THE 34TH DAY T MINUS FOUR TWENTY-FIVE: LITTLE KELLY CHARGED

THINGS ON ABOUT

MERCER COUNTY PROSECUTOR ONOFRI IN BID TO CLEAR THE FIELD OF REPUBLICAN INCUMBENT TO ENSURE DEMOCRAT ONE-PARTY STATE SEIZURE OF ZONE STRONGHOLD OF POOR AND MIDDLE CLASS WHITES, LONG MALIGNED, ONCE PERHAPS TWICE ANTHRAXED, HOST TO THE FORGOTTEN MAILS SAGA OF NINE-ELEVEN, RIP IN PEACE IF APPLICABLE, NOW FACING OFF AGAINST THE CONCERTED EFFORTS OF TRENTON BUREAUCRACY IN STATE SPONSORED CAMPAIGN FULL STEAM AHEAD, SPEARHEAD BY MERCER COUNTY PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE ALLEGEDLY AT FORE OF PROSECUTION MAYOR STILL IN OFFICE ALONGSIDE CAMPAIGN MANAGER FOLLOWING FROM OPRA REVELATION OF UNLAWFUL DISCLOSURE OF EXPUNGED CASE RECORDS OF REPUBLICAN MAYORAL CANDIDATE HENDERSON ALREADY OUT OF THE RACE FOLLOWING PRIMARY DEFEAT, WITH REMARK OF NOTE VAGUE AND UNORTHODOX PROSECUTION OF THE MAYOR OF HAMILTON ALLEGED TO BE PENDING IN THE NO JURY HAMILTON TOWNSHIP MUNICIPAL COURT FOR CHAPTER FIFTY SOMETHING DISORDERLY PERSONS OFFENSE, JUDGE ABSENT REMARKS RELATIONSHIP NO GOOD SO TOLD, FURTHER CLAIM CASE(S) RELATED TO ANONYMOUS OPRA REQUEST DESCRIBED BY IDIOTIC NEW JERSEY MEDIA TO HAVE ORIGIN WITH MAYOR’S CHIEF OF STAFF WHO MAY OR NOT STILL HOLD THE POSITION IN WHATEVER IN THE HOLY HELL THIS THING IS, NOT ANONYMOUS MAYBE NOT, THE SHIT IS LIKE ON A PUBLIC BLOG WHAT DOES OPRA HAVE TO DO WITH IT, MOST INVARIABLY CLASSIC NEW JERSEY CATASTROPHE OF CRIMINALS ON ALL SIDES, WHEREBY OUTSIDERS HEREBY WARNED AGAINST SYMPATHY FOR THE REPUBLICAN PARTY IN COUNTY MERCER, TRUST NO ONE, INCLUDING ANY AND ALL INVOLVED PLEASE ABIDE, LITTLE KELLY YAEDE DIPSHIT OF ALL TIME REPUBLICAN IN NAME ONLY, OPPOSITION COMMUNIST IN ALL BUT NAME AND MOST LIKELY HORRIFIC RACIST SOCIALIST STRAIN OF DEMOCRAT INTENT ON ETHNIC CLEANSING WHITES OUT OF HAMILTON ON BASIS OF WELL KNOWN HATRED FOR WHITES PROMOTED VIRTUE LONG SINCE NORMALIZED IN DEMOCRAT MAINSTREAM PLATFORM, VOTE SCHEMES FACILITATED BY SEVERAL RESIST CELLS ON THE GROUND IN VICINITY OF ZONE AFTER SPONTANEOUS EMERGENCE OF FULLY FORMED RACE OBSESSED ANY WHITE HATE GRANDFATHERED INTO ZONE POLITICS LONG AGO NOW OUT FOR BLOOD LET’S JUST CALL THEM A RAPE AND MURDER GANG, BURROW SWINE, REASON WHY NO TOURISTS IN TRENTON, NEWARK MAYBE, CAMDEN PLEASE NO, JERSEY URBAN BLIGHT WORST IN NATION BY FAR AND ON THE MOVE, ONE-PARTY STATE BY LAW DANGEROUS AND HOSTILE IN THE EXTREME TO OUTSIDERS FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC WHO MIGHT CATCH ON TO THE THING THAT LIES NOT SO FAR BELOW ZONE SPECIFICALLY, DYSTOPIAN CLUSTER OF SOMETHING THAT NEEDS TO BE QUARANTINED, PLEASE GOD JUST SHUT IT DOWN, OTHERWISE YAEDE CHARGE MOST RECENT DEVELOPMENT IN HEATED ZONE FIGHT ONGOING SINCE WINTER, PROBABLY WITH ORIGIN LONG BEFORE, POLITICS OF MOB LACKING SOPHISTICATION TO BE CALLED MAFIA HISTORICALLY SADISTIC YET IN FEAR OF IMPLACABLE FACTION OF JERSEY PICKETER POLITICS SO NAMED THE BURROW, HAMILTON TOWN OTHERWISE DEER IN HEADLIGHTS, DIPSHITS THE WHOLE LOT SAVE MAYBE ONE OR TWO STALKED AND HARASSED BY THE REST WITH BONUS WORDS ALLUDING TO ATTEMPTS TO IMPRISON, HUMILIATE AND IMPOVERISH OPPOSITION CANDIDATES, ANY REPUBLICAN LEGITIMATELY CONSERVATIVE KNOWS QUITE WELL DANGEROUS TO GO OUTSIDE, CIRCLE OF SHAME GOES ON, INDEED LITTLE KELLY YAEDE CHARGED IN MCPO BID TO HUMILIATE MAYOR WITH LONG HISTORY OF ATTEMPTS TO HUMILIATE OPPOSITION CANDIDATES, THIS CASE GADFLY HENDERSON ALREADY OUT OF THIS RACE, OPRA PLAINTIFF ONGOING SO WE ARE TOLD, ALL OF THIS ALLEGEDLY OF COURSE, DETAILS NOT FORTHCOMING AND LITTLE AT ALL FOR THE PUBLIC TO GAIN, ABANDON ALL HOPE YE WHO ENTER HERE. [NJ DOT COM ARCHIVE]

YAEDE-SCHARFENBERGER MAYOR, CAMPAIGN MANGER, BOTH CHARGED, MAYBE CO-DEFENDANTS

UNIDENTIFIED WEBSITE ALLEGEDLY OPERATED BY LITTLE KELLY YAEDE AND CAMPAIGN MANAGER DAN SCHARFENBERGER, REPORTED AS LIKELY CO-DEFENDANT IN CASE REPORTEDLY FILED BY MCPO IN HAMILTON MUNI COURT, FANCY THAT, MAYOR OF HAMILTON AT THE READY, FOR CHARGE(S) RELATED TO UNLAWFUL DISCLOSURE OF ALLEGEDLY DISMISSED AND EXPUNGED CASE RECORD OF REPUBLICAN PRIMARY CHALLENGER AND OFT DESCRIBED HAMILTON GADFLY DAVID HENDERSON, SPECIFICALLY DESCRIBED AS MANY YEARS OLD MATTER OF CRIMINAL DOMESTIC VIOLENCE DISMISSED AND EXPUNGED, OFF-LIMITS INDEED, WHICH UNFORTUNATELY PROVIDES NO INSIGHT WHATSOEVER INTO THE DOMESTIC LIFE OF MR. HENDERSON, WHO JUST THE SAME AS THE REST OF STATE MAY HAVE BEEN THE VICTIM OF PERJURY AND/OR OTHER FOR REASON PD INVOCATION OF MAGIC INDEMNIFICATION LETTERS GRUESOME TWOSOME D AND V, CAN’T SUE IF DV SO EVERYTHING IS DV EVEN WHEN NO FUCKING CHANCE TWO PEOPLE COULD BE CONSTRUED SHARE A DOMESTIC SPACE AND INDEED WHEN WHATEVER THE HECK HAPPENED NOWHERE INSIDE OF A DOMICILE, PERJURY ASIDE, AT SUCH TIME NO SUCH THING AS A RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THOSE TWO PEOPLE PLAUSIBLY CONSTRUED, IN DV FOR ONCE TALKING TO SOMEONE, CLASSMATE IN MIDDLE SCHOOL MANY YEARS THEREAFTER, NO RELATIONSHIP WHATSOEVER, DV ALL THE SAME IF NJ EVER HAD A SAY, OTHERWISE THAT STATUTE BULLSHIT IN THE EXTREME AND DOES NOT PERMIT PERJURY, AT LEAST THEORETICALLY AT THE FEDERAL LEVEL, DV CHARGE TACTIC OF DENOUEMENT FOLLOWING PICKETER STALK PHASE AFTER BEING RED-LISTED POLITICAL NON-COMPLIANT, DOMESTIC VIOLENCE RATHER POTENT SLANDER AND AS WE OBSERVE IN HENDERSON CASE NO INKLING OF WHAT ISSUE WAS AT STAKE, VIOLENCE IN THE NAME EVEN IF NO VIOLENCE AT ALL, DESPICABLE TACTIC OF CROOKED COPS FOR WHOM EVERYTHING UNDER THE SUN DV FOR LAWSUIT INSURANCE, MAYBE FOR NO REASON AT ALL, ONE CASE QUITE SO JUST DECLARED DV IN SUPPLEMENTARY AFFIDAVIT WITHOUT SHARED DOMESTIC SPACE OR ANY VIOLENCE WHATSOEVER, AS WE LEARNED IN LAWRENCE RIGHT DOWN THE WAY THERE, SLANDER FORMALIZED WITH REASON FOR DV LITERALLY AND WE DO QUOTE JUST D AND V, TARS, JUST A BIT TOO AFFLUENT, MAYBE QUITE THE OPPOSITE, RATHER NICE PROPERTY THERE BOTH YOU LOT, THANK YOU MUCH, SOMETHING ELSE ENTIRELY ALONG WITH ALL OF THE AFORESAID, NO ONE TOO MUCH RESPECT FOR CANDIDATE IF DV HISTORY MADE PUBLIC TWENTY YEARS LATER DESPITE COMPLETE INNOCENCE IN THE MATTER, EXPUNGEMENT AND LAW ON THE BOOKS FORBIDDING KNOWING DISCLOSURE OF RECORDS FROM CASE AS SUCH. DO NOTE, MR. HENDERSON LIKELY RECENT PLAINTIFF IN PRIOR DESCRIBED OPRA LAWSUITS AGAINST THAT SAME TOWNSHIP, AND WITH DOCUMENTED HISTORY OF SO DESCRIBED LOW-LEVEL HARASSMENT BY TOWNSHIP STAFF THAT INDEED IS AND WAS MORE ACCURATELY DESCRIBED BY THE TEXT IN STALK STATUTE OF NJ CRIMINAL CODE, AND IN SIMILITUDE TO THE EXPERIENCE OF YOURS TRULY, WHEREUPON SUBSEQUENT INTERVIEWS WITH LAW ENFORCEMENT FOUND OUT THAT LOCAL POLICE MOST UNWILLING TO DESCRIBE DESCRIPTIONS OF STALKING AS STALKING INDEED, RATHER LOCAL PD OF CENTRAL NJ RATHER FAVOR CLASSIFICATION AS TWO C THIRTY-THREE FOURS, HARASSMENTS, NOT A FELONY UNLESS CHARGES FILED AGAINST PERSON ALREADY A FELON OR THEREABOUT, MAYBE NOT, AND WE DO SUSPECT IN NEAR CERTAINTY PD DO SO IN LIEU RISK OF UPSET TO ESTABLISHED UNION ORDER KNOWN TO ALL P AND D,  AND FURTHER KNOWN TO BE THE OPERATING PRINCIPLE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT IN THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ONE TACTIC USED IN AFORESAID ONE-PARTY STATE BY LAW, ENTRATA TO ENDLESS LAW-FARE MEANT TO RUIN AND KILL. THEORY AND PRACTICE OF SUBSECTION F DID INDEED BECOME THE RAISON D’ETRE OF BAETYL AND THOSE MANY MONTHS AND INDEED YEARS OF EXPERIENCE IN CONDITIONS AS SUCH ARE DESCRIBED AT CONSIDERABLE LENGTH IN THE BAETYL ARCHIVE. GOOD LUCK INDEED, DEAR READER, YOU ARE MOST LIKELY TO SUCCEED BY FOLLOWING IN CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER FROM DAY ONE. DO NOTE, NJ LOCAL POLICE ARE INDEED UNIONIZED AND WE HAVE LONG WONDERED HOW AND WHEN THE STALK CRIME HATH BEEN APPLIED TO UNIFORMED POLICE OFFICERS IN THE CIVIL AND CRIMINAL CASE HISTORIES, IF AT ALL, WHERE FOLLOWING EITHER ON OR OFF DUTY ACTS OF STALK AND MAUCH, ONE OR MORE OFFICERS WERE CHARGED WITH ONE OR MORE FELONY OFFENSES, SPECIFICALLY IN CONTEXT OF REPORTED INTENT, BUSINESS OR PLEASURE, INSANITY PERHAPS, NOT TO BE OVERLOOKED KEY POINT INDEED CONCLUSION WITH OR WITHOUT ABSOLUTION AT THE READY FROM N J S A, TITLE TWO C, CHAPTER TWELVE, SECTION TEN, SUBSECTION F, PICKETTER’S CHARGE, FREE PASS FOR CRIMES COMMITTED AGAINST ENEMIES OF STATE, REPUBLICANS IN NAME ONLY OF NEW JERSEY INDEED DO ALSO USE THE ESTABLISHED PARADIGM OF MAUCH STALK TO MAINTAIN THEIR OWN FIEFDOMS WHEREVER THEY MAY BE FOUND, OR PERMITTED, HOWEVER, ALL REPUBLICANS, NOT DEMOCRATS IN NEAR EXCLUSION OF UNCERTAINTY OF INTENT, ARE MOST RIGOROUSLY SURVEILLED AT NEARLY ALL TIMES IN STATE, THE MACHINE INDEED, ONE MOMENT OF WEAKNESS AND STATE-SPONSORED UNDOING TO FOLLOW. TRUTH IS NOT THAT IMPORTANT IN THESE MATTERS OF PARTY AND STATE, AND THE MOST EGREGIOUS OFFENDER OF ALL TIME IS THE MERCER COUNTY PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE, INDEED THIS MATTER IN HAMILTON ALLEGEDLY BROUGHT FORTH FROM ONE ANONYMOUS OPEN PUBLIC RECORDS ACT REQUEST NJ DOT COM REPORTS HAD BEEN SUBMIT BY YAEDE’S VERY OWN CHIEF OF STAFF, SO NAMED MARTY FLYNN, AFTER SAYING MICROS BEFORE THAT REQUEST WAS ANONYMOUS, AND RESULTS OF WHICH LATER POSTED TO UNNAMED WEBSITE, UNREMARKED UPON IN DETAIL AND THAT MAY OR MAY NOT EXIST WHATSOEVER, GREAT CATCH THE HOPEWELL MOON SAGA BACK AGAIN AND THIS TIME WITH MAYBE A URL AND MOST READILY RESPONSIVE OPRA FULFILLMENT INTENDED IN MAUCH OF ZONE DEFEAT REMARKED HEREUPON IN THE HISTORY STILL WITH GAPS IN EXISTENT PUBLIC RECORD MAINTAINED IN NEAR PERFECT COMPLETION AT ALL TIMES BY [REDACT], RATHER LIKE MCPO NEARLY SIMPATICO WITH NJ ADVANCE MEDIA SHITSTAIN NEOLIBERAL AGENDA JUST CARE NOT FOR WHAT THEY REPORT UPON AND DID WITHHOLD WHERE YAEDE AND CO BLOG CAN BE FOUND PROBABLY BECAUSE RUN AROUND OF ONE-STATE DEMAND FOR COVER-UP AT ALL TIMES, FIRST, SECOND AND LAST TACTIC IN COMMUNIST LIGHT SOP OF CRIMINAL COERCION IN ALL MATTERS JUDICIAL, MOST OTHERS TOO, LEST DEFENSE OF AN INNOCENT BECOME PUBLIC RECORD AND COMMON KNOWLEDGE AS WELL, SO LONG AS POSTED ON SUCH DOMAIN NEITHER OBSCENE OR PORNOGRAPHIC, ALSO PROOF OF LIFE DAY TO DAY, AND THE PLAUSIBLY GENUINE RECORD OF HISTORY, ONGOING AT ALL TIMES, HINT HINT, WINK NOD, WHATEVER THE HECK, ALL THE WHILE THE DEMOCRAT CONTENDER IN APPARENT HAMILTON MAYORAL OR PERHAPS COUNCIL CREATURE AT-LARGE ELECTION UPCOMING THIS NOVEMBER NOW WITH THE GIFT FROM ZONE OF CHAOS INFLICTED UPON OPPONENT CAMP IN LIKELY PLOY TO EFFECT THAT VERY CONDITION AND BOOST DEMOCRAT ONE-PARTY STATE IN OTHERWISE BESIEGED CONSERVATIVE, READ:AMERICAN, HEAVY TOWNSHIP THAT DOES NOT DESERVE EITHER YAEDE OR THE DEMOCRAT CONTENDER. [NJ DOT COM ARCHIVE]

WHERE DID MAYOR YAEDE GO WRONG?

AS WE ARE TOLD THUS FAR, NO PERMISSION IN THE FORM OF AN ORDER FROM SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY WAS EITHER SOUGHT OR ISSUED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CAMPAIGN MANAGER WHO MAY OR MAY NOT BE AWARE THAT THERE ARE LEGITIMATE REASONS TO PERMIT DISCLOSURE OF CASE RECORDS, INCLUDING ARREST RECORDS, FROM MATTERS THAT WERE DISMISSED OR WHERE DEFENDANT DETERMINED NOT GUILTY, OTHER SUCH CASES OF CONVICTIONS AS WELL. WE DO NOW PUT FORTH THE SCENARIO IN WHICH DAVID HENDERSON THERE DID PHYSICALLY ASSAULT HIS WIFE OR CHILDREN SOME YEARS AGO, PERHAPS KNOWN INTIMATELY TO A NEIGHBOR OR FAMILY WHO ALSO AWARE THE SUBSEQUENT CASE RESULT EXONERATION OF A VIOLENT CRIMINAL, AS THE WIND BLOWS ABSENT CRIMINAL RECORD AT PRESENT AND INDEED BECOME PROMINENT PUBLIC RUNNING FOR ELECTED OFFICE IN YA, THAT PLACE. RATHER IN LIEU OF DISORDERLY PERSONS CHARGE, ONE SEEKING RECORDS AS SUCH WITH OR WITHOUT PRIOR KNOWLEDGE MAY PETITION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, LAW DIVISION, CRIMINAL PART JUDGE TO ISSUE AN ORDER PERMITTING DISCLOSURE OF THOSE RECORDS IN QUESTION PURSUANT TO N J S A TWO C FIFTY-TWO DASH NINETEEN. OF ALL THINGS TO CONSIDER, THE DRAFT MACHINE OF BAETYL DOES INDEED POSSESS NO LESS THAN ONE DRAFT MOTION EXHIBITING WHY ONE MAY SEEK TO OBTAIN FORBIDDEN RECORDS OF COURT PERTAINING TO CASES OF ANOTHER PERSON, IN BOTH THE CASE AND THE DRAFT EXHIBITION THE RECORDS SOUGHT ARE ASSOCIATED WITH ONE OR MORE INDIVIDUALS AGAINST WHOM MATTERS IN SUPERIOR COURT LIKELY ONGOING, AND SPECIFICALLY IF THE RESTRICTED ARE THE SUBJECT OF TESTIMONY THAT REQUIRE STATEMENTS DESCRIBED AN EXPUNGED CRIMINAL ACTION FOR REASON OF THE UTMOST NECESSITY, SEE BELOW, OR PERHAPS AS IDITOTIC AND CAPRICIOUS SLANDER PROMULGATED IN NEAR CERTAIN IGNORANCE OF STATUTE DISCUSSED AT LENGTH IN THING BELOW, WHICH DOES REQUIRE FORE KNOWLEDGE OF UNKNOWN STATUS OF CASE IN QUESTION THAT WAD AND IS DIRECTLY RELATED TO CRIMINAL ACTION ONGOING AGAINST ONE OR MORE INDIVIDUALS DESCRIBED ABSENT NAME AND FORMAL PROFESSIONAL TITLES, HOWEVER WE WILL TELL STRAIGHT AWAY THAT THE MOST ROTTEN ENTITY IN THE THING THAT HATH CALLED THE TOWNSHIP OF [REDACT] IS THE SUBJECT OF TESTIMONY THAT MAY OR MAY NOT HAVE BEEN EXPUNGED SURREPTITIOUSLY FOR THE VERY REASON THAT JUDICIAL ENTITY WELL AWARE SEVERE CRIMINAL PENALTIES UP TO AND INCLUDING SUBSTANTIAL PRISON TIME MORE THAN LIKELY TO FOLLOW LAWFUL DISCLOSURES HEREUPON AND ELSEWHERE.

MANEUVERS OF THE HIGHEST SIGNIFICANCE

THE SET IS AS FOLLOWS: AN INDIVIDUAL WAS SUMMONED TO APPEAR BEFORE STATE IN CAPACITY AS A WITNESS TO A CRIME, THE WITNESS DULY APPEARS ON THE APPOINTED DATE AND TIME MARKED ON SUMMONS TRANSMIT BY POST SOME WEEKS PRIOR, HOWEVER UPON ARRIVAL THE WITNESS DOES FIRST BECOME INFORMED THAT THE DAY’S EVENT, UNDER OATH WE DID PRESUME, HAD BEEN CANCELLED WITHOUT ANY PRIOR NOTICE PROVIDED TO THE WITNESS WHO DID TRAVEL AND PREPARE FOR THE DAY AS SUMMONED TO APPEAR, THE WITNESS IS TOLD THIS AND THAT BY STAFF RIGHT THERE IN PERSON, QUESTIONABLE CLAIMS NEVER PROVEN WHATSOEVER, HOWEVER THE WITNESS IS INFORMED OF A FUTURE FOR A OR THE EVENT, NOTE THE TESTIMONY AS SUCH FROM OUR WITNESS WAS NOT EVER HEARD BY STATE FOR REASON STATE DID MOST CERTAINLY COLLUDE WITH OPPOSING COUNSEL TO CANCEL THE DATE IN PERPETUITY SO THE AFORESAID TESTIMONY COULD NEVER BE HEARD, WITNESSED STACK OF SUMMONS INTERNALLY MARKED WITH CREATION ONE SINGLE CALENDAR BEFORE THE CANCELED DATE, ALL DOCUMENTS ARE MEANT AND DESIGNED TO BE TRANSMIT BY POST, INDEED WITNESS WITH OVERLARGE COLLECTIONS OF DOCUMENTS AS SUCH, THE STACK THAT DAY ABSENT ANY POSTMARK WHATSOEVER IN CONFIRMATION THAT STATE MADE EXPLICIT ATTEMPT TO HIDE KNOWLEDGE OF CANCELLATION FROM OUR WITNESS WHO WOULD NOT HAVE EVEN RECEIVED THE AFORESAID SUMMONSES BY POST UNTIL DAYS AFTER TRAVELLING TO THE CANCELLED EVENT, THE VERY SAME STAFF IN QUESTION DID IN FOLLOWING MONTHS SEEK RAPID DISMISSAL OF THE CASE IN WHICH OUR WITNESS NEVER TESTIFIED, AND IN PLAUSIBLE SCENARIO THE SAME COURT IN COLLUSION WITH ONE OR MORE SUPERIOR COURT JUDGES DID RAPIDLY EXPUNGE THE CASE IN QUESTION FOR THE EXPLICIT PURPOSE OF RENDERING THESE DESCRIPTIONS HEREIN UNLAWFUL, ALBEIT NEVER MADE KNOWN AS SUCH IN FURTHER ACT OF COERCION COMMITTED AGAINST THE WITNESS UNDER DURESS AND VICTIM OF MOST EXTREME CRIMINAL COERCION, PURPOSEFUL AND KNOWING EACH AND EVERY TIME, SUCH THAT THE ACTORS AT STATE, SUPERIOR AND BELOW, DID PLACE THE WITNESS IN PLAUSIBLE DANGER OF PROSECUTION FOR DISORDERLY PERSONS OFFENSE IF OUR WITNESS SOUGHT RELIEF AT ANY TIME FOR THE CRIMES SO DESCRIBED, MOST CERTAINLY CRIMES INDEED, THE CRIMES OF THE THING THAT CALLED ITSELF THE TOWNSHIP OF HOWELL, WHOSE CONDUCT IN VOLUMES MAINTAINED IN PERPETUITY BEYOND COMPREHENSION, FOR WHOM LITIGATION DESCRIBING THEIR CONDUCT IN TRUTH NEARLY AT ALL TIMES FOUND TO INCLUDE FORGED RECORDS OF COURTS, FORGED TRANSCRIPTS, FORGED ORDERS, FALSIFIED POLICE REPORTS, OUTLANDISH AND OBSCENE CLAIMS INTENDED TO HUMILIATE, AND OF COURSE MOST CURIOUS ASSERTIONS OF PARALLEL UNIVERSES WHERE THE SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER OF A CRIMINAL WAS FOUND TO BELONG TO YOU, DEAR WITNESS, WHO MAY NOW REVEAL WHAT IS IN STORE FROM THE YEARS OF STUDY MANDATORY NEAR THE BURROW DOOR, THE SOUNDS ON TAPE, HARD PROOF, CHECK AND CHECKMATE, NOW WE WONDER OK GREAT, WHAT NOW IN RESPONSE DOES AWAIT, RETALIATION OF COURSE MOST SEVERE IS PLANNED, WHEN THE BURROW GETS THE SHIT KICKED OUT OF THEM ACROSS THE STATE, THANK YOU MUCH BAETYL, BAETYL & CO, THEY DO INDEED RESORT TO THE RAPE AND MURDER GANG, ENCOUNTERED ON ABOUT MERMON ONCE SOME WEEKS AGO, MAUCH STALK AND SUBSECTION F THE CRITICAL INFORMATION THAT YOU NEED TO KNOW, IT IS NOT ABOUT THE GANG STALK NORMALIZATION OF THE WORDS, STALKED BY THREE OR MORE INDIVIDUALS INDEED STALKED BY GANG IN TERMS OF STATE LAW, RATHER MOST PRESSING CONCERN IS WHAT DOES OCCUR WHEN COURTS TO FAIL AND ACT IN ANYTHING BUT SOVIET OR MAOIST FASHION MOST PREJUDICED INDEED, THERE ARE LAWS ON THE BOOKS BUT WITH KNOWLEDGE OF THE BURROW, LAW BOOKS ONE DOES UNDERSTAND BURROW COURT BELOW DOES NOT HEED, BUT DOES RATHER MAUCH IN TONGUES THAT CAME UP FROM BELOW, QUITE LITERALLY THE FLOORS BENEATH ARE WEAPONS OF WAR DEPLOYED AGAINST THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NOW AND FOR SOME TIME INTO THE PAST, THE ORIGIN OF THE CONCEPT NEARLY CERTAIN TO BE OF BOLSHEVIK DESIGN, THE HORROR OF SOVIET COURTS NOT TO BE FORGOTTEN IN RUSSIA OR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ANY TIME SOON, THE POWER OF THE TRAPDOOR WHEN UNKNOWN DOUBLE THE STRENGTH OF A NUCLEAR MONSOON, NO PERSON SAFE AT HOME OR ABROAD, THE BEST AMONG US THE TARGET IN MOST LOGICAL ASSUMPTION THAT MOST FIT AMONG, MOST CLEVER AS WELL, BOTH IN TANDEM, FILL IN THE BLANKS, CONCRETE AND STONE, TOOK A LONG TIME UNTIL STATE DATE WHO IS BEFORE TRULY PRIOR KNOWN. EXHIBIT AS FOLLOWS,

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
LAW DIVISION ─ CRIMINAL PART
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
COUNTY VICINAGE

 

CASE TYPE
CASE NUMBER

 

BRIEF AND APPENDIX IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO PERMIT DISCLOSURE OF POSSIBLY EXPUNGED CASE RECORD PURSUANT TO N.J.S.A. 2C:52-19
DRAFT TEXT

 

CERTIFICATION IN SUPPORT OF PROCEDURAL MOTION SEEKING RELIEF IN THE FORM OF AN ORDER FROM SUPERIOR COURT PERMITTING INSPECTION OF RECORDS AND RELEASE OF INFORMATION PURSUANT TO N.J.S.A. 2C:52-19 IN A SINGLE DISPOSED AND LIKELY EXPUNGED CASE THAT IS AND WAS DIRECTLY LINKED TO [MATTER NOW BEFORE THE COURT], AND PURSUANT TO N.J.S.A. 2C:52-6 (a) THE CASE IN QUESTION WAS LIKELY DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE ABSENT ANY SUBSEQUENT PENALTIES IMPOSED BY THE LOWER COURT UP TO AND INCLUDING CONVICTION UPON ENTRY OF GUILTY VERDICT AT DATE NECESSARILY AFTER THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROCEEDING IN QUESTION FOR ONE OR MORE REASONS MOST SPECIFICALLY IN EVENT OF DEFENDANT FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE TERMS SET FORTH IN THE PRESENCE OF [REDACT] IN LOWER COURT UPON THE DATE THAT THIS MATTER IN QUESTION WAS MOST LIKELY DISPOSED WITH CONDITION UPON CONSENT OF DEFENDANT WHO BY COUNSEL DID SET FORTH CONSENT ON THE RECORD AND WHEREBY TERMS OF CONDITION PROPOSED UPON REQUEST OF [REDACT] FOR RECIPROCAL CONDITION IN BOTH MATTERS HEARD IN PARALLEL DISPOSITION HEARINGS WITH RESULT ENTRY OF TWO CONDITIONAL DISMISSALS PURSUANT TO P.L.2013, c.158 (C.2C:43-13.1 et al.). THE VICTIM AND [REDACT] DID IN CONFERENCE WITH PROSECUTION REQUEST THAT SUCH CONDITION AS AFORESAID BE SET FORTH AND TO WHICH PROSECUTION DID READILY ASSENT AND FOLLOWING THE PROCEEDING WITH MUTUAL DISMISSAL CONTINGENT UPON EQUANIMITY OF TASK, AS OTHERWISE CAPRICIOUS OVERSIGHT OF LOWER COURT IN UNILATERAL CONDITION PREJUDICED AGAINST THE VICTIM, CONSISTENT WITH [COMPLAINTS ELSEWHERE]. THE AFORESAID WAS SUBSEQUENTLY DESCRIBED ON RECORD DURING THE FINAL COURT EVENT THAT LIKELY INFORMALLY DESCRIBED AS THE LAST KNOWN HEARING, CONDUCTED WITHOUT REMARKS INDICATING THE LOWER COURT SOUGHT TO BRING THEN ONGOING OPEN-ENDED SEQUENCE OF HEARINGS TO TRIAL, HEARINGS CONDUCTED AT REGULAR INTERVALS FOR MANY MONTHS OVER TOTAL ELAPSED COURSE OF GREATER THAN ONE YEAR, [OFTEN SADISTIC] WHEREIN THE LAST HEARING CONDUCTED IN PARALLEL TO THE DISPOSED CASE AT ISSUE HEREIN DID CONCLUDE TRANSMITTAL OF SUMMONS TO APPEAR FROM LOWER COURT IN CAPACITY AS BOTH VICTIM AND [WITNESS], IN SUBSEQUENT PROCEEDINGS IN LOWER COURT [REDACT] WAS SUMMONED TO APPEAR AS SOLE [WITNESS] WITH NO SUBSEQUENT CORRESPONDENCE OR COMMUNICATION THEN RECEIVED FROM THE LOWER COURT INDICATING THE AGGRESSOR IN PREDICATE MATTER NOW BEFORE THE COURT DID OR DID NOT SUCCESSFULLY MEET AFORESAID CONDITIONS FOR DISMISSAL, AND AS SUCH THE LOWER COURT IS AND WAS IN DERELICTION OF LAWFUL OBLIGATIONS TO DULY NOTIFY SOLE DEFENDANT THEREAFTER OF EXPUNGED STATUS FOR CASE THAT IS AND WAS THE PRECIPITATING INCIDENT BEFORE THE MATTER THEN BROUGHT FORTH IN [RETALIATION] BY THE LOWER COURT ON THE VERY NEXT CALENDAR DAY, WITH REMARKABLE ABSENCE OF TRUTHFUL AND COMPLETE DESCRIPTIONS OF THAT EVENT IN ASSOCIATED RECORDS PLAUSIBLY WITHHELD STILL IN BOTH CASES. WHEREBY RESTRICTED TESTIMONY REGARDING THAT INCIDENT MOST PROXIMAL AND MOST DIRECTLY RELATED TO THE PREDICATE MATTER NOW BEFORE THE COURT DOES PRIMA FACIE CONSTITUTE PLAUSIBLE COERCION OF [WITNESS] RIGHT TO ENGAGE IN LAWFUL CONDUCT PRIOR KNOWN AS SUCH, THAT MAY APPEAR TO THE LOWER COURT AS UNLAWFUL BY PRESUMPTION COUNSEL AS APPOINTED BY LOWER COURT AGAINST THE WILL OF [WITNESS] DID FIRST INFORM OF THAT APPOINTMENT, AND FURTHERMORE UNDER PRESUMPTION COUNSEL ACTING IN GOOD FAITH DID DULY INFORM [WITNESS] OF RECORDS IN POSSESSION, [NOTE, WITHHELD AT ALL TIMES] THAT IN ALL LIKELIHOOD WOULD BEAR RECORDS OF ANY AND ALL EXPUNGED MATTERS AFFECTING BOUNDS OF TESTIMONY IN LOWER COURT PROCEEDING WHICH DID NOT ON ANY SINGLE DATE HEAR TESTIMONY FROM THE [WITNESS] THAT WOULD NECESSARILY REQUIRE ORDER TO DISCLOSE EXPUNGED CASE RECORD, IF APPLICABLE, PURSUANT TO FREEDOM FROM RESTRICTION TO PURSUE AFFIRMATIVE AND LAWFUL DEFENSE. HOWEVER, THE COURT FROM BELOW DOES HAVE MANY CASES HISTORIES OF FRAUDULENT APPOINTMENTS OF COUNSEL, WITH CONDUCTED COMMUNICATIONS IN PURSUIT COORDINATED ACTION AGAINST DEFENDANTS AND [WITNESSES] WHO ARE DENIED KNOWLEDGE COUNSEL APPOINTED BY ORDERS WITHHELD UNTIL MOMENTS PRIOR TO THE START OF HEARINGS, WITH ADVERSARIAL COUNSEL CONVICTED OF CRIMINAL COERCION IN ONE CASE WITH INTENT TO AFFECT CONSEQUENCE OF MAGNITUDE UPON DEFENDANTS AND [WITNESSES], IN THE MATTER IN QUESTIONS VICTIMS AS WELL, MOST DISTURBING IN THE EXTREME, FOR WHOM THE LOWER COURT DOES APPEAR TO ACT AGAINST WITH PREMEDITATION AND WITH UNDUE PREJUDICE THAT A REASONABLE PERSON WOULD CALL [SADISTIC AND ILLEGAL], WHEREBY VICTIM OF ASSAULT BEFORE THE LOWER COURT IN SUCH CAPACITY IS SOUGHT TO BE ISOLATED AS [DEFENDANT] ALONE AND WAS ON [DATE] PROHIBITED FROM TESTIFYING IN THE MATTER IN QUESTION FOR CLAIMS OF CANCELED COURT EVENT THAT LOWER COURT DID PROVABLY AND EXPLICITLY FAIL TO INFORM [WITNESS], DID WITHHOLD SUMMONS TO APPEAR INFORMING OF RESCHEDULED EVENT, AND DID SO IN SUCH FASHION REQUIRING [WITNESS] TRAVEL TO THE LOWER COURT PURSUANT TO LAWFUL ADHERENCE TO SUMMONS AND DONE SO IN FULL EXPECTATION OF TESTIFYING AS [VICTIM] IN THE MATTER IN QUESTION, HOWEVER, UPON ARRIVAL VICTIM WAS INFORMED BY LOWER COURT THAT EVENT HAD BEEN CANCELED AS PER VERBAL CLAIMS FROM NO LESS THAN TWO FEMALE ADMINISTRATORS, ONE OF WHOM DID CLAIM THE EVENT HAD BEEN RESCHEDULED UPON REQUEST OF OPPOSING COUNSEL IN A LETTER WITH CONTENT NOT DISCLOSED PRIOR TO ARRIVAL OR THEREAFTER EITHER IN FULL OR IN PART, AND SUBSEQUENT DISCUSSIONS ON THAT SAME DAY WITH THE THEN MOST SENIOR COURT ADMINISTRATOR DID RESULT IN VICTIM OBTAINING [MORE THAN ONE] HARD-COPY SUMMONS TO APPEAR FOR COURT EVENT RESCHEDULED ON SUCH DATE MORE THAN ONE CALENDAR MONTH THEREAFTER. ALL SUMMONSES RECEIVED BY THE VICTIM ON [DATE] WITH DATE OF GENERATION MARKED ONE CALENDAR DAY PRIOR, ALL ABSENT POSTMARKS, AND ALL [MORE THAN ONE] OF THE SUMMONSES AS DESCRIBED WERE DOCUMENTED BY MOBILE PHONE PHOTOGRAPHY IN SUPPORT OF PROVING [CLAIMS] TO BE SET FORTH REGARDING EGREGIOUS COERCION AND UNDUE PREJUDICE OF LOWER COURT IN WITHHOLDING MOST CRITICAL INFORMATION THEY ARE LEGALLY OBLIGED TO PROVIDE. IN FURTHER CONSIDERATION, [REDACT] DOES REQUEST THE COURT TO DISCLOSE THE MATTER IN QUESTION IN ORDER TO MOST LAWFULLY PROCEED IN DETERRING FURTHER CRIMINAL ACTS IN SIMILITUDE THAT MAY BE COMMITTED BY LOWER COURT STAFF WITHOUT FEAR OF REPRISAL IF THE MATTER IN QUESTION IS NOT DISCLOSED AND TESTIMONY NECESSARILY RELATED TO THOSE ACTS OF COERCION AND INTIMIDATION IS RESTRICTED BY SURREPTITIOUS EXPUNGEMENT PROCESSES THAT OTHERWISE WOULD APPEAR LAWFUL AND ROUTINE ACTS OF THE LOWER COURT, THAT CONSISTENT WITH THESE FACTS WOULD MOST PLAUSIBLY BE SOUGHT IN PURSUIT OF THE LOWER COURT INITIATING FURTHER ACTIONS AGAINST [WITNESS] IN EXPLICIT ACTS OF RETALIATION DIRECTLY RELATED TO THE MATTER IN QUESTION, SPECIFICALLY IF LAWFUL TESTIMONY IS BROUGHT FORTH AND AT SUCH TIME THE LOWER COURT ADMINISTRATORS PERCEIVE IMMINENT THREAT OF PROSECUTION FOLLOWING FROM, OR FURTHERMORE IN THE EVENT THE SAME INDIVIDUALS BECOME INFORMED THAT THE AFORESAID CONDUCT DESCRIBED TRUTHFULLY HEREIN THAT IS AND WILL BE SUPPORTED WITH DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES BY THE [VICTIM] HAS BEEN MADE AVAILABLE TO ANY COURT IN STATE OR ELSEWHERE WITH LIKELY CRIMINAL ACTION TO FOLLOW.

 

CF. R. 1:5, R. 1:6, R. 2:8, R. 3:10, R. 3:18, R. 3:23, R. 3:24, R. 3:29, R. 4:6, R. 4:40, R. 4:42, R. 4:46, R. 4:63A, R. 4:74, R. 4:105, R. 6:3, R. 7:13, R. 8:7

AHA!

OF NOTE, HAMILTON THING AFFIXED TO THE NJ FOURTH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT THAT IS GERRYMANDERED ALL THE WAY TO THE ATLANTIC OCEAN AT THE BORDER OF THE THING THAT HATH CALLED ITSELF THE BOROUGH OF HIGHLANDS, HOST OF THE ONLY REPUBLICAN HELD CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT IN THE STATE AT PRESENT TIME, WITH CONGRESSMAN MR. FOSSIL SMITH RATHER ENAMORED OF A CERTAIN FOREIGN NATION JUST A BIT TOO MUCH, ALTHOUGH MOST RECENTLY PUBLIC CURIOSITY ON TOPIC OF TICK BLIGHT OF ALL TIME INDEED MOST REFRESHING, THREAT TO FOREIGN NATIONALS HERE ABROAD INDEED, LYME DISEASE PLAUSIBLY WITH ORIGIN IN YAHTZEE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS PROGRAMS, PLUM ISLAND, THING HIGHLANDS HAS ONE TOO AND IT DOES THE SAME THING. SAME FOREIGN NATIONALS IN ALL LIKELIHOOD BEHIND THING AS SUCH.

 

[ZONE] HOPEWELL TWP MUNICIPAL COURT ON DAY ONE-HUNDRED NINETEEN OF THE UNDEAD CHARGE, FILED AGAINST YT IN RETALIATION FOR FLAWLESS PRO SE VICTORY IN PICKETTERS’ CHARGE, NJ/CDRONE COMPLAINT INTENTIONALLY WITHHELD FROM DEFENSE SINCE DAY ONE, DEFENSE NOT IMPRESSED, MORE SO UPON RECEIPT OF SEVEN PAGES FEATURING BRAND NEW CLAIM THAT SOMEONE ON OR ABOUT SIXTH SEPTEMBER TWO-THOUSAND SEVENTEEN POSTED UNSPECIFIED “PERSONAL INFORMATION” OF UNSPECIFIED PERSON TO A WEBSITE THAT MOST REMARKABLY REMAINS UNNAMED IN CAPRICIOUS AND UNLAWFUL CRIMINAL ACTS SANCTIONED BY OFFICIALS OPERATING UNDER THE BANNER OF A COUNTY PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE IN YEARS LONG CAMPAIGN TO SILENCE BAETYL, WHICH THEY WILL INVARIABLY LOSE IN MOST SPECTACULAR DISINTEGRATION OF CROOKED POLITICAL MACHINE THAT HATH BEEN WRITTEN IN THE STARS, YES INDEED

FOURTH JUNE NINETEEN EDGAR S CLAIMS RECORD(S) GIVEN BY MCPO IN LIEU OF DISTINCT REQUEST MADE TO THE TOWNSHIP OF LAWRENCE FOR THE EXPLICIT PURPOSE OF SIDE BY SIDE COMPARISON WITH MCPO DISCOVERY, ENTER HOPEWELL MOON AND WE HAVE A MOST CURIOUS DILEMMA WHERE THE MCPO RECORDS IN THE AFORESAID DISCOVERY ARE ABSENT DESCRIPTIONS OF ANY PUBLIC WEBSITE WHATSOEVER, AND AS SUCH NO DESCRIPTIONS OF INFORMATION ALLEGEDLY POSTED TO A STILL UNNAMED PUBLIC WEBSITE FOLLOW FROM.

SO EDGAR SEAMANS HAS NOW BEEN TRAPPED IN THEIR VERY OWN IDIOT BOX. LAWRENCE HAS NEVER PROVIDED ANY POLICE REPORT TO DEFENSE THAT IS DIRECTLY LINKED TO THE ALLEGED PREDICATE INCIDENT.

ON OR ABOUT TWENTY-SEVENTH SEPTEMBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN, THE LAWRENCE TOWNSHIP MUNICIPALITY TRANSMIT A DOCUMENT VIA EMAIL PURPORTED TO BE THAT ONE CRITICAL POLICE REPORT, EXCEPT THE ENTIRE NARRATIVE OF THAT REPORT WAS REDACTED. SO NOTHING IN FACT HAS EVER BEEN PROVIDED TO DEFENSE BY THE TOWNSHIP OF LAWRENCE.

AS OF TENTH APRIL TWO-THOUSAND NINETEEN, HOPEWELL TOWNSHIP MUNICIPAL COURT IN MERCER COUNTY TASKED WITH THE CASE ALLEGEDLY RELATED TO NEW ACTS MANY YEARS OLD ON VERY SAME DATE.

SO EDGAR SEAMANS LEGAL ARGUMENT IN EXPLICIT SUPPORT OF WITHHOLDING WHAT EXACTLY THE LAWRENCE TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT CLAIMED TO HAVE HAPPENED ON THAT SINGLE DATE IN TWO-THOUSAND SEVENTEEN.

HOPEWELL NOW PURPORTS THAT NEW CLAIMS ARE TO BE FOUND IN THAT SAME LAWRENCE TWP POLICE REPORT, FULLY REDACTED AND STILL WITHHELD FROM DEFENSE, SPECIFICALLY RELATED TO A STILL UNSPECIFIED WEBSITE. WHICH HOPEWELL CLAIMS THEY ARE NOT OBLIGATED TO PROVIDE FOR REASON THAT QUERIES AS SUCH ARE TO BE SUBMIT TO THE LAWRENCE TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT. WHICH FOR NEARLY TWO YEARS AND UP THE PRESENT NOW WITH PROXY LAW FIRM STILL REFUSES TO PROVIDE DEFENSE. THAT REPORT WAS THE FIRST AND LAST DOCUMENT LAWRENCE TWP HAD TO PRODUCE, WHICH THEY DIDN’T, AND NEITHER DID HOPEWELL.

SO WHAT ARE THEY HIDING?

CRIMES OF THE MOST SEVERE NATURE COMMITTED BY PUBLIC OFFICIALS.

OFFICIAL POLICY TO WITHHOLD RECORDS THAT SUPPORT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE

FOURTH JUNE NINETEEN EDGAR S CLAIMS RECORD(S) GIVEN BY MCPO IN LIEU OF DISTINCT REQUEST MADE TO THE TOWNSHIP OF LAWRENCE FOR THE EXPLICIT PURPOSE OF SIDE BY SIDE COMPARISON WITH MCPO DISCOVERY, ENTER HOPEWELL MOON AND WE HAVE A MOST CURIOUS DILEMMA

REFER TO EDGAR SEAMANS TWENTY-THIRD MAY TWO-THOUSAND NINETEEN COMMUNICATION IS SUPPORT OF LAWRENCE TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT WITHHOLDING THE ONE POLICE REPORT IN QUESTION ON GROUNDS THAT CONTENT OF THE POLICE REPORT FIRST PROVIDED TO DEFENSE THREE-HUNDRED AND NINETY DAYS AFTER THE ALLEGED INCIDENT IN “DISCOVERY” THAT IS STILL MISSING PAGES, AND IN LIEU OF DEFENSE DENIED NO LESS THAN TWO TIME UPON DIRECT IN-PERSON REQUEST FOR THE POLICE REPORT DURING THAT THREE-NINETY DAY PERIOD.

WHICH MEANS THAT A PERSON WAS NOT PERMITTED TO KNOW WHAT HE WAS ACCUSED OF DOING BY POLICE THAT WAS UNLAWFUL, THAT FACT ONGOING TO THE PRESENT, OTHERWISE FUNDAMENTAL TO THE LAWFUL PRACTICE OF LAW IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AND FURTHERMORE WHEREBY ENTRY OF HOPEWELL MOON COURT INTO THE FRAY, THE ACTS THE PERSON WAS ACCUSED OF COMMITTING, FOR WHICH ACQUITTAL ALREADY OBTAINED, WERE RECYCLED, USED AGAIN AGAINST THE PERSON, INDEED ALTERED AND ADDED UPON IN OUTRIGHT FABRICATION, ALL OF WHICH DID OCCUR WITHOUT RELEASE OF THAT SINGLE POLICE REPORT AT ORIGKN IN ALL OF THESE MATTERS, INCLUDING SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, THE GOVERNMENT RECORDS COUNCIL, THE LAWRENCE TOWNSHIP MUNICIPAL COURT, THE FORMER HOST OF A RETTZO-DEVLIN, AND NOW WITH FOUR ENTITIES OF THE ZONE AXIS ACTIVE AGAINST YOURS TRULY, INCLUDING THE LAWRENCE TOWNSHIP MUNICIPALITY, THE MERCER COUNTY PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE, THE LAW FIRM OF EDGAR SEAMANS ET AL, AND NOW MOST REMARKABLY THE HOPEWELL TOWNSHIP MUNICIPAL COURT. NOTHWITHSTANDING THE MONSTROSITY IN HOWELL, PIC RELATED,

TO SUMMARIZE, A CURIOUS OBSERVER, INDEED YOU DEAR READER, POSES THE RATHER REASONABLE QUESTION,

“SO WHAT EXACTLY DID HE DO?”

TO WHICH THE RESPONSE,

“THEY WON’T TELL”

THAT IS IT AND THAT IS ALL. WINNER TAKES ALL.

UPDATES TO FOLLOW AS THEY EMERGE,

STAY TUNED.

THE 34TH DAY T MINUS SIX TWO EIGHT THREE: THE TAU OF MUNICIPAL ORDINANCE

PART THIRTY-FOUR IN THE ONGOING SAGA OF THE MUNICODE MYSTERY

PART TWO OF TWO IN THE GRIBBENS FRAUD TRANSCRIPT BREAKDOWN, REFER TO PART ONE IN THE LINK HERE AND BELOW

FOLLOWING FROM

THE MUNICODE MYSTERY

THE 34TH DAY T MINUS FOUR TWO: THE NET AND THE NEST

THE 34TH DAY T MINUS FOUR THIRTY-FOUR: EXTERMINATUS ENGAGED

THE 34TH DAY T MINUS THREE ZERO THREE: INQUIRIES TO THE TOWNSHIP MET WITH NO RESPONSE AND THE LATEST FRONT IN THE MUNICODE MYSTERY

PLAUSIBLE DUPLICATES, ROUND TWO

THE 34TH DAY T MINUS ZERO ONE TWO ONE: BREAK DOWN OF GRIBBEN’S HOWELL COURT TRANSCRIPT TRANSMIT VIA G MAILS IN UNSECURED PDF, PART ONE OF TWO

EPONYMOUS MAGISTRATUS



WE FIRST RETURN TO THE WELL KNOWN THING THAT HATH CALLED ITSELF THE TOWNSHIP OF HOWELL

WHEN ON THIRTY-ONE JANUARY TWO-THOUSAND NINETEEN WE DID INDEED DISCOVER THAT BRANCH OF THE COUNTY MONMOUTH PUBLIC LIBRARY SYSTEM, SITUATED IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT ABOVE RIGHT TO THE RATHER VEXING OCTAGON SO NAMED THE HOWELL COURT, WHICH DOES INDEED LACK A HARD COPY OF THE TEXT OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE FOR THE TOWNSHIP THAT IT SERVES. THIS FACT WAS CONVEYED BY A OR THE REFERENCE LIBRARIAN IN RECORDED AUDIO FOR WHICH A GENUINE TRANSCRIPT CAN BE FOUND AT THE LINK ABOVE AND RE-POSTED AGAIN BELOW,

AUTOMATED: HELLO, YOU HAVE REACHED THE MONMOUTH COUNTY LIBRARY HOWELL BRANCH. FOR DIRECTIONS PRESS ONE, TO RENEW MATERIALS, CHECK YOUR ACCOUNT, OR INQUIRE ABOUT BORROWING PRESS TWO, FOR INFORMATION ABOUT CHILDREN’S PROGRAMS OR FOR CHILDREN’S…

 

[BEEP]

 

UNNAMED ONE: MONMOUTH COUNTY LIBRARY, HOWELL BRANCH

 

ACM: HI, HOW ARE YOU DOING TODAY?

 

UNNAMED ONE: I’M FINE HOW ARE YOU?

 

ACM: I’M DOING WELL, THANK YOU. I’M CALLING TO SEE IF THE HOWELL LIBRARY HAS A COPY OF THE TOWNSHIP OF HOWELL MUNICIPAL CODE ON FILE

 

UNNAMED ONE: UM, I DON’T BELIEVE SO BUT LET ME SEND YOU OVER TO REFERENCE, HOLD ON

 

ACM: OK, THANK YOU VERY MUCH

 

UNNAMED TWO: YES

 

ACM: HELLO

 

UNNAMED TWO: OH, HELLO, THIS IS [UNNAMED TWO] AT THE REFERENCE DESK

 

ACM: HI [UNNAMED TWO], I’M CALLING TODAY TO SEE IF THE HOWELL LIBRARY HAS A COPY OF THE HOWELL TWP MUNICIPAL CODE ON FILE OR AVAILABLE FOR…OR AVAILABLE ON RESERVE FOR REFERENCE IN THE LIBRARY

 

UNNAMED TWO: I DON’T HAVE A PAPER COPY, ITS AVAILABLE ONLINE

 

ACM: OH, OK

 

UNNAMED TWO: THAT’S RIGHT

 

ACM: SO IF I JUST GO ON THE WEBSITE AND SEARCH FOR MUNICIPAL CODE I’LL COME ACROSS IT

 

UNNAMED TWO: YES, YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO, YEP

 

ACM: OK. AND THEY DON’T MAINTAIN A PHYSICAL COPY IN THE LIBRARY IN ANY CAPACITY?

 

UNNAMED TWO: I HAVEN’T HAD ONE HERE, I’VE BEEN HERE THREE YEARS, AND I DON’T RECALL EVER HAVING ONE HERE, UM, I DID INQUIRE OF THE TOWNSHIP AND ACTUALLY NEVER RECEIVED A RESPONSE SO I PROBABLY SHOULD…

 

ACM: OH, NOT SURPRISING

 

UNNAMED TWO: YEA BECAUSE SOMEONE ELSE HAD ASKED ABOUT IN, PROBABLY WITHIN THE LAST SIX MONTHS OR SO, UM, BUT YOU CAN SEE IT AS I SAID IN ELECTRONIC FORMAT

 

ACM: OK, VERY GOOD, THANK YOU VERY MUCH, APPRECIATE YOUR HELP

 

UNNAMED TWO: OK, YOU’RE WELCOME



IN LIEU OF THE PHYSICAL COPY OF THE BOOK

WE ARE FORCED TO ACCESS SOMETHING MOST CERTAINLY THIRD-PARTY SO NAMED E CODE THREE-HUNDRED SIXTY (DIRECT LINK WARNING) FROM THAT CAN BE FOUND THROUGH INTERNET SEARCH FOR THE HOWELL MUNICODE OR DIRECTLY FROM A LINK PUBLISHED ON A OR THE TOWNSHIP OF HOWELL WEBSITE. (HOWELL DIRECT LINKS ONE TWO THREE FOUR WARNING)

IT MAY BE FOUND IN ONE OF THE TWENTY OR SO LAW LIBRARIES TO BE FOUND IN THE SUPERIOR COURTHOUSE OF EACH COUNTY IN THE STATE, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF ZONE (REFER TO A OR THE BURST PIPE BELOW BROAD STREET), WHEREIN WE DOUBT THE TEXT IS TO BE FOUND ON RESERVE IN THE RATHER QUAINT LOWER LEVEL LAW LIBRARY AT SEVENTY-ONE MONUMENT STREET, INDEED OUR MONMOUTH VICINAGE RIGHT THERE LOCATED IN ONE THREE ONE FIVE AND/OR ONE THREE ONE SIX AND/OR SOMETHING ELSE ENTIRELY.

WHY DO WE NEED TO CONSULT THE AFORESAID REFERENCE WHATSOEVER?

FOLLOWING FROM THE CONDUCT OF THE HOWELL COURT VIS-A-VIS YOURS TRULY, MANY OTHERS, ALL OF WHOM HATH ENTERED INTO THIS HERE DILEMMA, ONGOING YES INDEED, WHEREIN WE WONDER HOW SUCH LEVELS OF EVIL (READ: CRIMINALITY IN THE EXTREME AND ON THE VERY REGULAR) CAN EVEN BE POSSIBLE OF A PODUNK LOCAL GOVERNMENT. AS SUCH, WE RETURN TO THE FRAUD COURT TRANSCRIPTS GENERATED BY THE GRIBBENS OUTFIT THAT APPARENTLY IS THE SOLE THIRD-PARTY CONTRACTOR EMPLOYED BY THE HOWELL COURT TO PRODUCE THE OH SO VERY ESSENTIAL LEGAL DOCUMENTS THAT BEAR A OR THE RECORD OF WHAT TRANSPIRES IN A COURT THAT CONDUCTS HEARINGS ON MATTERS OF LIFE AND DEATH, OR AT LEAST THEY DID IN THE PAST, AND WITHIN THOSE FRAUD TRANSCRIPTS WHICH THEY ROUTINELY ADMIT ARE GENERATED WITH SIGNIFICANT AND MATERIAL ERRORS MARKED DE FACTO OVERSIGHTS EXPECTED AND ENCOURAGED OF THE GRIBENNSES NEST BY [REDACTED], AND WHICH ARE ONGOING TO THE PRESENT BECAUSE THE FRAUD GRIBBENSES THAT TRANSCRIBE THE FRAUD TRANSCRIPTS COMMIT FELONY ACTS UPON ISSUANCE OF NEARLY EVERY DOCUMENT THAT IS SHUTTLED OUT THE DOOR, OUT THE DOOR AT SUCH TIME AND WITHIN SUCH CONTENT THAT THEY ARE TOLD TO REMOVE OR INPUT DESPITE WHAT IS ACTUALLY STATED ON A OR THE RECORD IN THE SHITBOX OCTAGON ON OR ABOUT THE SAME PLOT AS THE SHITBOX LIBRARY. THIS FRAUD WE DID INDEED CONFIRM IN PART ONE WHEREIN UPON BREACH OF PAGE SIX, PEACE AND CALLED IT A DAY HAVING AT THAT TIME ALREADY EXTRACTED THE ESSENTIAL EVIDENCE TO JUSTIFY THESE VERY STATEMENTS YOU ARE READING RIGHT NOW WHICH IS INDEED ALLEGING ORGANIZED CRIME IS AT WORK HERE, AND OF NOTE THESE STATEMENTS ARE PUBLISHED BY BAETYL, BAETYL & CO. IN LIEU OF BRINGING FORTH CIVIL ACTIONS AGAINST GRIBBENSES AND FELLOW NEST DWELLERS FOLLOWING FROM THEIR PURPORTED IMMUNITY TO ANY CONSEQUENCE OF MAGNITUDE INFLICTED BY PROSECUTION DUE TO A OR THE ANTI-INDEMNIFICATION CLAUSE THAT WE ARE BEING TOLD IS TO BE FOUND IN A OR THE CONTRACT BETWEEN GRIBBENSES AND THE TOWNSHIP OF HOWELL AND/OR THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY AND/OR COUNTY MONMOUTH AND/OR SOMETHING ELSE ENTIRELY. WE DID INDEED REQUEST THAT TOWNSHIP PROVIDE A COPY OF THAT VERY SAME CONTRACT PURSUANT TO OPRA IN THE RECENT PAST IN ADDITION TO THE CIVIC PLUS AMAZON WHISPER NET CONTRACT, FORMER IGNORED AND LATTER MOST OBSCENELY CLAIMED TO BE UNINTELLIGIBLE, ONE SENTENCE IN LENGTH, PROBABLY BY MANIFESTO-PRONE TOWNSHIP ATTORNEY JOSEPH CLARK GABLE, YES INDEED GONE WITH THE FUCKING WIND.

BREACH OF PEACE, PART ONE, STOP SIX

REVISIT THE FIRST SIX PAGES OF THE FRAUD TRANSCRIPT, OBTAIN THE CODE TWO-HUNDRED TWENTY DASH TWO, NOW WE REQUIRE THE MOST UP TO DATE TEXT OF THE TOWNSHIP OF HOWELL MUNICIPAL CODE THAT IS THE VERY SAME USED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL TO ASCERTAIN WHAT THE FUCK KEAN T KEAN IS REFERRING TO VIS-A-VIS THE NOW LEGENDARY BREACH OF JURISDICTION SO NAMED THE “BOROUGH ORDINANCE”, THAT OUR MONMOUTH VICINAGE RIGHT DOWN THE ROAD THERE IS HARD PRESSED TO WRITE DOWN IN SIMILITUDE TO THE MUNICODE EX-MACHINA SOON TO BE HEARD CASE WHEREIN ALL OF THESE THINGS ARE TO BE DISCUSSED AT SOME LENGTH. LIKE JUNE, RIGHT? PERHAPS NOT. WE HAVE A MOTION PREPARED THAT IS TO BE SOON PUBLISHED AND SUBMIT IN LIGHT OF THESE FACTS.

FIRST, THE DRAFT OF A MOTION IN THREE BELOW,

MOTION DRAFT PAGE ONE, NOTA BENE, MONCO STAFF WITH CLAIM THAT THREE MONTHS NOT ATYPICAL LENGTH OF TIME FOR AUDIO TRANSMISSION, TRANSCRIPT GENERATION AND SERVICE, PLAUSIBLY SO, ALBEIT WITHOUT ANY DATA TO VERIFY ANECDOTES, AND NO REFERENCE DATABASE TO OBTAIN RAW DATAS AND CONDUCT SOME INDEPENDENT ANALYSES. OR IS THERE? NO, THERE IS NOT. THE COURTS ARE VERY SECRETIVE, SO WE ARE TOLD AND SO WE SAY.  

MOTION DRAFT PAGE TWO

MOTION DRAFT PAGE THREE

SECOND, RETURNING TO THOSE SIX PAGES IN SIX BELOW,

PAGE ONE

PAGE TWO

PAGE THREE

PAGE FOUR

PAGE FIVE

PAGE SIX

WE HEREBY COMMENCE PART TWO OF THE GRIBBENS FRAUD TRANSCRIPT BREAK DOWN

COLLOQUY PAGE SEVEN

Colloquy Page 7, lines 2 through 7, the MATTERS before the Court had already been concluded in aforesaid “plea” and despite that fact THE COURT for whatever reasons continues to insist on affixing the name of one or both crooked nest attorneys to the record such that the APPELLANT not be construed to have any competence whatsoever in light of three PRO SE victories added to the ledger on the very same day the conduct of Howell Court as such became criminal in the extreme.

Colloquy Page 7, line 3, These MATTERS before the Howell Court have finally been disposed after malingering for 12 months and 21 days (YES INDEED, FINGERPRINT OF EX-JUDGE MCGANN), not one single day at trial, no one iota of testimony from the APPELLANT, and furthermore the disposition of a or the MATTER is indeed the primary subject of the entire transcript, what would an attorney then do for the proposed client at such time? This is a very, very important question and the Federal Government does indeed want to know, so we are told. Transmission of a certified letter does not require the assistance of an attorney. Yes indeed, KEAN T KEAN remarkably failed to respond to no less than 3 certified letters transmit by our APPELLANT pursuant to satisfying a or the “plea” that most remarkably still are not present in any record the Howell Court will keep or maintain, and the series of letters were then apparently ignored by THE COURT in subsequent mid March coercion. However the complete record of transmission and receipt of those letters is to be found in the BAETYL ARCHIVE. Also please do refer to the TOWNSHIP OF HOPEWELL, ZONE, that was called up to active duty on or about TENTH APRIL by the OFFICE OF THE MERCER COUNTY PROSECUTOR to run interference against our APPELLANT in the MATTERS that did result from the proceeding marked present by the GRIBBENSES, MATTERS still active and indeed very active as one might surmise in light of the volume of words hereupon approaching DELUGE character.

Colloquy Page 7, line 6, More than one full year of this same line of bullshit. No, no one here committed any crimes and there is no need for a nest attorney to infiltrate the successful and affirmative defense mounted by our APPELLANT. In fact, the reason THE COURT is so persistent in posing this question, appointing nest attorneys in secret and otherwise attempting to MAIM our APPELLANT via third-party actions, is because that is the order THE COURT hath been commanded to carry out by one or more individuals that are not on any record and are not anything but career criminals. YES INDEED, RODGERS AND CO., THE ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTOR OF THE COURTS IS CONSIDERING A NEW LIFE IN A FOREIGN COUNTRY IN LIGHT OF WHAT HATH BEEN POSTED HEREUPON ALREADY. WE ARE INDEED JUST WARMING UP.

Colloquy Page 7, lines 14,  Re-edit of actual statement, “most amenable going forward”, into “most amenable to go forward”, despite the sparingly few on record statements of our APPELLANT, the GRIBBENES transcription is so irrevocably faulted and the transcriptionist is remarkably incompetent such that the fraud entrances and re-edits can be overcome by the memory of otherwise unassociated parties present within the Howell Court during the proceeding.

Colloquy Page 7, line 16, Direct and remarkable contradiction of already exhibited fraud statement found on Colloquy Page 3, line 15, with false claim that a or the MATTER related to a “municipal disorderly persons offense” that does not exist pursuant one or more statutes in Chapter 1 of Title 2C that forbid municipalities from conducting criminal prosecutions under the guise of municipal code violations, and furthermore in that same chapter we do indeed find verbiage in the case history describing a “Borough Ordinance” that was indeed out from the MuniCode of the thing that hath called itself the Borough of Sayerville, cf. Club 35, LLC v. Borough of Sayerville, tautologically not a Township, but a Borough.

Colloquy Page 7, lines 18 through 20, UNFUCKINGBELIEAVABLE, fraud entrance of an ex post facto riposte to the six Civil Actions brought forth in Superior Court of New Jersey against six state employees, all for criminal acts contrary to N.J.S.A. 2C:13-5(a)(6), Criminal Coercion, inter alia, committed against the PLAINTIFF, indeed our very same APPELLANT, all marked FILED at such time after this specific proceeding in the OCTAGON had concluded and with 33% of those Civil Actions against named DEFENDANTS who are or were public employees of the Township of Howell.

STAY TUNED, DEVELOPMENTS IN PROGRESS

 

 

THE 34TH DAY T MINUS THREE ONE ONE TWO: BRICK IN BID TO WITHHOLD ALL KEY FACTS

FROM THE ASBURY PARK PRESS

“ARMED MAN” VS “ACTIVE SHOOTER”

“SHELTERED IN PLACE”

“REPORT OF AN ARMED PERSON” THAT APPARENTLY DID NOT THREATEN ANYONE OR EVEN EXIT HIS DOMICILE.

“PROTECTIVE CUSTODY” VS UNLAWFUL ARREST.

BRICK SCHOOLS ONE OF TWO UNNAMED EXCEPT FOR IN ABOVE PHOTO, BOTH APPARENTLY IN LOCKDOWN FOR NO REASON WHATSOEVER STATED.

NO THREATS, NO ARRESTS, NO COURT INVOLVED, BUT SOMEONE UNNAMED IS BEING HELD FOR REASONS THAT REMAIN UNSTATED. THIS IS NOT A JOKE, DID HE NOT HAVE PROPER PAPERS FOR A FIREARM? THAT COULD BE A CRIME, WHAT CALIBER WEAPON? WAS IT A MUSKET? THAT’S NOT THE POINT, RATHER TO PROMULGATE FALSEHOOD THAT ANY FIREARM POSSESSION WHATSOEVER IS A CRIME. VERY NORTH KOREAN OVERALL.

ARCHIVE LINK TO THE WHOLE STORY

“THE GUY IS NOT GETTING OUT OF THE HOUSE WITHOUT POLICE TAKING HIM OUT.”
WHY? WHOEVER WROTE THIS SHOULD BE FIRED, YES INDEED, GECAN AND KACHMAR BOTH, AND IF TRUE, THE COP IS THE ONLY PERSON THAT THREATENED ANYBODY.
SO THE ONLY THING A READER IS TOLD IS THAT TWO BRICK SCHOOLS REACTED TO SOMETHING, THUS THE STORY IS ABOUT TWO BRICK SCHOOLS AND NOTHING ELSE. WHAT IS SPECIAL ABOUT THESE TWO SCHOOLS?
RETURN TO THE NET AND THE NEST WHERE WE FOUND ONE OR MORE WEBSITES ASSOCIATED WITH THE MAYOR OF BORDERING HOWELL TOWNSHIP TO SHARE NAME A SERVER WITH THE BRICK TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS WEBSITE.

BERGER LINKED WEBSITE O H I N J DOT ORG

SO THE REAL QUESTION IS NOW POSED, WHO IS OR WAS THE PERSON THAT WAS “DETAINED” AND WHAT RETALIATORY MOTIVES DOES THE TOWNSHIP OF BRICK, THE ASBURY PARK PRESS AND/OR DIRECTLY LINKED PARTIES HAVE AGAINST HIM.
IN OTHERWISE RELATED GEOEGRPAHY, OBSERVED IN THE SAME NEWSPAPER,

ARCHIVE LINK TO BRICK BEACH PAVILION STORY

THE VERY WELL TAKEN POINT THAT REAL ESATE IS SO IMPLACABLY LINKED TO THIS PHENOMENA, WHEREIN THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY COSTS ARE ASTRONOMICAL AND ENTITIES VYING FOR CONTROL OF THAT MARKET ARE INDEED CRIMINAL OPERATIONS THROUGH AND THROUGH.
BACK TO BRICK SCHOOLS, LOCATION OF ONE OF TWO SEEN BELOW,

NOTICE BRICK TOWNSHIP HIGH SCHOOL AND BRICK TOWNSHIP MUNICIPAL COURT IMMEDIATELY WEST AND NORTH. WERE THEY ON LOCKDOWN? WE DON’T KNOW. IF THERE WAS AN ACTUAL THREAT AGAINST CHILDREN AT A SCHOOL, SIMPLE OVER-CAUTION WOULD RESULT IN THE OTHER MUCH LARGER SCHOOL IN WALKING DISTANCE ALSO WITH LOCK DOWN.
TAKEAWAY, THE STORY IS ENTIRELY ABOUT CHILDREN BEING THREATENED BY GUN OWNER WHO IS NEVER NAMED, WHO ACTUALLY MADE NO THREATS, WHO MAY OR MAY NOT HAVE ACTUALLY OWNED A GUN AND WHO IS A PLAUSIBLE DUPLICATE FOR ANYBODY WHO MAY OR MAY NOT EXIST.
WHEN WE ARE LEFT WITH PLAUSIBLE DUPLICATES, YOU MAY INFER ENEMY ACTION.
EPONYMOUS MAGISTRATUS

THE 34TH DAY T MINUS ZERO ONE TWO ONE TWO: EDGAR SEAMANS BEAT THE FUCK OUT

WHEN YOU GO AHEAD AND PROVE YOUR OPPONENT’S CASE IN ONE FELL SWOOP

WITH BONUS CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY, CRIMINAL COERCION AND MANY MORE THAN TWO INDIVIDUALS ENGAGED IN DELIBERATE ATTEMPTS TO INJURE, OPPRESS, THREATEN AND INTIMIDATE YOURS TRULY, RESIDING IN THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, FROM THE FREE EXERCISE AND ENJOYMENT OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH THAT IS SECURED BY THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES, FURTHERMORE DONE PURPOSEFULLY FOR THE VERY REASON THAT THE FREE SPEECH HEREUPON IS AN EXCEEDINGLY EFFECTIVE TOOL OF SELF-DEFENSE, BOTH LEGAL AND OTHERWISE, AND AS SUCH THE FUCKING SWINE OF MERCER, ECKERT SEAMANS, LAWRENCE, HOPEWELL, ET AL, DO DAILY SEEK TO RESTRICT THIS EXERCISE OF FREE SPEECH THAT IS INDEED THE BULWARK AGAINST OVERWHELMING PERJURY, INTER ALIA, AND THOSE WHO SEEK TO COERCE BAETYL OFF THE INTERNET ARE MOST CERTAINLY IN VIOLATION OF US CODE, TITLE EIGHTEEN, CHAPTER THIRTEEN, SECTION TWO FORTY-ONE.

BECAUSE PHYSICAL WOUNDS HEAL

AND THEY’RE ALSO LOSING EVERY SINGLE CASE AGAINST YOURS TRULY ET AL, AND AS SUCH THEY CHOSE TO MAKE TO THEIR LAST STAND THEIR MOST HUMILIATING IN UTTER DEFEAT, AS SEEN BELOW IN EIGHTEEN,

 

EDGAR SEAMANS BEAT THE FUCK OUT ONEEDGAR SEAMANS BEAT THE FUCK OUT TWOEDGAR SEAMANS BEAT THE FUCK OUT THREEEDGAR SEAMANS BEAT THE FUCK OUT FOUREDGAR SEAMANS BEAT THE FUCK OUT FIVEEDGAR SEAMANS BEAT THE FUCK OUT SIXEDGAR SEAMANS BEAT THE FUCK OUT SEVENEDGAR SEAMANS BEAT THE FUCK OUT EIGHTEDGAR SEAMANS BEAT THE FUCK OUT NINEEDGAR SEAMANS BEAT THE FUCK OUT TENEDGAR SEAMANS BEAT THE FUCK OUT ELEVENEDGAR SEAMANS BEAT THE FUCK OUT TWELVEEDGAR SEAMANS BEAT THE FUCK OUT THIRTEENEDGAR SEAMANS BEAT THE FUCK OUT FOURTEENEDGAR SEAMANS BEAT THE FUCK OUT FIFTEENEDGAR SEAMANS BEAT THE FUCK OUT SIXTEENEDGAR SEAMANS BEAT THE FUCK OUT SEVENTEENEDGAR SEAMANS BEAT THE FUCK OUT EIGHTEEN

YOU DID ALL THE WORK FOR ME YOU FUCKING MORONS, READ IT AGAIN, FORWARDS AND BACKWARDS, THEN ONE MORE TIME WITH ALL OF THE GENUINE RECORDS IN HAND AND FIND OUT HOW MANY COUNTS CAN PLAUSIBLY BE FILED, STATE AND FEDERAL, AGAINST LAWRENCE POLICE, LAWRENCE COURT, HOPEWELL WHOEVER THE FUCK, MERCER COUNTY PROSECUTOR AND GANG, AND YES YOU EDGAR SEAMANS. PLEASE, BEAT THE FUCK OUT.

SO WHAT HAPPENED?

NOD WINK, EDGAR SEAMANS DOWN FOR THE COUNT, ROSTER DOWN ONE OR MORE, ALSO PUBLIC MONEY IN VAST AMOUNT DOWN THE DRAIN, YES INDEED FROM THE TAXPAYERS OF ZONE. LET US ALL THANK LAWRENCE, TAKE A BOW YOU FUCKING SWINE.

NOTE THE DATE OF THE LETTER

ELEVENTH APRIL, ONE DAY AFTER UNDEAD CHARGE TRANSFER TO HOPEWELL AND LONG BEFORE HOPEWELL WOULD EVEN CONSIDER ATTEMPTING TO INFORM YOURS TRULY OF THAT FACT, AND TRUTH OF THE MATTER YT INITIATED CONTACT WITH HOPEWELL TOWNSHIP, THAT TOWN AND COURT NOW PLAUSIBLY IMPLICATED IN CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY WITH EDGAR SEAMANS, MERCER COUNTY PROSECUTOR AND LAWRENCE TOWNSHIP TO EFFECT FALSE IMPRISONMENT. HOWEVER, BEAT THE FUCK OUT. STAY TUNED.

REFER TO THE FEDERAL CRIMINAL CODE, CHAPTER THIRTEEN – CIVIL RIGHTS, SECTION TWO FORTY-ONE, CONSPIRACY AGAINST RIGHTS, FROM THE TWO-THOUSAND NINE TEXT, SEE BELOW,

THEY SHALL BE FINED UNDER THIS TITLE OR IMPRISONED NOT MORE THAN TEN YEARS, OR BOTH; AND IF DEATH RESULTS FROM THE ACTS COMMITTED IN VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION OR IF SUCH ACTS INCLUDE KIDNAPPING OR AN ATTEMPT TO KIDNAP, AGGRAVATED SEXUAL ABUSE OR AN ATTEMPT TO COMMIT AGGRAVATED SEXUAL ABUSE, OR AN ATTEMPT TO KILL, THEY SHALL BE FINED UNDER THIS TITLE OR IMPRISONED FOR ANY TERM OF YEARS OR FOR LIFE, OR BOTH, OR MAY BE SENTENCED TO DEATH.

PLEASE DO NOTE THE PROXIMITY OF KIDNAPPING, AGGRAVATED SEXUAL ABUSE, MURDER AND ATTEMPTED MURDER TO CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IN THE TEXT OF THE LAW, FOR A VERY GOOD REASON.

THE 34TH DAY T MINUS ZERO ONE TWO ONE: BREAK DOWN OF GRIBBEN’S HOWELL COURT TRANSCRIPT TRANSMIT VIA G MAILS IN UNSECURED PDF, PART ONE OF TWO

TRACEY GRIBEEN DECEMBER EIGTHTEEN COVER PAGE

COVER PAGE ENLARGE

TRACEY GRIBEEN DECEMBER EIGTHTEEN PAGE TWO

COLLOQUY PAGE TWO ENLARGE

NOTES

WHICH ARE? (2-6)

NO, YOU HAVEN’T, YOU STORMED OUT OF THE ROOM RED-FACED AND THEN YOU NEGOTIATED VIA THIRD-PARTY OFF THE RECORD. (2-10)

WHY NOT GUILTY? NO EVIDENCE OR TESTIMONY AT ANY POINT PROVIDED. (2-12)

WHICH IS? (2-14)


TRACEY GRIBEEN DECEMBER EIGTHTEEN PAGE THREE

COLLOQUY PAGE THREE ENLARGE

NOTES

THERE ARE NO TICKETS ASSOCIATED WITH THESE MATTERS, THERE ARE ONLY NJ/CDR1 AND/OR NJ/CDR2 CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS. (3-6)

DOWNGRADED, REVISED* AND WITHHELD. (3-10)

THIS IS TOWNSHIP, NOT A BOROUGH, WHAT IN THE HOLY HAVE A NICE DAY IS A BOROUGH ORDINANCE? (3-10)

220-C AS PER MONMOUTH VICINAGE. (3-11)

THE TELL. (3-14)

NO SUCH THING. (3-15) TO BE DISCUSSED IN MUCH GREATER DETAIL.

THE POINT OF THE CRIMINAL COERCION. (3-20)

READ: LAWSUIT PREVENTION VIS-A-VIS JULY 11, 2017, NOVEMBER 28, 2017, ET CETERA. (3-19)


TRACEY GRIBEEN DECEMBER EIGTHTEEN PAGE FOUR

COLLOQUY PAGE FOUR ENLARGE

NOTES

WHY MEDICAL AND NOT PSYCHIATRIC? (4-1)

AND WHAT “MEDICAL” TREATMENT COULD THAT PLAUSIBLY BE AND FOR WHAT REASON? (4-6, 4-7)

AS EVALUATED BY WHOM? NOT A PHYSICIAN MOST CERTAINLY. (4-9 THROUGH 4-11)

MR. KEAN SUBSEQUENTLY IGNORES ALL SUBSEQUENT MAILINGS AND REFUSES TO BE PRESENT AT NEXT SCHEDULED MUNICIPAL HEARING IN MARCH 2019. (4-12 THROUGH 4-17)

NON-SEQUITUR. (4-18 THROUGH 4-25)

PLAUSIBLE DUPLICATES DENIED. (4-24)


TRACEY GRIBEEN DECEMBER EIGTHTEEN PAGE FIVE

COLLOQUY PAGE FIVE ENLARGE

NOTES

TO EFFECT AS MUCH DISRUPTION TO VICTIM’S LIFE AS POSSIBLE. (5-13)

THIS TRANSCRIPT IS SHIT AND IS IN-FACT WRONG. (5-15, 5-16)

DEAR GRIBBEN, DO NOT CORRECT WHAT IS STATED ON THE RECORD. (5-21) “LSCW” WAS MOST CERTAINLY AND MOST DELIBERATELY STATED ON THE RECORD, WHICH WAS THEN MOST EDITORIALLY CORRECTED TO “LCSW” BY GRIBBEN TRANSCRIPTIONIST IN LIKELY UNLAWFUL ENTRY INTO A OR THE OFFICIAL RECORD, MOST UNBELIEVABLY AT THAT, IN ACT OF RE-ANALYSIS OF WHAT THE SPEAKER WAS PRESUMED TO HAVE MEANT IN A SPECIFIC UTTERANCE, AS OBSERVED IN LINE TWENTY-ONE ABOVE, WHEN IN IN-FACT THE CLAIMED ABBREVIATION WAS NEVER SPOKEN ALOUD. IS THIS TRANSCRIPT EVEN ADMISSIBLE? IT IS CERTAINLY NOT EXEMPLIFIED.

FOR A MEDICAL ASPECT OF A PLEA? NO, THIS IS SIMPLY INANE VERBIAGE AND IN ALL LIKELIHOOD WAS USED TO EFFECT MAXIMUM CONFUSION. (5-24)


TRACEY GRIBEEN DECEMBER EIGTHTEEN PAGE SIX

COLLOQUY PAGE SIX ENLARGE

NOTES

IN ALL LIKELIHOOD, THE RESULT OF THIS LINE OF QUESTIONING WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ELUCIDATED IF MR. KEAN WERE LEFT TO HIS OWN DEVICES. (6-1)

SO WHY DID MR. KEAN FAIL TO STATE THAT FACT WITH CLARITY FROM THE VERY START? THERE IS ONLY ONE PROFESSION THAT IS MEDICALLY LICENSED, AND THOSE WOULD BE PHYSICIANS, M.D.’S AND D.O.’S, WAS MR. KEAN MAKING THIS UP ON THE FLY? CERTAINLY APPEARS PLAUSIBLE. (6-4 THROUGH 6-9)

BIZARRE EPISTEMOLOGICAL STATEMENT WHEREIN THE COURT IS THE JUDGE AND THE JUDGE IS THE COURT IN CONTRAST TO THE LEGAL SETTLEMENT OF THE CORPORATION TO BE VIEWED BEFORE THE LAW AS AN INDIVIDUAL PERSON. WHO IS THE COURT EXACTLY? DO NOTE MR. KEAN OSTENSIBLY WORKS FOR THE VERY SAME COURT. OR DOES HE? PLAUSIBLE DUPLICATES YET AGAIN. (6-10, 6-14, 6-20, 6-25)

“LET US PROCEED TO GET THE HAVE A NICE DAY OUT OF HERE AS SOON AS POSSIBLE FOLLOWING HOWELL POLICE THREATS, LOPEZ VIA REGINA, TO ARREST THE VICTIM FOR MAKING NEVER-SPECIFIED AND NEVER-MADE THREATS AGAINST NEVER-SPECIFIED “COURT STAFF” IMMEDIATELY UPON ENTRY INTO THE BUILDING THAT WERE SUBSEQUENTLY NEVER ACTED UPON AND OF NOTE WHERE OUR VICTIM DID APPEAR TO COME AND GO FROM THE VERY SAME COMPLEX TWO DAYS PRIOR WITHOUT ANY ISSUE WHATSOEVER. (6-12)

COERCED. (6-13)

THE NAME “MS. BRENNAN” WAS NEVER UTTERED DURING THE PROCEEDING IN WHAT IS THE MOST LIKELY SPOT WHERE PERJURY AND/OR ONE OR MORE OTHER VIOLATIONS OF CHAPTER TWENTY-EIGHT OF THE CRIMINAL CODE OF NEW JERSEY MAY BEGIN PROSECUTION. DO NOTE, THE STORY OF “MS. BRENNAN” WAS DOCUMENTED LIVE, IN-FACT, HEREUPON BAETYL. THIS IS THE REASON WHY THE MERCER COUNTY PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE IS SO DESPERATE TO REMOVE THE BAETYL ARCHIVE FROM THE INTERNET, INTER ALIA, ALTHOUGH THAT CANNOT AND WILL NOT EVER HAPPEN. STRAIGHT CACHE. (6-15)

HOWELL COURT STAFF WHO DID FAIL TO INFORM OF ANY STANDBY COUNSEL APPOINTMENT UNTIL THE SECOND REQUEST BY YOURS TRULY IN REGULAR SWEEP TO DETECT ANY FURTHER PLOTS AGAINST DEFENSE, CRIMINAL COERCION IN THE EXTREME, AND FURTHERMORE WHEREBY FIRST KNOWN IN NOVEMBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN THAT “MS. BRENNAN” APPOINTMENT IN RETALIATION AND IN-SECRET ON TWENTY-SIXTH OCTOBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN, THE VERY SAME DAY THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY DULY FIRST INFORMED BOTH YOURS TRULY AND THE TOWNSHIP OF HOWELL THAT THE FIRST THREE GOVERNMENT RECORD COUNCIL DENIAL OF ACCESS COMPLAINTS HAD BEEN FILED AGAINST THAT TOWNSHIP, WITH SEVERAL MORE TO FOLLOW, AND INDEED ALL DIRECTLY RELATED TO ATTEMPTS BY YOURS TRULY TO UTILIZE THE OPEN PUBLIC RECORDS ACT (OPRA) TO OVERCOME THE S.O.P. OF CRIMINAL COERCION EXHIBITED BY THE HOWELL COURT AND THE TOWNSHIP OF HOWELL WHEREBY ANY AND ALL RECORDS IN THE FAVOR OF DEFENSE WERE AND ARE WITHHELD BY BOTH SUCH THAT MAXIMUM DAMAGES MAY BE EFFECTED UPON ANY AND ALL DEFENDANTS IN THE TREACHEROUS POSITION OF SUMMONED BEFORE, INCLUDING AND ESPECIALLY YOURS TRULY IN LIGHT OF WHAT IS DISCUSSED HEREUPON BAETYL. (6-16, 6-17)

M.K. CAOLA NAME WITHHELD. (6-20 THROUGH 6-23)

THIS WAS ALREADY ESTABLISHED IN MAY OF TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN AND DISCUSSED AT EXTREME LENGTH HEREUPON BAETYL. (6-24, 6-25)


TO BE CONTINUED IN PART TWO

NOVA CAESAREA.JPG

THE 34TH DAY T MINUS TWO ZERO ONE: HAMILTON TOWNSHIP MAYOR YAEDE IN BID TO BUY HERSELF ONE WAY TRIP TO FEDERAL PRISON

EXCERPT FROM THE OPRA CHRONICLES OF COUNTY MERCER

ENLARGE THE STORY

WHAT’S ACTUALLY HAPPENING HERE?

THE MAYOR OF HAMILTON TOWNSHIP, COUNTY MERCER, IN LEAGUE WITH HAMILTON BUSINESS ADMINISTRATOR DAVID KENNY ACCUSED THE CFO OF HAMILTON TOWNSHIP, JOHN BARRETT, OF STEALING TWO LAPTOPS THAT HE APPARENTLY USED IN OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER TO CONDUCT THE ROUTINE BUSINESS OF THE TOWNSHIP PRIOR TO FOURTH JANUARY TWO-THOUSAND NINETEEN.

IT REMAINS UNCLEAR WHEN AND WHY THE TWO LAPTOPS WERE DEEMED STOLEN PROPERTY, AND IT IS NOT YET CLEAR IF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF HAMILTON TOWNSHIP WAS EVER NOTIFIED THAT THOSE LAPTOPS WERE NO LONGER PERMITTED TO BE IN HIS POSSESSION. AS SUCH, THE CLAIM THAT JOHN BARRETT STOLE TWO LAPTOPS MAY INDEED BE AN OUTRIGHT FALSEHOOD USED TO TRIGGER HIS REMOVAL FROM THE TOWNSHIP.

IT IS REPORTED THAT THE TWO LAPTOPS IN BARRET’S POSSESSION WERE DEEMED IMPROPERLY DISPOSED ON OR ABOUT FOURTH JANUARY BY TOWNSHIP OFFICIAL DAVID KENNY WHO ALLEGEDLY REPORTED THAT ALLEGED THEFT IN-PERSON TO HAMILTON POLICE OFFICER AARON KULAK IN THE VICINITY OF HAMILTON PD HEADQUARTERS. DAVID KENNY QUITE POSSIBLY MADE THE REPORT TO KULAK IN THE PRESENCE OF HAMILTON MAYOR KELLY YAEDE AND/OR OTHER TOWNSHIP OFFICIALS. IT APPEARS THAT YAEDE REFUSES TO RELEASE KULAK’S BODY CAM FOOTAGE WITHOUT SUBSTANTIAL REDACTION AND FURTHERMORE THE TOWNSHIP UNDER YAEDE HAS DEMANDED AN OBSCENE AMOUNT OF MONEY FOR THE FOOTAGE THAT IN ALL LIKELIHOOD COULD BE TRANSFERRED TO A DVD IN SOME MINUTES AND PROMPTLY PROVIDED TO THE REQUESTORS, DAVID “GADFLY” HENDERSON AND SUBSEQUENTLY THE TRENTONIAN NEWSPAPER.

OF NOTE, DESPITE THE ALLEGATIONS OF OFFICIAL MISCONDUCT FROM COLLEAGUES, THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF HAMILTON REMAINS EMPLOYED BY THE TOWNSHIP AND AT PRESENT TIME ALSO REPORTEDLY IS THE PLAINTIFF IN A WHISTLE-BLOWER LAWSUIT NAMING MAYOR YAEDE AT LEAST, WITH THE POSSIBILITY OTHER AS YET UNKNOWN HAMILTON OFFICIALS TO BE NAMED  AS DEFENDANTS. THE SPECIFIC ALLEGATIONS MADE BY THE CFO IN THE LAWSUIT ARE NOT DESCRIBED, HOWEVER IT WAS REPORTEDLY FILED SUBSEQUENT TO THE FOURTH JANUARY THEFT ACCUSATIONS.

FROM THE PUBIC DISCLOSURES REPORTED IN THE TRENTONIAN, IT DOES APPEAR THAT YAEDE AND KENNY ATTEMPTED TO CONFISCATE ELECTRONIC DEVICES IN THE CUSTODY OF BARRET FOR THE PURPOSE OF OCCLUDING FINANCIAL CRIMES COMMITTED AGAINST THE TOWNSHIP OF HAMILTON BY NO LESS THAN MAYOR YAEDE AND BUSINESS DIRECTOR KENNY.

IF OFFICER AARON KULAK’S BODY CAMERA FOOTAGE REVEALS THE PRESENCE OF YAEDE AND/OR OTHER OFFICIALS AT POLICE HEADQUARTERS WITH DAVID KENNY ON FOURTH JANUARY, PROBABLE CAUSE FOR THE ISSUANCE OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST YAEDE AND OTHERS MAY BE FOUND, SPECIFICALLY FOR CRIMINAL VIOLATIONS OF ONE OR MORE FEDERAL STATUTES INCLUDING CONSPIRACY TO COVER-UP OFFICIAL MISCONDUCT AND THE FINANCIAL CRIMES SUBJECT OF THAT COVER-UP.

THE “GADFLY” SO NAMED IN THE TITLE OF THE SIX MARCH ARTICLE POSTED ABOVE HEREIN (WITH SOME ANNOTATION) AND THE TRENTONIAN ARTICLE DATED FIRST MARCH ARTICLE (LINK) DID REQUEST OFFICER KULAK’S BODY CAM FOOTAGE PURSUANT TO THE OPEN PUBLIC RECORDS ACT (OPRA), ALSO REFERRED TO AS THE “SUNSHINE LAW” BY THE TRENTONIAN AT VARIOUS TIMES, WHICH DOES REFER TO THE FOLLOWING PAMPHLET LAW,

P.L. 1963, c. 73 (C.47:1A-1 et seq.), as amended and supplemented

WHICH MAY BE UNDERSTOOD AS THE STATE VERSION OF THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA) WHICH PERMITS CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES TO REQUEST GOVERNMENT RECORDS FROM FEDERAL AGENCIES.

THE “GADFLY” IS PERMITTED TO REQUESTS BODY CAM FOOTAGE FOR THE SIMPLE REASON THAT HE IS RESIDENT OF THE TOWNSHIP AND IT IS IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST FOR CITIZENS TO BE PERMITTED ACCESS OF PUBLIC RECORDS THAT MAY WARRANT INVESTIGATION INTO PUBLIC OFFICIALS WHO KNOWINGLY AND PURPOSELY DISPOSE TAXPAYER DOLLARS INTO THEIR OWN PERSONAL BANK ACCOUNTS THROUGH CHANNELS OUTSIDE ALREADY ESTABLISHED SALARIES, INTER ALIA, WITH PUBLIC DISCLOSURE OF THE RECORD OF AN ATTEMPT MADE BY A TOWNSHIP OFFICIAL TO IMPUGN THE REPUTATION AND IN ALL LIKELIHOOD OUST THE TOWNSHIP’S CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER IMPLICITLY JUSTIFIED UNDER THE COMMON LAW FOR ALL THOSE RESIDENTS WHO ARE SUBJECT TO THE PROPERTY TAX THAT FILLS THE COFFERS OF THE TOWNSHIP.

IN THIS CASE, DAVID “GADFLY” HENDERSON FILED SUIT IN SUPERIOR COURT UNDER THE OPEN PUBLIC RECORDS ACT IN ATTEMPT TO OBTAIN OFFICER KULAK’S BODY CAM FOOTAGE.

REMARKABLY, THE CFO OF HAMILTON AND DAVID “GADFLY” HENDERSON ARE BOTH REPRESENTED BY THE SAME ATTORNEY, COLIN BELL, WHICH DOES MORE THAN IMPLY THAT COORDINATED ACTION AGAINST THE TOWNSHIP OF HAMILTON IS ONGOING.

RETALIATION, MOST FAMILIAR

THE TRENTONIAN ARTICLE PUBLISHED ON FIRST MARCH WAS REPORTED IN THE SIX MARCH ARTICLE TO CORRESPOND WITH BEHAVIORS CONSISTENT WITH CRIMINAL COERCION COMMITTED IN RETALIATION AGAINST DAVID HENDERSON BY PROXY. THE TRENTONIAN REPORTS THAT HAMILTON ZONING OFFICER MICHAEL COSMA DID TRAVEL TO THE HOME OF DAVID HENDERSON ON FIRST MARCH TO ALLEGE THAT HE WAS IN VIOLATION OF ONE OR MORE MUNICIPAL ORDINANCES, HOWEVER COSMA DID NOT ISSUE A TICKET AGAINST HENDERSON AND IT IS FURTHER REPORTED THAT HENDERSON AND COSMA LATER SPOKE BY PHONE (NOTA BENE, RECORD ALL PHONE CALLS WITH MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES) WHEREIN THE EXCHANGE EXPLICITLY ATTRIBUTES COSMA’S ACTIONS TO HIS HAMILTON TOWNSHIP BOSSES.

REFRESHER ON CRIMINAL COERCION

AN ACTOR COMMITS CRIMINAL COERCION IF HE OR SHE PURPOSEFULLY AND UNLAWFULLY RESTRICTS A PERSON’S ABILITY TO ENGAGE OR REFRAIN FROM ENGAGING IN CONDUCT THROUGH THREATS:

N.J.S.A. 2C:13-5 A(2), CONSISTING OF FALSE ACCUSATIONS THAT A PERSON COMMITTED A CRIMINAL AND/OR OTHER OFFENSE.

 

N.J.S.A. 2C:13-5 A(4), CONSISTING OF AN ACTION TAKEN OR WITHHELD BY AN OFFICIAL, OR CONSISTING OF AN ACTION THAT WOULD CAUSE AN OFFICIAL TO TAKE OR WITHHOLD ACTION.

 

N.J.S.A. 2C:13-5 A(6), CONSISTING OF PROVIDING TESTIMONY OR INFORMATION, OR WITHHOLDING TESTIMONY OR INFORMATION WITH REGARD TO A PERSON’S LEGAL CLAIM OR DEFENSE.

 

N.J.S.A. 2C:13-5 A(7), CONSISTING OF ANY OTHER ACT THAT IS INTENDED TO HARM A TARGETED PERSON WITH REGARD TO HIS OR HER HEALTH, SAFETY, BUSINESS, CALLING, CAREER, FINANCIAL CONDITION, REPUTATION OR PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS.

TEXT OF THE LAW
CRIMINAL COERCION
[ENLARGE]
CRIMINAL COERCION IN HAMILTON

HAMILTON TOWNSHIP MAYOR KELLY YAEDE DID COMMIT A SINGLE ACT OF CRIMINAL COERCION WHEN SHE PURPOSEFULLY ATTEMPTED TO RESTRICT THE ABILITY OF DAVID HENDERSON TO ENGAGE IN CONDUCT PURSUANT TO THE SUCCESSFUL ACQUISITION OF GOVERNMENT RECORDS IN HIS CAPACITY AS PLAINTIFF IN A PENDING CIVIL ACTION THAT IDENTIFIES YAEDE AS THE DEFENDANT. FURTHERMORE, YAEDE COMMITTED THE ACT IN OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS MAYOR OF THE TOWNSHIP OF HAMILTON WHEREBY THREATS WERE CONVEYED TO HENDERSON THROUGH A THIRD-PARTY WHO DID FALSELY ACCUSE HENDERSON OF NO LESS THAN ONE OFFENSE IN VIOLATION OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE, HOWEVER ZONING OFFICER MICHAEL COSMA DID NOT ISSUE A TICKET AGAINST HENDERSON ON FIRST MARCH FOR ANY OFFENSE. THE SINGLE ACT CONTRARY TO N.J.S.A. 2C:13-5 A(2) IS A CRIME OF THE FOURTH DEGREE.

LITTLE KELLY SAYS YOU’RE GONNA PAY

(ACTUAL PHOTO OF THE MAYOR OF HAMILTON)


FOLLOWING FROM 

FIRST MARCH TWO-THOUSAND NINETEEN, BOTOX ADDLED MAYOR IN BID TO BLOCK BODY CAM FOOTAGE RELEASE FOLLOWING FAILED ATTEMPT TO EXTORT REQUESTOR

WHAT THE HELL HOWELL, JUST SEND A LETTER, NOW YOU GO TO JAIL, THANKS THOUGH FOR THE LAYUP

WORST BEHAVED ONE THREE ONE NINE

DIANE ALVATOR OF OUR THING THAT HATH CALLED ITSELF THE BOROUGH OF HIGHLANDS DEMONSTRATES HOW TO RESPOND TO AN OPRA REQUEST BY RESPONDING AT ALL, YOUR WORDS VERY PRETTY, VERY NICE, I’LL READ THEM ALL, WHILE HOWELL DOES NOTHING IN RESPONSE TO OPRA REQUESTS OF THE HIGHEST SIGNIFICANCE WHILE HAVING FIVE ACTIVE DENIAL OF ACCESS COMPLAINTS AGAINST THEM. FIVE HOWELL, YOU MORONS. GET TO JAIL, ALL OF YOU. THE REST OF YOU DEAR READERS MAY NOW PROCEED TO OOGA BOOGA AND SECRET CODES BELOW.


THE OPRA HARVEST CONTINUES APACE