT YOU DO BEYOND. AND THEY DON’T VERY MUCH CONSIDER A TWO-WAY MIRROR GOOD POLITICS. [EXPAND]

A CASE STUDY

THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY DOES INDEED EXPORT COLLEGE STUDENTS AT ONE OF THE HIGHEST RATES IN THE NATION.

NJ COLLEGE EXPORT NUMBERS

IN LIGHT OF WHAT IS NOW KNOWN OF N.J.S.A. 2C:12-10(F). PICKETTERS’ CHARGE., WHICH DOES PERMIT AND ARGUABLY* COMMISSIONS THE STALKING OF TARGET DEMOGRAPHICS, LET US CONSIDER A LARGE GROUP OF COLLEGE STUDENTS TRAVELING HOME FOR THANKSGIVING FROM THE UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA IN COLUMBIA TO NEW JERSEY.



THE SHORTEST ROUTE BY CAR TAKES YOU UP SEVENTY-SEVEN NORTH THROUGH CHESTER COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA. WE ALSO HAPPEN TO FIND THAT THE ACTIVE WEBSITE FOR CHESTER COUNTY USES ONE OF THE FOUR NAME SERVERS ASSOCIATED WITH THE OHI/THERESA BERGER WEBSITE. SEEN BELOW IN ONE,

CHESTER COUNTY SOUTH CAROLINA USES DNS014 C REGISTER COM
WEBSITE OF CHESTER COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA. DNS014.C.REGISTER.COM [EXPAND]

SO WHAT DOES THIS MEAN? TAUTOLOGICALLY, THE NAME SERVER ENTITLED DNS014.C.REGISTER.COM IS USED BY BOTH THE COUNTY OF CHESTER SOUTH CAROLINA AND THE WEBSITE OF A THERESA BERGER COMPANY. SEEN BELOW IN ONE,

ICANN WHOIS CHESTERCOUNTY DOT ORG SOUTH CAROLINA
WEBSITE OF CHESTER COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA. DNS014.C.REGISTER.COM [EXPAND]

ESTIMATED TIME OF ARRIVAL

LET US CONSIDER THAT THE INTERSTATE SURVEILLANCE APPARATUS IS FUNCTIONING AS IT SHOULD. PACKETS ARE TRANSMIT TO THE SERVER WHERE THEY ARE DIRECTED AND VIDEO MONITORING OF TRAFFIC PATTERNS ON ROUTE SEVENTY-SEVEN IN CHESTER COUNTY DOES TAKE PLACE.

CHESTER COUNTY TRAFFIC CAMERAS
FROM EZ PASS TO THE UNDERPASS [ENLARGE]

MAN IN THE MIDDLE

NOW LET US ENGAGE THE INFRASTRUCTURE OF CHESTER COUNTY VIA THE WEBSITE THAT USES THE NAME SERVER DNS014.C.REGISTER.COM. THAT INFRASTRUCTURE DOES INCLUDE AUTOMATED LICENSE PLATE RECOGNITION WHICH NECESSARILY DESCRIBES THE LOCATION OF A VEHICLE AT A SPECIFIC TIME. NOW WHO WOULD BE INTERESTED IN A SUBSET OF THOSE VEHICLES TRAVELING HOME FOR THANKSGIVING? THE MAYOR OF A TOWN, YES INDEED, WOULD BE CONCERNED AS A REASONABLE PERSON* FOR THE POSSIBILITY OF AN INCREASED INCIDENCE OF DRUNK DRIVING AS THE LAST GRADUATING CLASS OF THE LOCAL HIGH SCHOOL HAD SENT ONE-HUNDRED STUDENTS OUT OF STATE.

NOW LET US CONSIDER AN UNREASONABLE INDIVIDUAL* THAT HOLDS THE TITLE OF MAYOR IN OUR TOWN AND HAS ACCESS TO THAT INFRASTRUCTURE WHICH PROVIDES LOCATION DATA ON TARGETED INDIVIDUALS. LET US CONSIDER A COLLEGE-AGED FEMALE. LET US NOW CONSIDER THE MOTHERFUCKING HOWELL POLICE.

ELEVENTH SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND EIGHTEEN CONTE RELEASED NEEDS MENTAL HEALTH EVAL
GET IT? FROM HOWELL [EXPAND]

SPINNING IN THE CHAIR RATHER FURIOUSLY

THIS CASE STUDY DOES RECOGNIZE THAT THIS SURVEILLANCE APPARATUS IS EXTRA-LEGAL AND IS IN FACT ILLEGAL. THAT IS WHY KNOWLEDGE OF THESE MATTERS DOES EFFECT RETALIATION FROM THOSE UNREASONABLE INDIVIDUALS* WHO WOULD HAVE NO PLACE IN POLITE SOCIETY IF THE TRUE SCOPE OF THEIR CRIMES WERE DISCLOSED TO THE PUBLIC. YOU MAY NOW IMAGINE THE FRUSTRATION OF THE NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY WHO BY VIRTUE OF THEIR POSITION ATOP THE TECHNOLOGICAL PYRAMID COULD THEORETICALLY WIPE THIS SLATE CLEAN, ALTHOUGH IN ALL LIKELIHOOD DEPLOYING THE VAST BODY OF INFORMATION THAT NSA HATH ACCUMULATED FOR DOMESTIC LAW ENFORCEMENT PURPOSES WOULD COMPROMISE THOSE TECHNOLOGIES THAT ARE THE INSTITUTIONS OF THE UNITED STATES. HOWEVER, IT IS SUSPECTED THAT INFORMATION AS ALLUDED TO DOES INDEED MAKE ITS WAY INTO THE CIVILIAN WORLD. YOU MAY OR MAY NOT BE READING TEXTS FROM ONE OF THOSE PIPELINES.


THE PALIMPSEST OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
WEBSITE OF CHESTER COUNTY SOUTH CAROLINA
WHICH ALSO MAY BE REFERRED TO AS A SHITSHOW [EXPAND]

THE OTHER RAMIFICATIONS OF PERFECT PRIVACY AND THE CLONED TECHNOLOGY DISPERSED ACROSS THE EARTH

AUTO ALLOW HACK
“AUTO ALLOW-HACK” UPON INITIATION OF PROTOCOL TRANSMITTING INFORMATION BOTH TO AND FROM NAME SERVERS ASSOCIATED WITH PERFECT PRIVACY, WHICH IN THE EYE OF THE PRIVACY PREFECT HATH BEEN DEPLOYED AS A ONE-WAY MIRROR AND ONE-WAY MIRROR ALONE. [EXPAND]
UPON RECOGNITION BY THE PRIVACY PREFECT THAT THOSE ONE-WAY MIRROR SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITIES DESCRIBED HEREUPON BAETYL AND ELSEWHERE HATH BEEN OBSERVED DOES RESULT IN THE ONSET OF A PROCESS THAT HATH BEEN SO NAMED PICKETTERS’ CHARGE, THE LAW OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY. ONE DOES CONCEDE THAT LAW ENFORCEMENT IN THE PROCESS OF AN INVESTIGATION WILL IN ALL LIKELIHOOD ENGAGE IN A COURSE OF CONDUCT THAT DOES RESEMBLE STALKING, INDEED THAT BEING THE POINT. HOWEVER, WHEN THE ONSET OF PICKETTERS’ CHARGE IS DECLARED, THOSE WHO FOLLOW THE TARGET ARE SO RARELY LAW ENFORCEMENT AND ARE RATHER THOSE MOLDED BY AND OF THE LABOR UNIONS THAT PERFUSE THE ECONOMY OF THE COASTS OF THE UNITED STATES, THOSE WHO REFUSE TO PERMIT COMPETITION OF ANY TYPE ON THEIR TURF. WHICH IS IN-FACT THE PROFILE OF ORGANIZED CRIME, ALBEIT IN THE MODERN ERA PRE-ABSOLVED OF ALL CRIMES BY THAT LAW SO NAMED PICKETTERS’ CHARGE.


WHEN SIGNALS INTELLIGENCE AND THE MEDIA COLLUDE TO CHANGE OUR MOST FUNDAMENTAL ATTITUDE
CHESTER COUNTY SC SHERIFF CIVILIAN RESPONSE TO ACTIVE SHOOTER EVENTS
AN INACTIVE SHOOTER QUITE POSSIBLY DESCRIBED AS ANY INDIVIDUAL IN POSSESSION OF A FIREARM. [EXPAND]
RETURNING TO THE NEST

WHEREIN THE MEDIA OF STATE, NATION AND ENEMY CORPORATION HATH DECREED THAT NO ALTERNATIVE STORY TO WHAT IS PUT FORTH AT THE ONSET OF A SHOOTING SHALL BE CONSIDERED AND ALL COMPETING NARRATIVES SHALL BE DEEMED HERESY TO THE COMINTERN. TO THE COMINTERN.

WHICH IS TO SAY THAT NO SUCH THING AS DUE PROCESS EXISTS AND ANY TRIAL THAT FOLLOWS FROM AN ACTIVE SHOOTER EVENT THAT IS BROADCAST ACROSS ALL CHANNELS MUST NECESSARILY EFFECT AN OUTCOME OF GUILT IN LIEU OF ANY AND ALL EVIDENCE TO THE CONTRARY. THE JUDICIARY OF THE FALSE FLAG, SO NAMED, IS INDEED THE SAME DESCRIBED HEREUPON BAETYL AND ENTRENCHED IN THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY. CURIOUS WHY ANTIFA AND RESIST HAVE HAD SUCH A REMARKABLE ABSENCE FROM THE PUBLIC SPHERE IN THAT STATE. FURTHERMORE, THOSE COURTS WHERE CRIMINAL ACTIONS AGAINST ACCUSED MASS SHOOTERS ARE CONDUCTED HAVE A RATHER VEXING SECRET TO TELL. THAT SECRET IS THAT A TEAM OF INDIVIDUALS OF A RATHER SPECIFIC TYPE ARE FERRIED FROM STATE TO STATE, AMONGST WHOM ARE FOUND BOTH DEFENSE ATTORNEYS AND PROSECUTORS. THAT STORY WILL BE TOLD HEREUPON IN DUE TIME AND YES INDEED THAT SAME CORRUPT JUDICIARY DOES DRED THE DAY WHEN COURT RECORDS OF THOSE PROCEEDINGS ARE TORN TO SHREDS IN THE HONEST JUDGMENT OF ANONYMOUS POLITY WHO HATH FOLLOWED THEIR ACTIONS WITH A RATHER KEEN EYE.


CHURCH AND STATE, COUNTY AND CHURCH
UNION EZELL AME ZION CHURCH AND ASSOCIATED
AS EXHIBITED ABOVE, THE CHESTER COUNTY SHERIFF DID THANK THE PARISHIONERS OF UNION EZELL AME ZION CHURCH FOR THE PARTICIPATION IN ACTIVE SHOOTER EVENT TRAINING. [EXPAND]

COUNTY BERGEN
NJ WOODRIDGE DOT ORG DNS100 A REGISTER COM
THE WEBSITE NJWOODRIDGE.ORG WAS FOUND AMONG THE LIST OF ONE-HUNDRED AND ELEVEN ACTIVE WEBSITES USING THE NAME SERVER DNS100.A.REGISTER.COM.  [EXPAND]

THE THING THAT HATH CALLED ITSELF THE BOROUGH OF WOOD-RIDGE

WOOD RIDGE NEW JERSEY COUNTY BERGEN
LINE OF SIGHT TO NEW YORK CITY [EXPAND]
FROM WHERE WE TRAVEL TO THE WEBSITE FOR THAT BOROUGH THAT DOES INDEED SHARE NO LESS THAN ONE OF FOUR NAME SERVERS USED BY THE THERESA BERGER COMPANY SO NAMED OCEAN HEALTH INITIATIVES OF NEW JERSEY.


THIRD-PARTY OFFICE OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT APPLICATIONS AND THE MAN IN THE MIDDLE
WOOD RIDGE NEW JERSEY COUNTY BERGEN NIXLE THIRD PARTY APP
[EXPAND]

THE TOWN COUNCIL OF OUR FRESHLY DISCOVERED BOROUGH
WOOD RIDGE NEW JERSEY COUNTY BERGEN MAYOR COUNCIL AND SECOND THIRD PARTY OBSERVATION
[EXPAND]

AND THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF WOOD-RIDGE FOUR BY FOUR ZERO TWO SIX NINE

THE MUNICODE MYSTERY
ONE ONE ZERO SEVEN

WHY ARE WE CONCERNED AT ALL WITH THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE THING THAT HATH CALLED ITSELF THE BOROUGH OF WOOD-RIDGE? PRECISELY BECAUSE THE TOWNSHIP OF HOWELL DOES INDEED OPERATE WITH TWO MUNICIPAL CODES SIMULTANEOUSLY, ONE THREE TWO ONE AND ONE THREE ONE NINE, AND FURTHERMORE THAT TOWN IS THE STARTING POINT FOR THIS STORY. AT THE PRESENT TIME ON THIS DATE OF THANKSGIVING, TWENTY-SECOND NOVEMBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN, THERE ARE FOUR REFERENCE DOCUMENTS PUBLISHED BY THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY FREELY AVAILABLE ONLINE THEREIN IDENTIFYING THE UNIQUE FOUR DIGIT CODE ASSOCIATED WITH EACH OF THE FIVE-HUNDRED AND SIXTY-FIVE MUNICIPALITIES IN THE STATE.

FOR EXAMPLE, THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE TOWNSHIP OF LAWRENCE IS ONE ONE ZERO SEVEN. THAT CODE SHOULD* BE FOUND ON LEGAL DOCUMENTS THAT WERE ISSUED BY THE TOWNSHIP OF LAWRENCE IN THE COUNTY OF MERCER. THE FOUR MUNICODE GUIDES ARE EACH IN AGREEMENT THAT ONE ONE ZERO SEVEN IS THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE TOWNSHIP OF LAWRENCE AS EXHIBITED BELOW,


ONE THREE TWO ONE AND ONE THREE ONE NINE

OF THE TWENTY-ONE COUNTIES IN NEW JERSEY, ONLY MUNICIPALITIES IN MONMOUTH HATH BEEN OBSERVED TO EXHIBIT DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE CODE APPEARING ON LEGAL DOCUMENTS AND THE CODE THAT THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY HATH ASSIGNED TO THEM.

EXCEPT, NOT QUITE, MOSTLY.

THREE OF THE FOUR MUNICODE GUIDES IDENTITY ONE THREE TWO ONE WITH THE TOWNSHIP OF HOWELL, AS STATED PRIOR AND SEEN ABOVE. HOWEVER, ONE THREE TWO ONE IS NOT FOUND UPON ANY* LEGAL DOCUMENTS HAVING ORIGIN IN THE TOWNSHIP OF HOWELL, BUT RATHER ONE THREE ONE NINE IS THE CODE CLAIMED AND USED BY THAT TOWN. THE PROBLEM IS THAT THE THREE GUIDES WHICH IDENTIFY HOWELL AS ONE THREE TWO ONE RATHER INEXPLICABLY IDENTIFY ONE THREE ONE NINE WITH AN ENTIRELY DISTINCT* ENTITY SO NAMED HIGHLANDS BOR.

ONE TWO BUCKLE MY SHOE

THIS RATHER VEXING ISSUE HAS INDEED BECOME MATERIAL TO THE COURT OF HOWELL. THAT HOWEVER WE WILL HAVE TO LEAVE FOR A FUTURE DATE WHEN AT SUCH TIME THOSE TRANSCRIPTS BECOME AVAILABLE WHICH DO INDEED BEAR THE RECORD OF THAT JUDGE DELIBERATELY OBFUSCATING THE ENUNCIATION OF A FOUR DIGIT SEQUENCE IN WHAT WAS A KNOWING AND PURPOSEFUL ATTEMPT TO SLANDER YOURS TRULY.

DUPLICATE SBI NUMBERS

ON THE TWENTY-EIGHTH OF OCTOBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN THE FOLLOWING TEXT FROM A TWO-THOUSAND SEVENTEEN HOWELL POLICE REPORT WAS POSTED HEREUPON AND IS AGAIN SEEN BELOW,

“A REVIEW OF HIS CRIMINAL HISTORY FOUND HIM TO HAVE TWO SBI NUMBERS ATTACHED TO HIM, INCLUDING ONE FOR ANOTHER ADAM MILLER, THAT INCLUDED SEVERAL NARCOTICS RELATED ARRESTS.”

IN ABSENCE OF THE FULL TEXT OF THAT REDACTED POLICE REPORT (SEEN HERE), IT IS RATHER DIFFICULT TO CONVEY THE MAGNITUDE OF WHAT TOOK PLACE. CONSIDER A GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL ABRUPTLY INFORMING YOU THAT YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER DID INDEED BELONG TO ANOTHER PERSON, WHILE SIMULTANEOUSLY CLAIMING THAT THE VERY SAME SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER STILL BELONGED TO YOU. FURTHERMORE, OUR FICTITIOUS GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL GOES ON TO MAKE THE RATHER VEXING CLAIM THAT YOU WILL NOT BE RECEIVING ANY SOCIAL SECURITY PAYMENTS BECAUSE THAT NUMBER DOES NOT BELONG TO YOU, OBVIOUSLY.

THAT WOULD DESCRIBE IDENTITY FRAUD.

NOW IMAGINE THAT YOU HAVE NEVER BEEN ARRESTED FOR ANY NARCOTICS RELATED ISSUED, NOT ONCE, NOT EVER, NOT EVEN CLOSE. WHEN THE POLICE IN YOUR TOWN DO SO ABRUPTLY CLAIM THAT YOUR “RECORD” EXHIBITS GREATER THAN ONE NARCOTICS RELATED ARREST, AND WITH THAT CLAIM FURTHER EXEMPLIFIED IN PRINT UPON A GOVERNMENT DOCUMENT, TO WHAT ENTITY DO YOU PETITION IN ATTEMPT TO REMEDIATE THAT HEINOUS, FALSE CLAIM?

THAT WOULD BE A COURT OF LAW.

COMPROMISED POSITIONS

HOWEVER, THE PRESIDING JUDGE OF THE CIVIL COURT OF LAW IN YOUR COUNTY WAS INDEED THE INDIVIDUAL RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INITIATION OF THESE SO RATHER VEXING EVENTS. THAT SAME PRESIDING JUDGE DOES STAND A REASONABLE CHANCE OF BEING CONVICTED AND SENTENCED FOR TWENTY YEARS TO LIFE FOR ONE REASON OF MANY THAT HE HIMSELF IS ATTEMPTING TO RUN OUT OF THE CLOCK ON THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS SUCH THAT YOURS TRULY CANNOT SUE FOR A SERIES OF CRIMES THAT HE DID INDEED COMMISSION, AND ASSIDUOUSLY TRIES TO HIDE. THAT, DEAR READER, IS NO MOTHERFUCKING LIE. THAT WOULD BE THE ONE SO NAMED BIG BOSS QUINN, PRESIDING “JUDGE” OF THE CIVIL DIVISION OF THE MONMOUTH COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT. THE NEST DOES INDEED NEED THAT FIRST AND LAST RESORT.

DISAPPEARING ACT

IN THE MEANTIME YOURS TRULY IS LEADING IN HOWELL, FIVE-THREE, PERHAPS FIVE-FOUR, ONE POINT IS MISSING FROM THE BOARD, AND ITS DOES NOT APPEAR ANY RULING ON THE FIELD IS FORTHCOMING. WHICH IS TO SAY, ONE OF THE FOUR FRAUD CHARGES ISSUED BY HOWELL COURT AND HOWELL POLICE AGAINST YOURS TRULY ALMOST ONE YEAR AGO IS NOW MISSING, GONE FROM THE RECORD BOOK, INDEED THE SAME CHARGE WHEREIN THE ASSOCIATED POLICE REPORT THE FRAUD CLAIM SEEN ABOVE OF “SEVERAL NARCOTICS RELATED ARRESTS” IS FOUND. IF DISPOSED, YOURS TRULY WAS NOT INFORMED. IF HIDDEN, YOURS TRULY MAY BE DISAPPEARED. ONE EPISODE OF IDENTITY FRAUD NEARLY ONE YEAR AGO COMPOUNDED TO THE PRESENT SEVERAL HUNDRED THOUSAND TIMES.

NEST OF THE CRIMINAL NET

AS ALLUDED TO IN THIS POST AND WHAT HATH BEEN SEEN ON THE NET. THAT NETWORK IN BID TO MAINTAIN THE UTMOST PROXIMITY TO EACH OTHER IN CYBERSPACE SUCH THAT THEIR COMMUNICATIONS BE LESS SUSCEPTIBLE TO INTERCEPT IN TRANSMISSION TO, FROM AND WITHIN JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA. THAT CRIMINAL NETWORK DOES INCLUDE THE MAYOR OF HOWELL, BERGER, T.

TWO OPTIONS, TWO MUNICIPAL CODES, DOUBLE LIFE, WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHO KNOWS

WHAT IS INSIDE THE DATABASE IDENTIFIED WITH THE MUNICIPAL CODE ONE THREE TWO ONE AND WHAT DESCRIPTIONS OF YOURS TRULY ARE YET TO BE REVEALED? DO TWO ONE AND ONE NINE COMMUNICATE? LAST MINUTE SUBSTITUTION IN LIEU OF AN END TO THIS OVERLONG STAY OF ABSOLUTION.

[INCOMING NOTE] THE PLAN FOR RETALIATION HATH BEEN HATCHED TODAY

AGAINST YOURS TRULY IN THE SAME MANNER AS BEFORE, WITH THE OUTCOME ABANDON ALL HOPE HOWELL.


SOME CURIOUS CO-TENANTS WITH BERGER, T. ON PERFECT PRIVACY
PITNEY-BOWES
PITNEY BOWES
THE MAILS GIANT [EXPAND]

THREE-THOUSAND ONE STAMFORD SQUARE 
THREE THOUSAND ONE STAMFORD SQUARE CT THE ASHFORTH COMPANY AND PITNEY BOWES
http://3001stamfordsquare.com USES DNS100.A.REGISTER.COM [EXPAND]

THE PITNEY-BOWES ROOM
FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGHTY PITNEY BOWES ROOM
ALLEGED VOTE FABRICATION OBSERVED IN THE PITNEY-BOWES ROOM BY COUNTY BROWARD FLORIDA SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS TEMPORARY EMPLOYEE. FIRST POSTED HEREUPON THE 34TH DAY T PLUS THREE TWENTY-SIX: FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGHT [EXPAND]

THE STOLEN MAILS OF YOURS TRULY
STOLEN MAILS
FIRST SEEN HEREUPON THE 34TH DAY T PLUS TWO THIRTY-THREE: LOG OF US MAILS STOLEN BY PICKETERS AS OF TWENTY-FIRST JANUARY TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN [ENLARGE]

RUTGERS SOUTHERN REGIONAL CHILD CARE RESOURCE AND REFERRAL AGENCY
RUTGERS SOUTHERN REGIONAL CHILD CARE RESOURCE AND REFERRAL AGENCY
https://www.rusouthernccrr.org USES DNS100.A.REGISTER.COM. HELL ON EARTH CONFIRMED AND THEN SOME. [EXPAND]

WHERE FROM WE RETURN TO DOW JONES NEWS CORE
DOW JONES NEWS CORE NOT ON THE MAP BUT RUTGERS BEHAVIORAL HEALTH INDEED OUT PLACE
THE DOW JONES ABSENT FROM THE MAP AND THAT RUTGERS BEHAVIORAL CENTER RATHER OUT OF PLACE. [EXPAND]

IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT
RUTGERS BEHAVIORAL CENTER PRINCETON RIGHT NEXT DOOR TO DOW JONES NEWS CORE
FORTY-THREE HUNDRED SERIES [EXPAND]

WE DEPART WITH TWENTY-THREE OBSERVATIONS OF THE PERFECT PRIVACY CRIMINAL NEST ON THE NET OF WHICH THE MAYOR OF HOWELL SO NAMED BERGER, T IS A PART.

THE 34TH DAY T PLUS THREE THIRTY-FOUR: THE OPRA HARVEST

FOLLOWING FROM

[XXXIV/II] THE 34TH DAY T MINUS THIRTY-FOUR: EIGHTEEN FEBRUARY TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN

THE 34TH DAY T MINUS THREE SEVENTEEN: MUZAK


AN OPRA REQUEST SUBMIT TO THE TOWNSHIP OF WEST WINDSOR, NEW JERSEY
WEST WINDSOR OPRA NOTHING FOUND
PLEASE TAKE NOTE HOWELL. [CLICK TO EXPAND]

EIGHTEENTH FEBRUARY TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN: “ASIA” CALLS THE POLICE ON THE NON-EMERGENT LINE

AFTER STUMBLING UPON A RATHER HORRIFIC SCENE AT THE CLARION PALMER INN ON THE MORNING OF EIGHTEENTH FEBRUARY TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN AS LINKED ABOVE IN [XXXIV/II], YOURS TRULY DID RETURN TO EITHER ROOM ONE-EIGHTEEN AND/OR ROOM ONE-NINETEEN.

RATHER VEXING AS THE UPLOAD* WAS AS YET INCOMPLETE AND THE INTERNET HAD CEASED TO FUNCTION.

AT WHICH TIME YOURS TRULY DID GO TO THE FRONT DESK AND ATTEMPT TO BOOK ANOTHER NIGHT AT THE CLARION PALMER INN FOR PURPOSE ORDERLY EXIT. HOWEVER, THE FRONT DESK CREATURE SO NAMED “ASIA” DID INSTEAD DIAL THE NON-EMERGENT NUMBER OF THE WEST WINDSOR POLICE FOR A REASON THAT WAS NOT CLEAR AT THE TIME. YOURS TRULY DID STAND AND WATCH “ASIA” DIAL THAT NUMBER, THEN RETURNED TO A ROOM AND WAITED FOR POLICE TO ARRIVE. MOST IMPORTANTLY, NO CALLS WERE PLACED TO POLICE BY YOURS TRULY AFTER THE HORRIFIC DISCOVERY MADE SOME MINUTES PRIOR. (IMAGINE HOW THE POLICE OF HOWELL WOULD RESPOND TO A CALL DESCRIBING WHAT WAS SEEN)

TWO WEST WINDSOR POLICE OFFICERS DID ARRIVE SHORTLY THEREAFTER AND PROCEED TO INTERROGATE YOURS TRULY REGARDING AN ALLEGED “THEFT” OF A “SCREEN” THAT WAS PRESENT IN EITHER ROOM ONE-EIGHTEEN AND/OR ONE-NINETEEN, THAT IF EVEN PROPERTY OF THE CLARION PALMER INN HAD NOT BEEN REMOVED FROM THE CLARION PALMER INN. THAT SCREEN INDEED USED AS BACKDROP FOR THE PRODUCTION OF AWFUL THINGS.

ONE OF THE TWO OFFICERS DID STATE THAT HE WAS A GRADUATE OF FREEHOLD BORO HIGH SCHOOL, IF MEMORY SERVES.

THE OTHER OFFICER WAS RATHER INSISTENT THAT SOME MANNER OF THEFT HAD OCCURRED AND RATHER AGGRESSIVELY ASKED IF “THE CAMERA FOOTAGE WILL AGREE WITH YOUR STATEMENT?”, WITH MY REPLY, “YES.”

WE DO STILL WONDER WHAT CAMERA FOOTAGE WAS REVIEWED, IF ANY, FOR WHAT PURPOSE AND WHAT EXACTLY WAS SEEN.

CONCERN THROUGHOUT THE MORNING FOR ACCUSATIONS OF INSANITY FROM THE WEST WINDSOR POLICE.

AT NO POINT DID YOURS TRULY MENTION OR ALLUDE TO WHAT HAD BEEN OBSERVED SOME MINUTES PRIOR AT THE CLARION PALMER INN.

FURTHERMORE, MY ABILITY TO ACCESS AND POST TO THIS WEBSITE CEASED TO FUNCTION ON THE EIGHTEENTH OF FEBRUARY AND FOR SOME TIME THEREAFTER.

FOLLOWING FROM, AN OPRA REQUEST WAS SUBMIT TO THE TOWNSHIP OF WEST WINDSOR IN ATTEMPT TO OBTAIN THE POLICE REPORT FOR THAT DAY.

QUOTING FROM ABOVE,

“…THERE ARE NO REPORTS…”

THERE MAY OR MAY NOT BE AN ACTIVE CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION.

STAY TUNED.


UPDATE. WHO IS INTERESTED IN THE 34TH DAY T PLUS THREE THIRTY-FOUR?

WHO IS INTERESTED IN THE THIRTY FOURTH DAY
[CLICK TO EXPAND]
DISREGARD THE TIME-TRAVEL PROTOCOLS







DESTINATION DOES NOT EXIST



THE 34TH DAY T PLUS THREE THIRTY: ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC AND THE MISSING EMAIL

WHERE DID IT GO?

EDGAR SEAMANS GOES ALL IN
[CLICK TO EXPAND]
HARD DRIVE IN THE MICROWAVE?

PRIVATE SERVER?

STAY TUNED!


RIGHT HERE
SENT MAILS
EVERY OTHER TOWN MANAGES TO ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF EMAILS, INCLUDING THE TOWNSHIP OF LAWRENCE IN OTHER CASES. YES, EVEN THE TOWNSHIP OF HOWELL GETS THESE EMAILS ALTHOUGH THEY DO PRETEND NOT TO SOMETIMES.  [CLICK TO EXPAND]

WHERE FROM WE RETURN TO THE TOWNSHIP OF WALL ON FIFTH MAY TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN AND OBSERVE WHAT AN UNDELIVERABLE MESSAGE LOOKS LIKE

05 04 2018_UNDELIVERABLE TO WALL 2 PAGES
ljsmith@townshipofwall.com UNABLE TO RECEIVE EMAIL WITH SIXTUS THE FIFTH ATTACHED, ADDRESS OF THE WALL TWP MUNICIPAL COURT ADMINISTRATOR OBTAINED FROM THAT TOWNSHIP’S WEBSITE. [CLICK TO EXPAND]
NO INDICATION THAT THE THIRTIETH SEPTEMBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN EMAIL TRANSMIT TO THE TOWNSHIP OF LAWRENCE WAS NOT DELIVERED.

WHAT ARE WE DEALING WITH HERE?

THE TOWNSHIP OF LAWRENCE IS TRYING TO BUY TIME. WE WILL BE SEEING MUCH MORE OF THIS TYPE OF DUPLICITY GOING FORWARD.

ANY RELATION TO THE GREENBERG DISPATCHED EARLY ON IN PICKETTERS’ CHARGE?

HANK GREENBERG?


FOLLOWING FROM

[XXIX/III] THE 34TH DAY T MINUS TWENTY-NINE


Continue reading THE 34TH DAY T PLUS THREE THIRTY: ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC AND THE MISSING EMAIL

THE 34TH DAY T MINUS THREE TWENTY-TWO: RESULT OF OPEN PUBLIC RECORDS ACT (OPRA) REQUESTS TO THE TOWNSHIP OF LAWRENCE

IN MARKED CONTRAST TO TWP HOWELL WHICH DOES INDEED REFUSE TO HONOR OPRA REQUESTS
LAWRENCE TWP-1
PDF OF HEAVILY REDACTED POLICE REPORTS [CLICK TO EXPAND]

WHAT IS IN THAT PDF?

NINE PAGES OF EIGHTEEN TOTAL

ALL REDACTIONS BY YOURS TRULY IN RED WITH ENTIRE CONTENT OF THIS POLICE REPORT PRE-REDACTED IN BLACK BY THE ENTITY SO NAMED “LAWRENCE TOWNSHIP POLICE” AND/OR THE “LAWRENCE TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT”. AS SUCH, THE NATURE OF ANY ALLEGATIONS MADE BY THIS POLICE DEPARTMENT REMAIN UNCLEAR. PLEASE ALSO DO NOTE NO CRIMINAL COMPLAINT WAS EVER SERVED UPON THE ALLEGED DEFENDANT SO NAMED [REDACTED] IN THIS REPORT. MULTIPLE PRIOR ATTEMPTS WERE MADE TO OBTAIN THIS POLICE REPORT IN TWO-THOUSAND SEVENTEEN AND TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN ALL OF WHICH WERE REFUSED ON SPECIOUS GROUNDS AND THE MERCER COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE DOES INDEED REFUSE TO ADMIT THAT A CRIMINAL COMPLAINT WAS NEVER SERVED.


WHAT ABOUT THE PHONE?
WHAT ABOUT THE COMPUTER?
WHAT ABOUT THE VEHICLE?
TRACKING DEVICES?

THE OTHER NINE: BLACKROCK APOCALYPTO


EIGHTEEN REPEAT, UNDER THE AGE OF EIGHTEEN

NINE TWENTY FIVE TWENTY SEVENTEEN-18

PROVABLE.


LAWRENCE AND HOWELL
THE PEDOPHILE POLICE DEPARTMENTS

MISBEHAVIOR CAUGHT ONCE AND AGAIN
FIRST OPRA REQUEST TO LAWRENCE TOWNSHIP DID INDEED CONFIRM THAT NO CRIMINAL COMPLAINT HATH EVER BEEN SERVED. HOW?


OPRA REQUEST CLOSED AND NO DOCUMENTS SERVED OR RECORD OR SERVICE PROVIDED.


CASE CLOSED? NOT EXACTLY AS A NON-CORRUPT JUDICIARY IS REQUIRED TO HANDLE ACTUAL EVIDENCE. 

TWENTY-FOURTH SEPTEMBER TWO-THOUSAND SEVENTEEN

PSYOPS-2393276