PLAUSIBLE DUPLICATES, ROUND TWO

CIS

COMPLAINT

WHAT DOES SBI MEAN? (STATE POLICE LINK)

WHAT ARE SBI NUMBERS USED FOR?

FINGERPRINT IDENTIFICATION, INTER ALIA.

THE SIMPLICITY OF THIS COMPLAINT NOT TO WASTE EFFORT ON PRESIDING QUINN AT THE MONMOUTH VICINAGE.

OTHERWISE, MANY MORE WORDS AND MANY MORE VIOLATIONS COULD BE DESCRIBED IN ACTUAL FACT.

HOWEVER, IT REMAINS TO BE SEEN IF QUINN IS CAPABLE OF ANY SEMBLANCE OF LAWFUL CONDUCT IN STILL POSITION OF PJ CV, CIVIL DIVISION, MONMOUTH COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT.

BECAUSE WE BUMP UP TO THE NEXT LEVEL AFTER THIS ONE GETS THROUGH.

ACT ACCORDINGLY DIPSHIT.

YES INDEED, YOU QUINN.

WHEN ALL OUR FAVORITE THINGS CONJOIN AS ONE, COERCION, PERJURY, AND FRAUD CLAIMS OF NARCOTICS RELATED ARRESTS, PLAUSIBLE DUPLICATES, THE QUESTION ANSWERED, WHY INDEED HE WEARS THE VEST

PROBABLE CAUSE FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A COMPLAINT – WARRANT

ON OR ABOUT [TWO-THOUSAND SEVENTEEN] THE DEFENDANT DID KNOWINGLY AND PURPOSEFULLY COMMIT NUMEROUS ACTS CONTRARY TO N.J.S.A. 2C:13-5(A) ET SEQ, AND NO LESS THAN ONE ACT OF PERJURY CONTRARY TO N.J.S.A. 2C:28-1(B) WHEN HE KNOWINGLY PROMULGATED THE FALSE CLAIM PLAINTIFF HAD BEEN ARRESTED FOR UNKNOWN AND UNSPECIFIED NARCOTICS RELATED OFFENSES IN THE NARRATIVE OF AN ARREST REPORT WHEREIN DEFENDANT FURTHER PROMULGATED THE ALARMING CLAIM THAT PLAINTIFF’S LEGAL IDENTITY COULD NOT BE DISCERNED FROM ANOTHER INDIVIDUAL WITH SAME FIRST AND LAST NAME, MIDDLE INITIAL WITHHELD, AND WITH WHOM THE PLAINTIFF WAS ALLEGED TO SHARE DUPLICATE STATE BUREAU OF INFORMATION (SBI) NUMBERS THAT ARE OTHERWISE MARKED AS UNIQUE FINGERPRINT IDENTIFIERS.

DAMAGES

BY THE ACTIONS OF THE DEFENDANT DESCRIBED ABOVE, THE PLAINTIFF DID BECOME A VICTIM OF THIRD-DEGREE PERJURY AND THIRD-DEGREE CRIMINAL COERCION FOLLOWING FROM THE GRADING SET FORTH IN N.J.S.A. 2C:13-5(B) WHEREBY THE UTTERED THREAT TO COMMIT A CRIME MORE SERIOUS THAN ONE OF THE FOURTH DEGREE WAS COMMITTED IN NO LESS THAN ONE ACT OF PERJURY.

THE DEFENDANT DID PURPOSEFULLY SLANDER THE PLAINTIFF IN THE NARRATIVE OF [REDACT] REPORT SEVENTEEN-[REDACTED] CALCULATED TO SUBSTANTIALLY HARM THE PLAINTIFF WITH RESPECT TO NEARLY EVERY FACET OF LIFE, AND DID SO WITHHOLD WHAT SPECIFIC NARCOTICS RELATED OFFENSE(S) THE PLAINTIFF HAD NEVER IN-FACT BEEN ARRESTED FOR, AND FURTHER CLAIMED TO PROVIDE INFORMATION DESCRIBING THE FRAUDULENT NARCOTICS RELATED ARREST CLAIMS IN PAPERS TRANSMIT TO ANOTHER PUBLIC AGENCY WHEREBY BOTH PUBLIC AND PRIVATE RECORDS WOULD BEAR A MARK THAT COULD IMPLY THE PLAINTIFF HAD BEEN ARRESTED AND CHARGED WITH ONE OR MORE CRIMES RANGING VAST IN DEGREE, FROM THE FIRST, FOR EXAMPLE STRICT LIABILITY DRUG INDUCED HOMICIDE, TO PERHAPS A PETTY DISORDERLY PERSONS CHARGE FOR CONTROLLED DRUG SUBSTANCE POSSESSION. FURTHERMORE, THE CONDUCT OF THE DEFENDANT IS A HAIR’S BREADTH FROM SURREPTITIOUS ACTS OF PLANTING CDS IN VICINITY OF A PERSON TO EFFECT THE APPEARANCE OF CDS POSSESSION, UNLAWFUL ARREST AND FALSE IMPRISONMENT OF THAT PERSON FOR NARCOTICS ORIGINALLY IN POSSESSION OF THE DEFENDANT WHO IS OR WAS A POLICE OFFICER PERMITTED TO HANDLE CONTROLLED DRUG SUBSTANCES IN OFFICIAL CAPACITY WHILE CONDUCTING THE ROUTINE BUSINESS OF LAW ENFORCEMENT.

THE ACTIONS OF THE DEFENDANT ARE GROUNDS FOR HIS IMMEDIATE TERMINATION FROM THE POSITION OF [SERGEANT] HE MAY OR MAY NOT CURRENTLY HOLD IN THE [REDACTED] AND FURTHERMORE THE DEFENDANT SHOULD BE PROHIBITED FROM BOTH HOLDING PUBLIC OFFICE OR FURTHER EMPLOYMENT AT ANY PUBLIC AGENCY. THE ACTS DESCRIBED CONSTITUTE PROBABLE CAUSE FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A COMPLAINT – WARRANT FOR THE ARREST OF THE DEFENDANT, WITH THE PROSECUTION FOLLOWING FROM SEEKING CONVICTION AND MAXIMUM SENTENCING GUIDELINES FOR SUCH GROTESQUE ABUSE OF THE PUBLIC TRUST COMMITTED IN OFFICIAL CAPACITY BY A SWORN OFFICER OF THE PEACE WITH CAPRICIOUS DISREGARD FOR THE INEVITABLY DISASTROUS CONSEQUENCES HEREBY MANIFEST.

IN OTHER WORDS

UPON THE CROSS