THE 34TH DAY T MINUS THREE ZERO THIRTEEN: A VERY CURIOUS COINCIDENCE

DO YOU SEE WHAT EYE SITS BY THE SEA?
SECOND JANUARY THE DAY OF THREE THIRTEEN ONE
[ENLARGE]
SECOND JANUARY TWO-THOUSAND NINETEEN
AND ON THE VERY SAME DAY
THREE-THIRTEEN IS OUT
THE PRINCETON MUNICIPALITY
DID YOU CATCH IT?
FOLLOWING FROM

THIRD FEBRUARY TWO-THOUSAND NINETEEN, THE 34TH DAY T MINUS THREE ZERO FIVE: ONOFRI HAS SOME EXPLAINING TO DO, AND THE UNCERTAIN CONCLUSION OF THE CASE NAMED HEREUPON BAETYL PICKETTERS’ CHARGE.

TWENTY-FIRST DECEMBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN, THREE ZERO THREE

EIGHTEENTH NOVEMBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN, THE 34TH DAY T PLUS THREE THIRTY-FOUR: THE OPRA HARVEST

SEVENTEENTH NOVEMBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN, “REPORTING THAT THE ACCUSED TOOK A PHOTO OF SOMEONE ELSE’S PHONE WITH SECURITY CODES AND PUBLISHED IT ONLINE. CALLER WAS ADVISED OF HIS RIGHTS TO SIGN COMPLAINTS”

SEVENTEENTH NOVEMBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN, THE 34TH DAY T PLUS THREE THIRTY-THREE: THE MANIFESTO OF JOSEPH CLARK, THE ATTORNEY FOR THE TOWNSHIP OF HOWELL

SIXTEENTH NOVEMBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN, THE 34TH DAY T PLUS THREE TWO: TAMPERING WITH EVIDENCE, REFER TO THE THIRTY-FOURTH PAGE ENUMERATED THIRTY-SIX IN THE FIFTY-TWO PAGE DISCOVERY PACKET FOR PICKETTERS’ CHARGE THAT WAS EXHIBITED ON SIXTEENTH NOVEMBER SANS COMMENTARY ALBEIT WITH NECESSARY REDACTIONS. THAT PRESENCE OF THAT PAGE AND THE NAME THEREUPON, CARA MCCOLLUM, HATH BEEN REMARKED UPON IN THE ORIGINAL SEQUENCE OF THE 34TH DAY. HOWEVER, THAT DOCUMENT IN THAT SPACE REMAINS A MYSTERY FOR WHICH NEITHER THE MERCER COUNTY PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE, NOR THE TOWNSHIP OF LAWRENCE HATH PROFFERED AN EXPLANATION. THAT PAGE APART OF TWO THREE NINE.

FOURTEENTH NOVEMBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN, THE 34TH DAY T PLUS THREE THIRTY: ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC AND THE MISSING EMAIL

THIRTEENTH NOVEMBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN, TWO FOUR THREE AND TWO FOUR FOUR

FIRST NOVEMBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN, THE 34TH DAY T PLUS THREE SEVENTEEN: THREE MORE DOCUMENTS FROM BEHIND THE CURTAIN AND A STRANGE ARTICLE OBSERVED IN THE ASBURY PARK PRESS, WHEN THE LINE HATH BEEN REVERSED ON THE PLOT OF NINE TWENTY-THREE, NOT FOR THE VERY FIRST TIME, THOUGH THIS TIME RATHER ELEGANT IN TANDEM WITH TWO MORE IN THE TRIO, ONE ABOVE AND ONE BELOW, TWO THREE FOUR AND TWO FOUR THREE, THANK YOU MUCH, THE ARTICLE FROM THE ASBURY PARK PRESS EXHIBITED ON THE FIRST OF NOVEMBER DATED THE SAME, THE SAME DATE A TRIO AGAINST LAWRENCE ISSUED DATE THE SAME, THAT ARTICLE REGARDING THE CONDUCT OF THE HOWELL TOWNSHIP MUNICIPALITY ON THE SAME TOPIC OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAW OF LAND IN THE MATTER OF THE OPEN PUBLIC RECORDS ACT, DAMAGE CONTROL AFTER THE FIRST SALVO UNLEASHED AGAINST THAT TOWN SOME DAYS BEFORE, NUMBERED ONE, TWO AND THREE FOLLOWING FROM TWO-HUNDRED THIRTY-FOUR.

TWENTY-SIXTH OCTOBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN, TWO THREE FOUR, TWO THREE FIVE, AND TWO THREE SIX, WHERE FOLLOWING FROM THE HOWELL TOWNSHIP MUNICIPALITY MOST CERTAINLY DID RETALIATE AGAINST THE REQUESTOR NAMED THRICE BELOW.

TWENTY-THIRD OCTOBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN, THE 34TH DAY T PLUS THREE EIGHT: THE MOBIUS DEFINED, COUNTY MONMOUTH THROUGH ZONE, COUNTY MERCER

WHAT DID WE LEARN?

RETALIATION IS ALREADY ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE MATHS OF OBTAINING PUBLIC RECORDS FROM THE MUNICIPAL RACKET, YES INDEED, FACTORED INTO WHAT OTHERWISE SHOULD BE ROUTINE AND LAWFUL CONDUCT OF ENTITIES IN THIS STATE WHEREIN RETALIATION AS SUCH HATH BEEN SO NAMED HEREUPON BAETYL MANY TIMES, EYE FOR AN EYE, FOR EVERY SINGLE THING IN FAVOR OF THE TARGET, ONE POINT, AYE, THE ADVERSARY DEMANDS AN EYE IN REVENGE, AYE AYE.

IN ONE OR MORE CASES, THAT EYE IS LEFT OF FIELD TO THE FIELD OF PLAY, BROUGHT TO FIELD IN PRINT THE VERY SAME DAY, ABOUT THE RACKET, MAYBE AFTER A CALL TO THE PRESS, CALL IN A FAVOR, PLEASE TO THE PUBLIC, PUT THE TRUTH UNDER DURESS.

IN ONE OR MORE CASES STILL, RETALIATION DID INDEED OCCUR IN THE CASES ALREADY THEN BEFORE A COURT, THE HOWELL TOWNSHIP BUT OF COURSE, WHEREIN THE VERY ACT OF LITERACY RISKS LIFE AND LIMB, WHERE ONE NEED REQUEST AT REGULAR INTERVALS IF THE COURT HATH APPOINTED COUNSEL IN SECRET, AND WHEREUPON BECOMING INFORMED OF THE VERY FACT THAT COUNSEL HATH BEEN APPOINTED SURREPTITIOUSLY, THE NEXT EYE IS SOUGHT AFTER THE LAST EYE HATH BEEN FOUND, THE CASE OF TWENTY-SIXTH OCTOBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN, WHEREUPON THE VERY SAME DAY THE FIRST THREE BECAME KNOWN, TWO THREE FOUR, FIVE AND SIX, THE COURT APPOINTED ONE ITS OWN EMPLOYEES AS DEFENSE COUNSEL, HID THAT FACT FOR GREATER THAN TWO WEEKS, THEN LIED ABOUT THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THAT INVOLUNTARY APPOINTMENT WHICH WAS ONLY DISCOVERED FOLLOWING FROM PERSISTENT INQUIRIES AS TO WHETHER COUNSEL HAD APPOINTED APPOINTED IN SECRET, AS THAT COURT DID THE VERY SAME THING IN THE PAST. OF NOTE, BOTH FEMALE APPOINTEES DID FAIL TO INFORM THEIR CLIENT THEY HAD BEEN APPOINTED, AND THE ALL FEMALE STAFF OF THE COURT DID ALSO FAIL TO PROVIDE ANY NOTICE WHATSOEVER. VERY GROTESQUE ACTS COMPOUNDED BY LIES ABOUT THOSE SAME ACTS.

AT WHICH TIME WE RETURN TO SEVENTH DECEMBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN

FIRST, A FACTUAL DESCRIPTION OF EVENTS, HERETOFORE PUBLISHED ON THIRTY-FIRST JANUARY OF THIS YEAR, AND AGAIN REPRODUCED BELOW TO PROVIDE FULL CONTEXT FOR WHAT FOLLOWS FROM.

Pursuant to P.L.1963, c.73 (C.47:1A-1 et seq.), records kept or maintained by the Township of Howell, the Howell Township Municipal Court, the Howell Township Police Department and/or any other department in the jurisdiction of the Township of Howell, are requested and again marked required on this date of Request, January 30, 2019, to be in possession of both named parties in MUNICIPAL APPEAL NO: 18-040 that has been FILED and is now pending in SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, LAW DIVISION – CRIMINAL PART, MONMOUTH VICINAGE, and despite receiving no less than one form of notice marked FILED in the present year, no formal acknowledgment of that matter has been forthcoming from the Township of Howell, with that notice consisting of a one page document stamped “DAVID F. BAUMAN, P.J.Cr.”, whereupon the date of “JAN 10 2019”, the Howell Township Municipal Court was ORDERED to pay all fees and costs associated with preparation of the court transcript from the Municipal Hearing that did take place on just the one Hearing date of December 7, 2018, despite a multitude of other Hearings that did take place and are all directly related. Of note, the Violation enumerated “220-C” and/or “220-2” that did result in MA 18-040 was coerced on December 7, 2018, on which date a plea was agreed upon in light of a false presumption provided to this requestor while seated in the Howell Township Municipal Court with no less than one Howell Township Police Officer standing nearby following from alleged threats that on this date of Request have are not described in language beyond the general description of “threats”otherwise absent any official record(s) known to this requestor. The aforementioned proximity was maintained by HTPD on what had been scheduled as the first day of a trial, during which time each and every moment this requestor was present within either the Howell Township Municipal Court or in the antechamber that presence was maintained by the female Howell Township Police Department Officer whose badge number was identified #676 upon request and subsequently identified in a handwritten OPRA Request dated December 7, 2018 that was transmit on or about 12:10 PM EST to “Dianne”, who in all likelihood is or was employed by the Howell Township Police Department Records Bureau on that date. Furthermore, that Request has not yet been fulfilled or acknowledged as of the present time, and the text of that OPRA Request dated “12/07/18” was photographed on or about 12:08 PM EST and is reproduced in full, including errors, as follows hereafter: “All written documents in possession of Howell Police and/or the Township of Howell describing thereupon all alleged threats this requestor made, allegedly, against Howell Court staff, the judge(s) of Howell Court, and/or other Township of Howell employees, specifically following from the allegation made by PTL S. Regin (sic), #676 that SGT. J. Lopez as her supervisor ordered one to one monitoring of this requestor following from unspecified, allegedly and explicitly false claims that threats were made one or more (sic) employees of the Township of Howell.” The OPRA Request was handwritten on one of the handful of blank four page “OPEN PUBLIC RECORDS ACT REQUEST FORM” packets observed stacked on the counter of the public facing side of the Howell Township Police Department Records Bureau window that is also located in the antechamber to the Howell Township Municipal Court. Furthermore, that packet was obtained and completed in both physical and visual proximity to the male HTPD Class II Officer #324, whose surname remains unknown, and the female HTPD Officer PTL S. REGINA #676, as prior stated. Both HTPD Officers were so kind as to state their badge numbers aloud following from requests for identification made in the moments prior to handing the completed Request form to “Dianne”, despite only identifying #676 thereupon. The specific record(s) requested herein are the very same requested on December 7, 2018 and in at least one OPRA Request dated prior, both of which remain unfulfilled, wherein the prior dated and nearly identical Request regarding alleged threats is highlighted in GRC Complaint 2018-303 entitled Miller v. Twp. of Howell (Monmouth), for which the original Denial of Access Complaint submit by this requestor was stamped “RECEIVED” by the New Jersey Government Records Council on “2018 DEC 3 PM 1 26” at such time four GRC Complaints entitled Miller v. Twp. of Howell (Monmouth) had already been filed. Furthermore, the specific government record(s) that would bear the requested, required and otherwise absent information are not known to be anything other than police reports. As such, any and all Howell Township Police Department reports are requested herein, if not otherwise exempt, thereupon describing any and all threats allegedly made by this requestor against anyone who claims to have been threatened by that very same person in the period between the present date of January 30, 2019 and the nominal date of September 23, 1986.

SECOND, DOES THE CONDUCT OF LOPEZ PRIMA FACIE CONSTITUTE PROBABLE CAUSE FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST THAT REQUESTOR FOR MAKING TERRORISTIC THREATS? CONVERSELY, IF NO THREATS WERE ACTUALLY MADE BY THE ACCUSED, AS IS THE FACTUAL REALITY, DOES THE CONDUCT OF LOPEZ, WITH PERHAPS OTHER ACTORS, CONSTITUTE ONE OR MORE VIOLATIONS OF,

 N.J.S.A. 2C:13-5. Criminal coercion

SPECIFICALLY IN REGARD TO 2C:13-5 A(2), 2C:13-5 A(4), 2C:13-5 A(6), AND/OR 2C:13-5 A(7), DESCRIPTIONS OF WHICH CAN BE FOUND IN THE TEXT OF THE NEW JERSEY CRIMINAL CODE EXHIBITED BELOW FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION.

CRIMINAL COERCION
[ENLARGE]
AN ACTOR COMMITS CRIMINAL COERCION IF HE OR SHE PURPOSEFULLY AND UNLAWFULLY RESTRICTS A PERSON’S ABILITY TO ENGAGE OR REFRAIN FROM ENGAGING IN CONDUCT THROUGH THREATS:

N.J.S.A. 2C:13-5 A(2), CONSISTING OF FALSE ACCUSATIONS THAT A PERSON COMMITTED A CRIMINAL AND/OR OTHER OFFENSE.

 

N.J.S.A. 2C:13-5 A(4), CONSISTING OF AN ACTION TAKEN OR WITHHELD BY AN OFFICIAL, OR CONSISTING OF AN ACTION THAT WOULD CAUSE AN OFFICIAL TO TAKE OR WITHHOLD ACTION.

 

N.J.S.A. 2C:13-5 A(6), CONSISTING OF PROVIDING TESTIMONY OR INFORMATION, OR WITHHOLDING TESTIMONY OR INFORMATION WITH REGARD TO A PERSON’S LEGAL CLAIM OR DEFENSE.

 

N.J.S.A. 2C:13-5 A(7), CONSISTING OF ANY OTHER ACT THAT IS INTENDED TO HARM A TARGETED PERSON WITH REGARD TO HIS OR HER HEALTH, SAFETY, BUSINESS, CALLING, CAREER, FINANCIAL CONDITION, REPUTATION OR PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS.

THIRDWITH REGARD TO THE ABOVE DESCRIBED ALBEIT NON-SPECIFIC ALLEGATIONS THAT THREATS WERE MADE, WE FIRST CONSIDER POTENTIAL VIOLATIONS OF,

N.J.S.A. 2C:12-3. Terroristic threats

WITH ABBREVIATED TEXT OF THAT STATUTE EXHIBITED BELOW AS EXCERPTED FROM THE PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE DATABASE MAINTAINED THE NEW JERSEY STATE LEGISLATURE.

TERRORISTIC THREATS
[EXPAND]
AN ACTOR IS GUILTY OF MAKING TERRORISTIC THREATS IF HE OR SHE,

N.J.S.A. 2C:12-3 (A), THREATENS TO COMMIT ANY CRIME OF VIOLENCE WITH INTENT TO TERRORIZE THE TARGETED PERSON, OR MAKES A THREAT THAT RESULTS IN THE EVACUATION OF A BUILDING, PUBLIC SPACE AND/OR OTHER DEFINED LOCATIONS, AND THE SEVERITY OF THE VIOLATION IS GREATER IF THE ACT IS COMMITTED DURING A TIME OF DECLARED EMERGENCY. FURTHERMORE, THE ACTOR SHALL BE STRICTLY LIABLE UPON PROOF THAT THE CRIME OCCURRED.

 

N.J.S.A. 2C:12-3 (B), THREATENS TO KILL ANOTHER PERSON WITH INTENT TO PUT THE TARGETED INDIVIDUAL IN IMMEDIATE FEAR OF DEATH.

FOURTH, AGAIN CONSIDERING THE UNSPECIFIED NATURE OF THE ALLEGED THREATS, THE DESCRIPTIONS OF CRIMINAL HARASSMENT AND CYBER-HARASSMENT FOUND IN CHAPTER THIRTY-THREE ARE IN ALL LIKELIHOOD WHAT WOULD BE CONSIDERED NEXT FOR ALLEGED COMMUNICATIONS NOT EXPLICITLY THREATENING THE LIFE OF AN INDIVIDUAL. EXCERPTS BELOW FROM THE TEXT DESCRIBING VIOLATIONS OF,

N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4. Harassment

AND

N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4.1. Cyber-harassment

AN ACTOR COMMITS A PETTY DISORDERLY PERSONS OFFENSE OF HARASSMENT IF HE OR SHE PURPOSEFULLY HARASSES ANOTHER PERSON:

N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4 (A), BY MAKING OR EFFECTING COMMUNICATION(S) KNOWN TO HAVE BEEN INITIATED BY THE ACTOR AT VERY INCONVENIENT HOURS, USING OFFENSIVE LANGUAGE, OR IN SUCH A MANNER LIKELY TO CAUSE ANNOYANCE OR ALARM.

 

N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4 (B), BY EITHER STRIKING, KICKING, SHOVING, OR OFFENSIVELY TOUCHING THE VICTIM, OR THREATENING TO DO SO.

 

N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4 (C), BY ENGAGING IN ANY OTHER COURSE OF ALARMING CONDUCT OR BY REPEATEDLY COMMITTING ACTS INTENDED TO ALARM OR SERIOUSLY ANNOY THE VICTIM.

 

N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4 (E), WHEREBY THE OTHERWISE NON-FELONY CRIMINAL ACTS DESCRIBED IN THE PRECEDING THREE SUBSECTIONS ARE GRADED AS A CRIME OF THE FOURTH DEGREE IN THE EVENT THE ACTOR ENGAGES IN SUCH CONDUCT WHILE SERVING A TERM OF IMPRISONMENT, WHILE ON PAROLE, OR WHILE ON PROBATION FOLLOWING FROM CONVICTION OF AN INDICTABLE OFFENSE UNDER THE LAWS OF NEW JERSEY, ANY OTHER STATE OR THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.

AN ACTOR COMMITS THE FOURTH DEGREE CRIME OF CYBER-HARASSMENT IF HE OR SHE MAKES A COMMUNICATION IN AN ONLINE CAPACITY USING ANY ELECTRONIC DEVICE OR THROUGH A SOCIAL NETWORKING SITE WITH THE PURPOSE TO HARASS THE TARGETED VICTIM THAT DOES:

N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4.1 (A)(1), THREATEN TO INFLICT INJURY OR PHYSICAL HARM TO THE TARGETED VICTIM OR HIS OR HER PROPERTY.

 

N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4.1 (A)(2), KNOWINGLY SEND, POSTS, COMMENTS, REQUESTS, SUGGESTS, OR PROPOSES ANY LEWD, INDECENT OR OBSCENE MATERIAL TO OR ABOUT A PERSON WITH THE INTENT TO EMOTIONALLY HARM A REASONABLE PERSON OR PLACE A REASONABLE PERSON IN FEAR OF PHYSICAL OR EMOTIONAL HARM.

 

N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4.1 (A)(3), THREATEN TO COMMIT ANY CRIME AGAINST THE TARGETED VICTIM OR HIS OR HER PROPERTY.

 

N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4.1 (B), OF NOTE, WHEN COMMUNICATIONS ARE MADE CONTRARY TO THE PRECEDING THREE SUBSECTIONS AT SUCH TIME THE ACTOR IS OVER THE AGE OF TWENTY-ONE AND THE TARGETED VICTIM IS A MINOR, THE ACT BECOMES A VIOLATION OF THE THIRD-DEGREE.

WHEN THE ACTOR IS MINOR UNDER THE AGE OF SIXTEEN, THE COURT MAY ORDER AS A CONDITION OF SENTENCE:

N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4.1 (C)(1), A CLASS OR TRAINING PROGRAM INTENDED TO REDUCE THE MINOR’S PROCLIVITY TO COMMIT ACTS IN VIOLATION OF THE STATUTE.

 

N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4.1 (C)(2), A CLASS OR TRAINING PROGRAM INTENDED TO INSTRUCT THE MINOR TO THE DANGERS ASSOCIATED WITH CYBER-HARASSMENT.

WHEN A PARENT OR GUARDIAN FAILS TO COMPLY THE CONDITIONS OF SENTENCE SET FORTH IN (C)(1) AND C(2) ABOVE, THAT PARENT OR GUARDIAN IS ADJUDICATED:

N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4.1 (D), A DISORDERLY PERSON WHO SHALL BE FINED NO MORE THAN TWENTY-FIVE DOLLARS FOR A FIRST OFFENSE AND NO MORE THAN ONE-HUNDRED DOLLARS FOR EACH SUBSEQUENT OFFENSE.

FIFTH, THE CASE OF PICKETTERS’ CHARGE DID INCLUDE FOR A PERIOD OF SIXTY-SEVEN DAYS THE PERCEIVED THREAT OF IMMINENT ARREST OR SERVICE OF PROCESS OF ONE OR MORE BRAND NEW CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS FOR ONE OR MORE ALLEGED CRIMINAL ACTS DESCRIBED AS “CYBER-HARASSMENT” BY A FEMALE INDIVIDUAL WHO DURING THAT SIXTY-SEVEN DAY PERIOD WAS ALLEGEDLY THE DEFENSE ATTORNEY OF THE ONE DEFENDANT IN PICKETTERS’ CHARGE, AND SHE WHO DESPITE NO LESS THAN THREE NOTIFICATIONS THAT HER SERVICES WERE NOT DESIRED DID IGNORE THOSE REQUESTS FOR SUBSTITUTION AS DID ANOTHER FEMALE EMPLOYEE OF THE MERCER COUNTY TRIAL REGION OPD WHO DID CLAIM TO BE HER SUPERIOR. FURTHERMORE, THE ATTORNEY DID MAKE A COMMUNICATION ON OR ABOUT TWENTY-NINTH NOVEMBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN BY PHONE CALL PLACED TO HER CLIENT, DURING WHICH TIME SHE DID STATE MULTIPLE TIMES THAT “THE MERCER COUNTY PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE IS LOOKING TO CHARGE YOU”, FOR COMMUNICATIONS DESCRIBING A VICTIM THAT SHE DID NOT IDENTIFY BY NAME AND SPECIFICALLY REGARDING PUBLIC DISCLOSURES RELATED A DIVORCE THAT WERE ALSO NOT SUBSEQUENTLY DESCRIBED BY DOCKET NUMBER, IDENTITY OF A JUDGE, THE NAME OF EITHER PARTY OR BY WHAT SPECIFIC PUBLIC DISCLOSURES WERE DEEMED CONTRARY TO N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4.1 (A) et seq. THE COMMUNICATIONS AS SUCH WERE NEVER DESCRIBED AS HAVING BEEN MADE OR CAUSED TO HAVE BEEN MADE BY THE DEFENDANT, NEVER CLAIMED TO HAVE BEEN MADE ON ANY ELECTRONIC DEVICE OR THROUGH A SOCIAL NETWORKING SITE THAT WAS IN ACTUAL FACT OWNED OR OPERATED BY THE DEFENDANT, AND OF THE HIGHEST SIGNIFICANCE SOMETHING WAS CLAIMED TO HAVE BEEN POSTED TO A WEBSITE THAT MAY OR MAY NOT HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS “SOMETHING AWFUL”, AND REGARDLESS OF WHAT SPECIFIC DOMAIN WAS UTTERED BY THAT ATTORNEY, THE DEFENDANT REMAINS UNAWARES OF ANY PUBLIC DISCLOSURES RELATED TO THE CASE POSTED TO ANY WEBSITE THAT SHE MAY OR MAY NOT HAVE ACTUALLY NAMED, AND FURTHERMORE THE DEFENDANT HER THEN CLIENT WAS CERTAINLY NOT AFFILIATED WITH ANY WEBSITE AS SUCH.

THE FOLLOWING CLAIMS WERE ALSO MADE BY THAT ATTORNEY DURING THE TWENTY-NINTH NOVEMBER PHONE CONVERSATION:

ONE, ASSERTION THAT ANY DIVORCE PROCEEDING INVOLVING THE ALLEGED VICTIM IN PICKETTERS’ CHARGE ACTIVE CONCOMITANT TO THE CASE COULD NOT POSSIBLY BE RELEVANT TO AN AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE. THIS CLAIM WAS MADE VERY EMPHATICALLY, IN MANNER ONE MIGHT DESCRIBE NEAR BORDERLINE HYSTERICAL, REPEATEDLY ASSERTED, APPROX “THERE IS NO POSSIBLE WAY IT COULD BE RELATED”.

 

TWO, EXPLICIT REFUSALS TO ASCERTAIN WHETHER A OR THE DIVORCE PROCEEDING RESULTED IN FINANCIAL GAIN OR LOSS FOR EITHER PARTY.

 

THREE, WOULD NOT ENTERTAIN POSSIBILITY THAT DEFENDANT MAY HAVE BEEN SUBJECT OF DIVORCE ON-RECORD TESTIMONY AND/OR DESCRIBED IN OTHER COURT DOCUMENTS. OF NOTE, ATTORNEY WITH NO KNOWLEDGE OF HISTORY BETWEEN DEFENDANT AND ALLEGED VICTIM PROVIDED BY DEFENDANT UNLESS SHE DID READ DOAC SERES VS LAWRENCE, NOTE RETURNED TWENTY-EIGHTH JANUARY TWO-THOUSAND NINETEEN, INCLUDING INVITE TO WEDDING OF THE ALLEGED VICTIM AND HUSBAND, BOTH OF WHOM NAMED ON EACH OF THREE VERSIONS OF A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER THAT DID APPEAR TO BE MADE AVAILABLE FOR USE AGAINST THE DEFENDANT IN A SIMULTANEOUS CRIMINAL PROCEEDING CONTRARY TO N.J.S.A. 2C: 25-29 BY VIRTUE OF INCLUSION IN FIFTY-TWO PAGE DISCOVERY PACKET FIRST PROVIDED TO DEFENDANT FIRST OCTOBER TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN AT INITIAL DISPOSITION CONFERENCE.

 

FOUR, CLAIM THAT ENTIRE DOAC SERIES VS LAWRENCE DID NOT MATTER, UNCLEAR IF SHE WAS EVEN AWARE OF CONTENT OR HOW THAT CONTENT RELATED TO AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE.

SIXTHTHE HISTORY OF PICKETTERS’ CHARGE AS RECORDED BY ZONE ON FOURTEENTH JANUARY TWO-THOUSAND NINETEEN, EXHIBITED IN THE TWENTY-TWO IMAGES SEEN BELOW,

SEVENTH, THE TWENTY-EIGHTH JANUARY TWO-THOUSAND NINETEEN SERIES OF A NEARLY IDENTICAL GROUP OF SHEETS THIS TIME DIRECTLY REQUESTED USING THE FORM EXHIBITED IN POSITION ONE WHICH DID YIELD THIS SERIES PURPORTING TO DESCRIBE A HISTORY OF PICKETTERS’ CHARGE. SPOT THE DIFFERENCE FROM THE FOURTEENTH JANUARY LOT IN THE TWENTY-SEVEN IMAGES EXHIBITED BELOW,

EIGHTH, THE FOURTH FEBRUARY TWO-THOUSAND NINETEEN SERIES THAT DID MARK THE CONCLUSION OF PICKETTERS’ CHARGE IN ZONE IS EXHIBITED IN FIVE IMAGES BELOW, AND DO INDEED PAY SPECIAL ATTENTION TO THE REMARK ON CORRESPONDENCE ALLEGEDLY NEVER SENT TO HUNTERDON COUNTY.


STAY TUNED!

 

 

THE 34TH DAY T MINUS TWO SIXTEEN: GREETINGS FROM GAS BOMB ACADEMY! SHELLING OF ZONE CONTINUES! ALSO, FOR THOSE YOU WHO HAVE REMAINED IN TUNE, STAY TUNED!

STAY TUNED!

SIX SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND SEVENTEEN FOLLOWING FROM SEVEN JANUARY TWO THOUSAND SEVENTEEN - Copy

SEVENTEEN ZERO-TWO EASTERN STANDARD TIME
ONE JULY TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN

CZECH THESE DIGITS FIVE ZERO TWO PM EST JULY ONE TWO THOUSAND EIGHTEEN

BRIEF RETURN TO TWENTY-SEVENTH APRIL TWO-THOUSAND SEVENTEEN

SIRS JOHN DEE AND EDWARD KELLEY

CZECH EM! THE DIGITS! NOW! OR AT YOUR LEISURE!

CZECH EM RETRIEVED 9 6 2017 PHOTO FROM PDF MADE NINE THIRTEEN 2017 LTPD FROM 9 24 2017 KNEW NOW Q RE NATURE OF INFO SURVEILLED

PAR_BOOKS!
ORDER DETAILS
RELEVANT TO THAT PROCEEDING AND/OR OTHER CONDUCTED IN CHAMBERS THAT ARE AND/OR WERE THOSE OF A “JUDGE” NAMED THOMPSON LOCATED WITHIN ONE SEVENTY-FIVE SOUTH BROAD STREET, TRENTON, NEW JERSEY, ZONE, ZERO EIGHT SIX FIVE ZERO DASH ZERO ZERO SIX EIGHT REGARDING WHATEVER DOCUMENT(S) WERE CLAIMED TO BE THIS VERY ONE. [EXPAND THE PROOFS]
SEVENTH JANUARY TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN PURCHASE CONFIRMED
PAR BOOKS SELLER NOTIFICATION SEVENTH JANUARY TWO THOUSAND SEVENTEEN
CZECH EM AND WRECK EM [EXPAND THIS EMAIL]
WHY EXACTLY THE COMINTERN (NUEVO DEMOCRAT COMMIE FILTH, ET ALIA) WAS SO UTTERLY OBSESSED WITH MY WHEREABOUTS THE WEEK OF NINE-ELEVEN SEPTEMBER TWO-THOUSAND SEVENTEEN AND WENT TO GREAT LENGTHS IN FABRICATING A DOCUMENTARY TRAIL OF FRAUD CLAIMS THAT WERE EVENTUALLY SUBMITTED, ALMOST ALL OF THEM, TO BOTH A STATE OF NEW JERSEY SUPERIOR COURT LOCATED IN TRENTON, NEW JERSEY AND SUBSEQUENTLY A FEDERAL COURT LOCATED IN AN UNDISCLOSED VICINITY THAT MAY IN FACT BE ON AN ISLAND IN THE PACIFIC OCEAN FOR REASONS TO BE FOUND HERE AND THERE ON BAETYL

THINGS THESE AND THOSE WEEK OF SEPTEMBER NINE ELEVEN TWO THOUSAND SEVENTEEN
CACHED CZECH BOOK STRAIGHT CASH! ALSO, WEE BUNS TOP RIGHT. [ENLARGE THE CACHE]
THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF CHP CARD WITH DIGITAL JEROME SOMEONE OR OTHER WHO WE SHALL CALL MR DEE PF2007
CZECH OUT ALZBETA (SIC) (ALSH-BETA) IN UPPER RIGHT [ENLARGE PLEASE]

REMEMBER THAT TIME LYDON TRIED TO TRICK ME INTO CONVICTING MYSELF ON SOME UNKNOWN CHARGE CARRYING A THIRTY-SIX MONTH SENTENCE?
PIC AND ROLL SHITSHOW PREP LYDON VANQUISHED TWO TIMES IN FIRST AND THEN SECOND RE DO OF FIRST
BLACK BOX REDACTED NAME OF UNLIKELY ALLY. HIGH NOTE, THIS IS AND WAS ALL DONE PRO SE. [ENLARGE ONE PART OF THIS FUCKING MASSIVE PROCEEDING WHICH SPANS THE EARTH AT THIS POINT. NOT A JOKE, RATHER BEWILDERING TO MANY IF NOT ALL PARTIES DULY NAMED IN THE CAPTION AS “THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA” IN THAT PROCEEDING SO NAMED “THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA VS. [REDACTED NAME(S) OF ASSORTED ASSHOLES AND COMMIES REQUIRING AND INDEED DESERVING DEATH FROM ABOVE]
REMEMBER THESE THINGS YOU FUCKING ILLITERATES? YES, LAW BOOKS. BOOKS FILLED WITH WORDS. WORDS THAT DESCRIBE THINGS YOU HAVE DONE IN ABUNDANCE FOR FAR TOO LONG DESPITE THE PROHIBITION OF THOSE ACTS BY THESE VERY WORDS. 
TWO THOUSAND FIFTEEN EDITION OF THIS FILTHY FOREIGN TEXT
[TITLE PAGE BIG BUTTON]
SO WHAT IS THE POINT OF THE HISTORY OF THE CZECH LANDS, INTER ALIA?
INTERFERING WITH A PERSONS PROPERTY
PAGE FOUR EIGHTY-EIGHT. YOU KNOW WHY, ONE REASON ALONE. WHAT IS IT? YES, INDEED, “INTERFERING WITH A PERSON’S PROPERTY” RATHER COMMON EXPERIENCE DESCRIBING THOSE HUMANS PERSONS TARGETED BY THOSE “LEGALLY” PERMITTED IN THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY (PROBABLY NY AS WELL) TO COMMIT THE CRIMES DESCRIBED ON THIS PAGE, WHICH THEY DO INDEED WITH RECKLESS ABANDON AND ARE “ABSOLVED” OF SIN BY VIRTUE MEMBERSHIP IN WHAT HAS NEVER BEEN DEFINED IN ANY LAW BOOK AS A “PICKETING ORGANIZATION”, IN SHORTHAND N.J.S.A. 2C:12-10(F). UNKNOWN REFERENT IF ANY, HOWEVER IN PRACTICE “PICKETERS” ARE THE DEMOCRAT PARTY AND THE DEMOCRAT PARTY ALONE. THAT IS CORRECT. THIS LAW WILL STRICKEN FROM THESE BOOKS VERY SOON. AND THEN THESE BOOKS WILL BE PUBLISHED BY AN AMERICAN COMPANY AND AN AMERICAN COMPANY ALONE. [ENLARGE ALL CRIMES PERMITTED TO BE IGNORED AS WEAPON USED AGAINST WHITE CHRISTIAN MEN AND WOMEN ALMOST EXCLUSIVELY]
ONE CRITICAL ITEM OF THAT PROPERTY SUBJECTED TO RATHER REPEATED AND EGREGIOUS INTERFERENCE STRAIGHT FROM THE LIST OF REQUIRED READING OF GAS BOMB ACADEMY (!) YES, INDEED, THAT ACADEMY AND/OR THEREABOUT AS SEEN BELOW,
PHOTO CREDIT EPA THAT WOULD BE THE TELL NOW DEP FROM THERE WHAT OF IT
THIS RATHER LONE REFERENCE FROM AN EVENT IN TWO-THOUSAND NINE TO THIRTEEN RANGE THAT LACKS ANY READILY FOUND TEXT DESCRIBING WHAT INDEED OCCURRED. THE EPA MIGHT HAVE A HINT THOUGH, FANCY THAT. SCUM OF THE FUCKING EARTH. [ENLARGE AND OBSERVE EPA RED BOXED]
WE INTERRUPT THIS THREAD NOT FOR ANYTHING UNRELATED
TWENTY-ONE FORTY-THREE EASTERN STANDARD TIME
ONE JULY TWO-THOUSAND SEVENTEEN

ONE JULY TWO THOUSAND EIGHTEEN NINE FORTY THREE EST CZECH EM

BACK TO THE HOWELL TEE DOUBLE YOU VEE MUNICIPAL SOVIET
VOICE MESSAGE FROM “COLLEEN” DATED FOURTEEN DECEMBER TWO-THOUSAND SEVENTEEN

THIS CALL WAS MADE IN RESPONSE TO WHAT LATER BECAME A CRIMINAL CASE ENTITLED “THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. [REDACTED/NAMED PARTY “VICTIM” IN ONGOING PROCEEDING(S) OF HOWELL TWP MUNICIPAL COURT]”, DESPITE THAT “VICTIM” HAVING NEVER APPEARED BEFORE ANY JUDGE, SO NAMED OR OTHERWISE, AT ANY TIME UPON ANY DATE WITH NO ARREST WARRANT FOLLOWING FROM, DONE SO FOR VERY REASON THAT A/THE VICTIM IN THAT MATTER WAS INDEED MYSELF, “ADAM C MILLER”.

OF NOTE, THAT FEMALE SO NAMED “ROSEMARY O’DONNELL, C.M.C.A.” OF HOWELL TWP MUNI SOVIET DID INDEED ATTEMPT TO DELETE ALL RECORDS OF THAT CRIMINAL CASE AND SUBSEQUENT PROCEEDING AND IN FACT DID ADMIT TO THAT CRIME DIRECTLY TO MYSELF, ADAM C MILLER, UPON DATE TWENTY-FIFTH JANUARY TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN. RIGHT THERE ON CAMERA AS THAT STICKER BOTTOM RIGHT WARNS THE TOWNSPEOPLE TO INDEED ACT “PROFESSIONALLY” BEFORE.

PREVIEWS!

LET US PROVIDE NOTICE THAT WHAT TRANSPIRED ON DATE TWENTY-FIVE JANUARY TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN WAS A REMARKABLE EVENT WITNESSED ACROSS THE WESTERN WORLD AND THAT DAY ALREADY OF RATHER IMMENSE SIGNIFICANCE UPON THOSE REVISED STANDARDS OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT FOLLOWING DIRECTLY FROM THOSE CRIMINAL ACTS COMMITTED AGAIN AND AGAIN AND THEN AGAIN OBSERVED AND RECORDED UP AND DOWN THE ELECTROMAGNETIC SPECTRUM OVER THE PAST THIRTEEN MONTHS BY THOSE INDIVIDUALS WITHIN HOWELL TWP MUNICIPAL COURT, AND OTHER COURTS ACROSS THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY AND THEN BEYOND ACROSS THE EARTH.

DEAR READER, KNOWN TO YOU RATHER WELL ALREADY, WHAT EXACTLY IS THIS ENTITY SO CALLED “RESIST”?

UPDATE 2313 EST, INCOMING! CALL(S)! “TWITCH” RATHER FLUMMOXED BY WHAT PREVIEW IMPLIES AND RATHER AGGRESSIVELY F-FIVE-ING THAT ILLEGALLY INSTALLED “SECURE” HOME TERMINAL.

UPDATE 0006 EST, OUTGOING! THAT “SPECIAL RELATIONSHIP” BETWEEN LAWRENCE TWP AND HOWELL TWP UNDER RATHER HEAVY INVESTIGATION AT THIS VERY MOMENT. THANKS GOD FOR THAT.

TWO PAST MIDNIGHT EASTERN STANDARD TIME
TWO JULY TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN

TWO PAST TWELVE AM EST SECOND JULY TWO THOUSAND EIGHTEEN

UPDATE 0117 EST, HARMAN, WE NEED TO CHAT. LIKE, NOW. ON, UH, THAT, UH, RATHER CRITICAL TOPIC OF, UH, ILLEGAL SEARCHES AND SUBSEQUENT SEIZURE OF PROPERTY THAT ALREADY HAS BEEN BACK-DOORED EIGHT HUNDRED THOUSAND WAYS FROM SUNDAY, AS BELOW THIS GEM OF A SHIT-SHOW FROM LAWRENCE TWP ONE ONE ZERO SEVEN,

LAWRENCE OF HOWELL OF LAWRENCE
[ENLARGE]
UPDATE 0123 EST, AND EAST FROM WEST BACK TO HOWELL FOR WHAT IS (IN ALL LIKELIHOOD, ASTERISK) ANOTHER FRAUD DOCUMENT HAVING ORIGIN AT MONMOUTH MEDICAL CENTER IN LONG BRANCH, NEW JERSEY WHICH TO THE FORGETFUL IS RATHER RIGHT DOWN THE ROAD FROM THE ACTUAL ONE THREE ONE NINE SO KNOWN, SO TITLED, THE THING THAT HATH CALLED ITSELF “BOROUGH OF HIGHLANDS”, THAT GEM OF A SHIT-SHOW FROM THAT THERE SHIT-SHOW ON THAT THERE HILL, THAT BEING, UH, HOWELL, UH LIKE, UH, YET AGAIN, YA KNOW, REMAINS, UH, LIKE UH, AS BELOW,

LAWRENCE OF HOWELL OF LAWRENCE (1 of 1)
[ENLARGE]

 

 

THE 34TH DAY T MINUS TWO THIRTEEN: T MINUS FORTY-EIGHT HOURS FROM HOWELL TWP MUNICIPAL COURT ROUND N OF N, PART TWO, WITH BONUS RE-EDITION OF THE MUNICODE MYSTERY!

THE AGENDA

ONE, UPDATES ON THE MUNICODE MYSTERY AND THE BATTLE FOR THE ALPHANUMERIC OF TOWNSHIP HOWELL, ONE THREE TWO ONE VERSUS ONE THREE ONE NINE.

TWO, RETURN TO FRIDAY TWENTY-FIFTH MAY TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN IN TWP HOWELL MUNICIPAL COURT WHEREUPON THE CONCLUSION OF THAT PROCEEDING IT HATH BEEN UNEQUIVOCALLY ESTABLISHED BY THAT “JUDGE” SO NAMED SUSAN SCHROEDER CLARK THAT DISSENT FROM ONE THREE ONE NINE WOULD NOT BE TOLERATED. OF NOTE UPON THAT SAME DAY FIRST OBSERVATION OF “CAOLA” IN THE PRESENT YEAR, THE YEAR OF OUR LORD TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN.

THREE, THAT PRIOR DESCRIBED TRIP TO THE “EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT” AS PER THE “ORDER” OF SCHROEDER CLARK, SUSAN FOLLOWING DIRECTLY FROM THE REMARKABLE AGITATION EXHIBITED BY THAT ALL FEMALE STAFF OF TWP HOWELL MUNICIPAL COURT, ALL PARTISAN DEMOCRATS, ALL “RESIST”, FOR ALL OF WHOM MAXIMUM SENTENCING GUIDELINES HATH BEEN REQUESTED, AND THAT AGITATION FOLLOWING FROM A SERIES OF COMMUNIQUES INITIATED BY MYSELF ON MY OWN BEHALF, TO NOTE ALL OF WHICH SENT DIRECTLY INTO THE VOID, THAT COULD BE DESCRIBED IN TRUTH AS RATHER SIMPLE AND CONCISE REQUESTS FOR COURT RECORDS, UNANSWERED PHONE CALLS FOR PURPOSE CONFIRMATION OF THAT OR THE OTHER, UNANSWERED LETTERS FOR PURPOSE DIRECTLY RELATED TO ANY AND ALL MATTERS BROUGHT BEFORE THAT COURT AND/OR PERTAINING TO OTHER RATHER MUNDANE ISSUES. LASTLY AND OF HIGHEST SIGNIFICANCE, THE PREPONDERANCE OF FORGED DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED TO THAT COURT SO NAMED HOWELL TWP THAT BEAR MY FULL CHRISTIAN NAME, AND IN SOME CASES ALSO WITHIN TO BE FOUND SOMETHING RESEMBLING MY SIGNATURE, HATH REACHED A CRITICAL JUNCTURE REQUIRING THE INTERVENTION OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AS THAT “COUNTERFEIT UNIT” LOCATED AT AND BELOW MONMOUTH MEDICAL CENTER IN LONG BRANCH, NEW JERSEY, HATH RECENTLY FORGED A URINE DRUG SCREEN BEARING MY NAME WITH FRAUD CLAIM POSITIVE OPIATES FOUND IN THAT URINE. THAT FRAUD URINE DRUG SCREEN PRINTOUT WAS SUMMARILY SUBMITTED TO THE STAFF OF TWP HOWELL MUNICIPAL COURT WHO UPON RECEIPT EAGERLY JUMPED FOR JOY AT THAT FRAUD CLAIM OF HEROIN ABUSE AND FURTHERMORE POSTHASTE PLACED FACSIMILES OF THAT FORGED URINE DRUG SCREEN IN EVERY CREVASSE WITHIN THAT BUILDING LOCATED AT THREE-HUNDRED OLD TAVERN ROAD  AND THAT ALL FEMALE STAFF, ONE OR ALL RATHER ALL THE SAME, DID INDEED LEAVE A HANDWRITTEN NOTE UPON THE DESK AND OR CHAMBER POT OF “JUDGE” CLARK EXCLAIMING “WE GOT HIM”, UNDERNEATH TO BE FOUND THAT FRAUD URINE DRUG SCREEN THAT HAD BEEN A PART OF THAT “COURSE” FOLLOWING FROM THE “ORDER” SO “ISSUED” BY CLARK ON DATE TWENTY-THIRD MAY AND/OR TWENTY-FIFTH MAY TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN. TO BE FOUND HEREIN BELOW THAT ORIGINAL AND PRISTINE URINE DRUG SCREEN. THAT’S THE REAL DEAL.

FOUR, INDEPENDENT OF THE ONGOING JUDICIAL FRAUD TO THE GREATEST EXTENT POSSIBLE, AN EXPOSITION ON THAT PROCESS OF “PSYCHIATRIC EVALUATION” AS “ORDERED” BY A MUNICIPAL COURT “JUDGE” FROM PERSPECTIVE OF MEDICAL SCIENCE WITH BRIEF NOTES ON ANY AND ALL MANNER OF “TREATMENT” AND/OR “EVALUATION” THAT HATH BEEN CONDUCTED FOR THOSE STATED PURPOSES.

FIVE, CONCLUDING REMARKS ON THAT PROCEEDING (FINALLY) HELD ON DATE TWENTY-FIVE MAY TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN AS WE ENTER THE NEXT ROUND OF THAT SORDID AFFAIR WITH END IN SIGHT. DEAR TWP HOWELL, GOOD FUCKING NIGHT.

THE MUNICODE MYSTERY

CONTINUING FROM TWELFTH MAY TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN ON WHICH DATE THE MYSTERY OF THE MISPLACED MUNICIPAL CODE HATH FIRST APPEARED ON BAETYL AS ARTICULATED WITHIN THE 34TH DAY T PLUS TWO: ANOTHER FORGERY FROM MONMOUTH MEDICAL CENTER, LONG BRANCH, NEW JERSEY, WHEREIN THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF “FREEHOLD TWP” ONE THREE ONE SEVEN WAS FOUND TO BE PREOCCUPIED IN THAT THING SO CALLED “BOROUGH OF HIGHLANDS” THAT HATH BEEN IDENTIFIED WITH CODE ONE THREE ONE NINE BY THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY.

THAT SECRET PAMPHLET CONTAINING THE GENUINE RECORD OF ALPHANUMERICS MAINTAINED BY THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY

ON FOURTH JUNE TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN A FEMALE INDIVIDUAL WITH SO CLAIMED PROFESSIONAL TITLE  OF”ACTING COURT ADMINISTRATOR” MADE A RATHER CURIOUS CLAIM AFFIRMING THE ONE THREE ONE NINE IDENTITY OF TWP HOWELL WITHIN AN EMAIL THAT HATH BEEN DUTIFULLY SUBMITTED TO HADRIAN118@PROTONMAIL.CH FOLLOWING FROM AN EARLIER COMMUNIQUE DATED THIRTEENTH MAY TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN ADDRESSED AND SUBMITTED BY HADRIAN TO A SECOND FEMALE INDIVIDUAL SO NAMED “SONIA K. PAXTOR, C.M.C.A.” ALLEGED UPON THE WEBSITE OF THAT ENTITY SO CALLED “MUNICIPAL COURT” OF THE THING THAT HATH CALLED ITSELF “BOROUGH OF HIGHLANDS” FOR PURPOSE OF ASCERTAINING THE WILLINGNESS OF THOSE INDIVIDUALS SO NAMED “COURT STAFF” IN THAT VICINITY TO PROVIDE ONE WITH DOCUMENT(S), RECORD(S) AND/OR THING(S) FROM HOWELL TWP MUNICIPAL COURT THAT HATH BEEN OTHERWISE “STORED” WITHIN THE VERY SAME PROMIS SEQUESTRATION WHICH INDEED WAS INSTRUMENTAL ON THAT DATE NINE-ELEVEN TWO-THOUSAND AND ONE IN CAPACITY AS COMMAND AND CONTROL NODE PROXIMATE TO PRIMARY, SECONDARY AND INDEED TERTIARY TARGETS.

THAT WISELY LACONIC REPLY OF “ACTING COURT ADMINISTRATOR” OF ENTITY UNKNOWN SO NAMED “PATRICIA D. SICKELS” FOUND IN ONE BELOW,

AFFIRMATION OF TWP HOWELL INDEED ACTIING COURT ADMIN
ONE THREE ONE NINE INDEED, DULY NOTED. [EXPAND UPON THIS AFFIRMATION]
AND THAT FIRST COMMUNIQUE DATED THIRTEEN MAY SENT TO THAT CERTIFIED MUNICIPAL COURT ADMINISTRATOR (C.M.C.A.) “SONIA” FOUND IN ONE BELOW,

FIRST QUERY THIRTEEN MAY TWO THOUSAND EIGHTEEN ADDRESSED TO SONIA K PAXTOR CMCA
WHAT HAPPENED TO THAT C.M.C.A. BETWEEN DATES THIRTEEN MAY TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN AND FOURTH JUNE TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN? [EXPAND UPON THIS DEVELOPING SAGA]
NOTWITHSTANDING THAT SILENT UPHEAVAL THAT HATH OCCURRED IN COUNTY MONMOUTH IN THE VERY RECENT PAST,  INDEED ONGOING INTO THE PRESENT AND FORESEEN TO HAVE CONSEQUENCE OF MAGNITUDE FAR INTO THE FUTURE WHEREUPON THE CONDUCT OF THE JUDICIARY WITHIN THIS VERY STATE AND THEN FOLLOWING FROM ACROSS THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA HATH BEEN SERVED A “SOFTWARE UPDATE” FOR PURPOSE THAT MAY INDEED BECOME ELUCIDATED UPON FURTHER CONSIDERATION OF THOSE HARD-WIRED FAIL SAFES FIRST ALLUDED TO IN BRIEF YESTERDAY IN PART ONE, BAETYL INDEED HATH RECEIVED AFFIRMATION FROM OUTSIDE ENTITY THAT TOWNSHIP HOWELL INDEED IS KNOWN TO BE ASSOCIATED WITH CODE ONE THREE ONE NINE.

SO DEAR READER THE QUESTION IS NOW POSED AS FOLLOWS: WHERE IS THE REAL LIST IDENTIFYING THOSE CODES AFFIXED TO EACH AND EVERY MUNICIPALITY?

THOSE TWO LISTS PUBLISHED UPON THE TREASURY WEBSITE OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY DO INDEED SO READILY DECEIVE THE LAITY INTO ALL MANNER OF IMPROPRIETY IN ATTRIBUTING WHICH NUMBER WHERE.

HOWEVER, FOR CLARITY IN THIS MATTER WE RETURN TO THE LOST SAGA OF TWP PLAINSBORO FIRST EMBARKED UPON MANY YEARS AGO, ELUCIDATED FURTHER OVER MEMORIAL DAY WEEKEND TWO-THOUSAND SEVENTEEN, FORGOTTEN THEN FOR A PERIOD, RETURNED TO WITH A VENGEANCE UPON DATE FIVE APRIL TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN IN THE POST ENTITLED THE STORY OF A MAYOR OF PLAINSBORO, PETER CANTU, AND THE SERIAL KILLER HE CALLED HIS GRANDSON. FIFTY-NINE THOUSAND EVERY YEAR, NO MORE, NO MORE, WILL WE TOLERATE A MAYOR WAGING WAR ON THIS SACRED LAND, AND TO WHOM WE GIVE UNLIKELY THANKS FOR ISSUING THAT RATHER LUDICROUS TRAFFIC CITATION AS SEEN IN ONE BELOW,

ONE TWO ONE EIGHT
COURT CODE ONE TWO ONE EIGHT, TWP PLAINSBORO. [EXPAND UPON THIS UNEXPECTED CORRESPONDENCE]
NOW WE ROLL AND SEE WHAT DIGITS ARISE UPON QUERY OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY FOR THOSE VERY DIGITS ASSOCIATED WITH TWP PLAINSBORO, COUNTY MIDDLESEX…

WHEREIN WE CONSULT THE PUBLICLY AVAILABLE RECORD(S) KEPT BY THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY AND/OR OTHER FOR PURPOSE IDENTIFYING THAT FOUR-DIGIT NUMBER ASSOCIATED WITH EACH AND EVERY MUNICIPALITY IN THE STATE, THOSE RECORDS POSTED BELOW IN SEQUENTIAL ORDER OF PUBLICATION UPON BAETYL, THE LATTER TWO FIRST SEEN HEREIN AND OF HIGH NOTE THAT THIRD ENTRY OF THE THREE FOLLOWING BELOW OF RECENT ORIGIN,

ONE
MUNICODES ONE
LIST ONE, ORIGIN: TREASURY OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY. HOWELL TWP: ONE THREE TWO ONE. PLAINSBORO TWP: ONE TWO ONE EIGHT. [https://www.state.nj.us/treasury/omb/forms/pdf/municodes.pdf] [EXPAND THIS LIST]

TWO
MUNI CODES TWO HOWELL INDEED REMAINS 1321
LIST TWO, ORIGIN: TREASURY OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY. HOWELL TWP: 1321. PLAINSBORO TWP: 1218. [https://www.state.nj.us/treasury/taxation/pdf/lpt/cntycode.pdf] [EXPAND UPON THAT FORMERLY UNIVERSAL ENUMERATION OF TWP HOWELL AS ONE THREE TWO ONE]

THREE (!)
NEW STATE LIST OF MUNI COURTS WITH HOWELL 1319 RUN DATE 6 25 2018
LIST THREE, ORIGIN: “JUDICIARY” OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY. HOWELL TWP: ONE THREE ONE NINE (FIRST IDENTIFIED AS SUCH BY THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY IN ANY PUBLISHED DOCUMENT HEREIN WITH REMARKABLE DATE OF TWENTY-FIFTH JUNE TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN). PLAINSBORO TWP: ONE TWO ONE EIGHT. PAGE FORTY FOUR OF ONE HUNDRED-THIRTEEN WITH CLAIM “RUN DATE” FOUR DAYS PRIOR TO THE PRESENT ON DATE “25 JUN, 2018” WITH BOTH ORIGIN AND TIMES STAMP OF THIS DOCUMENT RATHER REMARKABLE FOLLOWING FROM THE VERY FIRST PUBLICATION HEREIN ON DATE FOUR MAY TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN PROVIDING ANY HINT WHATSOEVER THAT BAETYL, BAETYL & CO. WERE PRIVY TO THOSE ARCHAIC MATHS IMPOSED UPON THE LAITY BY THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY THAT HATH BEEN AMENDED IN DIRECT RESPONSE TO THAT AND/OR THOSE PROCEEDING(S) BEING CONDUCTED IN TWP HOWELL AT PRESENT TIME AND THAT STORY NECESSARILY TO BE FOUND WITHIN THE GENUINE RECORD(S) OF COURT FROM CODE ONE THREE ONE NINE ALONE. [https://www.judiciary.state.nj.us/public/assets/directories/munctadr.pdf] [EXPAND UPON THIS NEW STATE LIST OF MUNICIPAL COURTS]

TO WRAP-UP THIS UPDATE ON MUNICIPAL CODES, IMPLICIT QUESTION FOLLOWING FROM THAT DOCUMENTED FRAUD MOVING VIOLATION WITH ORIGIN PLAINSBORO TWP,  ATOP CITATION TO BE FOUND COURT CODE ONE TWO ONE EIGHT OF THAT VERY COURT LOCATED WITHIN THE TOWN OF PLAINSBORO ALONE AND FURTHERMORE NO OTHER ALPHANUMERIC OTHER THAN ONE TWO ONE EIGHT IS TO BE FOUND WITHIN ANY PUBLISHED GOVERNMENT DOCUMENT SO IDENTIFYING PLAINSBORO TWP. OF NOTE, HAVE NOT AND RATHER WILL NOT BE RECEIVING ANY NJ/CDR1 AND/OR NJ/CDR2 DOCUMENTS FROM PB TWP UNLESS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES AND NOT BEARING MY NAME.

SO WHY THEN DOES HOWELL TWP HAVE TWO NUMBERS AT ODDS AND GEOGRAPHICALLY DISTINCT, ONE THREE ONE NINE VERSUS ONE THREE TWO ONE, AND FURTHERMORE WHY DOES THAT VERY FACT STATED HEREIN AND ELSEWHERE ELICIT THE IRE OF THOSE TO BE FOUND WITHIN AND SOON WITHOUT HOWELL TWP MUNICIPAL COURT?

BEGIN ATOP THIS VERY POST FOR A PARTIAL ALBEIT SUBSTANTIVE ANSWER.


TWENTY-FIFTH MAY TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN
WHAT ARE YOU LOOKING AT THERE
BELOW RED ARROW INDEED MOSSAD. YES, YOU HEARD THAT CORRECTLY, MOSSAD. FOREIGN AGENT. THAT PUBLIC LIST MOSSAD THERE IS GAZING AT MADE PUBLIC IN RATHER EGREGIOUS BREACH OF SECURITY BY HOWELL TWP MUNICIPAL COURT STAFF WHEREIN THOSE NAMED PARTIES ORDERED BY LAW TO APPEAR IN THIS FILTHY FALLEN COURT HAVE CRITICAL IDENTIFIERS EXPOSED TO PUBLIC VIEW FOR REASON PRIMARILY INCOMPETENCE IN THE MOST CHARITABLE SCENARIO. [EXPAND THIS IMAGE TO SHUT THAT MOTHERFUCKER DOWN]
THAT THERE BOARD
THAT LIST UPON THE WALL
YES, INDEED. INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY. [EXPAND UPON THIS TRAVESTY IN THAT FORM IT SHOULD BE PUBLISHED]
FROM THE CHICKENSHIT COWARD SO NAMED CLARK THAT INDEED IS AND/OR WAS EMPLOYED BY “RESIST”

TWENTY FIFTH MAY TWO THOUSAND EIGHTEEN NOW GET OUT INVOLUNTARY SCREEN RECORDS REQUESTS NOT APPRECIATED ADJOURNMENTS EITHER THATS WHAT THIS MEANS
[EXPAND THIS HEINOUS CRIME]
THE ONLY RECORD OF STATEMENTS MADE BY CLARK, SUSAN SCHROEDER ON DATE TWENTY-FIVE MAY TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN PROVIDED TO ME BY MY RATHER CAPABLE FACULTIES OF MEMORY, THAT RECORD OF THE COURSE OF CONDUCT DIRECTED SPECIFICALLY AGAINST MYSELF, ACM, ON THAT SAME DATE BY CLARK, SUSAN SCHROEDER REPRODUCED WITH FIDELITY IN WHAT FOLLOWS BELOW,

ONE, AT TIME IN TRANSIT ON FOOT WALKING TOWARDS THE COURT OF HOWELL TWP AT APPROXIMATELY FIVE MINUTES PAST NINE AM OBSERVE CLARK HASTILY ENTERING THE NORTHEAST PARKING LOT IN A WHITE JEEP. INDEED THAT ILLITERATE PART-TIME “JUDGE” LATE FOR COURT. OF NOTE AND TO BE EXPOUNDED UPON LATER HEREIN, THAT “JUDGE” CLARK STILL MAINTAINS PRIVATE LAW PRACTICE IN THE MUNICIPALITY OF TINTON FALLS, MONMOUTH COUNTY, NEW JERSEY.

TWO, AT SOME TIME PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED MORNING START OF THAT PROCEEDING, THAT FEMALE INDIVIDUAL SO NAMED CAOLA HAD MADE PRESENCE KNOWN AND UPON FIRST ORAL COMMUNICATION MADE TO ME DID INDEED KNOWINGLY AND PURPOSEFULLY LIE NO LESS THAN TWO TIMES REGARDING MATTERS OF IMMENSE IMPORTANCE. CONSULT THAT TWENTY-TWO PAGE DOCUMENT DEPOSING CAOLA POSTED UPON DATE TWENTY-EIGHT JUNE TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN.

THREE, THE FOLLOWING STATEMENTS WERE MADE BY CLARK DURING THE FIRST HALF OF THE RATHER BRIEF “THING” THAT TOOK PLACE THAT FRIDAY, THOSE STATEMENTS IN CONTEXT AS FOLLOWS,

“YOU HAD ENOUGH TIME TO HIRE A PRIVATE ATTORNEY”, DESPITE HAVING RECEIVED NO PRIOR NOTICE WHATSOEVER TO THAT DATE TWENTY-FIVE MAY TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN THAT THE CRETIN SO NAMED CAOLA HAD APPOINTED ON MY BEHALF AND FURTHERMORE THAT MY TWO PRIOR PRO SE DECLARATIONS MADE UPON THE RECORD HAD AT UNKNOWN DATE AND TIME BECOME NULL AND VOID.

“I BROUGHT HER ALL THE WAY FROM TRENTON. SHE IS THE VERY BEST”, INDEED STATED IN SARDONIC TONE.

“I WANT TO VOLUNTARY SPEAK WITH CPC.”

FOUR, THE PROCEEDING(S) ARE ADJOURNED FOR A SHORT PERIOD DURING WHICH TIME IT HATH BEEN REQUESTED OF MYSELF TO “VOLUNTARILY” SPEAK WITH HERETOFORE UNIDENTIFIED INDIVIDUAL(S) AFFILIATED IN UNKNOWN CAPACITY WITH PEDOPHILE BASTION MONMOUTH RESOURCE NET AND AS SUCH COUNTY MONMOUTH GOVERNMENT SO NAMED “CPC” THAT INDEED UPON DATE TWENTY-THIRD MAY TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN I, ACM, HATH SCREENED ONE OF THOSE “CPC” LOCATIONS IN FREEHOLD BORO, ONE THREE ONE SIX, FOR PURPOSE INCLUSION WITHIN A PHOTO SERIES DOCUMENTING THOSE ENTITIES SHACKLED TO THE BODY POLITIC UPON THAT MAIN AVENUE ONCE KNOWN AS DOWNTOWN AMERICA. FURTHERMORE, REGARDING TWENTY-THIRD MAY TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN, THAT DATE HANDWRITTEN UPON THE SECOND “ORDER” SO “ISSUED” BY CLARK REMAINS WITHOUT EXPLANATION ASIDE FROM PLANNED AMBUSH, THAT “ORDER” REPOSTED AGAIN FOR PURPOSE REITERATION THAT THIS CRETIN CLARK STILL WALKS FREE AMONGST US, AS BELOW,

TWENTY FIFTH MAY TWO THOUSAND EIGHTEEN NOW GET OUT INVOLUNTARY SCREEN RECORDS REQUESTS NOT APPRECIATED ADJOURNMENTS EITHER THATS WHAT THIS MEANS
WHAT HAPPENED ON TWENTY-THIRD MAY TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN WARRANTING THIS ORDER? VERY MANY OF US WOULD LIKE TO KNOW. [EXPAND THIS HEINOUS CRIME]
FIVE, TWO BLACK FEMALES CLAIMED TO BE AFFILIATED WITH THAT ENTITY SO NAMED “CPC” INDEED NOT YET PRESENT WITHIN THE WALLS OF THAT BUILDING TO BE FOUND WITHIN HOWELL TWP MUNICIPAL COURT. BOTH ARRIVE SOME TIME LATER AFTER HAVING DUTIFULLY STOOD STILL IN PUBLIC SPACE DURING WHICH TIME THAT CRETIN SO NAMED “ROSEMARY O’DONNELL” WHOSE “PROFESSIONAL” CALLING C.M.C.A. AND/OR OTHER CERTAINLY FOLLOWS IN THE FOOTSTEPS OF ONE OR MORE RETTZO-DEVLINS, THAT VERY SPECIAL ONE SO NAMED D.M.C.A., WHEREIN THAT PUBLIC SPACE O’DONNELL ENGAGED IN COURSE OF CONDUCT TO NOT SPEAK TO ME DIRECTLY BUT RATHER BARK AT STATIONARY BAILIFFS FOR PURPOSE ORDERING ME INDIRECTLY TO MOVE FROM ONE LOCATION TO ANOTHER FOR PURPOSE CRETIN.

SIX, THAT VERY FIRST AND THAT VERY CONTROVERSIAL CONVERSATION CONDUCTED BETWEEN MYSELF, ACM, AND THOSE TWO BLACK FEMALES ALLEGED TO BE AFFILIATED WITH THE ENTITY SO NAMED “CPC”, THAT SEVEN MINUTE FORTY-FOUR SECOND CONVERSATION REPOSTED BELOW,

[UPDATE 0458 EST: HOWELL TWP “COURT” “STAFF” UP EARLY FOR EMERGENCY MEETING ON HOW TO EFFECT GREATEST CONSEQUENCE OF MAGNITUDE UPON ME LATER THIS MORNING IN RETALIATION FOR SUBMITTING A LEGAL REQUEST FOR THE GENUINE RECORD OF COURT CONTAINING THEREIN ANY AND ALL PLEA(S) MADE BY MYSELF OR ILLEGALLY ON MY BEHALF AND AS SUCH IN SECRET. IN BRIEF, I, ACM, ASKED THAT COURT FOR MOST RECENT VALUE ENTERED PURSUANT TO “NOT GUILTY” OR “GUILTY” PLEA. FOLLOWING FROM CRIME UPON CRIME. ITS TIRESOME IN FACT. BUT LIVE POSTING DURING THE PROCEEDING SCHEDULED FOR LATER THIS MORNING!]

[UPDATE 0501 EST: SAME “COURT” “STAFF” CONCLUDED THEIR BEST OPTION TO “CANCEL” TODAY’S PROCEEDING IN LIEU OF ETHICS GRIEVANCE HAVING BEEN DOCKETED AGAINST CAOLA, K.M. IN RATHER SHORT ORDER. “STAFF” INTENT RE: CANCELLATION FOR PURPOSE OF KEEPING MYSELF, ACM, AND ANY AND ALL NAMED PARTIES ENGAGED WITH THESE FACILE PROCEEDINGS DEEP INTO FALL TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN.]

SEVEN, NOTES ON THAT CONVERSATION ABOVE.

BLACK FEMALE ONE: “TATIEN”

BLACK FEMALE TWO: “TIE EVENS”

NEITHER OF WHOM WEARING IDENTIFICATION OF ANY SORT.

ACM: “WHAT DOES CPC STAND FOR?”

CPC: “IT DOESN’T STAND FOR ANYTHING”

THOSE TWO FEMALE INDIVIDUALS MADE AN EGREGIOUS FRAUD CLAIM DIRECTLY TO CLARK, SUSAN SCHROEDER IN THE MINUTES AFTER THAT CONVERSATION HAD CONCLUDED WHEREIN THAT CLAIM IT HATH BEEN ALLEGED THAT I, ACM, HAD INDEED THREATENED EITHER ONE OR BOTH “TATIEN” AND/OR “TIE EVENS” DURING THAT SINGLE CONVERSATION CONDUCTED UPON DATE TWENTY-FIVE MAY TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN, AUDIO OF WHICH POSTED ABOVE.

CPC: “IT’S A NON-PROFIT”

NO, ITS NOT. ITS COUNTY GOVERNMENT. PERIOD.

EIGHT, SECOND HALF OF THE PROCEEDING UNLIKE WHAT CAME BEFORE AND PUNCTUATED BY HEINOUS CRIME THAT IN ALL LIKELIHOOD WILL BE DOCKETED AS A “HATE CRIME” COMMITTED BY THE “JUDGE” NO LESS FOR REASON ALONE A VICTIM OF ASSAULT HATH BEEN ORDERED TO UNDERGO UNSPECIFIED “PSYCHIATRIC EVALUATION” FOR STATED PURPOSE “COMMITMENT AND COMPETENCY” WHICH TO NOTE IN MEDICAL TERMS MEAN NOTHING AT ALL WITHOUT ANY GENUINE CONTEXT PROVIDED FOR ISSUANCE OF THAT “ORDER” POSTED TWICE HEREIN. RESULT OF THAT ORDER IN TWO: IMMENSE DANGER TO MY PHYSICAL WELL-BEING AND THEFT OF THIRTY-SIX HOURS OF MY TIME.

ASIDE, NOTES ON ANY AND ALL DIALOGUE DURING THAT SECOND HALF, AS BELOW,

CLARK: APPROXIMATELY, “DUE TO YOUR CONDUCT TODAY AND PRIOR I AM SO TAKING ANOTHER JUDGE WITH THE MATTER OF YOUR INVOLUNTARY COMMITMENT.”

FURTHERMORE CLARK DID INDEED READ STRAIGHT FROM NO LESS THAN TWO DOCUMENTS THAT I, ACM, HAD IN THE WEEKS AND INDEED MONTHS PRIOR SUBMITTED TO HOWELL TWP MUNICIPAL COURT STAFF THEREAFTER PROVIDING NO RESPONSE WHATSOEVER TO THAT NAMED PARTY AND AT THE TIME DECLARED TWICE PRO SE.

THAT FIRST TEXT FROM WHICH CLARK READ ALOUD WAS INDEED A LETTER THAT HAD BEEN SENT VIA US FUCKING MAILS SUBSEQUENT TO THAT MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT OF SEVENTEEN APRIL TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN AND OF THE HIGHEST SIGNIFICANCE WITHIN THAT LETTER I HAD SPECIFICALLY REQUESTED AN ADJOURNMENT OF THAT PROCEEDING SCHEDULED UPON DATE TWENTY-FIVE APRIL TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN FOLLOWING FROM A “CONCUSSION” AND/OR “HEAD INJURY” SUSTAINED DURING THAT CITATION-LESS SINGLE VEHICLE ACCIDENT HAVING OCCURRED SECONDARY TO MECHANICAL FAILURE OF THAT BELOVED VEHICLE.

THAT ADJOURNMENT WAS INDEED GRANTED, HOWEVER THE CRETINS OF TWP HOWELL MUNICIPAL COURT DID NOT BOTHER TO RETURN PHONE CALLS OR RESPOND TO EMAILS REQUESTING CONFIRMATION OF THAT ADJOURNMENT UNTIL THE VERY DAY PRIOR IN MOST SADISTIC COURSE OF CONDUCT EXHIBITED BY THOSE SAME CRIMINALS FROM WHOM CROCODILE TEARS OF CONCERN FOR MY “MENTAL HEALTH” READILY FLOW FORTH UPON ANY ALL CONFRONTATION WITH THE BLUNT FORCE OBJECT OF RAW TRUTH.

NINE, CLARK CALLS CAOLA, K.M. AND THAT ATTORNEY REPRESENTING THE FEMALE DEFENDANT WHO HATH BEEN ARRESTED IN THE YEAR TWO-THOUSAND SEVENTEEN SUBSEQUENT TO COMMITTING ASSAULT UPON MYSELF, ACM, WHICH HAD INDEED BEEN CAPTURED ON VIDEO RECORDING AND FOR THAT REASON ALONE THE VERY NEXT DAY “BONDAREW” AND CO. ARRIVED AT MY FORMER HOME AND THOSE EVENTS FOLLOWING FROM THAT ARRIVAL OF THE HIGHEST SIGNIFICANCE AND REMAIN CONFIDENTIAL PURSUANT TO THAT SINGLE SENTENCE FRAUD DRUG CHARGE ALLEGATION LEVIED AGAINST MYSELF, ACM, BY “BONDAREW” AND NOW UPON DATE TWENTY-NINTH JUNE TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN IT HATH BEEN CONFIRMED THAT A FRAUD DRUG SPECIMEN WITH EVIDENCE TAG BEARING MY NAME WAS INDEED PLANTED IN THAT RECORDS ROOM LOCATED WITHIN THE HOWELL TWP POLICE DEPARTMENT BY THAT VERY SAME “BONDAREW”, FORMER “SGT” AND RECIPIENT OF NO LESS THAN TWO ANONYMOUS TIPS FROM MYSELF, ACM, REGARDING THE TRAFFICKING OF HEROIN IN THE VICINITY OF TWP HOWELL AND THEREABOUT.

TEN, THE CONSEQUENCE OF MAGNITUDE FOLLOWING FROM THAT “ORDER” PRE-DATED TWENTY-THIRD MAY TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN WHICH IN PLANNED AMBUSH EFFECTED UPON ME ON DATE TWENTY-FIFTH MAY TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN, THAT ORDER POSTED ONE ABOVE TO THOSE CONSEQUENCE(S) PRIOR CLAIMED NAMED, BELOW NAMED, FIRST THAT “ORDER” FOR THIRD TIME BELOW,

TWENTY FIFTH MAY TWO THOUSAND EIGHTEEN NOW GET OUT INVOLUNTARY SCREEN RECORDS REQUESTS NOT APPRECIATED ADJOURNMENTS EITHER THATS WHAT THIS MEANS
WHAT HAPPENED ON TWENTY-THIRD MAY TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN WARRANTING THIS ORDER? VERY MANY OF US WOULD LIKE TO KNOW. [EXPAND THIS HEINOUS CRIME]
ELEVEN, WELCOME TO ARIADNE DESIGN, COURTESY BLACKROCK FINANCIAL AND MONMOUTH MEDICAL CENTER, BELOW IN ONE DARK PHOTOGRAPH THAT CRIME SCENE WHEREIN IT HATH BEEN CLAIMED IN ATTEMPT TO EFFECT CONSEQUENCE OF MAGNITUDE UPON ME IN THE FORM OF INVOLUNTARY COMMITMENT OF UNKNOWN DURATION FOLLOWING FROM A FRAUD CLAIM MADE BY “WINSTON” OF MONMOUTH MEDICAL CENTER THAT I, ACM, WAS IN FACT THE AGGRESSOR AND INDEED ASSAULTED THAT VERY SAME FEMALE INDIVIDUAL WHO HAD BEEN ARRESTED IN THE YEAR TWO-THOUSAND SEVENTEEN FOR COMMITTING ASSAULT RECORDED ON VIDEO AGAINST MYSELF, ACM. THAT CRIME SCENE BELOW,

YES YOU ASSAULT WOMEN AND YES YOU WILL INDEED BE DISAPPEARED FOR SAME
MONMOUTH MEDICAL CENTER: YES, YOU ASSAULT WOMEN. AND YES, YOU WILL INDEED BE DISAPPEARED FOR SAME. [EXPAND THIS FUCKING FILTH]
TWELVE, FOLLOWING FROM POINTS THREE AND FOUR IN THE AGENDA ATOP THIS POST, BELOW THE COMPLETE RECORD AVAILABLE TO MYSELF AT PRESENT TIME OF LABORATORY STUDIES CONDUCTED FOR NO REASON WHATSOEVER OTHER THAN THE TEXT FOUND IN THAT “ORDER” DATED TWENTY-THIRD MAY TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN AND/OR TWENTY-FIFTH MAY TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN “ISSUED” BY UNDERSIGNED “CLARK”, THOSE LABS FOLLOWING FROM RATHER CURIOUS ORDERS THAT HAD BEEN ENTERED FOR BLOOD TO BE TAKEN FROM MYSELF AT TIME CLAIMED TO BE ONE-EIGHTEEN PM EST ON TWENTY-FIVE MAY, THOSE RESULTS NOT PROVIDED TO ME IN ANY CAPACITY ON EITHER TWENTY-FIVE OR TWENTY-SIX MAY DESPITE ONE OR MORE ANOMALOUS VALUES HAVING BEEN “FOUND.” BELOW IN SEVEN WHAT A “PSYCHIATRIC EVALUATION” CONSISTS OF IN ITS ENTIRETY ASIDE FROM HOURS SPENT FIGHTING THAT FRAUD CLAIM OF ASSAULT AGAINST THAT PRIOR DESCRIBED FEMALE, THE RECORD OBTAINED FROM STOLEN BLOOD AS FOLLOWS,

 

 

THIRTEEN, THAT GENUINE DOCUMENT, IMPLICIT TORT, FOLLOWING FROM SIXTEEN MARCH TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN WHEREFROM CLARK HATH READ ALOUD IN FALSE SPEECH OR WHERE FROM CLARK READ FROM FALSE TEXT, THAT REQUEST OF THE “STAFF” OF HOWELL TWP MUNICIPAL COURT SUBMITTED TO CONFIRM WHETHER  PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT FROM SAME WAS TO BE EXPECTED (NO, OBVIOUSLY) AND FURTHER CLAIMED BY THAT FUCKING CRETIN CAOLA TO BE A “REQUEST FOR ELECTRONICS” FROM TWP HOWELL WHATEVER. THAT’S THE REAL DEAL. ELECTRONICS. AS IN POLICE RADIOS STOLEN FROM THE NORTH BRUNSWICK POLICE DEPARTMENT. AS IN THAT CACHE OF HOLLOW-POINT AMMUNITION FOUND WITHIN ONE OR MORE DOMICILES IN FARMINGDALE. OR LIKE THAT SKELETON KEY TO POLICE CUFFS LEFT PANTS POCKET. YES INDEED, THE MATTERS OF CONSEQUENCE FOLLOWING FROM THE INTERACTION OF THOSE “STAFF” PRIOR DESCRIBED WITH INFORMATION IN TEXT ALONE HATH PRECIPITATED THE START OF THE DISSOLUTION OF THAT ENTITY FORMERLY AND AT PRESENT SO NAMED HOWELL TOWNSHIP. REGIME CHANGE MOTHERFUCKERS. A TORT IN THE FORM OF INFORMATION THEORY FAILED IN PRACTICE, AS BELOW,

INFORMATION THEORY
[EXPAND THE TARS]
FOURTEEN, YES, INFORMATION THEORY. WHEREIN INFORMATION IS TRANSMITTED BETWEEN POINTS IN SPACE AND TIME. CAN YOU ANSWER THE PHONE? CAN YOU RESPOND TO AN EMAIL? CAN YOU RESPOND TO A LETTER? YOU OBVIOUSLY CAN SQUIRREL ANY AND ALL COMMUNIQUES IN THAT “TO BE FORGED” PILE AND EXERT ENORMOUS EFFORT TO CONCEAL THAT NOW WELL-KNOWN FACT YET HOWEVER YOU FAILED TO STOP THE LOSS OF ONE HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS FROM THE COFFERS, PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE, OF HOWELL TOWNSHIP WHICH UPON CONCLUSION OF THESE PROCEEDINGS WILL INDEED SWIFTLY BECOME AVAILABLE TO MYSELF ALONE FOR SUBSEQUENT DISBURSEMENT, FIRST ACT IN COMMISSION OF A LEGAL TEXTBOOK DOCUMENTING EVERY SINGLE CRIME COMMITTED BY THE HOWELL TWP MUNICIPAL COURT AGAINST MYSELF AND ALL THOSE SIMILARLY VICTIM TO ARIADNE DESIGN.

FIFTEEN, THE VERY LAST NOTE UPON THIS MORNING TWENTY-NINE JUNE TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN AND RETURNING TO THE READINGS CLARK VERBALIZED RIGHT PRIOR TO THAT END ON TWENTY-FIFTH MAY WHEREIN LIEU OF FULL ELOCUTION CLARK HAD ELECTED TO MUMBLE THOSE COURTS CODES IN THE MANNER DESCRIBED BELOW,

“ONE TWO [INAUDIBLE] [INAUDIBLE]”

“ONE TWO [INAUDIBLE] [INAUDIBLE]”

IT REMAINS UNCLEAR WHETHER OR NOT CLARK READ FROM A FORGED DOCUMENT OR ELECTED OF HER OWN ACCORD TO ALTER IN SPEECH MY WRITTEN WORD. FOR THOSE SO PERPLEXED BY THE MUNICIPAL CODE MYSTERY HEREIN FIFTEEN LIES THE ANSWER. HOWELL TOWNSHIP IS INDEED THE ENEMY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND WILL BE DESTROYED IN THE FEDERAL JUDICIARY IN SHORT ORDER FOLLOWING FROM THE REVELATIONS THAT ONE OR MORE INDIVIDUALS HIDDEN WITHIN THAT ARIADNE DESIGN HATH BEEN FOUND GUILTY OF TREASON FOR REASON ACCOMPLICE TO ACTS OF WAR COMMITTED AGAINST THE CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES ON THAT DATE NINE-ELVEN TWO-THOUSAND AND ONE.

FIRST AND FOREMOST AMONGST THOSE PRIOR DESCRIBED, THERESA BERGER.

[FIN]