FIELD TRIP TO MONSEY NY REPORT INBOUND

FILTHY JEWS IN THE SEWERS AND OTHER VIGNETTES FROM GHETTO OF NATIONAL INTEREST

THE 34TH DAY T MINUS TWO ZERO ONE: HAMILTON TOWNSHIP MAYOR YAEDE IN BID TO BUY HERSELF ONE WAY TRIP TO FEDERAL PRISON

EXCERPT FROM THE OPRA CHRONICLES OF COUNTY MERCER

ENLARGE THE STORY

WHAT’S ACTUALLY HAPPENING HERE?

THE MAYOR OF HAMILTON TOWNSHIP, COUNTY MERCER, IN LEAGUE WITH HAMILTON BUSINESS ADMINISTRATOR DAVID KENNY ACCUSED THE CFO OF HAMILTON TOWNSHIP, JOHN BARRETT, OF STEALING TWO LAPTOPS THAT HE APPARENTLY USED IN OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER TO CONDUCT THE ROUTINE BUSINESS OF THE TOWNSHIP PRIOR TO FOURTH JANUARY TWO-THOUSAND NINETEEN.

IT REMAINS UNCLEAR WHEN AND WHY THE TWO LAPTOPS WERE DEEMED STOLEN PROPERTY, AND IT IS NOT YET CLEAR IF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF HAMILTON TOWNSHIP WAS EVER NOTIFIED THAT THOSE LAPTOPS WERE NO LONGER PERMITTED TO BE IN HIS POSSESSION. AS SUCH, THE CLAIM THAT JOHN BARRETT STOLE TWO LAPTOPS MAY INDEED BE AN OUTRIGHT FALSEHOOD USED TO TRIGGER HIS REMOVAL FROM THE TOWNSHIP.

IT IS REPORTED THAT THE TWO LAPTOPS IN BARRET’S POSSESSION WERE DEEMED IMPROPERLY DISPOSED ON OR ABOUT FOURTH JANUARY BY TOWNSHIP OFFICIAL DAVID KENNY WHO ALLEGEDLY REPORTED THAT ALLEGED THEFT IN-PERSON TO HAMILTON POLICE OFFICER AARON KULAK IN THE VICINITY OF HAMILTON PD HEADQUARTERS. DAVID KENNY QUITE POSSIBLY MADE THE REPORT TO KULAK IN THE PRESENCE OF HAMILTON MAYOR KELLY YAEDE AND/OR OTHER TOWNSHIP OFFICIALS. IT APPEARS THAT YAEDE REFUSES TO RELEASE KULAK’S BODY CAM FOOTAGE WITHOUT SUBSTANTIAL REDACTION AND FURTHERMORE THE TOWNSHIP UNDER YAEDE HAS DEMANDED AN OBSCENE AMOUNT OF MONEY FOR THE FOOTAGE THAT IN ALL LIKELIHOOD COULD BE TRANSFERRED TO A DVD IN SOME MINUTES AND PROMPTLY PROVIDED TO THE REQUESTORS, DAVID “GADFLY” HENDERSON AND SUBSEQUENTLY THE TRENTONIAN NEWSPAPER.

OF NOTE, DESPITE THE ALLEGATIONS OF OFFICIAL MISCONDUCT FROM COLLEAGUES, THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF HAMILTON REMAINS EMPLOYED BY THE TOWNSHIP AND AT PRESENT TIME ALSO REPORTEDLY IS THE PLAINTIFF IN A WHISTLE-BLOWER LAWSUIT NAMING MAYOR YAEDE AT LEAST, WITH THE POSSIBILITY OTHER AS YET UNKNOWN HAMILTON OFFICIALS TO BE NAMED  AS DEFENDANTS. THE SPECIFIC ALLEGATIONS MADE BY THE CFO IN THE LAWSUIT ARE NOT DESCRIBED, HOWEVER IT WAS REPORTEDLY FILED SUBSEQUENT TO THE FOURTH JANUARY THEFT ACCUSATIONS.

FROM THE PUBIC DISCLOSURES REPORTED IN THE TRENTONIAN, IT DOES APPEAR THAT YAEDE AND KENNY ATTEMPTED TO CONFISCATE ELECTRONIC DEVICES IN THE CUSTODY OF BARRET FOR THE PURPOSE OF OCCLUDING FINANCIAL CRIMES COMMITTED AGAINST THE TOWNSHIP OF HAMILTON BY NO LESS THAN MAYOR YAEDE AND BUSINESS DIRECTOR KENNY.

IF OFFICER AARON KULAK’S BODY CAMERA FOOTAGE REVEALS THE PRESENCE OF YAEDE AND/OR OTHER OFFICIALS AT POLICE HEADQUARTERS WITH DAVID KENNY ON FOURTH JANUARY, PROBABLE CAUSE FOR THE ISSUANCE OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST YAEDE AND OTHERS MAY BE FOUND, SPECIFICALLY FOR CRIMINAL VIOLATIONS OF ONE OR MORE FEDERAL STATUTES INCLUDING CONSPIRACY TO COVER-UP OFFICIAL MISCONDUCT AND THE FINANCIAL CRIMES SUBJECT OF THAT COVER-UP.

THE “GADFLY” SO NAMED IN THE TITLE OF THE SIX MARCH ARTICLE POSTED ABOVE HEREIN (WITH SOME ANNOTATION) AND THE TRENTONIAN ARTICLE DATED FIRST MARCH ARTICLE (LINK) DID REQUEST OFFICER KULAK’S BODY CAM FOOTAGE PURSUANT TO THE OPEN PUBLIC RECORDS ACT (OPRA), ALSO REFERRED TO AS THE “SUNSHINE LAW” BY THE TRENTONIAN AT VARIOUS TIMES, WHICH DOES REFER TO THE FOLLOWING PAMPHLET LAW,

P.L. 1963, c. 73 (C.47:1A-1 et seq.), as amended and supplemented

WHICH MAY BE UNDERSTOOD AS THE STATE VERSION OF THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA) WHICH PERMITS CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES TO REQUEST GOVERNMENT RECORDS FROM FEDERAL AGENCIES.

THE “GADFLY” IS PERMITTED TO REQUESTS BODY CAM FOOTAGE FOR THE SIMPLE REASON THAT HE IS RESIDENT OF THE TOWNSHIP AND IT IS IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST FOR CITIZENS TO BE PERMITTED ACCESS OF PUBLIC RECORDS THAT MAY WARRANT INVESTIGATION INTO PUBLIC OFFICIALS WHO KNOWINGLY AND PURPOSELY DISPOSE TAXPAYER DOLLARS INTO THEIR OWN PERSONAL BANK ACCOUNTS THROUGH CHANNELS OUTSIDE ALREADY ESTABLISHED SALARIES, INTER ALIA, WITH PUBLIC DISCLOSURE OF THE RECORD OF AN ATTEMPT MADE BY A TOWNSHIP OFFICIAL TO IMPUGN THE REPUTATION AND IN ALL LIKELIHOOD OUST THE TOWNSHIP’S CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER IMPLICITLY JUSTIFIED UNDER THE COMMON LAW FOR ALL THOSE RESIDENTS WHO ARE SUBJECT TO THE PROPERTY TAX THAT FILLS THE COFFERS OF THE TOWNSHIP.

IN THIS CASE, DAVID “GADFLY” HENDERSON FILED SUIT IN SUPERIOR COURT UNDER THE OPEN PUBLIC RECORDS ACT IN ATTEMPT TO OBTAIN OFFICER KULAK’S BODY CAM FOOTAGE.

REMARKABLY, THE CFO OF HAMILTON AND DAVID “GADFLY” HENDERSON ARE BOTH REPRESENTED BY THE SAME ATTORNEY, COLIN BELL, WHICH DOES MORE THAN IMPLY THAT COORDINATED ACTION AGAINST THE TOWNSHIP OF HAMILTON IS ONGOING.

RETALIATION, MOST FAMILIAR

THE TRENTONIAN ARTICLE PUBLISHED ON FIRST MARCH WAS REPORTED IN THE SIX MARCH ARTICLE TO CORRESPOND WITH BEHAVIORS CONSISTENT WITH CRIMINAL COERCION COMMITTED IN RETALIATION AGAINST DAVID HENDERSON BY PROXY. THE TRENTONIAN REPORTS THAT HAMILTON ZONING OFFICER MICHAEL COSMA DID TRAVEL TO THE HOME OF DAVID HENDERSON ON FIRST MARCH TO ALLEGE THAT HE WAS IN VIOLATION OF ONE OR MORE MUNICIPAL ORDINANCES, HOWEVER COSMA DID NOT ISSUE A TICKET AGAINST HENDERSON AND IT IS FURTHER REPORTED THAT HENDERSON AND COSMA LATER SPOKE BY PHONE (NOTA BENE, RECORD ALL PHONE CALLS WITH MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES) WHEREIN THE EXCHANGE EXPLICITLY ATTRIBUTES COSMA’S ACTIONS TO HIS HAMILTON TOWNSHIP BOSSES.

REFRESHER ON CRIMINAL COERCION

AN ACTOR COMMITS CRIMINAL COERCION IF HE OR SHE PURPOSEFULLY AND UNLAWFULLY RESTRICTS A PERSON’S ABILITY TO ENGAGE OR REFRAIN FROM ENGAGING IN CONDUCT THROUGH THREATS:

N.J.S.A. 2C:13-5 A(2), CONSISTING OF FALSE ACCUSATIONS THAT A PERSON COMMITTED A CRIMINAL AND/OR OTHER OFFENSE.

 

N.J.S.A. 2C:13-5 A(4), CONSISTING OF AN ACTION TAKEN OR WITHHELD BY AN OFFICIAL, OR CONSISTING OF AN ACTION THAT WOULD CAUSE AN OFFICIAL TO TAKE OR WITHHOLD ACTION.

 

N.J.S.A. 2C:13-5 A(6), CONSISTING OF PROVIDING TESTIMONY OR INFORMATION, OR WITHHOLDING TESTIMONY OR INFORMATION WITH REGARD TO A PERSON’S LEGAL CLAIM OR DEFENSE.

 

N.J.S.A. 2C:13-5 A(7), CONSISTING OF ANY OTHER ACT THAT IS INTENDED TO HARM A TARGETED PERSON WITH REGARD TO HIS OR HER HEALTH, SAFETY, BUSINESS, CALLING, CAREER, FINANCIAL CONDITION, REPUTATION OR PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS.

TEXT OF THE LAW
CRIMINAL COERCION
[ENLARGE]
CRIMINAL COERCION IN HAMILTON

HAMILTON TOWNSHIP MAYOR KELLY YAEDE DID COMMIT A SINGLE ACT OF CRIMINAL COERCION WHEN SHE PURPOSEFULLY ATTEMPTED TO RESTRICT THE ABILITY OF DAVID HENDERSON TO ENGAGE IN CONDUCT PURSUANT TO THE SUCCESSFUL ACQUISITION OF GOVERNMENT RECORDS IN HIS CAPACITY AS PLAINTIFF IN A PENDING CIVIL ACTION THAT IDENTIFIES YAEDE AS THE DEFENDANT. FURTHERMORE, YAEDE COMMITTED THE ACT IN OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS MAYOR OF THE TOWNSHIP OF HAMILTON WHEREBY THREATS WERE CONVEYED TO HENDERSON THROUGH A THIRD-PARTY WHO DID FALSELY ACCUSE HENDERSON OF NO LESS THAN ONE OFFENSE IN VIOLATION OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE, HOWEVER ZONING OFFICER MICHAEL COSMA DID NOT ISSUE A TICKET AGAINST HENDERSON ON FIRST MARCH FOR ANY OFFENSE. THE SINGLE ACT CONTRARY TO N.J.S.A. 2C:13-5 A(2) IS A CRIME OF THE FOURTH DEGREE.

LITTLE KELLY SAYS YOU’RE GONNA PAY

(ACTUAL PHOTO OF THE MAYOR OF HAMILTON)


FOLLOWING FROM 

FIRST MARCH TWO-THOUSAND NINETEEN, BOTOX ADDLED MAYOR IN BID TO BLOCK BODY CAM FOOTAGE RELEASE FOLLOWING FAILED ATTEMPT TO EXTORT REQUESTOR