SALT CONFIRMED, SALTED RECORDS MARKED IN ONE FULL YEAR LATER UPON THE ANNIVERSARY OF THE MOST HEINOUS TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN SALT ATTACK WITH ORIGIN ZONE

SALTED RECORDS RECEIVED AND RETRIEVED TWO YEARS RUNNING ON SIXTH AUGUST, CATASTROPHE TO BE AVOIDED AT ALL COSTS AND ALL PAPERS LEFT BEHIND

IT’S BEEN SOME TIME SINCE THE COURTS UP CLOSE HATH BEEN THE SUBJECT HEREUPON BAETYL SINCE THE FLAWLESS VICTORY OVER HOPEWELL MOON ON THE ELEVENTH OF JUNE, WHEREFROM DETENTE IN MONMOUTH REQUIRED TO AVOID IMMINENT AND MOST HORRIFIC LEVIED BY HOPEWELL IN THEIR PROLONGED MOMENT OF DEFEAT, AND DIRECTLY FOLLOWING FROM MATTERS IN MONMOUTH HAD TO BE TRIAGED BELOW THE RISK OF [REDACT] PERHAPS STILL AT PLAY, NEXT LEVEL UP THE GOAL AS IT WAS BEFORE AND WHENEVER THAT DATE MAY BE THE MOST THOROUGH PREPARATIONS OBVIOUSLY REQUIRED AS THE SAGA OF BAETYL IN THE ARCHIVE SO NAMED AND SO FAMED SPANS YEARS AND YEARS COMBINED

MANY UNTAINTED HARD-COPY RECORDS SALTED BY PROXIMITY TO THE EIGHT SIX EIGHTEEN QUARANTINE.

ACTION IN RETURN FOR ALL THOSE YEARS AND YEARS MORE CERTAIN NOW IN LINE WITH PRIOR CASE HISTORY, SYMBOLIC AND SADISTIC, BOUND FOR THE CASE HISTORY.

NOTE ONE, MOST IMPORTANT SIGN THE INCIPIENT STAGE OF UNFURLING SALT, FIRST OLFACTORY, SECOND BURNING EARDRUMS, THIRD MORE AND MORE PERCEIVED VOLUME ENTERING THE AIRWAY.

NOTE TWO, THE OFFENDING DOCUMENTS WERE PHOTOGRAPHED OUTDOORS AND THEN SEQUESTERED AND DISPOSED, TO BE BURNT WITH STERILE TECHNIQUE FAR FROM UNSUSPECTING AIRWAYS THAT MAY BECOME SWOLLEN AND OCCLUDED IF EXPOSED TO SALT FOR AN EXTENDED PERIOD.

NOTE THREE, EARLIER NOTICE ONE IF FOUR IN THE SERIES FROM THE SAME COURTHOUSE NOT PERCEIVED TO BE SALTED THEN OR NOW. ABOUT A WEEK, USPS HAS IT ALL BACKED-UP ON A FLOPPY DISK. SO DOES GOOGLE. [THE DROP INTO THE FUTURE]

STAY TUNED!

THE TOWNSHIP OF LAWRENCE GONE ROGUE, WHAT ELSE IS NEW, SALTED RECORDS, AND ONE OR MORE ACTS OF CRIMINAL COERCION, LAWRENCE TOWNSHIP, THE SHAME OF NEW JERSEY

RETTZO-DEVLIN

THE FOLLOWING TWO CLAIMS EXHIBITED HEREIN TWO LETTERS ARE STATEMENTS OF INTENT TO HARM, MAIM, KILL OR FALSELY IMPRISON THE DEFENDANT FOR LIFE. WHY? BECAUSE THE CASE IS IN LAWRENCE. NORCIA SAYS OTHERWISE. EXCEPT THE CASE IS IN LAWRENCE. SO NORCIA DENIES A CITIZEN THE RIGHT TO KNOW WHAT CRIME HE WAS ACCUSED OF COMMITTING AND IN DOING SO MAKES THE ABSURD CLAIM THAT THE LAWRENCE TOWNSHIP MUNICIPAL COURT IS NOT AFFILIATED WITH THE TOWNSHIP OF LAWRENCE. WHY? TO MOCK THE DEFENDANT.

THE REASONABLE READER MAY PERCEIVE THE CLAIMS AS MADE IN ERR, HOWEVER, FIVE HUNDRED AND TWENTY-SEVEN DAYS AFTER LAWRENCE FAILED TO SERVE A COMPLAINT, THE TOWNSHIP OF LAWRENCE REFUSES TO SERVE A COMPLAINT ONCE AGAIN, AND A BLACK AND WHITE COPY OF PAGE ONE ALONE IS NOT THE GENUINE SEVEN PAGE COMPLAINT.

DID NORCIA COMMIT A SEX-CRIME? MAYBE NOT OFFICIALLY, DISCRIMINATION AT LEAST, BIAS INTIMIDATION IN ALL LIKE

NORCIA MAKES AN ABSURD CLAIM IN THE SECOND LETTER THAT THE MATTER AT HAND SOMEHOW INVOLVES DOMESTIC VIOLENCE. SO NORCIA KEEPS EITHER ONE OR ALL OF THE SEVEN PAGES OF THE COMPLAINT WHEREUPON ONE OF THE SEVEN WITHHELD PAGES IS TO BE FOUND AN UNKNOWN DESCRIPTION OF ACTS THAT A DEFENDANT ALLEGEDLY COMMITTED WHICH DID QUALIFY UNDER THE STANDARDS FOR DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SET FORTH IN CHAPTER TWENTY-FIVE OF THE CRIMINAL CODE, AND AS SUCH NORCIA CLAIMS TO KNOW MORE ABOUT THE DOWNGRADED PETTY DISORDERLY PERSONS OFFENSE THAN THE DEFENDANT AGAINST WHOM AN AMENDED COMPLAINT WAS ISSUED WITH THE EXACT SAME OFFENSE DATE OF SIXTH SEPTEMBER TWO-THOUSAND SEVENTEEN.

PROVES FAR BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT THAT LAWRENCE TOWNSHIP OPERATES FAR OUTSIDE THE BOUNDS OF THE NEW JERSEY CIVIL AND CRIMINAL CODE, AND DOES SO IN STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE.

NO LAWRENCE, THIS IS HAPPENING IN YOUR HOUSE, AND YOU ARE WITHHOLDING INFORMATION ABOUT THE CASE SO NAMED PICKETTERS’ CHARGE THAT WAS REMANDED TO THE LAWRENCE TOWNSHIP MUNICIPAL COURT NO LESS THAN SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE DATE AFFIXED TO BOTH LETTERS ABOVE AND BELOW.

THE TOWNSHIP OF LAWRENCE IS WITHHOLDING INFORMATION ON THE CASE, HAS REFUSED TO SEND OFFICIAL LEGAL NOTICE TO AN AMENDED ADDRESS SPECIFIED BY THE DEFENDANT AND FURTHERMORE NO OFFICIAL LEGAL NOTICE OF ANY KIND HATH BEEN RECEIVED AT SUCH TIME THREE DAYS PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED COURT DATE.

TO WIT, LAWRENCE TWP TRIED TO SLIP ONE BY AND THE EFFECT THE FALSE IMPRISONMENT OF YOURS TRULY. YET AGAIN.


IT IS TIME FOR THE LAWRENCE TOWNSHIP MUNICIPALITY, AND THE LAWRENCE TOWNSHIP MUNICIPAL COURT TO BE SHUTTERED PERMANENTLY, AND IT IS TIME FOR MANY OF THOSE EMPLOYED WITHIN TO BE PROSECUTED BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.


WHERE ARE THE OTHER SIX PAGES? NOTE, LAWRENCE TWP MUNI COURT REFUSED TO MAIL ANYTHING TO THE ADDRESS SPECIFIED IN PHONE-CALL. STILL NO OLN.

WHO EXACTLY IS “JOSHANI ALMONTE, DET.” AND WHEN DOES HE BEGIN HIS OR HER TERM OF IMPRISONMENT FOR PERJURY AT THE VERY MINIMUM.

WHOSE WEBSITE?

WHAT URL?

WHAT PERSONAL INFORMATION?

PURPOSE TO HARASS? ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME? NO.

WHOSE FUCKING WEBSITE ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?

GET TO JAIL NOW JOSHANI.

THIS IS WHY THE OTHER SIX PAGES ARE REQUIRED.

NO WEBSITE IS NAMED.

NO VICTIM IS NAMED.

WHO IS THE VICTIM?

SO SOMEONE GOES ON TO A WEBSITE AND MERCER COUNTY CLAIMS THE WEB DEVELOPER FIFTY MILES AWAY IN A SEPARATE COUNTY COMMITTED CRIMES IN THE JURISDICTION OF MERCER COUNTY AGAINST AN UNKNOWN INDIVIDUAL WHO ACCESSED A WEBSITE NOT NAMED, ON A DATE NOT SPECIFIED, AND FURTHERMORE NO PROOF ALLEGED VICTIM WAS EVER ON THAT WEBSITE.

NO ACTUAL CRIMINAL CONDUCT IS DESCRIBED WHATSOEVER.

ANY WEBSITE ON THE INTERNET COULD BE FOUND IN THE OTHER SIX PAGES AND ATTRIBUTED TO THE DEFENDANT.

HERE WE ARE AGAIN LAWRENCE, AND THIS TIME ITS AN EXPLICIT HATE CRIME AGAINST THE DEFENDANT.

WHERE IS THE SUPPLEMENTARY AFFIDAVIT?

WILL WE FIND ANY NAMED WEBSITE AT ALL ON THE OTHER SIX PAGES?

IS THE DEFENDANT BEING FRAMED?

WHAT PERSONAL INFORMATION WAS POSTED?

WHY WAS THAT PERSONAL INFORMATION DEEMED “PROTECTED” ON SIXTH SEPTEMBER TWO-THOUSAND SEVEN?

IS FREE SPEECH BEING PROSECUTED?

OBVIOUSLY.

WHOSE ORIGINAL CONTENT AND ARTISTIC CREATIONS HAVE BEEN DEEMED CRIMINAL ACTS?

WHOSE COPYRIGHTS ARE BEING ATTACKED? THE DEFENDANT’S? WE DON’T KNOW.

ALL WE WANT IS JUSTICE.

FIRE NORCIA TODAY.

FIRE JOSHANI TODAY.

THEN WE MAY PROCEED TO TALK ABOUT THE AMOUNT OF MONEY LAWRENCE TWP OWES THE DEFENDANT.

OR DOES THIS FARCE PROCEED TO UNLAWFULLY CURTAIL THE FREEDOM OF THE DEFENDANT TO PURSUE CIVIL ACTION.

OBVIOUSLY.

WHY IS THERE A NEW DOCKET NUMBER IN THIS ALLEGEDLY DOWNGRADED COMPLAINT?

IS THE OLD CASE STILL ACTIVE AND LURKING IN THE ABYSS OF ZONE?

WHERE ARE THE CERTIFIED DISPOSITION DOCUMENTS?