THE 34TH DAY T MINUS ELEVEN FOURTEEN: THE ANN KLEIN FORENSIC CENTER, PART ONE, HELL ON EARTH AND THEN SOME CONFIRMED

NO CHARGES FOR GANG-RAPE TWELVE, PROBABLY MORE, INVESTIGATION DROPPED BY ANGELO ONOFRI, MERCER COUNTY PROSECUTOR

On eighth July two-thousand nineteen, the Trentonian newspaper published two articles credited to staff writer Issac Avilucea on the abyssmal treatment of inmates at a State facility entitled the Ann Klein Forensic Center.

The first article entitled Mercer County prosecutors close out Ann Klein gang rape probe without criminal charges, Trentonian direct link, archive, reports on end to MCPO investigation of gang-rape by “guards” of female inmate who may or may not remain alive at the present time. No information comes out of the Ann Klein Forensic Center that is not heavily sanitized by state and media.

Alleged follow-up on twenty-eighth November two-thousand eighteen report on brutal gang rape of one female inmate by group of guards numbered at 12, all of whom presumably state employees, Trentonian direct link. All we can discern from the report is the victim was capable of ambulation, allegedly.

THE FACILITY WITH NO NAME, NO HISTORY, NO PURPOSE AND NO JUSTICE, OTHERWISE JUST A DUNGEON

On nine July two-thousand nineteen, an initial cursory search using one or more publicly available search engines revealed that no wikipedia entry exists for the State of New Jersey Facility that was headline in both eighth July Trentonian articles reporting on incidents that allegedly transpired at the facility.

Scant information otherwise as to the origin of facility name and the specific subset of allegedly criminally insane inmates that are transferred to and incarcerated within to serve sentences following from criminal convictions that are either adjudicated against defendants with explicit endorsement at time of conviction, or upon subsequent diagnosis of one or more formal and purportedly lawful clinical course that yields findings of consistent with generalized designation of mental illness that correspond to entires in the most up to date ICD manual on the assessment and diagnosis of medical and psychiatric pathologies. Or just human persons disappeared to the dungeon on a whim.

APPARENT SUICIDE OF RODDRIC RUCKKER, NO EDIFYING CONTEXT, PLAUSIBLE VICTIM OF MURDER AND COVER-UP AS DETERMINED BY CASUAL SLANDER OF THE DECEASED IN TANDEM WITH UTTER FAILURE OF STATE AND MEDIA TO DESCRIBE WHO RUCKKER WAS, WHY HE WAS COMMITTED TO THE ANN KLEIN FORENSIC CENTER, WHAT CONDITIONS HE ALLEGEDLY SUFFERED FROM AND REMARKABLE OMISSION OF THE DATE OF HIS ALLEGED SUICIDE

The second article entitled Patient Dies at Ann Klein Forensic Center, Trentonian direct link, archive, reports on a public announcement made by an unidentified female spokesperson from the New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) notifying the public that a male inmate identified as 45 year-old Roddric Ruckker did sustain one or more cervical-spine fractures that resulted in his death following from a traumatic fall down from “the sink in his cell”, and which NJDOH alleges was a deliberate act of self-harm, and as such was reported as an apparent suicide that occurred at the Ann Klein Forensic Center on an unspecified date “over the weekend”, as reported by the Trentonian, that would necessarily fall between the fifth to the seventh of July two-thousand nineteen. Ruckker is purported to have a prior history of dangerous jumping behavior, whereby one poorly described prior episode of climbing onto a table and deliberately jumping head first from an unspecified height was allegedly witnessed by no less than one unnamed guard presumably on-duty at the Ann Klein Forensic Center, however that facility or other location is not specified in the report. The guard reported Ruckker was affected “like it was nothing” which does indicate that no injuries were sustained whatsoever and an incident as such does not appear to reflect a plausible prior suicide attempt, however Ruckker was further reported to have a history of “ramming his head into the walls of his cell” as per unnamed “guards”, again at an unnamed facility, was he transferred, was this the behavior of a child many decades ago, however claimed in most deliberate slander to have been elicicted by Mr. Ruckker’s apparent “delusion” that he was being secretly posioned with “radiation” by unnamed physician(s) attempting to treat unspecified “mental health conditions”, however in lieu of any edifying reportage by the Trentonian on Ruckker’s genuine medical and psychiatric history, the practice of radiology in the diagnosis and treatment of psychiatric illnesses is plausibly consistent with legitimate patient grievances in both extraordinary and routine clinical scenarios when a poorly communicative physician and/or medical staff routinely and/or repeatedly order and perform computerized axial tomography (CT) scans of the head in tandem with chest XR and the basic panel of laboratory blood-work that in our medical-legal framework constitutes the standard operating procedure for obtaining medical clearance for a patient prior to treatment, admission and/or transfer to a dedicated psychiatric unit for treatment of the psychiatric chief complaint(s) alone.

In brief, plausible scenario, Mr. Ruckker does indeed complain about excessive, nee heroic, medicine that he becomes concerned is affecting his long term health and well-being, the recalcitrant staff plausibly refuse to care and murder the gentleman in retaliation. State cover-up, media of zone at the ready to slander the deceased. We don’t even know the date of expiration of a man who was exclusively confined to a cell or other grounds in a state-run psychiatric facility presumably at all times for indefinite sentence to life in the likely heinous and illegal absence of a trial by jury, conviction or sentence as such for acts that can not come close to justifying the slow-motion termination of a human life on grounds of bad behavior that may or may not be based in factual testimony, and frankly is hidden by county government prima facie because they make shit up on a daily basis, nice house, that’s mine now, you gone.

FREE REAL ESTATE

Furthermore, the testimony resulting in an off the books life sentence on specious grounds of never specified “mental illness”, are explicitly not following from criminal charges, trial by jury, trial at all, or conviction and sentencing. This is not a joke, the man in question may be a convicted murderer, he may not be, the name may be an alias, he may may have been accused of bad behaviors by third-party with purpose with inflict casualty or indisposition of a person that may obtain financial gain in for example estate or divorce proceedings at the expense of that third-party, who in bid to prohibit the unwanted from otherwise lawful access to financials, or in one well-known case discussed at length hereupon, to purposefully restrict a person’s freedom of access to testify under oath in state or federal court in matters that could, would and did result in moderate to severe loss or gain of monies for named parties, or alternately (and often in parallel) in a criminal proceeding in which witness testimony likely to result in conviction and sentencing of a defendant attempted to be stricken from the record preemptively and permanently impeached. That does describe rather overt witness tampering state-run psychiatric institution state seal of approval, however not as common as say disappearing Christians durning Bolshevik reign of terror, more sinister in full-scale to erase the history of person who may be absent the ledgers of names of people born and still living, surrogate thank you much. State, local and other involved parties extremely vindictive in these cases which are more likely to be in political in nature.

CAMERA FOOTAGE, OR SOMETHING

In the year two-thousand nineteen, no medical history, no date and time of death, no reports of autopsy conducted or scheduled, how is one to surmise suicide as the cause of death? When did he jump, very simple question, did he survive the fall and subsequently die in the medical wing of Ann Klein Forensics? Was this a murder? Was that murder a message to those who ask too many questions about Klein, just in time for news of the blacklisted investigation to drop, eye for an eye for an eye.

HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION

Regarding claims of radiation ‘delusion’ however despite ionizing and other forma of radiation most commonplace in the routine practice of allopathic medicine. The Trentonian’s most despicable characterization of unspecified ‘radiation’ as the casus belli for psychiatric involuntary commitment in falls just left of the luddites in the vicinity of Sodom and Gomorrah and sentiment as such should be hoisted upon cross in the public square to teach the young civilization from chaos and death. Metaphorically speaking of course.

Did Mr. Ruckker have cancer? Was he receiving radiation treatment or chemotherapy? Was he be unlawfully and involuntarily subject to treatment in the absence of any appropriate diagnoses? That would be the control group.

What about human experimentation? Gang rape of an incapacitated and unwilling person, to the point of death nonetheless, is one of the most heinous crimes imaginable, however Trenton does even not find such things worthy of investigation. What are we missing here besides the camera footage? Ja, human experimentation, very real, very awful, and indeed most tragically plausible to be ongoing in the state New Jersey at the present time. Most coincidentally the state host of top or near top number or pharmaceutical companies that may may not engage if off books experimentation.

ABSENT CONDITION

The nature of a “state-run psychiatric facility” does not permit the re-analysis of initial diagnoses and presumes those person committed to the psychiatric facility are invariably afflicted with one or psychiatric conditions which render sequestration and detention necessary on the basis of judicial proceedings and otherwise assumed lawful procedure, in-place, and further presumed to be in-place to protect the public from the behaviors associated with psychiatric illness.

Reportage as such described herein from the Trentonian and nearly all other media follows the fundamentally flawed premise that any and all statements and behaviors of those human persons committed to “state-run psychiatric facility” are prima facie specious and related to any real or specious psychiatric illness that was at origin of their commitment. Furthermore, this ontological malady does not permit the rampant claims of abuse to be heard from those committed persons victimized at the hands of guards, doctors, nurses, orderlies, and all those state employees hidden behind the veil of poorly communicated medical and psychiatric conditions that can range from worst case patient, quadriplegia with total aphasia, bedridden for life, to fully functioning children or adults that are highly intelligent, plausibly accused of maladaptive behavior on the basis of dark age psychiatric procedures of assessment and diagnosis, or in worst case scenario slandered by a physician or another person with the official capacity to effect the aforesaid procedures of antediluvian assessment and diagnosis that transpire in the absence of any patient evaluation whatsoever, often fabricated outright, and which proceed in lieu of the Hippocratic oath, that’s a good one eh, whereof third-party claims against a person intended with purpose to inflict casualty are readily facilitated by the “state-run psychiatric facility” and associated complex.

ABSENT CONVICTION

No person in any story reported by the Trentonian describing the Ann Klein Forensic Center purports that any committed victim, deceased or living, was convicted of a crime and found to be criminally insane.

WHO AND WHY, VICTIMS OF THE DUNGEON HELLSCAPE AND THE CURIOUS CONCEPT OF DUE PROCESS, ABSENT AS FUCK

So the public is left with the knowledge that facilities exist packed with human persons that are subjected to the most horrific abuses, including murder, rape, and both. Why these people are herded into facilities like the Ann Klein Forensic Center is not apparently a concern of the state of New Jersey that hosts these hellscapes, and the borderline illiterate media in the state does not appear to give a flying fuck about what they report on.

THE MERCER COUNTY PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE

Just dropped the investigation on the basis they would have to prosecute half of state, including themselves. Long known to you, Dear Reader, the creatures of Zone are the very worst you can imagine.

DEAR ONOFRI

Stay in place until your trial. Or tribunals, whichever comes first.

PLEASE SHUT IT DOWN

The Ann Klein Forensic Center, YES INDEED.

THE 34TH DAY T MINUS TWO ZERO ONE: HAMILTON TOWNSHIP MAYOR YAEDE IN BID TO BUY HERSELF ONE WAY TRIP TO FEDERAL PRISON

EXCERPT FROM THE OPRA CHRONICLES OF COUNTY MERCER

ENLARGE THE STORY

WHAT’S ACTUALLY HAPPENING HERE?

THE MAYOR OF HAMILTON TOWNSHIP, COUNTY MERCER, IN LEAGUE WITH HAMILTON BUSINESS ADMINISTRATOR DAVID KENNY ACCUSED THE CFO OF HAMILTON TOWNSHIP, JOHN BARRETT, OF STEALING TWO LAPTOPS THAT HE APPARENTLY USED IN OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER TO CONDUCT THE ROUTINE BUSINESS OF THE TOWNSHIP PRIOR TO FOURTH JANUARY TWO-THOUSAND NINETEEN.

IT REMAINS UNCLEAR WHEN AND WHY THE TWO LAPTOPS WERE DEEMED STOLEN PROPERTY, AND IT IS NOT YET CLEAR IF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF HAMILTON TOWNSHIP WAS EVER NOTIFIED THAT THOSE LAPTOPS WERE NO LONGER PERMITTED TO BE IN HIS POSSESSION. AS SUCH, THE CLAIM THAT JOHN BARRETT STOLE TWO LAPTOPS MAY INDEED BE AN OUTRIGHT FALSEHOOD USED TO TRIGGER HIS REMOVAL FROM THE TOWNSHIP.

IT IS REPORTED THAT THE TWO LAPTOPS IN BARRET’S POSSESSION WERE DEEMED IMPROPERLY DISPOSED ON OR ABOUT FOURTH JANUARY BY TOWNSHIP OFFICIAL DAVID KENNY WHO ALLEGEDLY REPORTED THAT ALLEGED THEFT IN-PERSON TO HAMILTON POLICE OFFICER AARON KULAK IN THE VICINITY OF HAMILTON PD HEADQUARTERS. DAVID KENNY QUITE POSSIBLY MADE THE REPORT TO KULAK IN THE PRESENCE OF HAMILTON MAYOR KELLY YAEDE AND/OR OTHER TOWNSHIP OFFICIALS. IT APPEARS THAT YAEDE REFUSES TO RELEASE KULAK’S BODY CAM FOOTAGE WITHOUT SUBSTANTIAL REDACTION AND FURTHERMORE THE TOWNSHIP UNDER YAEDE HAS DEMANDED AN OBSCENE AMOUNT OF MONEY FOR THE FOOTAGE THAT IN ALL LIKELIHOOD COULD BE TRANSFERRED TO A DVD IN SOME MINUTES AND PROMPTLY PROVIDED TO THE REQUESTORS, DAVID “GADFLY” HENDERSON AND SUBSEQUENTLY THE TRENTONIAN NEWSPAPER.

OF NOTE, DESPITE THE ALLEGATIONS OF OFFICIAL MISCONDUCT FROM COLLEAGUES, THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF HAMILTON REMAINS EMPLOYED BY THE TOWNSHIP AND AT PRESENT TIME ALSO REPORTEDLY IS THE PLAINTIFF IN A WHISTLE-BLOWER LAWSUIT NAMING MAYOR YAEDE AT LEAST, WITH THE POSSIBILITY OTHER AS YET UNKNOWN HAMILTON OFFICIALS TO BE NAMED  AS DEFENDANTS. THE SPECIFIC ALLEGATIONS MADE BY THE CFO IN THE LAWSUIT ARE NOT DESCRIBED, HOWEVER IT WAS REPORTEDLY FILED SUBSEQUENT TO THE FOURTH JANUARY THEFT ACCUSATIONS.

FROM THE PUBIC DISCLOSURES REPORTED IN THE TRENTONIAN, IT DOES APPEAR THAT YAEDE AND KENNY ATTEMPTED TO CONFISCATE ELECTRONIC DEVICES IN THE CUSTODY OF BARRET FOR THE PURPOSE OF OCCLUDING FINANCIAL CRIMES COMMITTED AGAINST THE TOWNSHIP OF HAMILTON BY NO LESS THAN MAYOR YAEDE AND BUSINESS DIRECTOR KENNY.

IF OFFICER AARON KULAK’S BODY CAMERA FOOTAGE REVEALS THE PRESENCE OF YAEDE AND/OR OTHER OFFICIALS AT POLICE HEADQUARTERS WITH DAVID KENNY ON FOURTH JANUARY, PROBABLE CAUSE FOR THE ISSUANCE OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST YAEDE AND OTHERS MAY BE FOUND, SPECIFICALLY FOR CRIMINAL VIOLATIONS OF ONE OR MORE FEDERAL STATUTES INCLUDING CONSPIRACY TO COVER-UP OFFICIAL MISCONDUCT AND THE FINANCIAL CRIMES SUBJECT OF THAT COVER-UP.

THE “GADFLY” SO NAMED IN THE TITLE OF THE SIX MARCH ARTICLE POSTED ABOVE HEREIN (WITH SOME ANNOTATION) AND THE TRENTONIAN ARTICLE DATED FIRST MARCH ARTICLE (LINK) DID REQUEST OFFICER KULAK’S BODY CAM FOOTAGE PURSUANT TO THE OPEN PUBLIC RECORDS ACT (OPRA), ALSO REFERRED TO AS THE “SUNSHINE LAW” BY THE TRENTONIAN AT VARIOUS TIMES, WHICH DOES REFER TO THE FOLLOWING PAMPHLET LAW,

P.L. 1963, c. 73 (C.47:1A-1 et seq.), as amended and supplemented

WHICH MAY BE UNDERSTOOD AS THE STATE VERSION OF THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA) WHICH PERMITS CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES TO REQUEST GOVERNMENT RECORDS FROM FEDERAL AGENCIES.

THE “GADFLY” IS PERMITTED TO REQUESTS BODY CAM FOOTAGE FOR THE SIMPLE REASON THAT HE IS RESIDENT OF THE TOWNSHIP AND IT IS IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST FOR CITIZENS TO BE PERMITTED ACCESS OF PUBLIC RECORDS THAT MAY WARRANT INVESTIGATION INTO PUBLIC OFFICIALS WHO KNOWINGLY AND PURPOSELY DISPOSE TAXPAYER DOLLARS INTO THEIR OWN PERSONAL BANK ACCOUNTS THROUGH CHANNELS OUTSIDE ALREADY ESTABLISHED SALARIES, INTER ALIA, WITH PUBLIC DISCLOSURE OF THE RECORD OF AN ATTEMPT MADE BY A TOWNSHIP OFFICIAL TO IMPUGN THE REPUTATION AND IN ALL LIKELIHOOD OUST THE TOWNSHIP’S CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER IMPLICITLY JUSTIFIED UNDER THE COMMON LAW FOR ALL THOSE RESIDENTS WHO ARE SUBJECT TO THE PROPERTY TAX THAT FILLS THE COFFERS OF THE TOWNSHIP.

IN THIS CASE, DAVID “GADFLY” HENDERSON FILED SUIT IN SUPERIOR COURT UNDER THE OPEN PUBLIC RECORDS ACT IN ATTEMPT TO OBTAIN OFFICER KULAK’S BODY CAM FOOTAGE.

REMARKABLY, THE CFO OF HAMILTON AND DAVID “GADFLY” HENDERSON ARE BOTH REPRESENTED BY THE SAME ATTORNEY, COLIN BELL, WHICH DOES MORE THAN IMPLY THAT COORDINATED ACTION AGAINST THE TOWNSHIP OF HAMILTON IS ONGOING.

RETALIATION, MOST FAMILIAR

THE TRENTONIAN ARTICLE PUBLISHED ON FIRST MARCH WAS REPORTED IN THE SIX MARCH ARTICLE TO CORRESPOND WITH BEHAVIORS CONSISTENT WITH CRIMINAL COERCION COMMITTED IN RETALIATION AGAINST DAVID HENDERSON BY PROXY. THE TRENTONIAN REPORTS THAT HAMILTON ZONING OFFICER MICHAEL COSMA DID TRAVEL TO THE HOME OF DAVID HENDERSON ON FIRST MARCH TO ALLEGE THAT HE WAS IN VIOLATION OF ONE OR MORE MUNICIPAL ORDINANCES, HOWEVER COSMA DID NOT ISSUE A TICKET AGAINST HENDERSON AND IT IS FURTHER REPORTED THAT HENDERSON AND COSMA LATER SPOKE BY PHONE (NOTA BENE, RECORD ALL PHONE CALLS WITH MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES) WHEREIN THE EXCHANGE EXPLICITLY ATTRIBUTES COSMA’S ACTIONS TO HIS HAMILTON TOWNSHIP BOSSES.

REFRESHER ON CRIMINAL COERCION

AN ACTOR COMMITS CRIMINAL COERCION IF HE OR SHE PURPOSEFULLY AND UNLAWFULLY RESTRICTS A PERSON’S ABILITY TO ENGAGE OR REFRAIN FROM ENGAGING IN CONDUCT THROUGH THREATS:

N.J.S.A. 2C:13-5 A(2), CONSISTING OF FALSE ACCUSATIONS THAT A PERSON COMMITTED A CRIMINAL AND/OR OTHER OFFENSE.

 

N.J.S.A. 2C:13-5 A(4), CONSISTING OF AN ACTION TAKEN OR WITHHELD BY AN OFFICIAL, OR CONSISTING OF AN ACTION THAT WOULD CAUSE AN OFFICIAL TO TAKE OR WITHHOLD ACTION.

 

N.J.S.A. 2C:13-5 A(6), CONSISTING OF PROVIDING TESTIMONY OR INFORMATION, OR WITHHOLDING TESTIMONY OR INFORMATION WITH REGARD TO A PERSON’S LEGAL CLAIM OR DEFENSE.

 

N.J.S.A. 2C:13-5 A(7), CONSISTING OF ANY OTHER ACT THAT IS INTENDED TO HARM A TARGETED PERSON WITH REGARD TO HIS OR HER HEALTH, SAFETY, BUSINESS, CALLING, CAREER, FINANCIAL CONDITION, REPUTATION OR PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS.

TEXT OF THE LAW
CRIMINAL COERCION
[ENLARGE]
CRIMINAL COERCION IN HAMILTON

HAMILTON TOWNSHIP MAYOR KELLY YAEDE DID COMMIT A SINGLE ACT OF CRIMINAL COERCION WHEN SHE PURPOSEFULLY ATTEMPTED TO RESTRICT THE ABILITY OF DAVID HENDERSON TO ENGAGE IN CONDUCT PURSUANT TO THE SUCCESSFUL ACQUISITION OF GOVERNMENT RECORDS IN HIS CAPACITY AS PLAINTIFF IN A PENDING CIVIL ACTION THAT IDENTIFIES YAEDE AS THE DEFENDANT. FURTHERMORE, YAEDE COMMITTED THE ACT IN OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS MAYOR OF THE TOWNSHIP OF HAMILTON WHEREBY THREATS WERE CONVEYED TO HENDERSON THROUGH A THIRD-PARTY WHO DID FALSELY ACCUSE HENDERSON OF NO LESS THAN ONE OFFENSE IN VIOLATION OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE, HOWEVER ZONING OFFICER MICHAEL COSMA DID NOT ISSUE A TICKET AGAINST HENDERSON ON FIRST MARCH FOR ANY OFFENSE. THE SINGLE ACT CONTRARY TO N.J.S.A. 2C:13-5 A(2) IS A CRIME OF THE FOURTH DEGREE.

LITTLE KELLY SAYS YOU’RE GONNA PAY

(ACTUAL PHOTO OF THE MAYOR OF HAMILTON)


FOLLOWING FROM 

FIRST MARCH TWO-THOUSAND NINETEEN, BOTOX ADDLED MAYOR IN BID TO BLOCK BODY CAM FOOTAGE RELEASE FOLLOWING FAILED ATTEMPT TO EXTORT REQUESTOR

TWENTY-FOUR DAYS LATER, SEVEN DAYS AFTER DAY FIVE-HUNDRED FIFTEEN

FOLLOWING FROM THE 34TH DAY T MINUS THREE ZERO THIRTEEN: A VERY CURIOUS COINCIDENCE
TWELVE FEBRUARY TWO-THOUSAND NINETEEN
IN THIS MATTER, IT TOOK THE MERCER COUNTY PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE TWENTY-FOUR DAYS TO DOWNGRADE NO LESS THAN THREE CHARGES TO MUNICIPAL COURT FOLLOWING FROM AN INCIDENT THAT DID INCLUDE AT LEAST ONE ALLEGED ACT OF FELONY AGGRAVATED ASSAULT. HOWEVER, IN THE MATTER OF PICKETTERS’ CHARGE, IT TOOK THE MERCER COUNTY PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE FIVE-HUNDRED AND FIFTEEN DAYS TO DOWNGRADE ONE NON-VIOLENT CHARGE OF [PICKETTERS’ CHARGE] TO MUNICIPAL COURT FOR FURTHER PROSECUTION AS AN UNDEFINED PETTY DISORDERLY PERSONS VIOLATION. [ENLARGE]

WHAT EXACTLY IS AGGRAVATED ASSAULT?
LET US CONSULT THE TEXT OF THE LAW

FROM TITLE TWO C WE FIND THE FOLLOWING DEFINITIONS OF AGGRAVATED ASSAULT

SIMPLE ASSAULT GRADED AS SECOND DEGREE AGGRAVATED ASSAULT, N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1 (B)(5)(A)

AN ACTOR COMMITS AN ACT OF AGGRAVATED ASSAULT WHEN HE OR SHE COMMITS ANY ACT IN VIOLATION OF N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1 (A) et seq. THAT WOULD OTHERWISE BE IDENTIFIED AS SIMPLE ASSAULT AND GRADED AS A DISORDERLY OR PETTY DISORDERLY PERSONS OFFENSE, WHEN THE VICTIM OF THAT SIMPLE ASSAULT IS A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER ENGAGED IN THE COURSE OF HIS OR HER DUTIES WHILE IN UNIFORM, OR AT SUCH TIME WHEN EVIDENCE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITY IS BEING EXHIBITED, OR WHEN THE ACTOR DIRECTS SUCH CONDUCT AT ANY PERSON FOR THE INTENDED PURPOSE TO HUMILIATE A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER WHETHER IN UNIFORM OR PLAINCLOTHES.

DAVID CANNADY WAS IN ALL LIKELIHOOD CHARGED WITH SECOND DEGREE AGGRAVATED ASSAULT FOR ONE OR MORE ACTS IN VIOLATION OF N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1 (B)(5)(A).

SECOND DEGREE AGGRAVATED ASSAULT, N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1 (B)(1)

OTHERWISE, AGGRAVATED ASSAULT IS DESCRIBED AS ANY ACT THAT IS COMMITTED WITH THE INTENT TO CAUSE SIGNIFICANT BODILY INJURY, EVEN IN THE CASE WHEN THE ACT DOES NOT CAUSE SIGNIFICANT BODILY INJURY, OR ANY ACT COMMITTED WITH INTENT TO THAT DOES INDEED CAUSE SIGNIFICANT BODILY INJURY, OR ANY CONDUCT THAT AN ACTOR ENGAGES IN WITHOUT PRIOR MOTIVE UNDER CIRCUMSTANCES MANIFESTING EXTREME INDIFFERENCE TO THE VALUE OF HUMAN LIFE THAT DOES RECKLESSLY CAUSE SIGNIFICANT BODILY INJURY TO A PERSON.

THIRD DEGREE AGGRAVATED ASSAULT, N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1 (B)(2)

WHEN THE ACTOR ATTEMPTS TO CAUSE OR DOES CAUSE SIGNIFICANT BODILY INJURY WITH A DEADLY WEAPON WITH PRIOR MOTIVE.

FOURTH DEGREE AGGRAVATED ASSAULT, N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1 (B)(3)

WHEN THE ACTOR ATTEMPTS TO CAUSE OR DOES CAUSE SIGNIFICANT BODILY INJURY WITH A DEADLY WEAPON WITHOUT PRIOR MOTIVE.

FOURTH DEGREE AGGRAVATED ASSAULT, N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1 (B)(4)

WHEN THE ACTOR POINTS A LOADED OR UNLOADED FIREARM IN THE DIRECTION OF ANOTHER PERSON AT SUCH TIME HE OR SHE KNOWS THE ACT WAS COMMITTED UNDER CIRCUMSTANCES MANIFESTING EXTREME INDIFFERENCE TO THE VALUE OF HUMAN LIFE.

THIRD OR FOURTH DEGREE AGGRAVATED ASSAULT, N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1 (B)(5) ET SEQ.

WHEN THE ACTOR COMMITS SIMPLE ASSAULT AGAINST SPECIFIC PERSONS IDENTIFIED IN PARAGRAPHS (A) THROUGH (K) FOLLOWING AS LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS, FIREMEN, FIRST-RESPONDERS, SCHOOL EMPLOYEES, AND OTHER PROTECTED PROFESSIONS WITH FURTHER DESCRIPTIONS OF SPECIFIC GEAR AND SCENARIOS THAT CONSTITUTE AGGRAVATED ASSAULT

SECOND, THIRD OR FOURTH DEGREE AGGRAVATED ASSAULT, N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1 (B)(6) THROUGH (12)

WHEN THE ACTOR ATTEMPTS TO CAUSE OR DOES CAUSE SIGNIFICANT BODILY INJURY OF A PERSON IN A SPECIFIC CONTEXT, OR POINTS A LOADED OR UNLOADED FIREARM AT ANOTHER PERSON IN A SPECIFIC CONTEXT, OR USES SPECIFIC TECHNOLOGY IN A SPECIFIC CONTEXT.

DISORDERLY PERSONS, THIRD OR FOURTH DEGREE AGGRAVATED ASSAULT, N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1 (C) ET SEQ

WHEN THE ACTOR USES AN AUTO OR VESSEL IN AN ATTEMPT TO CAUSE OR DOES CAUSE SIGNIFICANT BODILY INJURY OF A PERSON IN A SPECIFIC CONTEXT, OR OTHER SPECIFIED ACTS COMMITTED USING AN AUTO OR VESSEL.

FOURTH DEGREE AGGRAVATED ASSAULT, N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1 (D) 

WHEN THE ACTOR COMMITS SIMPLE ASSAULT AGAINST AN INSTITUTIONALIZED ELDERLY PERSON.

FOURTH DEGREE AGGRAVATED ASSAULT, N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1 (F)

WHEN THE ACTOR COMMITS SIMPLE ASSAULT AGAINST A PERSON AT YOUTH SPORTING EVENT.


WHAT ARE THE SENTENCING GUIDELINES FOR A SECOND DEGREE AGGRAVATED ASSAULT CONVICTION?
LET US DISCOVER IN THE TEXT OF THE LAW
CHAPTER FORTY-THREE

TWO C FORTY THREE ONE PAGE THREE FIVE THREE

N.J.S.A. C:43-2 (A)

SENTENCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CODE AND AUTHORIZED DISPOSITIONS SET FORTH IN CHAPTER FORTY-THREE OF THE CRIMINAL CODE, EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE PROVIDED BY THE CODE.

N.J.S.A. 2C:43-2 (B)(3)

THE INDIVIDUAL CONVICTED OF AN OFFENSE MAY BE SENTENCED TO IMPRISONMENT FOR A TERM AUTHORIZED BY SECTIONS 2C:11-3, 2C:43-5, 2C:43-6, 2C:43-7, 2C:43-8 OR 2C:44-5.


SECOND DEGREE SENTENCING GUIDELINES FOUND IN CHAPTER FORTY-THREE, SECTION SIX

CHAPTER FORTY THREE SECTION SIX
[BEWARE DIRECT LINK] REFER TO NJ LEGISLATURE DATABASE AT https://lis.njleg.state.nj.us/nxt/gateway.dll?f=templates&fn=default.htm&vid=Publish:10.1048/Enu [ENLARGE]
AGGRAVATING OR MITIGATING FACTORS ASIDE, THE SENTENCING GUIDELINES FOR SECOND DEGREE AGGRAVATED ASSAULT ARE AS FOLLOWS BELOW,

(2) In the case of a crime of the second degree, for a specific term of years which shall be fixed by the court and shall be between five years and 10 years;

YET REMANDED IN TWENTY-FOUR DAYS BY THE MERCER COUNTY PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE!

UNBELIEVABLE!

WHEREAS IN THE CASE OF THE FOURTH DEGREE PICKETTERS’ CHARGE, THE SENTENCING GUIDELINE ARE AS FOLLOWS BELOW,

(4) In the case of a crime of the fourth degree, for a specific term which shall be fixed by the court and shall not exceed 18 months.

IN WHICH CASE THE MERCER COUNTY PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE TOOK FIVE-HUNDRED AND FIFTEEN DAYS TO REMAND AND DOWNGRADE PICKETTERS’ CHARGE BACK TO THE MUNICIPALITY OF ORIGIN AS A PETTY DISORDERLY PERSONS VIOLATION, THE SENTENCING GUIDELINES FOR WHICH ARE AS FOLLOWS BELOW,

CHAPTER FORTY THREE SECTION EIGHT
[BEWARE DIRECT LINK] REFER TO NJ LEGISLATURE DATABASE AT https://lis.njleg.state.nj.us/nxt/gateway.dll?f=templates&fn=default.htm&vid=Publish:10.1048/Enu [ENLARGE]

“A person who has been convicted of a disorderly persons offense or a petty disorderly persons offense may be sentenced to imprisonment for a definite term which shall be fixed by the court and shall not exceed 6 months in the case of a disorderly persons offense or 30 days in the case of a petty disorderly persons offense.


SO WHAT EXACTLY IS GOING ON IN THE COUNTY OF MERCER?
STAY TUNED.